Was looking to purchase this. Is it any good?
>>6044426
depends. is that shit still avileable? i recall there was some quality problems with specific stikfas sets, but dunno which ones
>>6044461
was going to say the same thing about the quality change. they've made this set a few times in different colors, not sure which ones are better.
>>6044426
The dragon is super cool, but the torso/pelvic joint can give you some trouble with how loose it is. Just refrain from having pretty much any rearing photos and it won't be too much of a hassle.
Beta frame is a q.t. you pretty much can't go wrong with her.
>>6044426
Didn't hasbro drop their cooperation with Stikfas because the owner of Stikfas diddled a kid? Regardless... try and find the early version of it. Stikfas kits became shit for most later reissues
>>6044789
>because the owner of Stikfas diddled a kid?
That happened years after Stikfas died. Nothing to do with Hasbro dropping stikfas.
>>6044789
how do you diddle a kid?
you take his money and run away instead of giving him the toy?
Seem kind of pointless and weird
Stikfas plastic will warp and or crumble within a few years of being opened. Great to mess with, but relatively short shelf life. I suppose its possible to extend the life of them by disassembling every piece after each use.
>>6044461
One quality problem figure is the phantom figure (glow in the dark figure specifically, can't say of the other one), I've had at least 1/4 of the pieces break on me in one week while other figure feel like they can last the apocalypse
>>6044426
Stikfas are pretty shitty. Breakage right out of the box is a real issue.
>>6049704
it actually depends on the year you bought them. Most of the middle Hasbro waves were great without any problems. Early Hasbro waves are half and half.
When they moved away from Hasbro, the quality was awful and it took them almost two years to start using better plastics.