Toy Photography

>>6318295
Too Dark Edition

Old Thread-------- >>6284366

>>6318327

Nice lighting

File: sing3.jpg (3MB, 4945x3312px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4945x3312px

>>6318329
Thanks!

I shot it three times that day. Couldn't decide on the light.

>>6318337
First pic is perfectly lit. The second one is underexposed and the last is over exposed.

File: 20170507_205220.jpg (1MB, 1295x1064px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1295x1064px

I want to try practicing taking toy photos more.

what do you shot with? i took decent toy pics but the fie was too large for 4chan, how do i make them smaller.

>>6318424

MS paint or GIMP.

>>6318424
Resize them, save as jpg, use 50% compression

File: as I walk through the valley.jpg (203KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 2048x1536px

>>6318424
I compress them in Photoshop. Ctrl+Shift+S and then save as Jpeg and then a slider would appear and you can slide it below 4 mb.

Additionally you can lower the height and width but you're going to have to input the resolution size yourself.

>>6318432
See, this looks perfectly fine and it's not a fuckhuge 1.5 MB file. I don't understand why this isn't the norm

>>6318432
Why does the crotch look so blurry compared to the rest of the figure? The hips are perfectly defined.

>>6318827
Looks like some wonky fake shallow DOF blur, that pic would probably be better without it.

>>6318793
>fuckhuge 1.5 MB file
>fuckhuge
>1.5 MB file

Dude, please. Stop using AOL dial up. For your own sake.

>>6319020
Serious question though, what about the people who are on mobile? Not everyone is sitting at their laptop

Do we even have a general number of how many people are using mobile data when they browse?

>>6319115
>what about the people who are on mobile?

Fuck'em. Why are they browsing a thread they know is likely going to be full of high resolution big file size pictures?

>>6319115
I get 30gb per month so I don't really give a fuck. I browse /toy/ all the time at work and on commutes.

File: P1210278.jpg (566KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

566KB, 1200x1600px

These Re-Ment accessories are some of my favourite purchases this year

File: P1210281.jpg (646KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

646KB, 1200x1600px

>>6319184
All Graveyards are SOVEREIGN® BONEZONES® and are under the McNAP®, skellymen will remove violators with 5.45x39 and contemplative xylophone music

File: P1210293.jpg (570KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 1600x1200px

>>6319187
Peaceful skeleton scientist developing vaporwave, c. 2046, colourized

File: P1210304.jpg (445KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 1600x1200px

>>6319191
What kind of hack fraud still uses VHS?

File: WhatTheFuckAreYouDoingWithThatCutoutOfMyFaceYouCreepyLittleGoblinWhatTheFuck.jpg (1MB, 1087x1271px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1087x1271px

>>6319184
>>6319187
>>6319191
>>6319196

What Re-Ment sets are those? Do they work with 1/12th figures too?

>>6319223
I used pieces from Public Phone, Fast Food, Aquarium, Personal Computer, and Audio. The skeleton's a BIT smaller than 1/12, so the stuff should work fine

>>6318328
awful

File: 20170506_042408.jpg (586KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 2048x1152px

>>6318297
>too dark edition
Finally

>>6319216
Nice. What's the test tube made from?

File: into the trash.jpg (1MB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1944px

Finally found a Strowman to put Kalisto where he belongs

File: it goes.jpg (1MB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1944px

>>6319610

>>6319115
/toy/ is a slow board, it's not like by the time I get to a laptop I'm going to miss the thread.

>>6319274
>>6319301
Love this. Sometimes it's hard to pose the SA clone body. I like the VC45 posability but it looks too lanky.

File: IMG_20170225_123905_798.jpg (2MB, 4592x3017px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4592x3017px

>>6319504
Thank you. And its plastic. You know the Ganondorf Statue that came with the Zelda Windwaker HD collectors edition? Thats the dome that originally covered the statue, placed on some scrap PC parts.

