Furry Comics
>>5761520
>>5761527
>>5761532
>>5761539
>>5761545
>>5761553
>>5761556
Are there more of it?
>>5761520
>>5761527
>>5761532
It's always so easy to tell when "lesbian" content was made by a heterosexual. Like, you're just looking at two hetero males pretending to be girls. I'm not even trying to be 2deep4u with it- it's just hetero? You guys have no idea what a gay girl is besides "gee bill... TWO girls?"
>>5764468
i know this is porn we're talking about, but that's also a limit/challenge with storytelling in general, in that authors tend to be much better at writing characters of their own gender.
but anyway, yes, you're completely correct in that the artist/author [Wolfy-Nail] is a dude.
i only really like one of his comics and it's the m/m one with the donkey guy. unfortunately i never got around to saving that one after U-XVIII-Chan went down though.
>>5764468
please go back to /lgbt/
>>5764468
Explain a little deeper. How is it hetero?
>>5764468
Explain your reasoning here.
>>5764468
Guess what anon. Even if they were boys, or one was a boy and one was a girl, they're just drawn cartoons pretending to be humans. If you honestly think those character resemble ANY actual human being, male or female, and act in ways one would be expected to then I really think you've never talked to another living person in your entire life.
It's a fucking 7 page porn comic.
>>5764649
No, I mean, sorry, I never meant to throw the artist under the bus just because they were male and hetero. I meant, the content itself super doesn't reflect what it actually means to be a gay girl.
I don't really know what you meant to say about the storytelling, but, it's just, everything has a moral... reference? You know what I mean? And there are certain methods that are just pure heterosexual morality. Like, just, if you're a girl and you're into girls, you see things a lot differently than a hetero...
>>5764721
Tbh I thought I would just be called wrong and told to fuck off, but, basically, consider m/m content. The entire appeal is you're a dude, and you're fucking a dude- that's it, really. You don't have to introduce anything, you don't have to think about anything... you're just a dude hooking up with dudes. Obviously there is stuff to that, but it's just comfy.
But then consider female on female content. You don't really have the dominant stuff of the male to sorta use as a foundation for what's moral. Instead, you're just a girl, which is uber submissive. But the point of being gay as a girl is you're not submissive to guys, so you're submissive to yourself. That's what people don't understand.
It's not about scissoring; it's not about girls necessarily being sexier than guys; it is only, you don't consider the dominant stuff of a male. You can play, but that's not in itself lesbianism, since lesbianism is just submission. This is why furry stuff is useful.
When you consider feral, human morality is irrelevant. So you want to be kissed by feral as much as possible when you play. I'm getting a lot of (You)s to my previous post so I'll cut this short, but the idea is just, the more you stray from pure submission to nothing external is the more "hetero" it becomes. So "butch" lesbians for example are just play. Think of it like a dildo. You're a lesbian because you submit to yourself, but play is fun for sensual content, and everything.
>>5764793
>If you honestly think those character resemble ANY actual human being, male or female, and act in ways one would be expected to then I really think you've never talked to another living person in your entire life.
I was just trying to say, the content above is more representative of hetero ideals than lesbian ideals; I wasn't literally saying that they were people, or anything...
It's just the whole scenario is uber backwards. It's like two males trying to stick their dick in something, so they messily wrestle tongues. It's not at all what girls like girls for...
>>5764824
>But then consider female on female content. You don't really have the dominant stuff of the male to sorta use as a foundation for what's moral. Instead, you're just a girl, which is uber submissive. But the point of being gay as a girl is you're not submissive to guys, so you're submissive to yourself. That's what people don't understand.
This has to be one of the most asinine things I've read all week. Did you really derail the thread for this bullshit?
>>5764824
>Tbh I thought I would just be called wrong and told to fuck off, but, basically, consider m/m content. The entire appeal is you're a dude, and you're fucking a dude- that's it, really. You don't have to introduce anything, you don't have to think about anything... you're just a dude hooking up with dudes. Obviously there is stuff to that, but it's just comfy.
