itt: fashion doll thread

File: tumblr_o4yhy2nDRZ1tp9tvoo5_1280.jpg (192KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1000x1000px

White Queen

File: tumblr_o4yhy2nDRZ1tp9tvoo1_1280.jpg (255KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 1000x1000px

fucking horrifying Mad Hatter

File: tumblr_o4yhy2nDRZ1tp9tvoo4_1280.jpg (279KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1000x1000px

Time

File: tumblr_o4yhy2nDRZ1tp9tvoo3_1280.jpg (325KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 1000x1000px

Alice

>>5585021
>microcephalic QoH

Ew...

>>5585030
>>5585026
>>5585024
>>5585022
>>5585021
Yuck.
Mad hatter is the only have decent one, all those fucking jawlines christ.

>>5585065
all of Disney Store's live action dolls have weird, square bulimic jawlines. No idea why.

>>5585030
Her face is literally the same face as Live Action Cinderella.

I hate how the live action dolls look like they are suffering from the mumps.

>>5585146
Aren't you a little old to be playing with toys Mr. Hansen?

File: 1458779136023.jpg (23KB, 211x226px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 211x226px

>>5585146
Why don't you take a seat right over there

File: oh shi-.jpg (55KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 500x333px

>>5585146
OH SHI-

>>5585146
Thread's over now.

>>5585146
You are a hero Chris

>>5585026
>filthy jew.
>>5585024
>I've seen some shit: the doll
These dolls are terrible, I can't believe they sold out in just a couple hours.

File: katniss.jpg (81KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1000x1000px

Only doll I own.

File: la-et-ct-chris-hansen-predator-crowdfunding-20-003.jpg (17KB, 650x366px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 650x366px

>>5585146

HAVE A SEAT

well this fell apart...

>>5585203
To be fair, they had a buy one get one half off sale, so they sold more than normal. That and Alice in Wonderland has an enormous fanbase

>>5585146
This is magical.

File: tumblr_o2gl2iRJxY1s1jrywo1_500.jpg (75KB, 500x337px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 500x337px

the next wave of Descendants dolls, Neon Light Ball

>>5585203
>These dolls are terrible, I can't believe they sold out in just a couple hours.

I think it's more likely that Disney realized they put the dolls up while a BOGO 50% off sale was going on and yanked them once they realized the mistake. They'll be restocked on Monday and in stores that day too.

>>5585688
Is the blonde Alice's daughter?

File: cb447c040e21333f41f18d78e14f1889.jpg (36KB, 736x736px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 736x736px

>>5586030
Not sure. This is the basic doll for Alice's daughter, face doesn't really seem similar. I wonder if it's supposed to be Sleeping Beauty's daughter? But the character and all the other dolls have had darker skin and brown hair, so....

File: 24615454589_54f305e02b_k.jpg (960KB, 2048x1382px) Image search: [Google]

960KB, 2048x1382px

>>5586030
bigger picture. According to someone on Flickr it is supposed to be Ally. But she has Audrey's color scheme for her clothes?

>>5586062
She seems cute. Is she a Disney Store exclusive?

>>5586062
The face seems really similar to me. Same mold, same eyes, and the neon doll has white rabbit earrings and the seemingly trademark stripe tights.

>>5585688
blondie and gal 2nd from the right is want. The rest look weird.

I really need to stop being a pussy and just buy these dolls. I do like them a lot.

>>5586067
okay but Audrey isn't Blonde.

>>5587071
I know.

>>5586062
>I wonder if it's supposed to be Sleeping Beauty's daughter? But the character and all the other dolls have had darker skin and brown hair, so....

File: tumblr_o52ehh6H5y1tp9tvoo4_400.jpg (47KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 400x400px

Jakk's Pacific dolls in their boxes.

File: tumblr_o52ehh6H5y1tp9tvoo3_400.jpg (46KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 400x400px

>>5589126

File: tumblr_o52ehh6H5y1tp9tvoo1_400.jpg (39KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 400x400px

>>5589128

File: tumblr_o52ehh6H5y1tp9tvoo2_400.jpg (34KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 400x400px

>>5589129

I thought the Disney Store dolls were supposed to be restocked today? I don't see them on there. I hope these don't become a pain in the ass to get... none of the other Film Collection dolls (except the Tomorrowland and Tonto dolls which were only in stores a brief second) were this hard to get.

File: image.jpg (35KB, 450x600px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 450x600px

Tonner Dolls, how are they?

>>5589245
Depends on the doll. I think their quality has gone down in recent years, though many of the older dolls are quite nice.

File: Barbie-The-Look-2016b[1].jpg (36KB, 450x556px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 450x556px

Pre view from a new The Look series.

I'm happy to finally see some "budget" doll that is a bit about the fashion, not just some already known character sold as merchandising.

File: oscar-de-la-renta-barbie-2016b[1].png (300KB, 534x729px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 534x729px

2016 Oscar de La Rente Barbie.

Too much branding for an unremarkable doll, dress, or product as a whole.

File: Barbie-Collector-Audrey-Hepburn-Roman-Holiday-Doll.jpg (56KB, 538x1024px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 538x1024px

Thinking of grabbing an Audrey.

Just can't decide on which one.

File: hocus-pocus.jpg (55KB, 586x463px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 586x463px

>>5585021

I picked up the Red Queen as shes the only one thats worth a darn in this line along with the new Animator Alice doll.

Also with that heart shaped red hair , puckered up lips and dress she reminds me of Winnie from Hocus Pocus

>>5585030
>Alice
You mean Cross dressing transgender Alice right?

>>5585146

Yeah, even the woman who work at my local Disney Store told me they hatted her which is kinda wired since they are supposed to be up beat and pretend to love all of their Disney merch. All four of them told me they hatted her because she was dressed like a man. The girl working the cashier pointed at the Animator Alice in the blue dress and said "this is what I think of when I think Alice. I don't know why they dressed her like a guy"

File: SPX-001595.jpg (70KB, 414x600px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 414x600px

>>5585026
Why does Hollywood insist on jamming this man who's known mostly for playing a very lewd character named Borat in so many films intended for children.

File: aladdin-disneyscreencaps_com-8273a.jpg (453KB, 999x848px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 999x848px

>>5585166
>hero
So on April 1st the word faggot was temporarily replaced with the word hero? Good to know.

>>5585218
>The only doll he owns is a representation of a woman who's acting abilities are equal to a B-list made for tv movie of the week actress who slept her way to the top *Harvey Weinstein* cough...

She also proved to be way un-cool when she got her million dollar an hour lawyers to try to get this very site taken down a year ago which caused the former owner of this site to spend a shit load of his money to keep the site up so that you could make a post celebrating the fact that shes the only doll you own a year later.

>>5585517
>Alice in Wonderland has an enormous fanbase
I never understood this. Sure the idea of Alice in wonderland directed by Tim Burton sounds like am emo Hot Topic shoppers wet dream but was the film itself all that great?

File: x354-q80.jpg (35KB, 288x282px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 288x282px

>>5585688
Literally who ?? The toy line. They should carry around a small locket or photo showing which Disney character they are supposed to be the children of.

With that said if this line ever gets to the point were they are desperate enough for new characters to make dolls of that they create a Decendant doll based on Olaf from Frozen I'll be laughing my ass off for a week.

File: hqdefault.jpg (60KB, 685x480px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 685x480px

>>5586030
>Alice's daughter
Wait, someone had sex with Alice ? It was the Mad Hatter wasn't it.

File: 55a07b95c5b1097bc2f476d7dd82b12d (1).jpg (35KB, 560x200px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 560x200px

>>5589128
At least they seem to have captured Johnny Depp's face better than the Disney Stores horrifying version. >>5585024

File: image.png (321KB, 730x546px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 730x546px

>>5590613
Olaf having a kid I could believe. Just make a snowball from his groin and roll it downhill a bit.