File: IMG_9465.jpg (1MB, 2592x3240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x3240px

>>6320597

Follow me, Anon

File: IMG_9571.jpg (584KB, 1752x1171px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1752x1171px

>>6320684

No time to rest, we gotta move

>>6320063
Yeah sometimes the VC helmets look too big on the lanky bodies and the figs just look unnatural.

File: ssj2gohan.jpg (162KB, 405x540px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 405x540px

I'm just fucking around with some new effect pieces

File: kamehameha.jpg (374KB, 853x640px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 853x640px

>>6321480
It's hard to find good uses for these

File: thunderfist.jpg (286KB, 694x640px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 694x640px

>>6321481

>>6319146
Dust

File: MuthaFuckinSCIENCEBitches.jpg (571KB, 1811x1243px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 1811x1243px

>>6321481
>>6321480
>>6321483

I need to get the elec ones. Well, I need to get all of them eventually, but the elec ones have been on my list forever.

>>6321502
They're nice, but I don't have any figures they go well with yet
I got a pretty good deal on them though, both for $20 total

File: IMG_6424[1].jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>6321502
They are pretty great, I still need the blue set.

and >>6321504 is correct, I didn't use mine really until I got this electro.

File: IMG_20170509_222140.jpg (639KB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

639KB, 2592x1944px

>>6321882

>>6321885
clean your house

File: IMG_7587.jpg (395KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 1200x1200px

>>6321951

File: IMG_7592.jpg (380KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 1200x1200px

>>6321955

File: IMG_7550.jpg (363KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 1600x1064px

>>6321960

File: DSC_4202as.jpg (819KB, 1500x997px) Image search: [Google]

819KB, 1500x997px

>>6322855

Posting random photos for now.

File: DSC_4164as.jpg (863KB, 1500x997px) Image search: [Google]

863KB, 1500x997px

>>6322866

File: BroadsideKaijuAssault.jpg (424KB, 2025x1079px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 2025x1079px

>>6322869

I really want one of those.

File: DSC_4183as.jpg (730KB, 903x1500px) Image search: [Google]

730KB, 903x1500px

>>6322869

Best movie Joker in this scale.

File: DSC_4199as.jpg (951KB, 1500x997px) Image search: [Google]

951KB, 1500x997px

>>6322886

File: DSC_4208as.jpg (917KB, 1500x997px) Image search: [Google]

917KB, 1500x997px

>>6322903

>>6322906
Why does a glasses wearing toonlink flee from a boohoo? This photo makes no sense.

>>6323018
Glasses or no glasses you'd run too. Makes perfect sense.

>>6323227
>>6323232
>>6323234
>>6323235
Flip your pictures you chimp

>>6323227
>>6323232
>>6323234
>>6323235
what the fuck? I mean I can understand it happening once, but you let it happen 3 times after that. Way to go.

>>6323018

>Complaining that images on a (4chan) toy message board make no sense.

kek

File: DSC_4193a.jpg (2MB, 2000x2360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x2360px

>>6322906

File: DSC_4195a.jpg (3MB, 3008x2000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3008x2000px

>>6323493

File: IMG_9718.jpg (2MB, 4791x3175px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4791x3175px

Time of our lives, and I owe it al to yoooooou

>>6318827
It's a blue board, anon. You can't just go and post his modest robot penis.

>>6319184
Looks like he's been on hold for quite some time.

File: 554C2595-9A16-4CB0-84C5-6B58895E30E4.jpg (121KB, 1008x668px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1008x668px

Standing...on the edge...

File: BruceLeeTraining.jpg (561KB, 1375x1371px) Image search: [Google]

561KB, 1375x1371px

I feel like I go for the whole "angles can be fun!" thing a bit too much at times. Oh well.

File: BruceLeeTraining2.jpg (511KB, 1245x1291px) Image search: [Google]

511KB, 1245x1291px

>>6324032

Same shot, different angling. Which looks better, /toy/?