>But then consider female on female content. You don't really have the dominant stuff of the male to sorta use as a foundation for what's moral. Instead, you're just a girl, which is uber submissive. But the point of being gay as a girl is you're not submissive to guys, so you're submissive to yourself. That's what people don't understand.
i've never heard of such a concept for modeling homosexuality before. can you elaborate upon these ideas?
>>5764824
>this is what SJW tumbltards actually believe about feminine sexuality
I would put money on you being a guy or a tranny.
>>5764824
I'm going to need you to elaborate and not use any weasel words. I'd like to make good furry porns, so please explain.
>>5764911
>replying to yourself to act like people want to hear more of your word vomit
>>5764824
>lesbianism is just submission
So you're just making shit up.
>>5764468
>using Wolfy-Nail as an example
Wolfy-Nail exclusively follows American hardcore porn tropes. Yeah, no shit his lesbian sex doesn't actually look like lesbian sex. Personally, I find most of his stuff so completely unarousing that I'd rather slam a drawer shut on my dick than fap to it.
But seriously, his straight stuff doesn't look like real sex, either.
>>5764841
>It's just the whole scenario is uber backwards. It's like two males trying to stick their dick in something, so they messily wrestle tongues. It's not at all what girls like girls for...
Hmm, this reminds me of something I read about Romans: They had no concept of lesbian sex. To Romans, someone always had to be "the male", so Roman depictions of lesbianism tend to use dildo's and strapons.
>>5765019
>>5764942
i'm not that anon, pinky promise.
I'm working on my own comic, don't know if I should post it though as I haven't gotten to the hard core porn yet. It's going to be a very big comic, so there's lots of development first.
>>5765049
>>5764927
>SJW tumblrtards
I don't know, it could just as easily be a naive geeblergoozer.
>>5765054
are you uploading it somewhere? you could link the site if you have one
(also if you dont, id recommend smackjeeves)
>>5765054
How fetish heavy and obscure is it?
>>5765055
>>5765089
>>5765120
>>5765110
damn I loved that comic.
>>5765075
I've been uploading it to IB so far, but I am looking for a better comic hosting site. Don't know if smackjeeves allows the content.
https://inkbunny.net/submissionsviewall.php?rid=38253e6c54&mode=pool&pool_id=40354
>>5765077
Jailbait & borderline loli/shota. jr. high and high school age relationships. After that it's going to mostly be fairly vanilla. Some of the later chapters might get more fetishy, I'm considering a rape/abuse one and an egg-laying one. Though whether or not it gets that far and turns into an on-going I have yet to determine.
>>5765145
>>5765152
Furaffinity always works.
Could you post a page or two here?
>>5765175
>do not reenact this comic
>>5765171
>Furaffinity
Nope, no underage.
>>5765257
Shit dude, underage b& sex?
>>5765582
FA bans anything remotely suggestive of underage.
well i guess ill post my WIP comic too
>>5764824
>but, basically, consider m/m content. The entire appeal is you're a dude, and you're fucking a dude- that's it, really.
>You don't really have the dominant stuff of the male to sorta use as a foundation for what's moral. Instead, you're just a girl, which is uber submissive.
Wow, what a very nicely presented pile of shit. You do realize that not all men are just horndogs looking to dominate everything they see and that all women aren't eager sluts willing to spread their legs for anything with the slightest bit of authority?
There's heterosexual relationships that run the gamut of the male being the absolutely dominant figure, to a relationship where they're both equals, to couples where the woman has significantly more "authority" over the man. And you can bet that homosexual relationships aren't just cookie cutter "two men struggling for dominance" and "two women constantly submitting to each other".
Heterosexuality is not someone dominating another person. It's a man and a woman in a sexual relationship. Period. Anything else is just you ascribing your own subjective views to it.
>>5764824
Is it just me or is it impossible to find the full-res ENGLISH version of this comic.
You reverse image search it or you straight google the "Sonne Kim and David" source of this filename and image. You find the spanish full-res version that CLEARLY is tagged "translated" and has the english text of the speech bubble in the bottom right panel poorly shooped out to put spanish words on top. But the full-res english original is nowhere. sauce, pls
>>5764824
>But then consider female on female content. You don't really have the dominant stuff of the male to sorta use as a foundation for what's moral. Instead, you're just a girl, which is uber submissive. But the point of being gay as a girl is you're not submissive to guys, so you're submissive to yourself. That's what people don't understand.