Even still I wouldn't count a descendant of Olaf as desperate. Now, a Descendants daughter of Chernabog is what I'd call desparate since he's immortal, just slumbers 364 days of the year to only wake up during the Wulpergis and was never really 'defeated', plus even without his powers he's still massive and would have dethroned Maleficent long ago as ruler of the isle. But if they do make a kid of Chernabog, I will buy that, and I don't even collect dolls.

>>5589133
I can't speak for every Disney Store or the Online version of the store but my local Disney store has a full wall full of the new Alice dolls. The only one that seems to be selling the most was the Red Queen. Her section was missing a few. Every other character was fully stocked with at least 5 to 6 dolls per character. They were also on sale.

>>5590578
Because despite everything, he's a very good actor (see Sweeney Todd, Les Mis.) The fact that he enjoys gross out humor is incidental.

File: tumblr_o4yjsgnyl61tp9tvoo1_1280.jpg (297KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1000x1000px

>>5590556
I'm surprised Disney didn't make these trio a super limited edition for D23, like they did for Leia? Maybe I shouldn't give them ideas...

>>5589875
The Look series is great. It's what Fashionista used to be several years ago. I want the hippie one for sure.

I went to my local Disney Store, they had all the Alice dolls in stock. Every single doll had a damaged box though. I decided to get the least damaged White Queen and Queen of Hearts at the store, since if I ordered them online I'd risk having the box totally crushed and then have to do the runaround with their customer service again. I'm debating getting Alice... what I don't like is how undefined her eyes are in person. Her outfit, like all the Film Collection dolls, is great--but her eyes are washed out. Also I don't know why people think it's the same face as Cinderella? Put them side by side and the only resemblance is "well they're both blonde and have the same jaws" but 99% of the Film Collection dolls have that odd jaw.

File: image.jpg (122KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1280x720px

Anyone know if these things from Disney are any good?

>>5590266
Her dress looks like the usual granny shit you get from talentless etsy artists who can't sew, but still want to sell clothes. Can't believe this is an official release.

File: image.jpg (61KB, 467x700px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 467x700px

Popovy sisters

File: 68a95046419d1834acbf8f78375bdc55.jpg (73KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 640x960px

>>5591039
>>5591039
They're cute? If you like them you like them.

>>5590604
And yet, she is still my waifu.

Go figure. :^)

>>5589245
Older dolls, clothing quality is excellent and the faces are usually well painted, though definitely in their own style. Not sure about new ones. Some of the more unusually colored dolls have odd feeling plastic (I own an older Harley Quinn that is pure white plastic and it feels kind of cheap) but it isn't like its floppy or shiny or anything.

>>5590574
Which is funny because the clothes are based off actual women's clothing from the period, just definitely not the mainstream stuff. Dress reformers were roughly the Victorian equivalent of bra burning feminists.

>>5590578
He's been in less R rated movies than Johnny Depp, I believe. Plus I can think of several actors known for extremely raunchy or deeply disturbing R rated content that are beloved family-movie actors as well. It doesn't fucking matter, because they're putting Sacha Baron Cohen in the movie not goddamn Borat.

>>5590605
I think 'enormous fanbase' translates here to 'lots of merch being bought'. Which I understand. The merch usually focuses on only one element, like a Chesire Cat shaped purse. The individual imagery in the movie is actually great, but it looks terribly cluttered put together and doesn't work well. Half the characters were odd proportioned, half weren't, some of the animals were humanized some weren't, it was a mess. But as a one on one thing? It looks great.

>>5590638
is that Brianna Garcia art? Haven't seen that nonsense since 2006 or so. Does she still go to Disney obsessively to draw ship art?

Does anyone here collect Integrity Toys? I went to a doll meet last month and handled a few but they all felt really lightweight and floppy. Why do people shell out so much for them?

File: 1334727436153.gif (858KB, 240x228px) Image search: [Google]

858KB, 240x228px

>>5590605
>but was the film itself all that great?

Nigga that film was awful, what are you talking about? The art direction alone was enough to trigger anyone's threshold for the uncanny valley.

Any one excited about the Disney limited edition Alice dolls?

>>5595477
Sort of. But I really hate the new trend of the $700 LE dolls, which are not higher in quality than the $130 LE dolls but for some reason cost 5x as much.

File: tumblr_o5c18xfmAl1uvye5jo3_1280.jpg (600KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

600KB, 1280x1280px

good god this doll is horrifying

File: Captureff.jpg (16KB, 314x171px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 314x171px

>>5597267
It truly is. I would say something funny like "it looks like it wants to steal your soul" but it actually looks more like he wants to steal your unborn child's soul.

>>5595477
What do they look like. Are there any photos out yet? Is Alice dressed like Alice or is she dressed like a man with baggy Aladdin pants ?

>>5597267
>>5597384

Zoolander?

>>5597391
No photos yet.

According to this one Disney doll blog which is almost always accurate on these things, the LE dolls will be

Regular LE Alice ($129.99) will be in that purple/orange outfit from the trailers
Regular LE Red Queen ($129.99) will be in an outfit from the new movie, sort of armor-like
Platinum LE Alice (???buttfuckingexpensive???) will be in the same outfit as the regular Film Collection doll
and a Mad hatter LE that is being called platinum--maybe Alice & Hatter will be a set.

I hope we get a film collection box set like we did with Cinderella, I'd like to see Alice in her dress from the first film and the White Queen in her lavender number.

File: 8785178_alice-through-the-looking-glass-producer_df2b330d_m.jpg (82KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 640x480px

>>5597428
this will be the regular LE Alice outfit

>>5597434
What even is that

File: dfe05f80007f0c6ac2572e60e83af02a.jpg (138KB, 736x1104px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 736x1104px

>>5597526
It's supposed to be inspired by Orientalist fashions in that era. I vaguely remember something in the first film about her being involved in a trading company in the end? So maybe inspired by them going to China or something.

>>5590810
that's a damn lie. He's terrible in literally everything.
> See Borat, Sweeney Todd, Les mis etc. etc.

>>5591130
>>5591039
They're cute but they feel 'too' childish for my tastes. Very bobble-headed.

>>5591654
Yes it is and yes she does.

File: 26219894492_98718bf0a9[1].jpg (49KB, 500x480px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 500x480px

>>5589875
Apparently, this is her face.

Does anyone knows wich face mold is this?

I'm actually getting hyped for this one...

File: hakone8.jpg (51KB, 380x558px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 380x558px

>>5597545
They're a little off with what Orientalism tended to look like... this is the closest example I can find to that outfit, most of the rest are women wearing kimonos that have been tied tightly with thin sashes instead of obis so the women retain the corseted waspie look. Even these two have merged it into a more Western look and I wouldn't doubt that they'd have them tailored more and split in back to accommodate bustles. Even as a girl that has demonstrated that she doesn't want to follow fashion and society norms, she ought to still be wearing something less babys-first-deviantart-OC level.

>>5597267
I fucking love these eyebrows, they're just so comical.

>>5590578
I loved him in Hugo

File: 63a7b25d3f403213912d9a8fff7b693a.jpg (12KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 236x236px

>>5599732
Looks like the Lea/Neko face mold.

>>5597434
She has such a manly face..

File: a86c7260-6639-0133-8ff6-0e17bac22e39.png (386KB, 670x358px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 670x358px

>>5600202
to be fair, it's not like they tried to make her costume from the first film super historically accurate, even taking into consideration her character's personality/behavior. But I think this outfit may be a Wonderland invention, anyway. I guess we'll have to wait for the film to come out to see.

