Toy Photography

>>6186403

Previous thread is kill >>6167166

File: IMG_8004.jpg (286KB, 1242x1605px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1242x1605px

I don't take too many pictures of my toys but I snapped this one the other day and thought it looked pretty cool.

File: 14124020_10155142287808066_1319957362_o.jpg (57KB, 1136x1135px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1136x1135px

>>6186403

>>6186431
Nice. A better background and some color correction would help immensely though.

File: Mount Ihu.jpg (571KB, 3283x2462px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 3283x2462px

>>6186403
Took this during 2015 with a point and shoot since that was the only thing I had at the time. I'd love the chance to retake this shot with my T6i

>>6186469
That is one ugly fucking toy

What do you all shoot with? I have been meaning to retired my Nikon D3300.

File: IMG_0701 copy.jpg (3MB, 1679x1980px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1679x1980px

>>6186543
iPhone 6s plus. Torn between getting a Nikon P900 and a 3D printer in April.

File: 14124181_10155142287768066_1431722343_o.jpg (73KB, 1136x1136px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1136x1136px

>>6186523
says you son.

>>6186469
Curious what your setup looks like for such a clean white background. Or do you clean it up in post?

>>6186790
a roll of paper and 2 diffused lights probably

>>6186543
an old Canon Rebel XSi

File: 20170214_111630.jpg (1MB, 2087x1174px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2087x1174px

Just got back into lego, you can really just come up with anything for them.

>>6186790
White poster board, two light sources, and touching it up in Adobe Lightroom. It's actually not that hard to get quality like that in a image, if Raspberrychainsaw can do it anybody here can with hardly any effort.

File: IMG-20170215-WA0008.jpg (195KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 960x720px

I, Ultraman, have a dream ~

File: IMG_20170212_042922.jpg (1MB, 2952x5248px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2952x5248px

What do you think?

File: Screenshot_20170217-011351.png (3MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1440x2560px

>>6186986

Better one

File: Screenshot_20170217-011405.png (3MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2560x1440px

>>6186989

Fly you fools!

Joker: *mockingly* NOOOOOOOOO!!!

>>6186786
Which eva is that? I like the lankiness of it.

>>6186406
Did Lenin kill it?

File: IMG_8864.jpg (2MB, 2176x3693px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2176x3693px

>>6186469

I've been debating getting an RD Eva, if only for the AT field. I have the Revo ones which are kinda fun but look a little too glossy. Unit 01 also looks weird straight on.

>>6186543

I've mentioned this so many times that I'm starting to sound like I'm promoting it but I'm not. I use the Sony Alpha A200. Its good enough for what I need and cheap ($200) but the pictures are a little soft and it's not very fast. I'd only really recommend it as a starter DSLR

>>6186932
>White poster board
>Raspberrychainsaw

I always assumed he used a lightbox or tent

>>6186581

She seems to be enjoying whatever's going on here

>>6186986
>>6186995
>>6186989
>Out of focus
>10 x larger than it needs to be
>dark and grainy
>poorly laid out
>unfunny 'joke'
Looks like ass. You probably just pointed the camera vaguely in the direction of the figures, took the picture and posted it, without even trying to make it look good, or taking several shots and choosing the best.
Fully expected you to play the "My poor old potato camera/I tried/please no bully/it's just for fun" card.

inb4 all the butthurt and white-knights try to defend these and say they are in any way ''good''.

>>6187459
The LED was too heavy and caused it to sink.

>>6187561
Perhaps you'd like to show me how its done with your own masterful work?

>>6187561
>>6187567
>Perhaps you'd like to show me how its done with your own masterful work?

Kek

You have the floor Anon, take us to school.

Anybody following these threads knows I'm all about constructive criticism but being an aimless dick with nothing to contribute is just pointless.

I don't wanna hear any of that "I don't have to do it just to have an opinion" bullshit either because...

A) If you don't do anything that makes >>6186986 >>6186995 >>6186989 literally better than anything you've ever done and...