Sorry, this is fucking stupid.
You can turn this argument right around and use it for m/m content. I'm not entirely sure what you're even attempting to fucking say.
It's about being submissive to yourself? How is that not at least a part of ANY sexual experience, isn't that pretty much describing this interesting notion of 'consent'? What else is it describing?
So, it's NOT about being submissive to the other partner? Whatsoever? That's actually patently absurd.
Hell, I could right now say that you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to m/m stuff, because newsflash, not all m/m stuff is actually restricted to your guidelines.
There exist fiction and prose that have deeply involved characters with extensive characterisation for many types of sexual relationships, they're out there.
Listen, I actually partially see what you were saying originally, there exists pretty stereotypical things in a lot of porn/smut which have the hallmarks of 'i couldn't really be assed to think of anything interesting or detailed, but all i care about is the fucking'.
I won't deny that from my experience, that shit seems to be less popular with women.
But what you're saying here, you're describing lesbianism like some kind of sexual ideology or philosophy. Unfortunately, you're talking out your ass. You can't just say 'well this isn't really true lesbianism' because I can absolutely gaurentee I can go on /lgbt/ right now and find several people who would disagree with your definition.
I mean, parts of this are utterly asinine, you're speaking in word salad and vague terms.
>>5766010
if you share the pages, I could translate em for you?
"I have a surprise for my little bro"
"What smells so good?"
"It's stew"
"And..."
"Biscuits!"
"Later..."
"I'm sorry, it's single player..."
"Don't worry, I don't mind. I can watch you play, it's fine"
"You're dead!"
"Damn elite"
"Hey"
"David?"
"Yeah?"
"I want to thank you for all of this."
>>5766138
No need- there is an English version and a Spanish version out there, public, already:
English (1200 x 609 res):
http://g.e-hentai.org/g/848484/3ebe37b216/
Spanish (2480 x 1180 res):
https://hentaiporns.net/sonne-kim-david-spanish/
I don't know why it is like this.
>>5766181
You could ask the artist about it!
>>5764824
>But then consider female on female content. You don't really have the dominant stuff of the male to sorta use as a foundation for what's moral. Instead, you're just a girl, which is uber submissive. But the point of being gay as a girl is you're not submissive to guys, so you're submissive to yourself. That's what people don't understand.
I don't even know what the fuck you're getting at
>>5766723
I mean, if I went that far I'd probably just find that the full-res version is on his FA as it probably is.
It's not that I don't see artists as real people, it's that, I guess I don't really find it offhand enough to hit him up about it since I don't use FA. I'm just assuming he has an FA. If we were on a social media site I'm always logged into I'd be like, fuck yeah, hey dude, what's up. But just having no avatar on a day-old account feels off.
I don't really have any content to post, but I wanted to post something. I only found one frame stuff with text/ dialogue before pic related.
>>5765135
Stupid sexy gazelle boy
>>5764863
Is there more to this image? Also source artist?
>>5767506
http://imgur.com/r/yiffcomics/KTWB0
>Brotherly Love [MD] ~ Dysa
>>5764824
>only, you don't consider the dominant stuff of a male. You can play, but that's not in itself lesbianism, since lesbianism is just submission
Now this is tranny posting. Back to /tlg/.
>>5764824
I know girls who are super into being doms, not subs. Yes being a girl is generally feminine, and that is normally portrayed as the submissive type, but there are lots of people who break both the generic sub/Dom and fem/masc both female and female.
Not to mention the fact that they are meant to be military, and it's meant to be kinky degenerate sex where one person is using authority to have a nut. In no way Is it meant to be realistic, and I'm fairly sure it's meant to be not realistic.
You're meant to just nut not push an agenda to this porn, it's pretty damn simple.
>>5764824
what the fuck
>>5769419
Whats that from?
>>5764824
I'm a lesbian, and I have no idea what you are trying to get at here.