File: tumblr_nxx2rmBpl21tiru7zo1_500.jpg (95KB, 500x353px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 500x353px

>>5600806
I bought this China girl doll but only because I wanted her possible light skinned body for another doll.

I still find it laugh out loud funny that I had to buy the Chinese doll to get the doll with the lighter skin color. They tan the living crap out of barbie dolls these days. To the point where even the ethnic dolls have a more fair skin color than the actual "white" girl doll.

>>5601333
She's Japanese but yes you are right. British Barbie would be the same colour as the Asian so calling Barbie the standard white skin tone is incorrect.

>>5601333
>>5601352
Could be that they're still stuck on representing the ideal of beauty for each culture. Super pale skin is def preferred in Japan (as the entire shelf of skin bleachers at the local import grocery place here tells me anyway), where tanning is still a huge thing for white girls and is even considered the way to look healthy.

File: 2015_Barbie_Fashionistas_New_Faces_New_Friends_New_Styles_Doll_Dolls_01[1].png (3MB, 1343x734px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1343x734px

>>5600806
Lovely.

I still obsess a bit over this 2015 prototype Lea/Leko that Mattel haven't released.

>>5602508
>I still obsess a bit over this 2015 prototype Lea/Leko that Mattel haven't released.
what the fuck its been out since late last year
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-Barbie-Fashionista-Kitty-Dress-Doll-Cat-Shirt-Toy-/121834697414

>>5602888
That's not the prototype doll.

File: 12962637_10153973484160498_1065586976_o.jpg (273KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1536x2048px

I snapped this pic at the Disney Store because I was pretty impressed with the face on the QoH but I don't buy Alice because I stopped shopping Hot Topics when I was 14.

File: 12980573_10153967016600498_300539420_n.jpg (94KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 720x960px

I bought this girl in Disneyland last week. Someone suggested putting her on a Made to Move body which seems really cool, but I haven't opened her yet. She looks nice in the box.

>>5602982
Ur so kewl

>>5602919
Just get Glam Night Lea, and put her in a ponytail.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Barbie-Style-2015-Glam-Night-Lea-Asian-Doll-Flat-Feet-Articulate-Nude-for-OOAK-/191777471820

>>5601625
>as the entire shelf of skin bleachers at the local import grocery place here tells me anyway

Anon you don't need just ancedotal evidence to say that being pale is preferred in Japan. The concept of bihaku is all very very real in Japan and in a lot of Asian countries.

File: nagel4.jpg (2MB, 1966x2856px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1966x2856px

Speaking of bleached white beauties...

Has there ever been a doll based on the works of Patrick Nagel?

You'd think that there would be a collector's edition Barbie or Tonner doll based on the fashion art icon of the 80's, but no. I've looked all over Google and there isn't anything. Just a vinyl statuette released by Super Rad Toys back in 2008.

It seems weird that the Nagel Girl never got a doll, either back in the 80's or during the "I Love the Eighties" craze back in the early aughts.

>>5603573
Sadly I don't think Moonbeam City will get any merch.

Has anyone found any of the Jakk's Pacific Alice dolls in stores yet?

File: 12724963_1762793047289864_2059807008_n[1].jpg (107KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 750x750px

Pictures of rumored new Silkstone dolls for 2016.

>>5602984
She's great for Alice customs.

>>5605874
I really hope thats not the final dress on the blonde. It looks worse than what the dollar store knockoffs have.

>>5605980
I'd assume it's just a mock-up. Of course, Mattel isn't always the best quality lately...

>>5606018
>it's just a mock-up

Oh, no. It's terrible, yes. But >>5599732 appears supposedly as >>5589875 face's seemingly photographed by the same person.

Now I'm affraid the final product will not be as pretty already.

File: colapso.gif (1MB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x188px

Her hair is "dry". Ops.

>>5606164
>>5606167
>>5606168
>>5606184
>>5606185
>>5606193
Super fucking creepy.

>>5606164
>>5606167
>>5606168
>>5606184
>>5606185
>>5606193
These are actually quite well animated. They really need a tripod though.

File: disney_dolls_collection_2012_by_jay3jay-d5aqs2v.jpg (167KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 900x600px

How do you display your dolls? I came across this weird display a while ago... who nails dolls to the wall?

>>5606334
Dungeon much...

>>5606334
>basement walls with girl toys nailed.
this is very sad...

>>5606334
It looks like maybe they're balancing on a nail under each arm. Still creepy but at least its not as disturbing as someone driving a nail through their sternums.

File: boo.gif (2MB, 269x202px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 269x202px

>>5606244
Ha, it's like I can't pin point exactly what makes it creepy to you, since there are so many (creepy) potential in doll-stuff, I guess.

>>5606252
I now feel indulged beyond your control. Thank you.

Ah, a tripod would be so good. As for now, I'm considering some double sided tape.

And maybe doing some still illumination...

Just in case, I'm using PhotoScape.

File: tumblr_n8ww1wNTum1twsrako1_1280.jpg (690KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

690KB, 1280x960px

not mine but mine is similar. I can't bring myself to debox dolls when they look nice in the box.

File: nothat.gif (3MB, 454x341px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 454x341px

>No new line of articulated dolls with nice clothes

File: peek.gif (1MB, 384x288px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 384x288px

>tfw all your pretty dolls are kept in storage and you are playing with "the messy one".

File: 13000477_10153983657035498_758454461_o.jpg (226KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 1080x1920px

>>5602984

I opened her up and was checking her out and snapped her neck peg. The body is super, super cheap. 4 POA and the legs were sticky already. This helped me commit to a Made to Move, which I've never had before. Holy shit I love it/her.

>>5606244
>>5606252
>>5607401
>>5607962
>>5607973
>>5607802
>>5607800
I also find them creepy. The animation is good overall but I think the 'life' to their limbs with the deadpan unchanging face does it in. The slight head tilts are cute though.

>>5606334
this looks really creepy.


>>5608063
damn it I need this doll in my country D;

File: barbb.png (132KB, 316x263px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 316x263px

>>5605874
Mattel's silkstone line has been fucking shit since 2012 ever since they started using ugly ass out of scale fabrics, using thick, crusty glitter in the make up and the choice of hairstyles sucked ass too since they were all out of scale, chunky braids or choppy hair.
I was genuinely excited for the poseable Silkstones since they were cutting back on the glitter and stupid ass hair, but the quality control and design choices are so utterly awful. Silkstones used to be considered top tier Mattel quality but now it's just an embarrassment.

Titanic 'Rose' Barbie, relevant today

File: arch508.jpg (96KB, 612x912px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 612x912px

>>5608600
dropped the picture

Mattel, Mattel...

They got one of the most notable Barbie bloggers temporarily banned from Facebook for posting an image of Star Trek dolls--images which are already on online shops selling the dolls, mind you. Why is Mattel so ridiculous about posting images? I've seen people get blogs deleted for reposting stock photos that Mattel themselves posted online.

File: tumblr_o5pbclA37X1tp9tvoo1_1280.jpg (315KB, 1280x918px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 1280x918px

New images of the Jakk's Pacific line. They'll be released May 11th.

File: Alice-in-Wonderlandi.jpg (142KB, 1000x1430px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1000x1430px

>>5602982
I'm not a big fan of this actress or the live action film but I blew my money buying this doll just because the face was so spot on and I don't know it just spoke to me.

>>5606164
>>5606167
>>5606168
>>5606184
>>5606185
>>5606193
Thats cool as fuck. I've always thought about animating my possible dolls but never found the time for it.

>>5607421
While I own a few of those dolls I'm majorly butthurt I don't own some of the dolls in this image.

>>5608063
> The body is super, super cheap
Creap I was thinking about maybe buying this doll. I guess she would only be cool if you kept her in the box.

