What are the worst threads on /trash/?

>>7807124
meta threads and the usual spammers

File: delphox is better.jpg (1MB, 909x1530px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 909x1530px

Braixen threads

>>7807124
/tlhg/, spammers (Glim, Varg, etc.) and Tranny Bubsy generals

scat, fatty threads, hunger games, and erp threads

>>7808374
Don't forget "Fapping Together"
Unless that counts as ERP

>>7807124
Whatever I don't like

i want to ban cartoon generals, kpop, trips/memeshit, mlp, hg, scat, guro, etc. and make shota/loli legal or at least kemoshota

>>7807124
Specific fetish threads or threads dedicated one character.

>>7808585
If trips ur le gay xd

>>7808374
What are hg threads about? I don't get those.

>>7808585
so literally everything on /trash/. might as well delete the board then

File: connie wanting your thread to delet.png (193KB, 476x430px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 476x430px

i want your thread to delet

>>7810401
No idea, I read through some and it seemed like a random generator thing.

File: bigger bait.jpg (20KB, 535x536px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 535x536px

>>7807124
xd

>>7810401
HG threads are basically roleplay threads that somehow manage to be more autistic than furry roleplay

Having a dozen different varieties of fat is annoying but all the fag shit is probably worse

File: Stop Liking What I Dont.jpg (207KB, 680x473px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 680x473px

>>7808374
>scat
You mean the threads that rarely show up ever?

>>7810625
>implying that makes them less cancerous

>>7810594
What's the whole needing 24 characters all about?

File: 1487398020243.png (578KB, 490x500px) Image search: [Google]

578KB, 490x500px

I d'ont care what the worst it. The best is /zootopia/

what is with fat fetishists and chans? they keep their shit contained at least but there are so many of them.

>>7810640
In the Hunger Games series 2 pairs of sacrifices from 12 regions of the country (so 24 total) have to fight to the death for the region the survivor came from to get special compensation

>>7810633
>fetish I don't like
>cancer

>>7810664
They keep getting split because straightfags want only fat females, fagfags want only fat males, some fatfags only enjoy realistically chubby while others can only get off to planet sized meat balloons, etc

>>7810747
That's the only part of the thread that makes sense

>>7810750
>>7810625
yes but unironically

>>7810862
>yes but unironically
What did he mean by this?

>>7807124
spam threads, unfunny repeat memeshit, complaint circlejerks
other than that, some threads should reasonably be on other boards, but that'll never happen due to mods being incompetent
>>7810887
he meant "stop liking what I don't like"

>>7810640
They play some sort of Hunger Games based zero-player game where you put a bunch of characters in a web page and the web page says who kills who, and they use it as a loose basis for their roleplay.

I used to think that furry typefucking is the most autistic thing ever but this takes the cake.

>>7810900
>he meant "stop liking what I don't like"
Well he's a faggot then.

There are no good threads on /trash/ but hg is by far the worst.

>>7810902
Wow, I always wondered what those were.

the failed generals that keep dying over and over, and the autist that keeps making them can't take a fucking hint.

>>7812348
This is the Tranny Bubsy generals. They keep reposting the same images over and over and bump it every time it falls to Page 10.

>>7807124
The extra, unneeded fat faggotry clogging up the catalog

Female
Male
Pony (and that's only because /mlp/ isn't a redboard and is pitiable)

Everything else can be done away with, except maybe /belly/ since that at least has a fairly decent showing of pregnancy and inflation.

t. fatfag

bubsy

Threads about things or fetishes I don't like.

But seriously, the correct answer is ALL OF THEM because this is >>>/trash/, if it was a good thread it would be on some other board.

>>7814493
There are some worst of the worst though.

/trash/ is for threads that don't fit on other boards, but aren't bad enough to get deleted. Issue is that people make threads on trash that SHOULD get deleted and don't.

The 'if trips' threads, the 'I fucking hate all of you's, those ones with the single letter for the OP pic... shit like that should be cleared out so it stops clogging up space.

It can be debated back and forth whether or not certain fetish threads have a right to exist, but the point is they still serve a purpose even if it's just something like subdividing a fetish.