>>5769767
Arcana hearts I think
>>5770194
Since you're here and participating in discussion, do YOU notice any difference between male artists depicting lesbian sex and female artists depicting lesbian sex?
half of y'all are jerking off and the other half are arguing about the stupidest shit. just let people draw whatever the fuk they want or make ur own thread
>>5764824
>>5771093
I have no idea what you are talking about when you say "heterosexual morality" or that a gay girl is submissive only to herself. I'm not into serious sub/dom stuff, but the dynamic still exists and it isn't all that different from a hetero relationship for me. Your mileage may vary I guess.
I don't understand what you mean by "it's not about girls necessarily being sexier than guys" either. That is the entire reason I am gay - I find girls more attractive than guys in both looks and potential personality to the point that guys aren't on my radar. I like girls so I date them and fuck them. That is what "lesbianism" is to me.
You're going to have to explain the morality bit more clearly. Completely lost on that even with the dildo example.
>do YOU notice any difference between male artists depicting lesbian sex and female artists depicting lesbian sex?
Not always. What tips me off most is when the characters are drawn as if there were an observer in the room just off screen getting off to them or when all they do is scissor.
Anyway, is feral okay?
>>5772205
>>5772228
>>5772249
>>5772260
>>5772267
>>5772285
>>5772303
>>5772325
>>5772349
>>5772377
>>5772205
Hmm. So POVs and close-ups. Interesting, thanks.
>>5772396
>>5772418
>>5772457
>>5772474
>>5772495
>>5772514
>>5767764
Not entirely sure if the link works, unless I'm an idiot somehow I dont see the comic anywhere within the linked gallery
>>5772551
>>5772569
>>5772589
>>5772623
end
>>5772623
>I don't let her fuck trees anymore now that she has a boyfriend who can't satisfy her
wow, bad end
>>5764824
The recipe for (you)s: earnest and innocent retardation.
>heterosexual morality
>lesbianism is just submission
>you want to be kissed by feral as much as possible when you play
Nigga go outside. Talk to real people, not just other faggots and gender studies majors.
>>5772698
Yes, he's a bit autistic about that tree.
Maybe he was cucked by a Trevenant in the past.
>>5773004
>>5773011
>>5773037
>>5773045
>>5773054
>>5773061
>>5764468
just because you're a mtf tranny does not make you an authority on women
>>5773111
trips confirm
>>5772408
I think it comes down to whether or not the author is mimicking existing real life porn. I've said it before, but someone like Wolfy-Nail takes a lot of cues from hardcore porn. So it's not really a surprise that his porn ends up looking as if it's intended for an observer. It is. But that has less to do with it being made by or intended for straight people, and more with his source of inspiration.
I've been fapping to a lot of kemono stuff, and it seems to completely lack this definition. It often even has an overt viewpoint character who is narrating in first person.
>>5773111
pretty much this
>>5777355
Yep.
>>5769767
It's Kazu from Arcana Hearts, though this specific screenshot was taken from his Eko-less MUGEN incarnation.
Get hype motherfuckers, it's time for some good shit.
>>5787353
Damn nice. But the original black and white was much better. These colors fuck everything up! Anyone have the next chapter of these two?
>>5787620
>>5787604
Not all of it, I'm afraid. What I have found I've booked marked, but don't have it on me.
I got a plethora of other stuff though.
>>5787667
Okay, this one I think works well with color.
>>5787684
The rest is decent, but I dislike the shower-curtain design. It blends too well w/ their hides.
>>5787777
Apparently quads are in favor of furry incest comics.
Who'd have thought?
This one is short but sweet.
>>5788003
>>5788079
>>5788105
>>5764824
>But then consider female on female content. You don't really have the dominant stuff of the male to sorta use as a foundation for what's moral. Instead, you're just a girl, which is uber submissive. But the point of being gay as a girl is you're not submissive to guys, so you're submissive to yourself. That's what people don't understand.