I've already purchased a Made to Move doll so I could swap her body with a celeb dolls head that came with a majorly disappointing body.

>>5608601
That looks nothing like Kate Winslet's face. More like barbie dressed as Rose from Titanic. Still a very nice doll to own if you're a fan of the film.

>>5610266
I wonder what Mattel would do if those doll images were posted here
Probably nothing at all.

File: Alice-in-Wonderlande.jpg (109KB, 510x619px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 510x619px

>>5611005
Much like the doll of the Red Queen that was released when the first film came out they always seem to miss the mark. When it comes to the Red Queen nothing tops the new Disney Store version.

File: concrete-wall-drilling.jpg (28KB, 386x308px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 386x308px

>>5606334
I've done this with a few doll. My walls aren't made of unpainted bricks tho and I actually tie a string behind the dolls back and I hang them by a hidden string.

I make it look nice by printing out a $10 background poster at walmart that goes with the film the dolls belong to. For example I'll print an image of the castle from the little mermaid/ Atlantica and hang the dolls in front of the background poster.


I lived in a house with concrete cement walls for a year once (it wasn't a basement just an old fashioned house in the country) and you can't just nail stuff to the wall with a hammer. The nail won't go threw. That means that this anon had to buy a drill (like I had to) and he had to drill holes to hang every single doll.

I do this mostly with Disney Store 2 for $20 dolls that cost me no more than $10 per doll. I mostly do it because I don't have a lot of space in my house to display stuff. I have so many great dolls in boxes that never see the light of day. I also have wooden type shelf cases where I display some dolls.

The only thing truly sad about that image is to see a fellow Disney Doll collector living in such a gloomy place. Kinda makes me wish I could help him or her out some how. At least he makes the best of what he has and tries to bring a little cheer into the room.

File: disney_dolls_collection_by_jay3jay-d4976zc.jpg (79KB, 900x449px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 900x449px

>>5607142
>>5607316
>>5607379
>>5608135
Man, it never ceases to amaze me how quick some people are at judging others who they know nothing about.

>>5606334
>>5611138
Drill on bros. Drill on.

>>5611118
Which ones do you want?

>>5611186
There are a so many great doll in that image which I would love to own some day. I missed the opportunity to get King Triton when he was being sold at the disney store a few years back which I regret now but I guess if I had to pick one I'd go with Hercules or Meg since I don't own those characters in doll form.

File: transformers clusterfuck.jpg (448KB, 1024x680px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1024x680px

>>5611168
>not looking down on other collectors who are too poor to afford proper settings to display them or just look tacky as fuck
Sorry, but we want to make you guys better and improve on your situation by laughing and making offensive remarks
Even something like this is better than just hanging your toys loose on a brick/block wall.

>>5611250
> looking down on other collectors who are too poor to afford proper settings to display

>we want to make you guys better and improve on your situation by laughing and making offensive remarks

How is laughing and making offensive remarks at poor people going to make them not poor again ? Ganging up on or making fun of the poor is called cruelty. You get a good laugh at there expense and feel better about yourself which is great for you I guess but why pretend you're doing it to "help" them.

>>5611168
Only 2 of those comments were directed at the owner of that room, the other two were opinions about the method of display. There's a difference anon.

>>5611254
>buying a bunch of toys
>poor
>too poor to buy cheapo $20 furniture
>own power tools
>totally poor
I guess it's wrong to laugh at you for being poor, but you have to admit that collections being nailed to walls are creepy and bad looking.

File: OSCAR_DE_LE_RENTA_BARBIE_DOLL_3-e1460547146557-799x981[1].jpg (67KB, 799x981px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 799x981px

>>5610266
It's papusilemele, for sure.

I always check the site for news. It's proably the most up to date nowadays.

I haven't wrote anything about it, but I'm glad some people are making some "noise".

Mattel completely sucks with customer service. Meaning they have none, and completely shone upon many buyers, including most of the ones that live abroad. As a brand, they only want to relate do some American moms.

I used to tolerate that, since they used to have some nice dolls for affordable prices.

But nowadays they want to add that to dolls like the Oscar de La Renta statue with the most awkward flower bouquet ever for US$175,00.

I have no interest in purchasing high end, borderline luxury, prices to this sloppy, messy, pink, blond, brand.

>>5611455
P.S. A new Star Trek series of dolls is a horrible idea, btw.

>>5611168
The difference is that >>5611138 doesn't just put them against a grungey looking basement wall. He prints out posters and makes it look at least colorful and not awkward and out of place.

>>5585021
I bought a disney descendants doll off of Amazon, but when I got her out of the box her head and right leg were really loose (the head’s almost wobbly)

I’ve never owned any of this line before…is this normal? Or should I call and complain to Hasbro?

>>5611796
No, it's not normal. Post pictures send to Amazon. If they won't send a new one, call Hasbro and they will.

>>5611254
Where do you think you are?

File: look-barbie-doll-2016-b[1].jpg (332KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 720x960px

She ain't a Steffie! They changed it. I'm almost shocked (but it's Mattel), since she looked so appealing before as ginger Steffie.

>>5611007
Lucy Liu?

>>5611005
>>5611007
>>5611011

Jesus, that is some serious man-jaw that Alice is sporting.

File: fashion-royalty-vanessa-dress-code-815511-MLB20561311813_012016-F[1].jpg (99KB, 750x1033px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 750x1033px

>>5613036
I don't think it's the jaw that makes her look possibly "manly".


But anyway, if the doll looks "manly", so does the actress, actually.

>>5611254
If someone can afford all those dolls and collectibles, they aren't poor, sweetheart.

>>5612863
Those fucks! Before she looked like a qt 60s Midge, and now...

>>5611254
>poor

I counted 69 dolls. Many of those are Disney Store Dolls--including dolls which are wearing some of the fashion packs they sold, meaning they would have had to buy extra dolls to fit into the fashion packs. Let's assume they got the 2 for $10 deal on all the Disney Store dolls, and price the Mattel dolls at $10 (even though there are some older Mattel dolls--Meg, for instance--that would have cost more secondhand). That's still almost $700 on dolls alone, and that's a lower estimate since I know some of those dolls came out when there weren't 2 for $10 deals so the total may be closer to $900, to say nothing of all the stuff not visible in the picture.

It might cost $100 to get a cheap sturdy big shelf you could display most of those dolls on. If that. You can find cheap sturdy shelves at thrift stores almost anywhere.

Also, since it wasn't noted in the first picture, that's a little girl's collection. So that's $700-900(+??) spent on toys for a kid. Pretty sure that family could afford a shelf if they wanted, but that's how they chose to display them--it's not some "oh golly we're too poor to do anything else!!" measure but a deliberate choice.

>>5591130
Those inset eyes are incredible. This picture sold me.

>>5613203
They are really pretty in person

>>5613045
No. They make all the live action dolls have the manliest, most mump infested jaws. Lily James and Lana Parilla does not have a manjaw and look at their dolls.

>>5613198
Toys are a necessity, dude.
A child cannot live without having a toy.
Furniture is a luxury product.

.... of course, that isn't a kid's collection, because what sad pathetic kid would keep his toys out of reach and stuck to a wall like that?

>>5614779
A kid whose older sibling has a doll display. It takes a few seconds to stand in a chair and get a doll down if you want to play. My 5 year old niece keeps her Little Kingdom dolls on a display shelf when she doesn't play with them.

>>5607401
turn off your fan if theres one in that room

>>5613766
>Once upon a time dolls
Holy damn I have a burning aching need.

File: image.jpg (31KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x500px

Finally got my hands on a Made to Move Barbie (or rather Endless Moves Barbie here in Europe) and I think I'm in love. Definitely need more of these to rebody my Life in the Dreamhouse dolls.