File: GUL_6442.jpg (571KB, 1000x662px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 1000x662px

>>6324034
I like this one better, Bruce's head looks too big in the other one.

>>6324032

This one is better

File: 2016-09-03 19.05.49.jpg (253KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 540x960px

>>6324034
I like dutch angles as much as the next guy, but definitely the second one.

>>6322886
He looks great, it's a shame that's probably the only pose he can do.

File: Squad Out.jpg (249KB, 1632x918px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1632x918px

>>6324305

File: IMG_20170422_074009_402.jpg (2MB, 4592x2898px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4592x2898px

>>6323756
I'm jealous.
And I will never find a PAK sized one either.

File: 20170511_220641.jpg (1MB, 2160x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2160x2160px

taking off the rust on doing pics

>>6324502

I also have the 1:18 Bbi Abrams tank and the Revol Mini Solid Snake but no snow to shoot an Outer Heaven scene

File: IMG_20170423_151929_277.jpg (3MB, 4410x3036px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4410x3036px

>>6325034
What about artificial snow?

File: IMG_8835.jpg (445KB, 2168x1451px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 2168x1451px

>>6325043

I've never been one for dioramas.

File: 4122017215449.jpg (540KB, 1200x1432px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 1200x1432px

Posting a few of my favourite Star Wars shots.

File: IMG_20170511_075226_461.jpg (3MB, 4592x3056px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4592x3056px

Can i ask for feedback on this photo?

>>6325171

I like it. Snake could be a bit less shadowy though.

>>6319115
I have 8 GBs of mobile data.

Even counting a "fuckhuge" 1.5 MB file, that's still 5333 pictures before I'd run out of monthly data.

>>6325171

I like that it looks like an old photograph, lots of imperfections. Ocelot could be a little less stiff

File: IMG_20170512_230703_712.jpg (2MB, 3056x3056px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3056x3056px

>>6325182
>>6325178
Thank you! Guess you're right. And about the shadowy part - yeah thats why i'm asking. I feel like theres way too much detail that gets lost in the shadows. But i thought that it being dark and moody ads to the atmosphere. Nice to hear that you like it anyways, wasn't sure about it.

>>6319144
>>6325180
I don't know, man. I do hate the giant ass files when browsing on my cell, not because muh data!, but because they don't fit into the screen, and is quite annoying to enlarge and then drag the thing through the screen to see the details.

I just never browse here when on the phone, even if I have wifi connection available.

File: IMG_2111.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>6325261

File: DSC03090.jpg (315KB, 970x1098px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 970x1098px

>>6325161
>ishygddt

>>6325339
Is that a dougram?

File: drrr.jpg (593KB, 3876x2181px) Image search: [Google]

593KB, 3876x2181px

Love me some Durarara!!

File: DSC03097.jpg (255KB, 1146x751px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 1146x751px

>>6325561
Yeah, the hi-metal. I took a ton of other pics but then I realized my memory card wasn't in the camera so only a couple made it.

>>6326010
Okay. I think i picked up one of thr orginal ones at goodwill a while back. Its in bad shape with parts missing but now i have an idea what it looks like whole

File: atact.jpg (1MB, 1990x2920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1990x2920px

more sw

>>6325586
>Too Dark Edition

winner winner chicken dinner

>>6320154
excellent

File: DSCF3538.jpg (1MB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1944px

what kind of dark are we allowed to post?

>>6322855
For Geeks
By Geeks


lord

>>6326566

what do you see, mr lee

>>6326650
Mr. Lee can see her V

File: BruceLeeBruceSee2.jpg (668KB, 1630x1128px) Image search: [Google]

668KB, 1630x1128px

>>6326650
>>6326654

File: 2017-05-13 22.24.39.jpg (221KB, 1632x918px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1632x918px

>>6326960

File: 2017-05-13 21.39.48.jpg (175KB, 1632x918px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1632x918px

>>6326962

File: IMG_8211.jpg (821KB, 2409x1610px) Image search: [Google]

821KB, 2409x1610px

>>6326963
Easy now

>>6323712
He's trying to get out of an XFinity contract

File: IMG_20170513_214452663.jpg (1MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4160x2340px

What do you guys think?

