Anyone have this guy? He looks super cool and I want it. Not sure if there is a best place to order him either.
Nobody here bought one?
I had it preordered but didn't pick it up. I held off because I'm not sure if this is worth 130
The Krang figure was pretty much spot on, this is just Shredder crossed with G.I. Joe EXTREME
I paid 100 for it, I think it is definitely worth.
the articulation is not bad
didn't he have red eyes or some futuristic thing in his armor? I don't see either of those things so he's pretty much perfect for me now, those were the few flaws it had for me not to get it...
What's his scale?
>>6292885
all things in the box,
maybe just the weapons are a little futuristic.
>>6292885
and he is about 9" tall.
Hey dose anybody have a picture of him next to the classic line turtles how dose he scale?
>>6292934
well that may kill it for me, any pictures to compare scale?
Just got mine in the mail
>>6292934
That finger print lol
>>6293666
got this from google
Why the fuck did they make it so huge
>>6295163
Seconding this question, really. I want something that can go toe-to-toe with Skeletor or Vader without looking like he swallowed a canister of ooze first.
On that note; any solid release date on the Figuarts Shredder yet?
>>6295147
Oh god he's got PAK proportions.
>>6295163
Tons of people told them not to but they insisted on it. Fuckin goofballs.
>>6295163
Well their going to make their own turtles too but, size wise I don't think he looks bad with the playmates classics. The only problem is unlike their Krang he's too stylized to fit in with them.
>>6296137
>On that note; any solid release date on the Figuarts Shredder yet
If we don't here anything by SDCC I think its safe to say he's stuck in proto hell...
>>6296166
So with the possibility of Figuarts Shredder being stuck in proto-hell, Playmates scrapping Classics Shredder...
Who does that leave for a proper 6" scale Shredder; Mafex?
Here's a review
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39YP7SmWtgE
>>6296139
nah he reminds me more of a s.i.c. release.
>>6296139
It's got PAK stylization too.
>>6298493
Pretty set on getting this now. Thanks.