But a thread consisting of the letter O for the OP pic, followed by nothing but bumps just... have no value to them.

>>7814607
this
also much of that's literally just done to spam the board, and spam is still against the rules here and is in the interest of nobody who actually wants to use this board

>The nonsense threads:
RWBY/RT, TLHG, Hunger gays, TF2G, Pokemon are real, TF2G, most ecelb threads,

>niche queer threads that can't form a few threads instead need to branch off into a million small groups
h/fur, g/fur, bara thread, tranny bubsy thread, femboy thread, trap threads, futa threads, picking random porn picture of someones OC and starting a thread with "would you fuck his ass?" or some other garbage that isn't going to generate interest (then proceeding to do it again 20 minutes later with another picture).
You don't need a billion threads.

>Fatties:
Seriously, you don't need 50 threads because it doesn't fit your mental illness gender or doesn't get the body type or series JUST right, maybe 2 at most for male/female.

>MLP
Everything from futa to cockvore to gay to forced memes/general shit posting to to specific ponies, fucking pick a thread or two every single one you create is low interest/abandoned and full of bumps

>2d /soc/ for ugly people threads
Discord thread, ERP, fapping together, etc

>Shitty FA porn dump threads with no discussion or content creation
s/fur (spammed by fags and most people left, no need for shitty FA porn dumps when tagging aggregators exist), g/fur, h/fur, etc.


If I had to pick just one, then the niche gay/herm/femboy/bara/gfur threads that are spammed because they want a billion flavors or to slide the index with nothing more than picking a random OC picture and start a thread around "would you fuck his ass?". The fat and pony community is just as obnoxious though, if not more so at times.

>Pokemon are real threads
Yeah...REAL GAY HEHEHEHE

>>7815009
wow, good job listing 80% of the board anon

>>7815348
Thank you, sorry for wanting to courtesy flush whatever community that I offended.

>>7807124
Glim threads, I've seen many cancerous threads here before. But the glim threads are literally the worst. The clip threads don't bother me at all, since the horsefuckers cant post that crap on /mlp/ because it's a blue board. However, these glim threads are spammed here not because of porn. They are posted for the sole purpose of fucking with us and to take over this board.

>>7815562
>clip

Meant clop. Autocorrect is a bitch.

tlhg, sug, star vs, and /co/ shit.

autistic threads, HG, faping together, ERP.

spam memes like if trips mods ban x, glim threads, stop posting x (aka varg), i fucking hate you all, shoes, N and O threads.

and the fucking disgusting fatfags.

>>7810455
just keep it furry porn

File: 1462431140471.jpg (23KB, 350x296px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 350x296px

>>7810750
>trying to justify laying in your own filth
>truly being this genuine of a degenerate

This thread

>>7818484
>being so retarded you actually bought into the degeneracy buzzword/meme
you're beyond help, anon

>>7821577
>being sexually aroused by literal shit
You don't even need to be a /pol/ster to know that's degeneracy, anon.

File: 1476161208003.jpg (21KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 500x375px

>>7807124
>"i used to be a normie until i came to /Trash/" threads
>marecock threads
>every /co/ general
>if sequential number bans "x" thread
>guro threads

>>7822078
I was more talking about the implication that "degeneracy" is somehow an innately negative thing

>>7810750
What we are talking about here is shit, anon. Literal shit.

>>7822214
It's literally in the name, anon. There are differing shades of it, but degeneracy is degeneracy.

>>7822246
he's still not wrong though
>>7822253
regardless of whatever name you give it, kinky shit isn't somehow bad in itself m8

>>7822314
>regardless of whatever name you give it, kinky shit isn't somehow bad in itself m8
It is when you're talking about literal shit, anon.
Stop with the bullshit inclusive "oh different strokes for different folks" and realize that, yes, there is a line between face-sitting, futa, furry, etc etc, and literal shit.

>>7822432
okay, define how having any fetish can be genuinely bad in itself (not including acting on it, which is a totally separate thing)
go on, I'm waiting

>>7822481
When your fetish is literally an inversion of natural repulsions, it's bad.