B) Its like bitching about politics without voting. Yeah, you're entitled to your opinion but nobody's going to take you seriously. Maybe you'll figure out how to troll when you finally finish middle school.

File: Here you go.jpg (416KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 960x720px

>>6187588
He's right though those photos are literally shit. Yes he was an ass about it but he actually gave legitimate criticism. Better than the usual you "cant pose for shit" or "learn how lighting works," faggot posts you see in these threads. These photos are some of the worst I've ever seen.

>>6186933
You. Read this.
http://blogs.adobe.com/VideoRoad/2009/03/cleaning_out_the_green_on_gree.html

>>6187567
The fallacy is that a person who is not capable of producing a better item does not have the moral high ground to criticize it.
Example: "I don't like this chicken." "Hmph! Let's see you try and cook it better!" It's a way to make a personal attack by criticizing an argument. The complainer is essentially accused of being unreasonably demanding by finding fault in something that he or she couldn't do better.
The issues were pointed out in >>6187561.
Deal with those and you might take better pictures, instead of sitting there getting tushy toasted because somebody did what you asked.

>>6186986
>what do you think?
>>6187561
>"I think..."

>>6187588
See >>6187612
Take your fallacy, and your thin skin, Mr Whiteknight, and go play somewhere else if you don't like the atmosphere here.

>getting your balls in a twist this badly on somebody else's behalf.
Wew lad.

>>6187567
He told you what your problems were. Just because you didn't like his tone or whatever doesn't make the info wrong. Also whether or not they can do better is irrelevant in this case because it doesn't change what you posted. Those pix are what's being critiqued. Nothing more.

>>6187610

>Better than the usual you "cant pose for shit" or "learn how lighting works," faggot posts you see in these threads

To me, what >>6187561 had to "offer" is cut out of the same cloth

>>6187619

Whoa now,

Asking for a little specificity isn't white knighting. What >>6187561 posted isn't critique, its shit-talking for the sake of being abrasive. It's basically "here's why you suck" without any suggestions for improvement. It just ends up sounding like that kid who acts up in class because they don't get enough positive attention at home.

Criticism would be something along the lines of "adjust your light source" or "back away from your subjects" or something that relatively hints at what >>6186986 >>6186995 >>6186989 could do better.

>>6186469
really kicking myself for not buying this when i had the chance

>>6187672
>Asking for a little specificity isn't white knighting
The guy wasn't even talking to you. Why do you think you're entitled to "ask for a little specificity" on the other anon's behalf? He's the one that asked for opinions, and people gave them to him.
>To me, what >>6187561 had to "offer" is cut out of the same cloth
So? It's not about YOU.
>Criticism would be something along the lines of "adjust your light source" or "back away from your subjects"
_____

>Out of focus
>10 x larger than it needs to be
>dark and grainy
>poorly laid out
>unfunny 'joke'
Seems pretty straight forward. If a person can't read that, and figure it out (especially since there's several threads on the board right now that have tons of information on how to do it better) then taking crappy pictures isn't their biggest problem.
Just because you didn't like his tone or whatever doesn't make the critique wrong.

Hey is this the shit post general?

File: SM-cry.jpg (25KB, 275x383px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 275x383px

>>6187937
"Waaaaaaahhhh somebody disagrees! They're sitposting."
Go figure out what that word means and get back to us,

>>6187946
I did not read shit. I came here expecting photos, not bitching. I don't know who is fighting who. Cancerous faggot.

>>6187932
he's right though, pointing things out that are wrong and not adding anything that could be done better IS shit posting

File: 1482599318927.jpg (88KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1024x576px

>>6187953
>I did not read shit.
>I came here expecting photos, not bitching.
>I don't know who is fighting who.
>Cancerous faggot.

Maybe you should try reading then.

>I came here expecting photos, not bitching
>Cancerous faggot
So you're saying you're part of the problem then.
OK Chief. Thanks for the info!

>>6187972

Well, I did say there'd be cake.

>>6187970
>>Out of focus
Focus your camera.
Problem solved

>10 x larger than it needs to be
Reduce the size of your photos
Problem solved.