>>5615497

Wow.... I've never seen those. Are they new?

>>5615295
Do you also have $700?

File: image.jpg (459KB, 1423x1782px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 1423x1782px

>>5615501
They've been out a couple of months now but new for 2016 so yeah they are still pretty new. The articulation is great, they are double jointed at the knees and elbows. I highly recommend picking one up.

>>5615497
>look them up on Amazon
>those fucking prices

No.

>>5615638

>Paying $100 on Amazon.
>Paying $15 at Wal-Mart.

You need to get out of the house, Anon.

>>5615638
She costs £10 here in UK stores and is £11 on Amazon UK.

>>5615659
I am a fat balding neckbear, buying boy toys is bad enough, buying a Barbie? No thank you.

>>5615638
>amazon is the only place to buy something

yikes

>>5615667
If you really care that much about what some Wal-Mart register monkey thinks of you, just ask for a gift receipt. Your secret will be safe.

>>5615667
No one cares what you're buying, seriously.

>>5615667

Hey, I'm a guy too. (Thankfully not balding, not fat, and clean shaven.)

I bought my M2M Babs at Wally-World and nobody gave a flying fuck. Not the other customers, not the granny cashier. Nobody. And that was the only thing I bought. No groceries or sundries to "hide" my purchase. And if you still refuse to grow a pair of balls, there's always the self-checkout line.

And yes, you can get some great lewd poses out of her. The main problem is the indented hip joints really hurt the silhouette lines of the doll.

>>5615684
>>5615683
Several of my cousins work at the nearest Walmart and at least of them is a register monkey, and I'm not driving 2 hours for a doll.

>>5615670
Shiiiiiet, prices are much better on ebay.

>>5615709

>2 hours away from the nearest Wal-Mart.
>Can't even K-Mart, Target, or TRU.

So what backwoods hellhole of a state do live in anon and why do you have working internet?

>INB4 "I live in Alaska/Wyoming/North Dakota.

Hell, I live in the country here in the deep south and I have a Wal-Mart within a 30 min drive in 3 directions near me. And no hick cousins working at any of them.

>>5615746
Eastern Kentucky. Nearest Walmart is 45-1 hour away, but my family would find out and tease me for buying dolls, and the next nearest is probably closer to 1 1/2 hours than 2 hours, but it depends on traffic. Last time I went I got stuck behind somebody moving a mobile home, and before that it was some asshole on a tractor.
Toys-R-Us and Target are even further away.

>>5615809
>kentucky

I'm so sorry

File: bc-glinda.jpg (24KB, 360x500px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 360x500px

I've been after this Madame Alexander 'Wicked' Glinda for years. I always seem to miss the auctions when they occasionally pop up, although it's usually the re-release (which uses the cutesy mold and has less details) that ends up on ebay.

I'm genuinely shocked that whoever owns the merchandising rights for Wicked hasn't made a bigger line of collector dolls outside of the Madame Alexander dolls, which haven't released a new Wicked piece in years. Imagine how much money they'd get selling even $40, Disney Store quality dolls of Glinda and Elphaba at the shows.

>>5616226
Beautiful dress, ugly face.

>>5616228
It's Madame Alexander, we take what we can get.

File: image.jpg (124KB, 937x1500px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 937x1500px

Anyone else collect Licca-chan?

>>5616290
There's been a few i've been tempted to buy but I haven't actually gone through with it yet. Do you collect them?

File: image.jpg (69KB, 499x1127px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 499x1127px

>>5616304
I have this one which was gifted to me in a Secret Santa and I think she's cute and just wondered if anyone here collected them.

File: Kurhn-doll-fashion-doll-apparel-dresses-elegant-fashion-gown-dress-up-doll-accessories-doll-clothes.jpg (87KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 750x750px

Anyone else like Kuhrn dolls? I love the ones they've been coming out with in the past 2 years, the general quality has improved a lot.

>>5616476
Question about Licca: Is her arms rubber with wire? How durable is that?

>>5617138
Yes I would also like to know this. I always wanted to get a Licca-chan doll.

File: 12383181_225850321104269_2084900145_n[1].jpg (20KB, 320x341px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 320x341px

I'm really wishing that in clear pictures she will be as pretty as >>5599732

Anyone else interested in the new Look dolls?

>>5616711
>>5616476
>>5616290
these are cute but at the same time I don't see me buying any.

>>5615585
JFC they're going for $1.6k as a set on ebay.
>My need is not that mighty afterall.
>or is it?

If I had the lucrative income I'd probably do it but 1.6k on plastic dolls is definitely on the lower end of my priorities.

File: 12383247_978653188850466_1818803266_n[1].jpg (49KB, 480x493px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 480x493px

Upcoming separates.

>>5617138
>>5617219
Yeah her arms and legs have wire in them which makes posing easy. She does however have a lot of trouble putting her arms outwards to her side (like a plane) for some reason. The wire still seems pretty stiff on mine but I have read that over time the wire wears out and holding a pose becomes problematic.

>>5617443
I am. I definitely want this one and >>5617444 but I'll be putting her clothes on my Glam Luxe Midge because that style looks better with the retro clothes.

>>5617450
>that plaid shirt

I can dig it.

File: at-first-i-was-like-but-then-i-was-all.jpg (34KB, 448x672px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 448x672px

>>5617443

"She's topless!"
>Click on pic.
"Oh. O-okay."

File: midge.jpg (94KB, 353x640px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 353x640px

>>5617822
>Glam Luxe Midge

Adore this doll. And she has eyelashes and torso arituclation.

Too bad they repeated the face molds so much in the Luxe line, and quickly got it discontinued .

>>5600730
Oh, anon, me too.

>>5604909
Such a shame, but understandable.

>>5615497
>>5615638
Wow, my local store is always fully stocked on these dolls which sell for $14.99.

Maybe I should try buying a few more but I kinda feel like I'm good.

>>5615696
>And yes, you can get some great lewd poses out of her.
And here I thought I was completely alone in a thread full of females and gay male barbie collectors. Hope to keep seeing you around.

For the normies (aka girls and gays) of the thread no lewd poses isn't the main reason like highly possible dolls but it's refreshing to hear someone say something slightly sexual about them at least once a year in these threads.

>my family would find out and tease me for buying dolls

Would they make fun of you for collecting dolls or would it be because they think that any male that collects dolls must be flat out gay. I guess being gay in the south is still a big no no.
You can do what I do. Tell them to deal with it and get mad at them for being retarded. If that doesn't work you can always try being creepy about it if you don't care about them steering clear of you and never talking to you again.

>>5617440
They look like moms or woman in their last 30s and 40s. Very classy but not very fun.

File: 14754625450_57c82f4e16_b.jpg (510KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 683x1024px

>>5619322
she's the best

File: 14d.jpg (68KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 500x500px

>>5619997
If shes the best than who's the worst ?

File: RosieBarbie2.jpg (25KB, 436x576px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 436x576px

>>5620223
easy.

>>5620223
Which barbie is this?

>>5619997
Damn the quality of the clothes look nice

>>5620263
Made to Move Barbie, discussed earlier in the thread.

>>5608063
>>5602984
what doll is this? shes super cute

>>5620691
Disneyland 60th Diamond Anniversary doll

>>5590268

Oh she looks lovely.

Does anybody the best way to dust a large doll collection? Thank you for your time.

>>5622333
I use an inexpensive makeup brush for mine.

You can preorder the Jakk's Pacific Alice in Wonderland dolls at the Toys R' Us website. Yikes at the prices, though.

File: 1396297763960.gif (2MB, 390x277px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 390x277px

>Been trying to get Disney limited Edition 17" Snow White for not full assrape price
>Someone on facebook was selling a while back
>Ask price
>$4000 USD
>No thanks
>2 months later she's still selling and commented for people to stop getting an attitude about the price and to go to ebay if they want shit quality

Good luck there m8. I'll continue my search in the mean time.