>>6327347

This would be pretty cool if it was clearer. I can't tell if there's a filter or it's out of focus. The mood of the lighting is good

Either way I need a xenomorph myself. Anybody got a recommendation?

File: IMG_20161225_141321_204.jpg (3MB, 2576x3220px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2576x3220px

>>6327383
Which itteration exactly? Big Chap? Dog Alien? Warrior? I'm pretty happy with my Revoltech Big Chap. His head movement is a little hindering at times, but a far from that its a perfect figure that also comes with the Facehugger and Egg. And the head movement limitation fits his clunky movements from the first alien movie anyways.

The other revoltechs might be just as good, but i don't have them myself.

>>6327413

I'm partial to the four-legged look. I've been debating the Monsterarts Alien Warrior from AvP

File: tmp_16163-IMG_20170514_115452~22057184818.jpg (591KB, 1944x1458px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 1944x1458px

Mirroring

Hello anons, what camera do you use to take these toy photos and how much do they cost?

>>6327413
>>6327573
I have the revoltech Big Chap and Alien Warrior. The Alien Warrior has much better articulation, though they both look really nice

>>6326971
Fix that scarf, ffs

>>6326664
Jesus christ that ass is fat

File: BruceLeeBootyInspector.jpg (494KB, 1132x1188px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 1132x1188px

>>6327810

You're damn right it is.

File: IMG_9687.jpg (2MB, 3872x2589px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3872x2589px

And what is your profession, Hylian child?

File: drosseldinner.jpg (4MB, 3814x2499px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3814x2499px

needs more comfyposting

File: wo.jpg (419KB, 1280x1918px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 1280x1918px

one of mine

File: BruceLeeWatermelon.jpg (420KB, 1133x1171px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 1133x1171px

>>6329379

I wish I had the props for comfy posting.

Counter the following statement:

(toy-)photography is a pay2win hobby. The better your equipment and your figures are, the better are your photos.

File: BruceLeeConsiders.jpg (370KB, 1038x1120px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 1038x1120px

>>6329712

But if you're paying a shitload of money to post on an anonymous image board, are you really winning?

File: EDITIMG_6529.jpg (958KB, 2333x1556px) Image search: [Google]

958KB, 2333x1556px

It's entirely about composition. A ton of people here use iphones and come up with great shots. Most of the shit photos on IG are good quality cameras with garbage editing(always with WAY too much contrast)
The reason Sgtbananas and Shadywar shots are so good has nothing to do with their cameras.
>better figures
The most interesting photos in this thread are Pose Skeletons.

pic not related

File: Screen Shot 2017-05-16 at 8.32.17 AM.png (1MB, 1074x719px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1074x719px

>>6329712

>(toy-)photography is a pay2win hobby. The better your equipment and your figures are, the better are your photos

Kinda not really. A good photographer will take good pictures regardless of their kit and a mediocre photographer isn't going to take better pictures just because the camera is better

Top Left was taken with an iPhone 4. Nothing to write home about but I've seen people take worse with a full frame four-figure camera

Top right is shortly after I got my Sony A200. Its a better camera than a cell phone but since I still didn't really know how to use it and was still learning basic photography the final product is worse than the previous one even though the camera is better

Bottom left is the same camera after something like 3 years. Its an improvement even though its the same camera. However, I found myself wanting something faster, more light sensitive, and sharper. This one takes relatively soft images that don't blow up very well. Anytime you hear someone tell me I need to focus it isn't a problem with focusing; its the image quality.

Bottom right was taken with my first outing with my Nikon D5100. Everything about this camera is better, so the images are a step up but that's also mostly due to the fact that I've also gotten better before getting a new kit.