>>dark and grainy.
Use more light.
Problem solved.

>>poorly laid out
Look at other people's pictures for ideas.
Problem solved.

>>unfunny 'joke'
Dunno. Get a better sense of what's funny?
Problem possibly solved but maybe not.

It's not rocket science.

File: drosselcake.jpg (414KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 1280x960px

>>6187988

File: freaky-yotsuba-and-cake.jpg (458KB, 700x1003px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 700x1003px

>>6187988

>>6188012
Nice! Is that the Hot Toys stand?

>>6187561

I used my phone camera in a pitch black room you cunt. The last one is literally the front selfie camera.

I'd say i did pretty good without seeing what i was about to capture. Faggot.

File: 1172017195654.jpg (765KB, 2311x1300px) Image search: [Google]

765KB, 2311x1300px

>>6188016
Thanks, and yes it is.

File: oh-such-harsh-language..jpg (265KB, 690x900px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 690x900px

>>6188032
>I used my phone camera in a pitch black room
Why on earth would you do that? Did you expect the picture to miraculously look good once you posted?

>I'd say i did pretty good
Sorry anon. Not really.

>cunt
>Faggot
Such language!

>>6187409
the Robot damashii Eva 01 Awakening figure.

>>6188098
didn't that come with that weird halo effect from the berserk scene in rebuild?

File: IMG_8865.jpg (913KB, 2460x1647px) Image search: [Google]

913KB, 2460x1647px

Why they never did a Bad version I'll never know

>>6188098
Yes it did, it's pretty dope.

File: lenen.png (508KB, 1626x1374px) Image search: [Google]

508KB, 1626x1374px

>>6187588
School indeed.

>>6186786
moar

>>6186581
I'd lose the serial numbers right under her elbow but otherwise good

>>6188348

Nice.

What kind of camera are you using?

>>6188352
Canon 1200D with the standard lens

>>6188362
Cool

Adjust your white balance to eliminate that yellowing and you're all set.

File: trapped.jpg (178KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1000x667px

>>6188365
Sometimes I like my photos being off-colour.

Poster of the Joker/gandalf photos. I love what lengths you guys went to bash me when i was just fucking around. But i guess i should study up on photography so i can start taking masterful shots of my cheap toys.

File: 20170218_012843.jpg (36KB, 1507x847px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 1507x847px

Kinda new to this

>>6188682
Stop with the passive aggressive bullshit, kiddo.
People have given you good advice. Take it and do something with it, or go be less than mediocre some place else.

It's not about being a master photographer, it's about doing the best job you can do, and never stop trying to do better.

>>6188900
Interesting.

>>6188954
Nice and Thanks for reminding me, i need to get a hatsune figure

>>6188959
Get 2.0. She's miles above all the other ones.

File: 20170218_021146.jpg (64KB, 1075x896px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1075x896px

Why do i do these things?

File: 20170218_021437.jpg (71KB, 1146x771px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1146x771px

>>6189004

File: 20170218_021825.jpg (74KB, 1276x899px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1276x899px

>>6189012

>>6188385

Fair enough, I really like this one

File: Watch-out-Mcfly.jpg (506KB, 864x1296px) Image search: [Google]

506KB, 864x1296px

>>6186403
Haven't taken any pics in awhile, but i'll post one of my nice ones. Really want to get a new camera, thinking of getting a Panasonic GH4, since i also do video work.

File: Co-op-Action.jpg (527KB, 1296x864px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 1296x864px

>>6189675
Because i forgot, i currently use my canon rebel T3i.

>>6188322
It's a tame farm raised metroid. They don't have ears to put tags in, so you gotta keep track of 'em by tattooing.

>>6187525
Nah, the guy uses a plain white poster board. Hell, if you can get tile sold at Home Depot or Lowes and use a white or black background you can do better than him. Look up product photography on YouTube and you can get some awesome ideas on shots.