File: 3c725ef2d98adae5dab66ebeea6ddc0e.jpg (91KB, 736x772px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 736x772px

I wish that the Disney Store would do a limited Film Collection re-release of the wedding Enchanted doll. The one they made back when the film came out had an odd face (the Film Collection doll faces aren't perfect now but at least actually resemble the actors), but the dress was really well done. Secondhand the Enchanted dolls go for outrageous prices though.

File: gene_marshall__fashion_doll_gene_in_blue_goddess__retired_333782af.jpg (18KB, 300x482px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 300x482px

anyone else in this thread collect or like gene marshall dolls? i remember seeing them in doll magazines when i was little and i always wanted one.

File: attachment.jpg (38KB, 497x692px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 497x692px

>>5630672
I dont collect them but they're nice.

>>5632299
I really like her dress.

File: gene_marshall_fashion_doll_red_venus__retired_bf5bc84b.jpg (42KB, 375x500px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 375x500px

>>5630672
I don't but my grandmother does. She always wanted one but they were out of her price range when she first started collecting dolls (mostly Barbie and some vintage lucky finds). A few years ago though, a woman I met through the bjd hobby was getting rid of her old Gene collection so I nabbed some for grandma as a surprise. Pic related plus the pink lingerie Madra. She's been enthusiastically collecting all the old McCalls sewing patterns for them now.

>>5632944
>I nabbed some for grandma as a surprise.
That was really nice of you. Do you guys doll hunt together?

>>5633906
Back when I lived near her, yeah we did all the time. She even got into bjds with me. Right now we're trying to find time to get together and go through her massive doll collection and see whats actually in there. Like 85% of it has been shoved into a back room of the attic 25 years ago because of a long term doll-phobic house guest so its gotten to where shes not entirely sure whats even in there. Last time we made some progress on it, we found a few original Strawberry Shortcakes in their box along with a bunch of other very 80s nostalgic dolls and celebrity dolls too. She's sure theres some original Blythes up there too with their boxes but we've yet to find them.

File: tumblr_o6b5wzWqd11tdyxhuo1_1280.jpg (418KB, 1280x1707px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 1280x1707px

What are your biggest doll regrets?

I regret not picking this up when it was first released... I had the money, and it wasn't even that much and they were bundling the Snow White re-release along with it.

File: 3736506cc93317c9d05fd5ab04213b3d-d48mgc8.png (509KB, 700x920px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 700x920px

>>5634525
You can't really regret not buying what you didn't even know existed at the time.
These dolls started catching my eye at the Disney Store around the time the short brown hair Rapunzel doll came out. Only reason I saw her in person is because they had a hard time selling her and a bunch of them were in the front of the store for weeks.

Passed on Cinderella because I didn't feel the quality was worth $100.
A parent talked me out of buying Ariel (with my own money) when she came out by threatening me. That parent ended up paying four times what she sold for in 2013 over the summer because I wouldn't stop blaming them for causing me to miss out on her when she was in stores.

I could have bought four of them in 2013 for the price of the one I got this summer which still kinda bugs me since I kinda wish I could take her out of the box sometimes but won't do to her price point today. Other than that I guess I'm good. Wish I would have known about a few other surprise LE releases in time so that I could have gotten them at a fair price instead of having to pay greedy jew scalper prices.

File: Sexy-Phicen-Doll-1-6-Super-Flexible-Female-Seamless-Nude-Body-Figure-with-Stainless-Steel-font.jpg (208KB, 1000x1051px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1000x1051px

Has anyone ever gotten a phicen like doll or similar?

What's their poseability like?

Pic related.

>>5591120
Holy shit, that's awesome.
Just looked them up, damn those are some amazing dolls that I'll never afford...

>>5635435
>That parent ended up paying four times what she sold for in 2013 over the summer
Justice of the Unicorn.

>>5635464
>emulationaal woman secret parts

>>5634525
Selling dolls when I was in need of money, and now those dolls go for too much for me to justify rebuying them. The Disney Store Enchanted dolls, the Charlotte Disney Store dolls (I had both and was planning on putting the first run dress on the new body which didn't have crossed eyes, jesus how did Disney put that into production) as well as--my greatest shame--the Broadway Ariel doll.

>>5635936
>Justice of the Unicorn.
Sorry m8, but I don't get this reference. Googled it and all I got was some weird guy singing some unrelated song.

>>5635464
I have a doll with this type of body but the doll is life size. In fact I think the doll is taller than I am.

>>5635464
I have a Phicen, but its the older plastic skeleton. The posability is very good but they do have a shelf life before they start to split. Plus (and this is just me being weird), it feels so skin-like that when I move the clicky-joints it feels like I'm snapping a little animal's bones. I think that issue might be resolved on the metal frame but it does bother me to the point of not playing with her very much.

>>5637361
I'm not even going ask.

>>5637361
>life size

...you fuck it don't you?

File: tumblr_o6eifsMJ1e1tp9tvoo2_1280.jpg (75KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 800x800px

LE 17" Red Queen

Wish it was her 'regular' dress and not this bacon contraption

File: tumblr_o6eifsMJ1e1tp9tvoo1_1280.jpg (65KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 800x800px

LE 17" "Mandarin Dress" Alice

File: tumblr_o6eifsMJ1e1tp9tvoo3_1280.jpg (92KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 800x800px

LE Platinium Alice & Hatter 17"

>>5638350
by the way they're charging $750 for this.

>>5638345
>>5638347
>>5638350
The clothes are really pretty but I couldn't justify buying these when I hate the face sculpts so much.

>>5637614
>>5637557
>you fuck it
That would be kinda creepy and odd. Dolls are for decoration not for fucking but I guess someone could if they wanted to. I love dolls and I collect dolls of all brands and of all sizes. I don't just limit myself to 12" or 17" dolls. I collect traditional play , collectible, and adult dolls.

File: tumblr_o6g0tzYXXA1sdf8vao1_1280.jpg (45KB, 478x960px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 478x960px

LE Red Queen in her box.

>character known for large head
>it's super gaunt

well

File: tumblr_o6g0tzYXXA1sdf8vao2_1280.jpg (40KB, 464x960px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 464x960px

LE Alice.

She looks better in the actual photos IMO.

File: 12965247_1534642163505222_1175073183_n.jpg (107KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1080x1080px

Elena of Avalor. Disney Store, and 2 Hasbro dolls.

>>5640334
CUTE

>>5640334
And now i need these... Didnt expect to find them as cute as a button, but damn they are. I need a new body for the middle one though.

>>5640334
I like the face mold on the far right best. Hope her skin tone matches the far left doll for a body swap.

>>5640271
No blue dress!? I'm not interested in buying a butch, lesbo, pants wearing Alice tho.

>>5640267
>plastic top
>face looks off
What the fuck is going on with the lower half of her dress ? are those just strips of ribbons? What am I looking at? I think I'll stick with my $35 red queen. The scepter looks nice I guess.

File: 1440118897623b.jpg (159KB, 1578x889px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1578x889px

>>5640334
Who the heck is this? This doesn't look like the new Disney Princess of color I was hoping for.

>>5641237
I think she's a spin-off character from Sofia the fist.

>>5641242
>fist
First. Damn auto correct.

>>5641237
>actual black character is goofy comic relief and voiced by a gay actor
>princess has white features and merely a sun tan

>>5641237
Moana's proportions are horrible. She has a thin person's stomach and a chubby person's arms and legs. Her calves are thicker than her waist.

File: tumblr_o6euaqu2eU1v261u2o3_1280.jpg (366KB, 1025x1280px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 1025x1280px

Tonner version of Alice from the live action Disney films.