>all women can ever be is submissive little housewives incapable of sexual desire
you sound like such a fedora tipping faggot jesus iceskating christo
>>5764824
even if you are a lesbian girl, you are not ALL lesbian girls, and i don't know why you think you can collectively psychoanalyze so many people that have so little in common.
it's pretty arrogant to be prattling about how gay girls "are submissive to themselves" like that's a truth and not just some shit you thought up about yourself
>>5764841
gee, it's almost like the comic was written by a guy, to appeal to guys. i wonder why it doesn't appeal to girls????
>>5765257
For the sake of bumping I guess I'll just bring this up to date.
>>5800511
And that's it so far.
>>5772660
>>5765593
Unless you're Adam Wan, anyway.
Why do a great portion of furries have a fetish for cheating
>>5765593
I haven't had images banned yet.
>>5797262
>not posting it full
>>5807097
Meh, Adam Wan doesn't draw cub.
>>5761556
This comic brings back so many memories. Namely, the one where my parents caught me jacking to it my junior year. To this day I still think that they think that I'm an autist.
>>5807481
They are whores.
>>5809237
Are they wrong?
>>5807097
>>5813131
>>5813141
>>5813149
>>5813155
>>5813167
>>5813175
>>5813186
>>5813203
>>5813211
>>5813225
>>5813231
>>5766010
There's a version on sadpanda.
Only 8 pages, here ya go:
>>5813339
>>5813348
>>5813361
>>5813369
>>5773070
>>5813231
B-b-but that's not cub pron!
Just kidding, if it wasn't a big name artist that comic wouldn't have made it past page 4.
>>5785845
shark is too cute
>>5773070
>>5816331
It's not. They all have the same body proportions of adults. Just a little shorter.
>>5773070
>>5819143
>>5773004
Astounding.
>>5787840
>that fucking punchline
>>5813141
this started so promisingly
>>5800493
I have no clue where this comic is going, but I'm interested.
>>5766088
Jitensha?
>>5771720
sauce?
>>5808138
Rosianna Rabbit is so fun. The idea of doing something like this with polyjuice potion has honestly been such boner material for me ever since I first read about it.
>>5764824
wendy isnt even a lesbian, you fucking retard.
this is like one of only two works she is depicted to have sex with a female.
besides that, she was basically ordered to do so, unlike in every case she is with a guy
>>5764468
So how would greater realism be an improvement?
Everybody knows female sexuality is fucking inferior.
Two lesbians in real life, you know how they act? Lots of hot nasty sex the first two weeks quickly replaced by domestic abuse and crying and man-hate and truly fucking disgusting levels of binge-eating.
>OH YEAH! FUCK! SO HOT!
Pffft!
>>5764824
Lesbians be like,
>"Our love is so special and so different from anything that ever came before!"
"Well what's different about it?"
>"It cannot possibly be described, your puny heteronormative mind could never grasp our TRUE SPLENDOR . . ."
"Yeah, well, that's great, now don't mind us when we draw lesbians in porn and we show how lesbians would be if they weren't so goddamned annoying and self-aggrandizing!"
Jesus fuck, like anybody doesn't already KNOW how disappointing lesbians are in real life. WE KNOW, LADY. It's a well-documented phenomenon already.
>>5819867
It really is, considering he introduced that young character as being in the 5th grade, then retconned the age without changing her design at all.
>>5835939
>Black and Red
>>5819867
>the same body proportions of adults
They definitely do not.
>>5841268
>and the he NEVER UPDATED AGAIN
>>5841268
> no edit ending
... I'm actually a little relieved!
>>5845922
This looks more like they're going into the office wearing fursuits instead of being furries.
>>5846562
I think they are just wearing fursuits.
Either that or they all look dead.
>>5838411
>retconned the age
Right but given she's still got the same adult proportions, it don't matter for shit.
>>5848982
I see you subscribe to the "she's actually a 1000 year old vampire" school of pedo apologetics
>>5849825
I subscribe to the the "I know basic anatomy" school. They've got full hips, full breasts. There's nothing underage about them.
>>5800517
continuing...
>>5761527
Isn't this an edited version with less teets?
>>5849936
Full hips and breasts really doesn't mean they're adults. You can have that as young as 13 or 14.