>>6189004
>tfw /who/ visits /toy/

>>6189004
10/10

File: Radical Raptor.jpg (2MB, 3072x2304px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3072x2304px

>>6186921
>Just got back into lego, you can really just come up with anything for them.
Indeed...

>>6189675
I love this one.

>>6190844
Ah, thanks man! Its one of my favorites i've done.

http://en.rocketnews24.com/2017/02/14/japanese-photographer-wows-internet-with-stunning-action-shots-of-superhero-figurines/

>>6191406
Rad shot! Got higher res for a wallpaper?

File: 20170217_21.26.16.jpg (241KB, 918x1630px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 918x1630px

>>6189752
Post more. You do nice poses. You make toys I didn't want look so cool. Now I want them.

>>6191434
the ones with the beer cans are awesome

>>6191439
No, sorry. That's the final.

And thanks!

File: 2017-02-17 21.27.26.jpg (252KB, 1632x918px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1632x918px

>>6191496

File: 2017-02-17 21.27.01.jpg (255KB, 1632x918px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 1632x918px

>>6192001

File: 2017-02-17 21.29.32.jpg (316KB, 1114x1631px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1114x1631px

>>6192003

File: 2017-02-18 15.02.48.jpg (229KB, 1632x918px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1632x918px

>>6192007

File: 2017-02-17 21.28.27.jpg (325KB, 1061x1679px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 1061x1679px

>>6192012

File: 2017-02-18 15.02.25.jpg (272KB, 1632x918px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 1632x918px

>>6192036

File: collage.jpg (1MB, 1800x765px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1800x765px

A collage of some recent pictures.

>>6192038
There's something oddly erotic about that...

>>6192047
What figure is that on the top left?

File: DSC_0020 (1280x853).jpg (488KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

488KB, 1280x853px

I made this masterpiece last year.

>>6194552
Head: MMS Otoha
Hands: Busou Shinki Murmeltier
Body: MMS naked
Clothes: Azone Picco Neemo

>>6187972
>happy birthday to me
>happy birthday to me
>sigh
>happy birthday dear to--
>*glances around*
>happy birthday dear iron man
>happy birthday to me

>>6192036

Stop it! I don't even care about Dazzler as a character. Stop making me want her.

>>6194835
Wasn't aware that it was possible to have so much garbage in a single photo.

File: P_20170216_174411.jpg (2MB, 4096x2304px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4096x2304px

Who uses asus phones here? I want to know how I can improve my shots. Sometimes when I upload it on a pc the picture ends up grainy compared to how it looks like here on the phone.

File: IMG_20160829_050332.jpg (2MB, 3024x3780px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x3780px

>>6188269

File: IMG_20160829_051706.jpg (2MB, 3024x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x3024px

>>6196329

File: IMG_20160826_041109.jpg (1MB, 2954x2954px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2954x2954px

>>6186790
Small cardboard box with the sides cute out with white cotton on the sides with the lamps. I'm using my cell phone for these shots and just add an instagram filter. I need to rebuild bigger and better.

>>6196330

The Bodyguard?

>>6196120
Possibly looking grainy on your computer because you are viewing them at a greater size. Try resizing it down slightly and see if that takes off a bit of the grain.

File: blue team.jpg (1MB, 3226x1815px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3226x1815px

>>6186917
I tried a lil something

File: 2017-02-19_01-51-42.jpg (945KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

945KB, 1600x900px

I love mega bloks, goddamn.

File: 2017-02-19 15.23.26.jpg (183KB, 918x1630px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 918x1630px

>>6196028
I didn't either, but she's fuckin groovy

File: IMG_20170219_102907_114.jpg (3MB, 4592x3056px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4592x3056px

Its hard for me to tell which of my photos are good, and which aren't.

Not trying to sound like a Like-whore here, but my personal favourites get less likes and comments on social media, than some that i don't like thaaaat much.

I honestly can't tell what makes a good photo.

>>6197573
Subject matter can affect it. A photo of a store shelf full of Marvel Legends can get more likes/comments than a nice photo of an anime import.