>>6329739

>The reason Sgtbananas and Shadywar shots are so good has nothing to do with their cameras

So fucking true, and I love both their work. Shadywar posts around here on the 1:18 and Acid Rain generals. Sgtbananas is one ofmy favorites and the inspiration for me throwing rocks on the bottom right picture. His shit just comes alive. I also highly recommend Hot.Kenobi. He's great but very simple and minimalist proving you don't need to trek outside or build a shitty alley dio to take great pics.

A good camera will do well with a skilled photographer but gear isn't everything and no matter how expensive the camera a bad photographer will always take bad photos.

>>6329712
That's like saying you'll be a better artist of you get Photoshop/Illustrator. They're just tools, and if you don't know how to use them, you'd might as well be using MS Paint.
Sure, there's a lot more options with those programs, but you need the skills to back them up.

>>6330116
how'd you get the dirt to kick up like that?

>>6330152

I had a friend kick shit at it off frame while I kept the shutter going at high speed.

Sgtbananas and others use a remote and kick up debris themselves with either a brush, compressed air, or in his case just capturing firecrackers.

You gott turn off the autofocus, focus the image manually, then keep the shutter going while things are flying.

>>6329705
You don't really need props, but they do help. I wish I had more comfy stuff like a dollhouse bed or couch, but I can make do with what I have. Posing is the most basic way to convey comfy, and you only need your figure for that.

File: VenomSlavSquat.jpg (649KB, 1021x1061px) Image search: [Google]

649KB, 1021x1061px

>>6330232

I feel you do need props to a degree-It doesn't quite carry the connotation of comfy to me without something to lean or rest on.

File: IMG_9733.png (2MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 750x1334px

>>6330232
>>6330242

You guys want props? You guys want comfy? Check out captaindangerous

She's does amazing work and was even named a Brand Ambassador by Nintendo

File: Drosselpen.jpg (729KB, 803x1276px) Image search: [Google]

729KB, 803x1276px

>>6330242
I agree that props are fun, and they can bring a lot to a toy photograph. Toys interacting with each other or a prop can convey a sense of life that a lone toy might not be able to. But you don't need to buy fancy props either, going outside can give you a wealth of objects to interact with to add life to your photo. Plus, natural lighting is always nice.

File: SnakeReading.jpg (1MB, 1935x1327px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1935x1327px

>>6330257

Oh, it doesn't have to be big expensive props or anything. I just mean, like, a simple couch or some chairs or something.

Hell, all I've got for a chair is either an $80 robot or a plastic pizza...Thingy. That is put inside pizza boxes to keep the lid from touching the cheese.

File: ShamrockWave.jpg (379KB, 761x875px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 761x875px

>>6330260

Oh, and I guess the bottom half of an easter egg container thingy.

File: COME AND GET THEM.jpg (234KB, 1281x670px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 1281x670px

>>6330257

> you don't need to buy fancy props either, going outside can give you a wealth of objects to interact with to add life to your photo. Plus, natural lighting is always nice.

I couldn't agree more. One of the reasons I like captaindangerous and others so much isn't the props, its because they're either outside or lit by sunlight, which as you've stated is the best light.

I've been and remain very critical about the whole ACBA dio thing but the main reason is because I think pictures taken outside are better than pictures taken inside. Why go through the trouble of trying to sculpt rocks when you can just go out and shoot by some rocks?

I never understood their "everything in camera, no post" bullshit. Ask any photographer, and real photographer and they'll tell you post is just part of the process. As whole I think they suck because they're more focused on the "toy" part as opposed to the "photography part."

There's also a repetitive nature to dios and since they're indoors a lot of people tend to have poor white balance. I'm not saying they're all bad but like 90% all look the same and aren't done very well. Literally the only exception I can think of is Monsterlaut and even he follows a lot of ACBA tropes.

I can rant about it forever but the point is I'd recommend shooting outdoors anytime.

