PAK Marcus Fenix

File: Square_Enix-Play-Arts-Kai-Gears-of-War-3-Marcus-Fenix-action-figure-standing_figure_walking-pose.jpg (110KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 900x900px

>>5966148
Lookin good lookin good.

File: Square_Enix-Play-Arts-Kai-Gears-of-War-3-Marcus-Fenix-action-figure-standing_figure_side-view-pose.jpg (101KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 900x900px

>>5966149
Here's the one thing I have to criticize. Well, aside from the price I mean. He looks way skinny from the side, mainly in the waist. I assume this affords him a better ab crunch (we've seen similar things happen on other figures in the past), but man, it looks bad.

I guess I'd always be displayin him from the front. If I were buying him. Which I'm not. But still, it's interesting to see PAK seems to be digging itself out of that deep, dark hole it sank itself into.

File: thats a paddlin.jpg (12KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 480x360px

>>5966148
>anything PAK related on /toy/

>>5966153
>it's interesting to see PAK seems to be digging itself out of that deep, dark hole it sank itself into

Let's wait for the product in-hand and not dimly-lit, heavily-photoshopped promotional bullshots before making that call.

>>5966962
this
if you look at all of PAKs promo pics, it's always shot in the dark

>>5966962
>>5967001
I actually sort of came to understand why they do this. For all their other failings, PAK sculpts are really very finely detailed, and back/sidelighting them like this picks out all those details and makes them shine, as well as giving the photo some nice drama. Honestly, I like these shots of Marcus a lot--its just that they're more suited to someone's toy photography Flickr or something. As descriptive shots of a product you're trying to decide on purchasing, they're kind of terrible.