File: 13076632_1132865053444193_6985947198081800469_n.jpg (29KB, 326x600px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 326x600px

Classic Cocktail Dress Silkstone

File: tea_cups_by_prismageek.png (2MB, 600x759px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 600x759px

>>5641455
>Beautiful long blue dress
You see this is a lovely Alice doll not this >>5640271
>>5640275
Turbo, Lesbo dyke thing Disney is trying to pass as Alice these days.

>>5641484
ur so edgy!11

File: DISNEYb 78.jpg (45KB, 390x240px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 390x240px

>>5641491
>edgy!11
>!11
>11

>>5640271
Whats her release day? Will she be sold in stores ?

>>5641679
>that's the joke

>>5641233
Outfit is in >>5638345. Its supposed to resemble a bustle I think.

>>5640271
>>5640275
Those jaws are disgusting. Will it kill Disney to have them soften them for once with the LA dolls?

File: TRT14JADD02lg.jpg (51KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x500px

Why couldn't a better company than Tonner get the Jupiter Ascending license? Even Mattel wouldn't make her look so blah.

File: HSB6717lg.jpg (44KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 500x500px

Genie Chic Freddie

>>5643671
I haven't even seen basic Freddie in stores yet. I've just about given up on ever getting Jay too.

>>5643765
I haven't seen Freddie either. I heard that some random Jays are popping up at Walmarts.

>>5643666
To be honest I don't think any other companies tried to get it. It wasn't marketed very well, wasn't a success, and doesn't seem to fit with Mattel's other young-adult-blockbuster dolls, which tend to be pretty low key and simple.

>>5643765
found two cases of them in TRU the other day and its one Jay to two Freddie's in a case

File: 915NPYScHLL._SL1500_.jpg (291KB, 1046x1500px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 1046x1500px

new Misty Copeland Barbie. Pink Label.

Already pre-ordered mine... thank god it's the more articulated ballerina body and the tutu isn't that same boring one they've been using on ballet dolls for like 3 years.

File: 81tVZY0Xf+L._SL1500_.jpg (133KB, 938x1500px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 938x1500px

>>5644731
huh, neat. the doll actually matches Copeland's body fairly well instead of being a generic mold. Big calves, etc.

>>5644731
>>5644775
Want.

Going to have to add this to the collection.

>>5644775
It looks like they put new lower legs on the Made to Move body maybe? It might be just me but it definitely looks like the double-joints are there on the knees and elbows.

>>5611005
Since i saw these the day before yesterday - i would say these are already out. Lord are they expensive for how damn ugly they are... The queen happens to be nearly forty dollars if i remember - which shocked me.
Cant even describe how horrid the Hatter looks in hand...

>>5647369
It's called the "new ballet body." Apparently Copeland was involved in designing it (since she wanted it to reflect a muscular dancer body) so I guess it's a new body.

I have a feeling Mattel is going to be doing a lot more new/unique bodies in the future to go with the new varied Barbies. Now if only they'd do more ballet dolls with this body and without those same old boring frou frou pink tutus...

>>5647389
I was planning on getting the blue dress Alice and the Red Queen until I saw the price. Haha, no. I'll wait until they're inevitably on clearance.

File: 24c.jpg (41KB, 625x650px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 625x650px

>>5644731
>>5644775
What a sexy and neat ethnic doll. I still like the one I got about a year ago more tho.

>>5644731
>>5644775

Horrible.

I have hardly ever seen any classic ballerine with such big breasts...

But the real dread is the clothing. There is nothing to it, besides a bunch of folded tulle, and they can't even bother to make the catsuit suit properly around the ankles and wrists.

I can only see the marketing here, with the "first black prima ballerina" famous name attatched to the brand's name, but not any joy in the final doll.

>>5649329
>I have hardly ever seen any classic ballerine with such big breasts...

It's supposed to match Copeland's body, and she has larger breasts. Why are you complaining that the doll has breasts, anyway?

>There is nothing to it, besides a bunch of folded tulle, and they can't even bother to make the catsuit suit properly around the ankles and wrists.

What do you even mean here? There's nothing wrong with the body suit.

I think the doll is a refreshing change from the bland as fuck ballerina dolls Mattel has been released in the past few years.

>>5649368
>It's supposed to match Copeland's body

Oh, so they are not going to be using it for other ballerinas? Good.

>There's nothing wrong with the body suit.

What?
It's so badly made. It is supposed to be a catsuit. Skin tigh, form-fitting. It's completely frumpy at the ends, it will look boxy, wich completely ruins the silhouette, for people who care about it.

>a refreshing change from the bland as fuck ballerina dolls
This is exactly what this doll is.

>>5649690
>Oh, so they are not going to be using it for other ballerinas? Good.

Get over yourself, you big baby.

>It's so badly made. It is supposed to be a catsuit. Skin tigh, form-fitting. It's completely frumpy at the ends, it will look boxy, wich completely ruins the silhouette, for people who care about it.

It's not supposed to be a skin tight cat suit. It's meant to be a body suit which corresponds to the theme of th "Firebird," not an exact replica. IIf it was, the doll could not be undressed, and since the doll is being massively marketed at young ballerinas, you can guarantee it will be getting undressed.

You say it's bland yet the last 4 ballerina dolls from Mattel have been same old, same old. This is something new and different.

>>5649734
>Get over yourself, you big baby

Rude and random.

>not an exact replica
>IIf it was, the doll could not be undressed

What? LOL
You are literally making random things up to defend a poorly designed product.

>and since the doll is being massively marketed at young ballerinas

As I said before, I see the "massively market" part

>This is something new and different.

I just don't fall for this appellative crap to push a mediocre doll's sales.

>>5649824
>You are literally making random things up to defend a poorly designed product.

No, I'm not. If it was a skin-tight catsuit, it would be very difficult for the target demographer (children) to undress the doll. There is nothing wrong with the design, since it's not supposed to be a skin tight catsuit.

>I just don't fall for this appellative crap to push a mediocre doll's sales.

Notice how you can't argue that it's not new and different.

Go back to buying your bland stationary ballet dolls that Mattel hasn't bothered changing up since 2012, I guess!

>>5649824
>You are literally making random things up to defend a poorly designed product.

Also, Mattel description of the doll:

>Her fire red bodysuit, with sunburst orange tulle cutouts, stretches over her perfectly poised body, while layers of red and orange tulle tease a luxurious red tail. A vibrant tulle headpiece tops off her elaborate look, adding drama and flair. The doll features a brand-new ballerina body, with a face sculpted to Misty's likeness!

Not random, not making it up. Piss off. ;)

>>5650021
>>5650031
It's like you can't understand a single word you read.

>If it was a skin-tight catsuit, it would be very difficult for the target demographer (children) to undress the doll.

LOL

Tha parroting of "Mattel's description of the doll" is surprisingly useless, btw.

>Go back to buying your bland stationary ballet dolls that Mattel hasn't bothered changing up since 2012, I guess!

Just beyond random assumptions and attempts at being edgy. Zero points in reading your replies, and nothing left to be said, of course.

Some people just find marketing "so inspirational'. Tsk.

>>5616228
could be worse, could be the baby face version

>>5649329
>I have hardly ever seen any classic ballerine with such big breasts...
You say this as if it was a bad thing. What do you have against woman or dolls with large breasts ? Do you view breast as something inappropriate and vulgar that should be downplayed in a doll ?

Makes me wonder if this type of thinking is the real reason that Disney has never created a Disney princess with a C cup breast size. It's just sad. All body types are beautiful.

>>5649734
>Get over yourself, you big baby.
Yay! The snarky troll anon that lurks these doll threads is finally picking on someone other than me for once. It seems like only yesterday that he was telling me to get over myself while calling me a big baby.