File: RyuHowTheFuckAmIGonnaExplainThisToMom.jpg (1MB, 1437x1297px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1437x1297px

>>6330266

I can't take pics outdoors. A lot of people probably can't. Just don't got the place or space for it (city dwellers who can't do shit without the crowds in the way etc).

Realized Sylvanian Family furniture is affordable, detailed and the right size for Nendoroids so I'm going to be using them a lot in future

File: DSC00407.jpg (1MB, 3699x2234px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3699x2234px

>>6330275
>I can't take pics outdoors. A lot of people probably can't. Just don't got the place or space for it (city dwellers who can't do shit without the crowds in the way etc).

Sure you can, you just have to get creative but you have the whole city as your playground. You know who invented toy photography as we know it? No, not the ACBA but people in Malaysia and Japan shooting around the city.

I took pic related on the top floor of a parking garage.

check out a guy named art_troopers_chicago. He mostly shoots right in the city. If you're not too far from a park thats an option too.

File: shamrocklounge.jpg (511KB, 966x723px) Image search: [Google]

511KB, 966x723px

>>6330260
The only props I own are some Orcara mini foods (which I find scale better with 1/12 than Re-ment) and the Re-ment skelly tatami set, which is a bit too small for 1/12 but if you fiddle with it you can kinda make it work.

>>6330266
Shooting outdoors is unfortunately not always possible, due to weather or just living in shitty areas, but if you have the freedom to shoot outside it should be given a chance! I like dioramas too, but I agree often they are poorly done. Editing in post is good too, but I think a lot of people think they need photoshop or other expensive software to do so, which may deter them from even trying. Lately, I've just been using Irfanview to do some colour correction on shots, which isn't as great as photoshop, but has enough to satisfy me.

Sorry for the shitty phone shots, by the way.

>>6330293
>Shooting outdoors is unfortunately not always possible, due to weather or just living in shitty areas,
>>6330275
>I can't take pics outdoors. A lot of people probably can't.
Id tell you stop being so fucking lazy and go figure it out, but if you had that level of motivation, you wouldn't be taking such shitty photos to begin with.

>>6330293

As far as editing software goes I'd recommend Pixelmatr or VSCO apps. Although Lightroom and Photoshop can be bought in installments I'd give those two apps a try first and see how it goes.

If you really can't shoot outside you can still take great pics indoors. Checkout a guy named Hot.Kenobi

File: ursol.jpg (106KB, 528x960px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 528x960px

Took a couple outside visiting my mom today. I know they're no photographic masterpieces, but they were fun.

File: cowboy.jpg (88KB, 528x960px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 528x960px

>>6330688
Blind Cowboy is really fun for pics, but without the poncho he tends to be out of focus a lot. I liked these two the best

File: cowboy2.jpg (113KB, 528x960px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 528x960px

>>6330690

>>6330690

Does this come with the horse or is that separate?

File: 6ESPfok.jpg (467KB, 1500x1470px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 1500x1470px

I was just having fun messing around with the lighting for this one

>>6330719
He was separate, kinda wish I hadn't passed on it, but since the horse is a solid piece with no articulation, I wasn't super into it.

>>6330116
i really like your shit name fag

>>6330962
It's their instagram account, on a thread about toy photography...

>>6323493
Is that the stock paint on the Jungle Hunter mask?

It looks amazing.

>>6326638
Yeah I know it's pretty cringey, but I love 5th element and the NES and it was a random find at a show for two bucks, so I can't complain.

>>6330997
Yeah it's stock. Shame about the shitty ricochet tampos.

>>6330962
>namefag
>as if that means anything
>just like "flavor of the month"

>>6329712
This is false, I've seen people have crisp pics of hot toys posed like shit, in shit angles with shitty framing and shittier composition.

Of course if you have a bad figure with a. 5mp phone camera, you will suck.

But if you have a decent camera, a decent figure, and decent spatial/visual awareness, you can take good pics.