>>6197583
This is true. People usually like things they know, like a shitty picture or iron man will get more attention than a cool picture of a lesser known character.

But unless it's your job, try not to think about it. When it comes to photography (and creative stuff in general), taste is very subjective. Sure there are guidelines you can follow, but at the end of the day, people like what they like.

File: 2015-06-08 01.34.48.jpg (421KB, 1778x1000px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 1778x1000px

>>6197573
>Not trying to sound like a Like-whore here, but my personal favourites get less likes and comments
Ditto. I think most people find stuff searching tags of stuff they're already into, so my marvel and star wars shots usually end up being more popular than something of bruce lee, for instance. It pretty much comes down to people liking stuff other than what I do, and being ok with that is a pretty important life skill.

File: ABFABFBE-82F6-4911-A120-525BE9FDB77A.jpg (2MB, 3778x2528px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3778x2528px

>>6197573

As far as Instagram likes go it really depends on what hastags you're using and how popular the character you're shooting is

>>6197573
I posted a photo last week, it didn't get many likes.
I deleted it, then posted the same photo with a new caption and it got double the amount of likes it originally had within minutes.

Instagram is a very fickle place

File: IMG_3803.jpg (254KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 1200x1200px

I posted this in the old thread but I made my necromancer skeleton an arcane focus.

File: IMG_3807.jpg (317KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1920x1080px

>>6198237

File: IMG_3811.jpg (350KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 1920x1080px

>>6198242

File: IMG_3842.jpg (271KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 1200x1200px

>>6198246

File: IMG_3878.jpg (454KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

454KB, 1920x1080px

>>6198252
The two I made, one has a small piece of amethyst and the other I used a small piece of quartz crystal.

File: IMG_8883.jpg (3MB, 3872x2592px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3872x2592px

>>6197925

Time of day has a lot to do with it too. Mid morning seems to work the best

>>6198575
Time is relative to where you live, obviously. So you had to find out where the majority of your followers come from, and post depending on that schedule.

Personally, i think it works best to post during evenings though. People tend to check instagram before going to bed or after work, rather than in the morning where they have to get ready for the day.

File: IMG_20161228_202127_719.jpg (3MB, 4592x3056px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4592x3056px

>>6197925
>>6197853
>>6197645

youre right. Just realized that my most liked photos are Zelda related. Its the majority of Zelda Nerds i guess, rather than people actually interested in toyphotography. Likes on Instagram don't seem to be a good indicator for quality then.

Pic related is my most liked photo by far, and personally speaking, i don't think its that good.

I also think that cute photos tend to get more likes than funny, creepy or "cool" ones.

File: DSCF2530.jpg (3MB, 3072x2304px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3072x2304px

>>6197252
INDEED!

>>6194835
lol

File: 324D105B-524A-42A0-ACD2-047A9037FD32.jpg (524KB, 1158x1733px) Image search: [Google]

524KB, 1158x1733px

>>6199099

True, I've just found that if I post in the mid morning i end up accruing likes throughout the day and end up with a decent amount by the end of the day and they'll keep trickling in regularly for about three days

>>6199102

Yeah, I've found that the most likes comes from posting Link or Power Rangers

>>6197573
This.

Whenever I post a pic I'm really proud of and took a long time on I get shit for likes. Whenever I half ass a pic/think it's not very good it blows up.

File: 20160421_074550.jpg (2MB, 2988x5312px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2988x5312px

Don't talk to her or her daughter again

File: IMG_8880.jpg (2MB, 3164x2118px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3164x2118px

>>6199448

Use all 30 of your allotted hashtags and then just browse around liking people's shit for attention.

File: 20170220_033314.jpg (2MB, 4032x2268px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x2268px

these are awesome

File: DSC02061.jpg (205KB, 907x1157px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 907x1157px

>I'm not a robot

File: DSC02079.jpg (306KB, 1327x907px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1327x907px

>>6200148

>>6200150
>Eva AT field

nice

>>6200150
First thing I thought when I saw the thumbnail was the looney-tunes theme.

