Artist: Jay Naylor
We need more of these dumps
Naylor is for cutes, not lewds!
>>7895563
Nope, it's for lewds
I'll be beack
>>7895054
>tfw read *click as *cuck
it wouldn't be out of character for ja
>>7895817
Shit I see cuck now
OK I'm done for a while guys.
Needs more piss and incest.
>>7895817
Maybe it's trying to say something
>>7896726
You're gay anon
>>7896799
I am, that's why i'm not usually into trannies.
Has naylor ever done any (other) gay stuff?
>>7896892
Nope. I believe this is as far as he goes just trannies.
>>7896892
Scratch that I'm a lair, I remember seeing something he mad what was gay long ago.
>>7896933
I remember one with the same Panda from Twisted Sister.
And I'm done, don't expect anything more. Will come back maybe to add new stuff if it hasn't already been posted by someone else.
Will probably make more of these threads.
>>7895040
>>7898233
I don't get it, did something happen to him?
>>7895303
> that last panel
God damn, I lost it.
>>7898262
Well...
It's just he got a lot of hate because "most" of what he draw it's literally cuckold porn and how male humans are inferior to male furries
Example: >>7897769
But hey, cool thread for the moment!
>>7898262
Because of the prolific cheating content in Jay Naylor's stuff, /pol/ (and by extension most of 4chan) has developed an irrational hate boner for him.
The extreme cheating-bashing stems from the fact that in most hetero porn the audience (often male) will place themselves in the role of the man enjoying the woman. Frequently in pornography you have a petite white woman being taken by a large black man, this is to exaggerate male potency (since they tend to be bigger down there). This creates a short-circuit in your average /pol/ack. Their brain wants to enjoy the porn, while simultaneously being terrified of placing themselves in the role of a non-white. It's an analog to the rhetoric they often spout about how multiethnicity is killing proper white culture.
Naylor uses similar themes, with big buff dogs or horses taking the place of the big black male. While cats or more scrawny dogs take the role of white guys. This is why the hate seems out of proportion compared to even more extreme stuff like gore or underaged material. It threatens the essence of their manhood so they need to lash out against it.
>>7898505
People also hate the fact that he's a Randian. Though I still don't really get why that would affect his art. At most he tends to go on about how the sex or the pursuit of sexual pleasure is a primal part of the character, or often writing these elaborate monologues on the roles of submission or domination (or the joys of cheating). I don't really see how that's "Rand" ish.
>>7898132
Please do SunnySundown next
>>7898505
Meh, I'm a /pol/tard myself but I don't mind that much. I don't watch cuck porn simply because I don't like it.
I'm not autistic enough to go on a crusade against someone for drawing or even filming porn I don't like.
Most of Jay Naylor's stuff is pretty fucking great, if you don't like a particular subject just discard comics that are about it and shut up.
>>7898658
You got it
>>7898932
Would you happen to have that one where that guy gets turned into a twink? It was called something along the lines of Mikey Begins.
>>7898951
You got it
I need a twink in my life
>>7899261
No, you are <3
For some reason this cucks art makes my dick shrivel up at the mere sight of it.
>>7900008
If its got piss, cucking, and/or heavy BLACKED overtones, it's Naylor shit.
>>7898505
Exhibits A and B: >>7900008 >>7902163
In all seriousness though, all cheating weirdness aside, the guy does a great ass. I can't not want them.
>>7902341
>If you dont like cuck shit your from /pol/
Please kys
>>7895137
Well wait, what happens next? What was it building too?
>>7902418
It's fucking furry art, stop getting so triggered
>>7900008
Don't mind it at all, it's still good art. I do hate the stuff that have human/furry though
>>7902418
It's such a random thing to get so riled up over. Why don't you go over to poz threads or cub threads or gore threads and stir up a tizzy over there. Hating those actually makes some kind of sense. As much as randomly hating other people's fetishes makes sense...
>>7898420
I never really noticed this until now.
Cuck is one of the most pathetic fetishes to exist especially in a drawn medium. Either you envision yourself as so completely pathetic that the only way you can ever actually win is to self-insert to beat another fictional character in a porn story as a lover or you see youfself even lower than that and even in your imagination and wildest dreams you only ever lose.
>>7904008
I haven't seen any poz, cub, or gore threads on here.
>>7907377
The definition has lost all meaning.
You see, normal people are able to establish a kind of separation between their fantasies and reality. I can envision a scenario where I have a sex dungeon holding wild catwomen from the jungles of Arouz, where I train them to be sex pets. Or I can place myself as the rebellious catwoman being tamed by a human. Does that mean I have deep-seated a desire to enslave women, or a desire to be enslaved? Maybe not, maybe both. The point is it doesn't matter, it's fiction. We can fantasize about being a sniper in WWII, that doesn't mean we want to murder people.
When you totally fly off the handle about cheating, as you will, it tells me that it's hitting a nerve somehow. Either it's hitting too close to home in real life, where you feel you are a weak male figure that's desperately afraid that other more impressive males will steal away your women. Or... you really like it and you're guilty about liking it for whatever reason, so you project this hatred on others who enjoy it as a way of punishing yourself by proxie.
tl;dr
Calm down, it's just fetishy porn on the internet.
>>7907377
This. I hate that it gets posted so much, but doubly so that it's always MINORITY on white.
Cucks can spout some stupid bullshit about just fantasy, but it says something about the real goal when it's almost always something anti-white and not say, Hispanic cucking black or Asians cucking Jews.
>>7913052
>about the real goal when it's almost always something anti-white
It's more anti-black than anti-white with the black men always being ghetto ass thug niggers regardless of how the white people are portrayed which ranged from normal looking whites to the girl being a blow-up doll and the nerdy micro dick white guy. Remember that this porn is made by and for white people.
>>7913797
>Made for and by white people
Actually, it's legitimately made mostly by jews. Look up your favorite cuck porn and be amazed.
>>7913935
>Jews
They are still white people. You can pretend that they are not but they are.
>>7913797
/pol/ would very probably point out that Jews arn't white and have the same unusually large impact on the porn biz that they do on most modern media.
However, that entirely aside I feel the need to offer a separate defense against the 'geeze u guys are overreacting' argument. My defense is twofold;
1. A strong, tribalist reaction to cucoldry (even when the target is not the self) is a psycho-social trait with extremely useful, thus very pervasive and persistent heritable fitness. If anything this selection is only intensified in the modern age as more different ethnic and social groups come into contact and those groups without it are wiped out through interbreeding. (note: cuckold hostility is unlikely to be simply genetic, very probably having a strong memetic component passed along as well.)
2. Cuckolding porn has appeal on not simply the 'hypermasculine expression' level, but is probably exploiting a mild 'brain hack' (in a similar fashion to how futa porn exploits the social signaling of 'male brain sees nearby erect penis, there must be something arousing nearby, engage our own penis and seek target.) The 'hack' I suspect is simply dosing up the brain with competitive/aggression hormones for a sort of 'anger high', combined with arousing material and it's like mixing pills for enhanced effects. Consider how effective 'angry news' is in this modern age. 'White folk' in particular may seek outrage to stimulate a novel hormone rush in the otherwise sedate and safe environment they've created for themselves.
>>7913935
Are there any good sources on this? Something shareable with normies? Or you know, as close as we can get considering the source material