>>6330962
Thanks, Anon

File: IMG_8206.jpg (248KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1600x1064px

>>6333210
The rock is fun as hell

File: IMG_8199.jpg (268KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 1600x1064px

>>6333865

File: IMG_8197.jpg (344KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 1600x1064px

>>6333866

File: IMG_8117.jpg (353KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 1200x1200px

>>6333869
Also quake is cool

>>6333870
that mold is cool, will buy when its low/on sale

File: IMG_8151.jpg (321KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 1200x1200px

>>6333888
It really is. I hope it gets made into stalker.

File: Broadside4.jpg (446KB, 1815x1019px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 1815x1019px

>>6333908

TR brought us so many good molds. Pic not really related, but oh well. Not everything can be 10/10 for $15-25 bux, right?

File: FB_IMG_1495210480759.jpg (22KB, 720x405px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 720x405px

Hurr look at me im such an artist durr

File: IMG_8235.jpg (236KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 1200x1200px

Check em

File: IMG_8219.jpg (348KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 1600x1064px

>>6334529

File: IMG_8247.jpg (320KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 1600x1064px

>>6334531

File: IMG_8237.jpg (296KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1600x1064px

>>6334535

File: IMG_8239.jpg (333KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 1600x1064px

>>6334536

File: IMG_8241.jpg (309KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 1600x1064px

>>6334539

File: P1210384.jpg (488KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

488KB, 1600x1200px

This picture was a mistake.

I genuinely don't know if it's horrible or if it's art

>>6335498
It's both


I love it.

File: S E L F - S P O O K E D.png (2MB, 761x1646px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 761x1646px

>>6335528
Here's the full, inebriated, series of shite events

>>6335823
>>6335824
>>6335826
Spectacular.

>>6334529
>>6334531

Does he come with those sunglasses? He is dirt fucking cheap on Amazon.

>>6335566
This is probably one of the most brilliant things I've seen on /toy/! The fact it wasn't planned makes it even more spectacular.

>>6334529
That series made me laugh internally (which is what people mean when they say "lol"), nice one anon!

(Captcha won't rest until it's shown us every storefront in the world, will it? I guess even electronic entities need a hobby.)

>>6335566
Lmao, saved.

File: IMG_8228.jpg (337KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 1600x1064px

>>6336001
Yeah he does.

File: Trailbreaker Falls.gif (852KB, 500x334px) Image search: [Google]

852KB, 500x334px

>>6335900
ty!

File: DSCF3545.jpg (1MB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1944px

fuck me, the basic ring barely fits on my desk. I'd hate to see how much space the authentic scale ring takes

>>6331000
Reminds me of the hermit crab from Banjo Kazooi

You guys got any blogs or whatever that I can follow?

>>6334529
>>6334531
>>6334535
How is he in person? From the pictures he looks weird to me.

>>6337493
Wouldn't the spider-sense tingle before the attack though?

>>6337612
I always got the impression that his spider sense would be going off all the time in a fight, just sort of constantly feeding him information.

File: IMG_8182.jpg (329KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 1600x1064px

>>6337608
Dude he is so much fun.

>>6337673
Oh yeah that's a good point, like it's not a one time thing.

>>6337673
>>6337782
We should ask on /co/ for more precise information, but I doubt it would activate in a fight because, given his reflexes, lots of stuff are happening in slow motion, and therefore are not really that dangerous for him.

"Oh, that guy is going to hit me with a car! I know, I will jump into the top, break the door and pull the driver out... well, he need to be closer for that to work... c'mon, I don't have all day."

I see that the thread hit the max image limit and no one has made a new thread but I took more pictures than I usually do. I just painted the barrel today too.
https://imgur.com/gallery/IZmpL

New thread.
>>6338026

>>6336093
>>6336145
You flatter me, genuinely.

>>6337604
I'm at Buzzwordself.tumblr.com

>>6337604
Instagram.

lookup Articulated.Snake

>>6319187
>All Graveyards are SOVEREIGN® BONEZONES® and are under the McNAP®

top fucking keke