>>5649824
>Rude and random.

That anon is very rude and random. He gets off on getting the last word and always replying with some type of rude, and snarky reply. Sometimes his replies can even be borderline mean spirited.
He will fight you for days until the thread gets totally derailed. In some doll threads mods have actually had to come along and delete the whole conversation.

>>5649734
>>5650021
> made for children

I thought the pink label collection was meant for a higher age bracket and are intended mostly for collective purposes? They go for between $60 - $100 here and I don't feel like you'd like some kid who'd just undress and trash it have it for that price? With that mind mind >>5649329
would be correct since collectors would be more interested in a nicer and less boxy fit.

For what it's worth I like the new calves, yes larger breasted ballerinas are rare but they happen and also that costume just looks lazy af in general.
> red bodysuit + tulle = done.
Looks boring.

>>5650807
Where do you live? That's massively overpriced for retail. Pink label is the walmart tier of barbie collector. Retail for pink dolls is $15-30. this particular doll (like the misty copeland book) is being marketed towards young predominately black ballet dancers, hence it already being used in promotions at ballet schools before it's wide release.

File: straya.png (557KB, 1303x476px) Image search: [Google]

557KB, 1303x476px

>>5650950
Australia, land of the overpriced. Admittedly this is at TRU but it's pretty much the same everywhere give or take $5 up or down.

File: 361777.jpg (27KB, 400x262px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 400x262px

>>5650960
>$60-80 for the ballet dolls
>$80 for birthday wishes

Jesus holy fuck! Yeah, I can see how the prices can give a false impression for sure! Would it be cheaper to get them secondhand? Or I guess shipping prices would still fuck you guys over. Damn, I feel so bad for Australian doll collectors.

Regular non-Australian prices are much cheaper. For reference: Normal retail for Birthday Wishes is $30, and the retail price for both those ballet dolls is $25. Retail for the Misty Copeland doll is $30, and that extra $5 is probably just for paying for her likeness/name.

Barbie Pink Label is the 'lowest' label for its collector dolls. It's the dolls that have less or no hand details, don't have any limited or specified edition, and are sold in children's section of places like Target, Walmart, Kmart, Toys R Us, some supermarket chains, etc. Sometimes they're even cheaper or the same price as the playline dolls, or at least the deluxe fashion ones that aren't made as often anymore. (I miss you Glam Luxe RIP)

>>5602508
>That redhead doll

I was going to pick her up awhile back, but my local Walmart was sold out of her and they never restocked. Does anyone know if she's still being sold?

>>5651664
Says out of stock on the Mattel website. She's called 'Western Chic,' try ebay!

>>5651858
Well that's unfortunate. Thanks for your help!

File: Can't dream within Dream.jpg (623KB, 2000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

623KB, 2000x1500px

>>5650960
>Used to be $59.99
>Now "on sale" for $49.99 ?

I payed $29.99 for that doll at Walmart about a year ago. I bought two of them. One for display and I got the other so I could rip off it's head and put it on a different dolls body. I know Walmart is cheaper than some other places but I don't think it was all that much more at Toys R Us. Never saw it as high as $50.

>>5650980
Damn, yeah we normally get screwed with this sort of thing. I think Barbie is the worst for it compared to Monster High or EAH or the Disney Hasbro lines. Nice to get the perspective though since I did think they were more a collector thing. Nobody wants to buy a young child an $80 doll to have it destroyed, but if they're normally $30 that makes a lot more sense. I wish the prices matched because I've wanted to get a friend of mine one of the birthday wishes as a gag gift but couldn't justify it.

>>5652104
These are prices in Australia, so it's $50 AUD not USD but our exchange rates aren't THAT bad to warrent an almost double mark-up last I checked.

File: tumblr_o6rmfbRfuv1tp9tvoo1_1280.jpg (437KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 1280x960px

Jakk's Pacific in person. Ehhhh.

I might get the blue dress Alice if it goes on sale.

File: 23175623653_f8bfec2b3e_b.jpg (304KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1024x1024px

recent deluxe playline Rapunzel vs the LE from a few years back

File: Specials-XFiles.jpg (286KB, 800x915px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 800x915px

>>5611126
I think that's the point, they had some X-Files barbies and it was just Barbie and Ken dressed as Scully and Mulder.

>>5655638
Yep! This doll isn't meant to be Rose. it's just "Titanic Barbie doll." When the dolls are meant to be characters, it will say their name exclusively on the packaging. For example, my Effie Barbie says 'The Hunger Games: Effie' on the front and calls it the Effie doll on the back; but the X-Files dolls you posted say "Barbie AS.... Ken AS...")

>>5654406
Is it bad I like the playline more?

>>5656133
Nope! Different strokes. The sleeves are the reason I didn't buy the LE Rapunzel when she was released (though now she sells $1400 secondhand so I couldn't get her if I wanted her!)

Has the official list of the Designer Heroes & Villains dolls for this year been released? I heard we aren't getting Jasmine/Jafar...

>>5585030
i dont even remember that outfit

File: la-et-mn-alice-through-the-looking-glass-trailer-johnny-depp-20160329.png (811KB, 1280x646px) Image search: [Google]

811KB, 1280x646px

>>5658689
The movie hasn't even come out yet. She is wearing it in most of the promo shots.

File: NC49501lg.jpg (24KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 500x500px

who has a Coraline?

>>5659540
Where did they sell her?

>>5659576
I've only found her online. I think the initial run sold out but there's a new one now.

>>5659540
Trash

File: tumblr_nojrhnprET1sdf8vao1_1280b.jpg (93KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 640x640px

>>5654406
I'm a guy so if I had to pick one I'd go with the LE because it's makeup makes the doll look more adult / seductive. Her waist is also visibly tinier than the playline Rapunzel. The tiny waist helps to accents the dolls breast which makes them look slightly larger aka (The doll looks curvier). The corset strings stand out more visually and are pulled tighter together. The neckline is more open/ low cut. All these things come together to make the doll look sexier .
I could care less about the non-movie accurate puffy selves and high collar all tho I will admit they are a nice yet unnecessary touch.

The LE dress itself has a more generous amount of material going around the lower half of her tiny waist which give the the doll a nice flowy dress effect. Way higher quality, and softer fabric was used on the LE dress while the Playline dress looks like they used just enough cheap, hard, glittered, fabric to cover her ass. No more. No less.

While I'm a fan of long flowing hair I have to say that the playlines braid is very well done. The fact that it comes with light up flowers and a light up lantern is a plus. She also sings the whole song as the braid glows. The dolls singing voice is also Mandy Moores and not a cheap sound alike.

I payed $30 (on sale ) the week before Christmas for the Playline version and I am Very Very happy with her. As nice as the LE doll is I could never justify paying anything close to $1000 dollars for her. This is coming from a person who payed $500 for an LE Ariel a few months back. Ariel is my favorite princess tho.

>>5590613
I'm frankly most looking front to seeing if they will actually do the magic lesbian baby of Queen Elsa and her sister. She's really just a living ice girl probably.

File: tumblr_o70o911yAg1tp9tvoo1_540.jpg (130KB, 497x810px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 497x810px

classic Disney Store dolls are $9 each. Probably clearing them out for the new ones.

File: !B,)CdPgB2k~$(KGrHqIH-D!Eqtbsy9vNBKs8dT4Few~~_12a.jpg (81KB, 1341x890px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1341x890px

>>5663352
>Probably clearing them out for the new ones.
Well they are going to have to do better than $9. At least in actual stores that is. They have them priced at 2 for $20 all year long. Last year when my local Disney Store was trying to make room for the new 2015 dolls they placed the old ones at the back of the store and priced them at around $7 each.