How many of you actually follow this process?

I'm a structuralist, and this shit looks retarded.

>>55403681
i guess this behavior evolves out of social interaction plus gameplay activity

>>55403681
No one follows that process, because creativity doesn't follow an autismal process like that.

This is a terrible way of explaining something very simple.

>>55403681
>behold, I have rephrased something obvious with $5 words and difficult to read graphs
>my degree wasn't a waste of time or money
Yes, it turns out people who actually play games play games, then talk about them, then use what they talked about the next time they play. This also makes things more fun, most of the time.

>>55403734

Actually it does.

The diagram is vague to the point of uselessness but it is accurate in that vagueness.

>>55403786

I actually viewed the chart as a diagram of what happens during play.

This serves to further prove what a useless chart it is.

>>55403786
>not being able to into operant feedback structure space

>>55404573
Don't worry, daddy still loves you even though you wasted his money on that useless degree.

File: Executive-Dashboard.jpg (111KB, 750x470px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 750x470px

>>55403786
>behold, I have rephrased something obvious with $5 words and difficult to read graphs
Business grad here. Managers pay well for pretty visuals telling them things they already know.


Granted, they're unlikely to make a game design degree stop being a waste of time. Unless perhaps you somehow find yourself making presentations to VPs at Hasbro or something.