Furshit? It's an extension of the sexual desire for exotic mates.
Scat? An inversion and perversion of natural disgust towards diseases and filth.

This is what defines a """normal""" fetish from degeneracy; the former is an extension, however weird, of natural urges and thought.
The latter is sexual desire of something that is hardwired to be disgusting, repulsive, or otherwise existentially harmful to life. (Example: Snuff)

That is not to say that they don't cross over, with many degenerate fetishes having aspects that are extensions of natural urges, but the core aspect in of itself is degenerate.

>>7810659
Undertale threads are second best

>>7822548
I'm not at all defending the guy, but I'd say fatfaggotry fits under that too, yet they rarely get called out.

>>7822548
I don't disagree with your analysis of the appeals of the two fetishes, but what makes a fetish in-line with 'natural repulsions' bad? really just seems like a naturalistic fallacy to me desu
also I feel like I should point out that snuff/guro/etc seems to have strong roots in masochism, which in turn seems like it's rooted in dom/sub dynamics, which is a very common part of typical human sexuality, yet you're classifying it as "degenerate." I wouldn't disagree that it's more abnormal than most, but I don't think there's any grounding to consider it somehow worse by the nature of its roots.

Thank God the Fallout and Pokemon Rp thread died before it can get anywhere

>>7822621
I am that guy, and fatfaggotry is seriously among the most basic and natural fetishes out there. it's a pure appeal to fertility and much of the earliest art we know of depicts it (look up the Venus of Willendorf and other such figures, I'd upload a pic if I could.)

I love all /trash/ threads unconditionally

Hi, my name is Lucas and I hate every single thread on this board.
Go kill yourselves, you pitiful assholes

diaper pony, steven universe, varg posting, kpop, internet celebs

>>7822621
I would both agree and disagree, and would draw a soft line between "chubby/curvy" fat, being related to fertility and prosperity, and "obese/blob" fat, being related to sloth, laziness, disease, and even death.

>>7822623
Like I said, while aspects of it are extensions of natural urges, the topic/theme as a whole is an inversion of natural repulsion.

>but what makes a fetish in-line with 'natural repulsions' bad? really just seems like a naturalistic fallacy to me desu
Until I find a better subjective baseline to judge from, I'll stick with what's worked over the past few thousand years.

>no one mentioning the sunibee hate threads

We have constant threads shitting on artist who fucked us over in commissions, artists that art styles are bad or gradually got worse, and artist that we just plain don't like so why the fuck does Sunibee get an entire circlejerk hate thread about him every time he deletes some shit like he doesn't do that every two weeks

>>7822649
I know right
I got secondhand autism just from seeing that shit on the catalog

>>7822825
I'm absolutely with you, anon. Shadman is way worse, why don't we dedicate hate threads to him?

>>7822808
I'm gonna assume the first reply was meant for >>7822650 and say that you're half right. extreme fat by itself doesn't rely on the appeals of sloth, laziness, disease, and death, it's just a natural extension of the appeals of fat taken to unrealistic extremes. however, since such extremes would cause all those 'negative' appeals, such sizes tend to attract people who like those hedonistic and unhealthy ideas in themselves (hence why there's so much crossover between extreme fat and slob.) unhealthiness such as disease and death only seems to be an appeal at the very extreme (or maybe just rare) end of fat+other fetish crossover stuff though.
as for the second part of your post, you're right in identifying the appeals as being inversions of things that would typically repulsive, but I don't think that's solely it. it seems like to me that many fetishes just have combinations of a few base appeals such as dom/sub, masochism/pain (which may be derived from dom/sub,) taboo/'dirtiness,' and fertility. I'm more inclined to say that the idea of certain fetishes being more degenerate than others is simply a moral judgement that doesn't take into account how fetishes seem to work and instead just views fetishes based off of actions that would cause issues irl negatively. in other words, I wouldn't trust thousands of years of human experience when that experience was completely clueless as to how all this shit works (though admittedly I'm no psychologist and all that I'm saying is purely from my own observations.)