File: DSC02004.jpg (224KB, 907x1153px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 907x1153px

>>6200161
>get in the robot, peter

File: IMG_20170219_183142_321.jpg (2MB, 3098x2304px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3098x2304px

Had a nice day outside, got to take this. I am surprised that the stormtrooper fit on the horse lol

File: P1200617.jpg (510KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 1600x1200px

WATCH IT, STARRY.

File: Falconry.jpg (570KB, 2358x1579px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 2358x1579px

>>6200220

I wish I didn't miss out on Brego, I'm all about horses. Can you tell?

File: 20161114_155142.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

I wish I had a better background for this picture.

>>6200573
God Not-Victory Leo looks fucking fantastic when strapped on to Star Saber.

It's a shame the stand alone bot is riddled with issues and that the actual integration with Star Saber was poorly done.

>>6200591
I actually like that not-Victory Leo in his robot mode. Looked pretty nice to me.

>>6200323
>Brego
>>6200323

nice shot! yeah I got lucky with that, I got Brego, ringwraith horse and a warg pretty cheap and finally got to take some pics lol

File: lotr_nazgul.jpg (46KB, 720x302px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 720x302px

>>6200656

This is really cool, very minimalistic yet industrial--- very cool. Reminds me of these old VW ads where they'd have the car in pieces neatly laid out.

>>6200695

One of my grail shots is Arwen running from the Nazgul. I even have the perfect place to shoot at.

File: IMG_20161014_121845.jpg (143KB, 2048x1362px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 2048x1362px

I wonder what his eggs smell like, Haha!

>>6200617
He looks fantastic, but the chrome paint scratches easy, the flaps that cover the holes his hands rotate into are super loose and everything is super tight when you open him. You literally have to loosen a couple screws in his lower legs so that they will actually slide properly without excessive force.

Aesthetically he's great but QC wise he's a mess.

>>6199335
Good shit.

File: IMG_3533.jpg (262KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 960x960px

I probably should've bent his torso downward a bit, but I had put my light box away by the time I realized I could've done better.

I just have to accept that I'm not good at this. I use my smartphone, so I'm already using lesser equipment, but I don't know. Something about my shots seem so unimpressive, especially when compared to those of others. I want to say it's my composition and posing.

>>6201368
Its pretty much down to posing, with limited equipment thats where your posing has to pull through for you.

File: IMG_20161221_192858_089.jpg (2MB, 4592x3056px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4592x3056px

>>6201360
Thank you.

>>6201373
I figured as much. Thank you, anon. I'm going to work on improving that.

>>6191406
We need more Lupin!

>>6200573

Shoot with the background in frame but further away from your subjects and make the background as smooth as possible.

Or you can just use poster board

>>6201368
The quality of the image looks perfectly okay. Maybe try and experiment with angles, some low and high angles as opposed to shooting straight on.

File: IMG_20170117_194707_894.jpg (2MB, 4592x3056px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4592x3056px

To the likes and topic thing: pic related has to be one of my personal favourites of my photos, but the response was pretty.. quiet.

People tend to like cutesy and happy photos more than gruesome ones that make them feel uncomfortable i guess.

Either that or the thumbnail is boring because most of the photo is held in few shades of red.

>>6201676

It's the thumbnail, it looks monochromatic in a muddy way.

It's a damn good picture, I like your Metal Gear stuff but I've found that Instagram is a game of thumbnails

File: a holy-shit-RUN!.jpg (718KB, 1000x725px) Image search: [Google]

718KB, 1000x725px

>>6201469

File: missed-it-by-THAT-much.jpg (728KB, 1000x975px) Image search: [Google]

728KB, 1000x975px

>>6201469

File: l and j in the spotlight.jpg (538KB, 950x690px) Image search: [Google]

538KB, 950x690px

>>6201469

File: standoff.jpg (681KB, 1000x751px) Image search: [Google]

681KB, 1000x751px

>>6201469

File: FT015 LFF.jpg (649KB, 950x1263px) Image search: [Google]

649KB, 950x1263px

>>6201469

File: FT005 JUF.jpg (548KB, 891x696px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 891x696px

>>6201469

File: 2--lupins-for-the-price-of-1.jpg (483KB, 921x653px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 921x653px

>>6201469

File: lupin-grabs-the-loot.jpg (645KB, 950x1135px) Image search: [Google]

645KB, 950x1135px

>>6201469

File: Lupin's reward.jpg (638KB, 950x711px) Image search: [Google]

638KB, 950x711px

>>6201469

>>6201922
We need less Lupin!

