Is virtual reality the future of filmmaking?

>>78886739
The future is what based jim says it is.

Future of faggotry

Who cares since there are only capeshit now?

>>78886739
No. The immersion provided by VR only works for games. Otherwise you're a silent observer that no one notices, which is just weird.

We'll have the most mediocre and redundant, uncreative and expensively produced stories ever made fully rendered in three dimensional, human-eye-definition surround sound.

>>78886739
How did 3-D and high frame rate work out?

Answer = no. People who watch movies want to sit down and watch a story. People who play vidya and VR want to be active participants. Film is not active participation. People just want to watch it and experience it like a dream.

Jesus christ is that a cat or a dog? what the fuck kind of cat has hair like that? must be some rich person shit

imagine being the groomer that this stupid little rich bitch takes her cat to every month, imagine being paid to shave that cat's ass every month so it doesnt get shit stuck in its fur. How low can you go in hollywood to land a gig shaving the asses of rich people's cats?

>>78886739
Doubting
Directors could only create scenes, but not control the camera.

I'm thinking it would be like Half-Life 2.
Something happens and is filmed in 360° and you would have to choose where you are looking, with the chance of missing important things.

Dont know how you would realise sets or sound or just anything.
probably only possible for animated movies.

>>78886996
From the color I'd say it's a siamese. Sometimes they have curly coats. Cuddly as fuck.

File: 16123975_338336919900384_7612454710364078080_n.jpg (60KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 640x640px

>>78886996
Say that to my face fucker not online and see what happens.

>>78886872
Yeah, but imagine a movie that was interactive.

>>78887349
An interactive movie, if you will.

>>78886739
That's a weird looking doggo

>>78887481
Like a video game?

>>78887902
Yeah, but a movie.