>>7822825
>>7822895
honestly all the artist hate threads are shitty, unhelpful drama circlejerks 90% of the time. the only useful information that could be gained from them is who to avoid when commissioning, and even that can't be found out reliably when such threads tend to just devolve into stupidly assblasted anons saying dumb, largely untrue or misconstrued shit about artists.

>>7823040
While it seems our opinions are at an impasse for most of these points, I do want to reply to one particular bit.

>I wouldn't trust thousands of years of human experience when that experience was completely clueless as to how all this shit works (though admittedly I'm no psychologist and all that I'm saying is purely from my own observations.)
I would argue that heuristic conclusions are nearly as valid as analytic conclusions. Generally speaking, I'd say that "degenerate" fetishes, while not necessarily leading to degenerate action, do provide degenerate temptation. Better to be rid of the temptation all together, than to tempt fate.
Scatfags aren't going to 100% jump in a septic tank one day, but the thought of IRL scatplay is nonetheless slightly more normalized for them than nonscatfags.

We can apply this to all other such degenerate fetishes to varying degrees.
TL;DR: Don't underestimate the power of the human sex drive, it's an extremely powerful conditioning tool.

>>7823146
I agree on most of that, I guess what I'm trying to get at is that the idea of 'degeneracy' seems to make a negative moral judgement of this weird kinky shit when in reality it's not the fetish itself that is an issue but how an individual acts on it. given the fact we're now in the information age where people can discover and indulge in this weird shit without acting on it pretty easily now, I don't think the practical issues are even as much of an issue anymore either (though they'll all still exist until we're in some sort of utopian matrix bullshit or something.)
also it's cool that we've managed to have a decent discussion on this. I was expecting a shitpost like "t. triggered scatfag" or something in response, since it seems like many anons itt use terms like degeneracy as code for "things I dislike."

>>7823601
I would actually argue that the modern information age has exacerbated the issue; now, rather than knowing maybe half a dozen people in your entire city, if that, those with degenerate fetishes can instantly connect with thousands upon thousands of fellows.
I would argue that this would go far, far further in "normalizing" the fetish in the person's mind, especially with the ease of access for young adults and even children, of which they are either still fully developing their sexuality or are still in their formative years.

Furthermore, the ability to stay more isolated from mainstream normal society in the modern age can also serve to further normalize and intensify the person's fetishes.

Do you ever wonder why furries act like hyper-sexual savages at conventions? It's because they've literally sequestered themselves away with their fetish, and I'd assume its the same for more intense fetishes.

Ask yourself this; Can you jerk off to the same pic for your entire life?
Can you jerk off to the same set of pics your entire life?
Can you jerk off solely to the current intensity of your fetish?
As sexual tastes and desires develop, the person will inevitably desire either more intense sexual stimulation of the fetish (more extreme versions), or entirely new fetishes.
I would say that there is a point where the only place left to go for a given fetish, is real life. At that point, further sexual desire can only be sated by real life action, and as such it depends entirely on the individual's willpower to repress those desires. Sexual desire is a very powerful urge.

All that being said, I do also consider "degeneracy" to be a negative moral judgement, from my own subjective viewpoint. To me, certain things aren't just "different strokes for different folks", but legitimately morally wrong desires. It's not just things I dislike, it's things I think shouldn't even exist on a fundamental level.

test

>>7823665
I completely agree with all you've said until the last paragraph, and in fact have experienced much of it myself. I likely should have mentioned what you said alongside what I said about the information age affecting all of this, but I was intending to make more of a statement in the long term as I feel that the issues you mention will continue to fade as technology progresses.
as for the last paragraph, I'm going to assume from your other posts that you inherit your moral views on this issue from the thousands of years of human experience you already mentioned, in which case I feel like it's worth mentioning that it seems to me that the moralities that view 'degenerate' activities negatively evolved in societies without our current (and future) technological capabilities. as such, the idea is based off of what was most effective from a survival standpoint, which I feel will soon become obsolete and has no value other than in such a context. however, as you said it's likely we're at an impasse with this.

>>7823813
I disagree, as the current trend of technology is that of one towards hyper-individuality, sequestered cliques of contacts, and general disconnect from non-preferred society as a large.