File: holy-shit-RUN!-2.jpg (631KB, 1000x769px) Image search: [Google]

631KB, 1000x769px

>>6201883
Alternate take.

File: amazon-noms-kyubey.jpg (539KB, 950x713px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 950x713px

>>6201923
Have a pic of Amazon chowing down on Kyubey

File: IMG_3915.jpg (486KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 1600x1200px

>>6202582

File: D4F5C883-3122-4F6C-ADB2-C39583398AF0.jpg (941KB, 2168x1451px) Image search: [Google]

941KB, 2168x1451px

I don't know what's up with this pose but it was in the manga so here it is

>>6199940
where do you get those stikers? look nice

>>6200211
cool

File: hover hand.png (160KB, 353x424px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 353x424px

>>6202943
pls fix

>>6202582
Is this the new Jurassic World movie?

File: DSC_0199.jpg (3MB, 3008x2000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3008x2000px

Taken yesterday before the snow all melts

File: I've lost control of my life.jpg (621KB, 1143x892px) Image search: [Google]

621KB, 1143x892px

>>6202946
>>6202946
>take 68 different versions of a shitty throwaway joke
>light and dark versions
>three poses
>small detail is off

Every fucking time. But no.

File: DSC_0162.jpg (2MB, 3008x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3008x2000px

>>6202957
More Donnie

File: DSC_0180.jpg (2MB, 3008x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3008x2000px

>>6202982

File: IMG_20170222_152438_591.jpg (3MB, 4592x3056px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4592x3056px

>>6203461
Great shot!

File: P_20170107_151036.jpg (1MB, 1836x3264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1836x3264px

Posting

File: 1192017125221.jpg (236KB, 670x800px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 670x800px

Tried using my monitor as a backdrop.

>>6203495
Clever.

File: HipstamaticPhoto-509431015.155328.jpg (1MB, 1686x2518px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1686x2518px

Filtered to hell and back

File: DSC_2832as.jpg (813KB, 1500x997px) Image search: [Google]

813KB, 1500x997px

closeup of my custom painted Deadpool.

File: DSC_2801as.jpg (1012KB, 1500x997px) Image search: [Google]

1012KB, 1500x997px

>>6203786

File: DSC_2839as.jpg (1MB, 1500x997px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x997px

>>6203789

File: DSC_2860as.jpg (945KB, 1500x997px) Image search: [Google]

945KB, 1500x997px

>>6203792

File: DSC_2827as.jpg (753KB, 1500x997px) Image search: [Google]

753KB, 1500x997px

>>6203794

File: IMG_20170222_185441_623.jpg (4MB, 4592x3056px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4592x3056px

Felt like the original shot was too dark.
Lost the night vibe but got a more Fallout Esque colorscheme in return.

File: Bond_-_Sean_Connery_-_Profile.jpg (245KB, 688x800px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 688x800px

>>6203808

File: IMG_7332.jpg (1MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4032x3024px

Had to borrow a friends iPhone 7 for this

File: DSC_0147[1].jpg (552KB, 1620x1080px) Image search: [Google]

552KB, 1620x1080px

Loosner.

File: DSC_0143[1].jpg (373KB, 1620x1080px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 1620x1080px

She catches you looking at her, she blushes with a giggle.

File: DSC_0098_2[1].jpg (502KB, 1620x1080px) Image search: [Google]

502KB, 1620x1080px

This is Kyogre, lord of the seas.