>>5852830
What it means is they're not loli. So therefore, unless specifically stated they're underage, then FA won't delete them, and Wan specifically retconned stating their ages.
>>5761532
>help your substitute to start commencing her duty
Goddamn dogs suck at grammar
>>5855673
he is russian. can you even write a sentence in russian?
>>5855673
I'm not native either can you tell what's wrong with it?
>>5849936
>They've got full hips, full breasts
Nigga wat
>>5867409
Painfully unfunny.
>>5864393
Oh yeah, that's totally loli. Real pedophile material right there.
>>5864393
this bottomless thing bother me as fuck
>>5867540
bump/
>>5773011
>"Cream of anything. I've had very good."
godkek
>>5846562
thatsthejoke.jpg
>>5870096
Yeah like, why wear the shirt?
>>5881827
>Not posting the full thing showing where these two actually shag
>>5765037
>Let's avoid the question with a quirky quip!
>>5824676
>>5870096
What I heard is that it's an in-canon region of town where pants are illegal. Yeah, that sounds retarded.
Adam Wan really rubs me the wrong way. He's obviously talents, but I still find it to be less arousing than sandpaper.
>>5813141
They don't call Adam Wan the King of Cuck for nothing.
>>5891277
Because of one or two comics he made?
>>5889831
I still maintain that Adam Wan is a closet homo. I mean, think about it. He draws dicks in loving detail, and with his whole "bottomless district" autism he's basically making it so that every guys nuts are hanging out at all times, and he always makes sure to draw it as such. But he never shows the same amount of detail to female genitals or breasts.
>>5764824
I'm going to try to say this as nicely as possible.
It sounds like you have an incredibly closed minded view of sexuality, especially in its relationship to pornographic, and have issues differentiating fictional and realistic portrayels of fucking.
The best advice I can offer you in this situation is "If you don't like it, don't read it." Because your points are all emotional and circumstantial evidence, which means your arguments hold no water.
Now if you'll excuse me I have to go back to jacking off to my comics of half-animal people with absurd anatomy doing sexual things 95% of people will never experience in their lifetimes.
>>5894552
>closet homo
I thought he was openly homo. Most of his stuff is gay porn.
Do you even know who he is beyond this comic?
>>5894552
i think he's just bi considering he's drawing furry loli on IB
>>5895729
>furry loli
He doesn't draw loli, it's jailbait at the most. And again, most of what he draws is gay porn.
>Adam Wan
>Closet
>>5896194
im pretty sure that's the point
>>5764468
Didn't I see this r63'd somewhere? Like two gay guys in a comic made by a woman and everyone complained. I swear I saw it somewhere.
>>5770194
Seconded. And I'm a feminist, too. But enough stupid discussion, I need more delicious dog titty.
>>5772623
IT'S HIP TO FUCK TREES
>>5854984
>>5847377
like this?
>>5901962
>not having (colorized) as well
>>5902190
sorry is this better?
>>5902232
b r e h, not cool
>>5902190
dis better?
>>5902277
>>5902328
Bootiful
bump
>>5813241
well that was fucking retarded
>>5895868
OMG what a lucky boy.
>>5895868
those horses look fucking pissed
>>5903002
>>5903014
>>5903021
>>5903038
>>5903038
This little bastard had the sperm cells to ask nigger sheep if he could bang her.
Fucking based
>>5903049
>>5903062
>>5903080
>>5903091
>>5903103
>>5903113
>>5903155
>>5903164
>>5903174
>>5903183
>>5903203
>>5903237
>>5903249
>>5903262
i constantly misread his name as 'horatio'
>>5903295
fin
>>5902277
fuck you
>>5764824
See it's shit like this
>>5855635
Yeah pretty sure people are not gonna run to FA mods just cause you are not sticking to some bullshit about the age on 4chan.
bitch be a kid.
>>5902277
So many single mothers on fucking Tinder. Jesus, no one wants to take care of some other loser's man's baby.
>>5902515
>>5900439
>And I'm a feminist, too.
noone asked if you are retarded
>>5902953
Could be worse
>>5902515