Lovecraftian Monster Manual

File: beholder.png (1MB, 835x581px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 835x581px

And a shot form the actual Lords of Madness. Man the illustrations quality really improved in the past 10 years.

File: CHA23102a__54529.1403969972.500.659.gif (91KB, 348x450px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 348x450px

>>55020174
yes

File: cyclops_anatomy__natural_history_of_the_fantasic_by_christopher_stoll-d8z0kph.jpg (177KB, 774x1032px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 774x1032px

>>55020474
Thanks

>>55020174
If you have a manual for Lovecraftian horror, you are doing it wrong.

File: Formless Spawn.jpg (839KB, 1095x1448px) Image search: [Google]

839KB, 1095x1448px

Hey OP, you should look for Field Guide to Cthulhu Monsters or Field Guide to Lovecraftian Horrors.
Both are easy to find, just search for pdfs on google.

File: 2017-02-06 20_11_52-The illithiad (Color).pdf - SumatraPDF.png (1MB, 843x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 843x1080px

>>55020174
>That shit tier Illithid dissection barely detailed and left to that fucking paintbrush effect hack artists use all the time
Fuck Volo's guide, fuck it. Millenials are cancer.

>>55021217
The reference to the old stories about Illithids having beaks as being wrong is hilarious.

How many of strange creatures even have a good culutre developed behind them?

File: mahn.jpg (23KB, 680x447px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 680x447px

>>55020474

Came here to post that.

>>55020664
Came here to post that.

>>55020575
that looks like some hardcore ass

>>55020474
not enough pictures. Even the chthonic codex is better.