Unless you were to actually mandate that individuals needed to interact with wider society on a meaningful level, or that culture changed in such a way to exert sufficient force towards this end, I would say that we will see nothing more than more and more extreme echo-chambers, creating thousands upon thousands upon thousands of micro-cultures and micro-communities that do not exist within wider society, but rather independent of it.

>>7823665
>I would say that there is a point where the only place left to go for a given fetish, is real life. At that point, further sexual desire can only be sated by real life action, and as such it depends entirely on the individual's willpower to repress those desires. Sexual desire is a very powerful urge.
Eugh

This is basically "fetishes are the first step for committing a crime"

>>7824925
And?

File: Watcher.jpg (91KB, 377x372px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 377x372px

>>7822649
>>7822872
>shoots

Everything except /ftt/

>>7825335
Because it's a moronic slippery slope conclusion, based on some armchair psychology and where you draw the line based personal preferences, while your logic applies to literally anyone ("anyone who watches porn is a potential rapist")

>>7825899
>misrepresentation: the post
A better argument would have been "anyone who watches rape porn is more likely to become a rapist"

>slippery slope
Is only a fallacy in regards to deterministic arguments, try harder.

File: Dog Worried.jpg (33KB, 267x274px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 267x274px

>>7818484
I don't lay in my own filth, faggot.

>>7822246
And?

>>7822432
Give me a reason why liking scat is bad.
>inb4 "a drawing can somehow give you germs"

>all these paragraphs and paragraphs of arm chair psychology
>over some anon getting triggered by poo
Pic very related

>>7826052
>A better argument would have been "anyone who watches rape porn is more likely to become a rapist"
Your argument is about people going against what is considered acceptable behavior because of "sexual urges", because at some point "the only outlet they have is real life". This logic can be applied to plain, vanilla porn that way.

>Is only a fallacy in regards to deterministic arguments, try harder.
I didn't even use word "fallacy", open a dictionary or something

>>7826234
Those paragraphs and paragraphs of arm chair psychology are my reason, anon.
>but you can't get germs from a drawing :^)
Doesn't matter, the fetish itself is indicative of deep mental issues.
And no, anon, those aren't good or acceptable either.

>>7826295
>what is considered acceptable behavior
It's not about what is considered acceptable behavior, it's about scat literally being contrary to natural, impulsive disgust.

>because at some point "the only outlet they have is real life". This logic can be applied to plain, vanilla porn that way.
And thus they are driven to actually find sex in some form, whether it be prostitutes, a one night stand, or an actual relationship.
It's telling that you automatically associate vanilla porn and sex with rape, actually.

>I didn't even use word "fallacy", open a dictionary or something
Slippery Slope as a phrase inherently refers to the fallacy, stop being pedantic.

>>7826329
>Doesn't matter, the fetish itself is indicative of deep mental issues.
Watch out guys, Dr. Freud here's gonna give as the lecture on why I'm mentally ill because my problematic fetish triggers him deeply.

>>7807124
tf2g

I expected gay medic and got memes

>>7826527
>anon is actually a legitimate, triggered scatfag
ehl
ehm
aey
oeh

You're jerking off to literal shit, anon, there can be no other explanation besides "something has gone terribly, terribly wrong". Whatever extensions of natural urge or rationalizations you provide are ultimately secondary to the fact that your fetish, is in fact, shit.

More specifically, it is that you are not repulsed by it on some level, and even more so that you are sexually aroused by it.

>>7826647
I like how every single fag that's asked what's the problem with liking 2D scat can't ever come up with an actual reason for why it's actually bad. It's always "it's bad because it is, guys!".

>>7826753
The issue isn't that it's 2d, the issue is that it's scat at all.
Same goes for bugchasing.
Same goes for pedophilia.
Same goes for snuff.
Etc etc

>>7826790
his point is that 2D negates the negatives of actually acting on the fetish irl. having a fetish is not the same thing as acting on it.
>>7826588
the memes are pretty gay, at the very least

>>7826790
>comparing something that grosses you out to objectively reprehensible stuff like spreading HIV, rape and murder
WEW

>>7826820
>a drawing can give you AIDS
>being triggered by forced sex
>being triggered by death
your hypocrisy aside, go back to drawing instead of derailing threads you cunt

>>7826329
>Doesn't matter, the fetish itself is indicative of deep mental issues.
such as?

