ITT: which is best, and why it is 4 and 5

File: 45207146_p0.jpg (359KB, 1221x1601px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 1221x1601px

>>1972375
Better to feel a soft tail brushing against your ass as you pound into her little animal pussy

Finally, someone with good taste.

Yes, 4 and 5 are the best
But I also like 3

>>1972662
>But I also like 3

Get out you pleb

3 is literally the only one not sexy to me desu

>>1972737
>3
>sanic-tier furry
shiggy diggy

>>1972811
Who are you attacking?

>>1972375
> Kemono [2]
A BEST

>>1972375
All of the above.

>>1972662
this. 5 is perfection but 3 is fine too

File: fixed.png (591KB, 1400x2500px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 1400x2500px

>>1972375

File: 188929.jpg (89KB, 892x960px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 892x960px

>>1973448
This is the optimal 3. No hair and proper legs.

>Not liking all 5

Real animals are better desu

File: 24123842.jpg (916KB, 868x1228px) Image search: [Google]

916KB, 868x1228px

2 is best girl.

>>1973555
i see it more as a 3.5

Eh, 5 is the best, but they're all too cutesy/loli for my comfort.

inb4 >not liking loli

>>1973605
Poor simpletons are not allowed here

>>1973617
But that defeats the whole point of it all.

>>1973662
It should be the standard

>>1973672
I disagree

>>1973725
>Poor simpleton
What does that even mean?
All 5 are good for different reasons
Why limit yourself too only one?

>>1973725
What point?
The only reason you'd ever fap to furry porn is if there isn't enough zoo porn

Which is fairly often, since there's barely any good zoo porn out there, but still

>>1973725
> I disagree
We must now internet fight because my opinion is clearly the objectively correct factual choice.

My first move: youre dumb
Balls in your court, faggot.

>>1973555
This, it's so jarring when people treat fur as skin and put hair on top of it.

File: Furry chart.jpg (129KB, 991x493px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 991x493px

more expansive chart

>>1973800
There are people that like furry and dislike Zoo, and vice versa oo.
And people that like neither or both.
They are 2 different categories that don't interact.,

>>1973847
What is the difference between 7 and 8? Like they are still 1 to 1 animals, just ones a cat and ones a rabbit?

>>1973879
7 has "human eyes" and can talk I think, whereas 8 is a regular animal.

>>1973879
I'm assuming sapience and non-sapiance. i.e. the difference between bestiality and furry.

>>1973864
Of course there are people that dislike zoo, just the same as there are people who dislike 2-5
But I'm pretty sure the OP was referring only to people with good taste

>>1973896
>>1973900
Oh, right.
Couldn't tell because of the Jap.

>>1973922
There's no need for that kind of posturing here anon.

>>1973762
Once you become a wealthy patrician with good tastes then you will understand.

>>1973800
Real animals are very simple minded and only do so much. Even if you get the ability to fuck whichever one you like, all it will be is just sex and nothing else. Simply put, it goes further beyond than just sex.

>>1973808
k love you too bae

>>1973819
My brother!

>>1973847
Now this is a much better chart and by a nip no less.

>>1973971
>all it will be is just sex and nothing else.
If that's all you can do with an animal, then what do normal people do with their pets?

>>1974015
Feed them and clean then and satisfy their insitacital urge for physical contact.

>>1974015
Obviously sex them duh

I'm not into zoo but :

We can own animals
We can kill them
We can eat them

But somehow we can't fuck them.
???

>>1974063
I don't think anyone in this thread has specifically that you can't fuck animals.

File: 5526477099e62d3768f4bbc65064ddc4.jpg (468KB, 1500x2000px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1500x2000px

>>1972375
2 and 3, with some forays into 4. Pic related.

>>1973847
4, 7 or 8. preferred 7

>>1974083
I'm not talking about my fellow trashmen, but normalfags.

>>1973847
7 is ideal but 8 is realistic and almost as good.

>>1973971
> Even if you get the ability to fuck whichever one you like, all it will be is just sex and nothing else. Simply put, it goes further beyond than just sex.
Water u on, m8? I'm pretty sure people get really emotionally invested with their pets. It doesn't matter that the animal can't reciprocate on the same level with a human, but that they appreciate what we do for them.

>>1974032
You're forgetting the whole "companionship" thing
Neither furry porn nor sex toys can provide that

>>1974097
People call it rape. Like it is technically rape, as the animal has no way of indicating consent. People think that is 100% animal cruelty and that you're a horrible person. Seen it argued plenty of times in some Zoo threads actually.

I think if the animal just takes it and doesn't wanna run away or bail out, and it doesn't seem to be in discomfort, then it's alright I guess.

>>1974085
who is this semen demon?

>>1974121
Its not really that amazing. of a companionship. They are simply there, waiting more attention or food. They don't understand you and don't love you really. Not on a level even close to a human. They get the intelligence of a toddler or less. It doesn't seem like that great of a companionship[ compared to what something a person could offer. Sure its better then porn of things that don't exist and inanimate fuckable objects, but it isn't that amazing either.

To me zoofags just seem like people that are buying a living fleshlight or dildo with a 10 year lifecycle, well that's my personal opinion anyway.

>>1974230
You've never had pets, have you?

>>1974257
I have some now. Not mine but a roommates. 2 in fact. 1 old and whiney, the other doesn't want to leave you alone, solely so it can find a comfy place to snooze. Doesn't seem much like a friend to me.

>>1974162
Midori. She's a perv.

File: Sketch200215237.png (180KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1280x800px

>>1972737

>Not liking 3

Listen, you gonna fuck number 3, you like it or not

File: CWB3_Page_06.jpg (492KB, 1134x1631px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 1134x1631px

>>1974085
I love this cat.

>>1974303
Have you ever tried cuddling with them?

>>1974355
Sure I have let them do so a few times.
Not much different than cuddling a hot water bottle really. Pretty sure they only like doing it because its warm, they don't care who it is they're cuddling.

>>1974381
You sound like a cunt

>>1974327
based

>>1974015
If its a single owner then its an attempt to fill in the lonely void in their hearts.
If its a couple or a family then its just because its meme

>>1974063
Because if people think that you prefer animals over women then they think you just can't get any pussy and therefore think you're a loser and sick.

>>1974110
There is no realistic benefit for having a pet unless its for a job (like having a dog for herding sheep or likewise). So doing something to a animal that you can do the same to a human is a stupid idea since the latter can provide much more things than the former since the latter is a human and I'm pretty sure a human can provide alot more emotional and practical use than something like a dog or a horse.

tl;dr having a pet in a first world country is stupid and a waste of time.

>>1974327
If its to >>1973448 's standard then I would.

File: 1443476575724.gif (2MB, 450x371px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 450x371px

>Feral scum

>>>/zoo/

>>1974505
You say these things assuming that pets are just as much of a hassle as humans
They aren't

>>1974315
thanks