L.O.L. Little Outrageous Littles

>>6248423
Why would there be? They look like just another of those little blind bag toys that are everywhere now.

There is a tiny bit of discussion in the blind box toy thread further down the board.

They recently won an award in my country and the price jumped up to $20 each!

How do you get the table to fit in their ball? I can't figure it out

File: 20170320_140817.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

I don't know why they didn't give them clothes that actually covered their backs. They remind me of hospital gowns

>>6248543
MODS

>>6248543
Wow, for $10 I would expect quality

>>6248543
Wait, are they cast off?

File: 7978630.jpg (57KB, 500x348px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x348px

>>6248583
I don't know what that means sorry.

The clothes are like polly pocket clothes but worse because of the huge gaps at the back.

>>6248423
>you can make them piss
W E W

>>6248587
Basically just means removable clothes, so yeah.

>>6248592
Yeah they come naked. There are different layers to unwrap and each layer has a different prize. One layer might have their shoes and the next might have their clothes. Very clever.
But the clothes only go with the specific doll so you already know which one you have before you reach the doll in the centre.
But you don't know if it can pee, spit, cry or change colour

It's frustrating trying to collect them all when all TRUs & Chapters/Coles have zero stock
Why aren't these at WalMart yet?
(Leaf btw)

>>6248621
Are you going to try and collect each version of each character as well? Eg one spitter, one cryer, etc

>>6248423
>They are flying off the shelves here
clearly not, otherwise you wouldn't try shilling it here.

>>6248629
Probably not, just one of each is good

They just announced five balls (six figs, the tiny babies come two per ball) that are gonna be phased out in wave 2

Really want to grab them all, but nowhere to buy all of a sudden; soon enough will have to eBay the rest (ugh)

>>6248737
So they're keeping some of the babies for wave 2?
I think most kids would be pretty disappointed to spend so much money to get the babies, I think they should phase out all the babies.

File: lolballs2.jpg (177KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1280x720px

We lucked out and scored a Glitterati early in (like in our first four balls), now I got the jones to collect em all

It's like Pokemon but blind bag, at $13 a pop

File: crystalqueen.jpg (224KB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 1600x1600px

>>6249020
Pic related

>>6249020
>It's like Pokemon but blind bag
You know what would be a great blind bag line? Bring back the mini figures of Pokemon and I've them in pokeballs, regular, great, ultra, the specialty balls.

>>6248423
>>6248543
>>6249020
>>6249023
Ew. They look like those cheap-ass toys you see in dollar store dispensers.

>>6249033
Those exist as gashapons. Check candysan. I got an Espeon in a masterball.

>>6248583
>>6248592
>cast off
...no dude, that term is used pretty much exclusively for statues whose clothing you can remove in order to display them undressed (for lewdness purposes). It's bizarre to see you apply that term to something like a LOL or Polly Pocket. They're just dolls, that have plastic clothes instead of fabric.

File: lolretired.jpg (44KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 540x960px

>>6248754
These are the ones that will be retired when wave 2 hits

>>6249857
Oh wow, no wonder everyone is going nuts about getting queen bee.

Does anyone know of a video of showing the colour change? I've never seen it yet

File: PEDO.jpg (77KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 640x427px

She's just a doll, Anon. You aren't having deviant thoughts are you?

At first I thought they were hideous but they're growing on me.
But I think their mouths are still the worst part.

Has anyone noticed that in many of the youtube opening videos, the youtubers are terrible at taking the wrap off? They always bung up the zip parts.
It's really satisfying to have the zip open perfectly.

File: lolwave1.jpg (973KB, 1600x1280px) Image search: [Google]

973KB, 1600x1280px

Getting doubles is fine for having extras for your kids to smash, but it gets annoying buying five balls for only one new fig
(the nature of blind bags)

>>6250368
Hopefully you can find someone to swap with you.

The worry of getting a double has made me (currently) stop at 2 because they're too expensive in my country.

I like that the dolls are a range of different skin colours. Not just "Here are the white dolls and a few token black ones"

>>6250794
I actually really appreciate that, too. It doesn't feel as forced as when other toy lines try to be ~diverse~ either.

I'm with >>6249920 here. I thought these were stupid at first, but now I kinda want to buy a couple too.

I've got 4 now but I don't know what to do with them. If I display them then the kids will want to play with them but if I let them play with them they'll want to put water inside them and I don't want them to go mouldy. I think (hope) I won't buy anymore

>>6251731
Explain that they're not for playing with? I lived with my uncle growing up and he collected action figures. It was not difficult to understand the concept of "This is a toy but it's not my toy. The owner of this toy does not want me playing with it."

>>6249023
>>6249020
I don't know how to say this nicely, but you're wasting your money.

>>6252036
That works with my regular toys but I think these ones will look too much like a toy for them. But I'll try it anyway, thanks

>>6252110
If they enjoy them it's not a waste, friend.

>>6250368
I NEED a swap meet!

Anyone got any of the little babies yet?

File: lolbabies1.jpg (18KB, 300x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 300x400px

>>6258175
I wish, these are just pulled from google

File: lolbabies2.jpg (119KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 768x1024px

>>6260473

File: lolstand.jpg (27KB, 236x419px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 236x419px

More pics

>>6260526
>>6260527
I must say I do kind of appreciate these displays.

How come the stickers are so lame?

Isn't "littles" a term from daddy dom fetish?

>>6261824
Other way around, buddy. The daddydom fetish got it from the otherwise normal word.

File: lolfancy.jpg (29KB, 379x400px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 379x400px

who /fancy/ here?

File: IMG_0008.jpg (102KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 640x640px

Wave 2 is out! Just scored our 2nd glitterati

>>6262173
I'll rephrase:

Isn't it typically not used anymore except in that context?