>>7826866
>triggered the bugchaser

>>7826911
>triggered the shiteater
go back to drawing

>>7826907
Being problematic :^)

Undertale ones are the worse, There's always a general for each individual character.... it wouldn't be so obnoxious if they kept their cancer on a single thread

>>7826808
>his point is that 2D negates the negatives of actually acting on the fetish irl. having a fetish is not the same thing as acting on it.
And my point is that such fetishes provide an unreasonable temptation for acting on such fetishes IRL, without the intelectually dishonest nonargument of "watching porn makes you a rapist"

>>7826820
>comparing something that spreads disease and pestilence and was quite literally one of the major limiters of civilization before the development of sanitation to objectively reprehensible stuff like spreading HIV, rape, and murder*
FTFY

The hunger games threads and the Fapping together threads.

>>7827096
>can't tell the difference between gross fetishes and morally wrong fetishes
There can be no other explanation besides "something has gone terribly, terribly wrong".

>>7827171
>fetishes having any moral bearing or being at all worthwhile to judge from a morality standpoint
anon pls

>>7827203
>A scat fetish itself is indicative of deep mental issues, but fantasizing about rape and murder is A.O.K.
Anon pls.

>>7827237
No one said that, stop using strawmans.

>>7827237
I'm not the anon you've been responding to though. what I just said disagrees with both of you.

>>7827171
>spreading disease, plague, and pestilence is just gross, not morally wrong

>>7827248
>watching some take a dump
>spreading disease and pestilence

>>7827311
>reading is for reteards xd

>>7827321
You sure seem to believe that given the way you post :^)

>>7827311
>scatfaggotry
>sanitary in any way, shape, or form

>>7827358
>implying >>7827321 is me
I miss the other anon, at least he was respectful and interested in discourse.

>>7827377
>scatfaggotry
>sanitary in any way, shape, or form
Tell me more about the germs that you got from looking at scat.

>>7827377
>implying >>7827321 is me
Not what I implying. I said he was retarded for posting what he just said.

>at least he was respectful
More respect than you deserved from him.

>>7825609
fuck off turtwig

File: FB_IMG_1487063650357.jpg (35KB, 480x374px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 480x374px

>>7807180
GET OUT OF MY FACE

>>7827471
>Tell me more about the germs that you got from looking at scat.
If having a rape fetish is morally reprehensible for it being rape, then having a scat fetish is morally reprehensible for it being intrinsically linked to disease.
I'm not talking about you jacking your three incher, I'm talking about the actual subject itself, real or not.

>More respect than you deserved from him.
No u

File: Shootforthestars.jpg (209KB, 529x898px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 529x898px

>>7827508
>shoots

This one.

>>7827910
You need help from several thousand doctors.

>>7807124
The threads that should be on /co/

>>7808408
/ftt/ posts good porn sometimes though

File: 8e7.png (74KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1024x1024px

>>7810584
Looks like the bait was just the right size.

>>7832150
Faggots always ruin it in some way or the other.

File: 2hu harrasment2.jpg (286KB, 1035x1464px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1035x1464px

>>7807124
this thread

File: IMG_1386.png (61KB, 394x540px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 394x540px

>ctrl+f monster
>ctrl+f tulpa
>ctrl+f kemono
>0 results

Anything that isnt male human x female furry

politics

Generals

All

>>7837276
>everything but my normie tastes should be gone
get a load of this dumbo

Yours

>>7807124
FUCKING FURRIES

File: 1453433023677.png (104KB, 278x351px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 278x351px

>when the fatfags think they're entitled to more than one fat/bara thread

>>7851909
This.
Femfat and Malefat is all that's needed.
/belly/ too, possibly, since it caters to pregnancy and inflation as well.

t. fatfag

>>7815009
You're just a fucking sore loser furry

>>7830755
nice dubs :^)