>>6203972
>>6203988
I was actually looking forward to taking some snow pictures, and then we got a 70 degree february in chicago of all places. I really like these two though.

File: RPS-Champion-b.jpg (361KB, 850x631px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 850x631px

Anybody want to take on the Rock/Paper/Scissors champ?

>>6203994
>Cock, Wiener, Sausage!

>>6203492
goooooooooooooooooooodbye jojo

>>6203993

Ditto.
High temps in Toronto - Well at least ill Sunday supposedly.

File: Idiots.jpg (354KB, 1024x684px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 1024x684px

>>6196051
Being a terrible person is the one thing I'm good at.

>>6203808

This guy looks like nobody came to his birthday party

>>6203972
>>6203985
Congratulations, your photos are amazing

>>6203993
It suppose to show this Friday anon

>>6198237
>>6198242
>>6198246
>>6198252
>>6198255
Do you have a template for the robe?

>>6194835
Wonderful. Genuinely stealing this for future use.

File: Diver.jpg (3MB, 4592x3056px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4592x3056px

I love this opening so god damn much

>>6205863

Way too dark

>>6206027
i agree, i wouldn't even say that its a good photo desu.

>>6205863
>can't see shit, cap'n
>3.32 MB

Try again

File: 2017-02-23 20.03.32.jpg (203KB, 1632x918px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1632x918px

>>6206542

File: 2017-02-23 20.23.40.jpg (414KB, 1043x2947px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 1043x2947px

>>6206546

>>6206542
>>6206546
>>6206550
I don't think I've mentioned it before, but I love your pictures. You always have the best poses.

File: 20161114_155234.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>6201651
Funny thing is that I just took that picture from my couch with a red blanket over it.

As seen on this picture from the side, they are already taking so much space also if you know how big that MP-Not Victory Saber is you would understand why I had to take the picture that way.

>>6207078

It looks like you're using a cellphone so I'd stick with either outdoor shots, posterboard or another solid color background, like a wall without texture or something

You could also invest in a DSLR, the background on these were my couch

>>6197853
>>6198575
>>6199416

File: IMG_20170224_152748_processed.jpg (147KB, 1608x1080px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1608x1080px

Is this still too dark? The inspiration is very dark, so its really hard to find the right balance

File: maxresdefault.jpg (32KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 1920x1080px

this is the inspiration btw

>>6207330
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ty9krqlTZN8

>>6207330
I'd love to do this shot with practical effects instead of poor photoshop fuckery. But i don't know how

File: Screen Shot 2017-02-24 at 9.17.51 AM.png (1MB, 1117x621px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1117x621px

>>6207330

>Is this still too dark?

Yes it is. If you can't tell whats happening in the thumbnail then its too dark.

>practical effects instead of poor photoshop fuckery

Cool, just don't go down the slippery ACBA slope where you start taking mediocre to bad pictures just because they have some aversion to editing.

I promise you, NO photographer worth anything thinks this way--- post is and always has been part of the process. It's like saying "I'm going to carve something out of wood but without sanding or finishing it" They also tend to miss their white balance A LOT.

I recommend using your cell phone flashlight or a bright ass LCD flashlight a couple of feet away in a pitch black room and set the camera to a low exposure setting.

Set your camera up on a tripod or a sturdy base, manually focus it and turn off the autofocus, and set to time or use remote.

Pic related is an early experiment in the technique but you get the gist.

>>6207057
That statue have luck

>>6186543

Canon PowerShot SX150 IS that my father lend me after he buyed a new camera.

Its decent in outdoors but no matter what configurations I put, I cant get average pictures (they always look noisy for me).

Any recomendations? (I will post a picture for referente later, batteries charging up).

>>6208344

*cant get averahe pictures indoors (they always look noisy and grainy to me)

File: IMG_4009.jpg (377KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 1600x1200px

>>6208344
Have good lighting. Having good lightin can make a world of difference.

>>6201883
Love this one anon

>>6207286
That pussy peek...

>>6203993
>>6205664
Thanks my dudes.

>>6203939
what playset is that?