Pauper MTGO General: Value Combo Edition

>>54559667
sounds like you need more anti-burn tech in the sideboard
I'm currently working on a rogue-ninja-cipher thing with blue-black control structure
I wish there were more cipher cards

>>54561458
Oh that sounds fun!

>>54561458
What anti-burn would you suggest?

>>54559667
>MTGO
So is there any table scene of this at all?

>>54563646
Yeah, I used to play it on paper a lot. I play no-ban paper pauper with hymn, high tide and merchant scroll though so it may not appeal to you.

>>54562676
I think Hydroblast is a good choice, Hydro and Pryo blasts are really good in pauper.

>>54563646
depends on yr city unfortunately

How do people get away with running 16 lands in Affinity? I always feel like its too little.

>>54559667
I like that art

>>54567181
Most of the cards cost 2, 1 or even 0 mana when enough artifacts are in play. Plus they have a ton of ciclyng and draw to get more lands if they need em.

>>54567181
Cranial playing helps, affinity helps, cheap shit helps. Ponza is extremely good against them so it only works in a world without land disruption.

File: 1483993240652.png (29KB, 262x270px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 262x270px

Tell me people, how competitive are you when it comes to pauper? Do you like to brew jank builds to have a chill time or prefer cut-troath, tier 1, flavor of the month deck?

>>54572200
cranial plating is banned

>>54576228
I actually meant springleaf drum in that sentence, not sure why I put cranial plating.

>>54574187
I brew decks all of the time, but I prefer them to be at least moderately competitive. I like the "race against the clock" feeling of combo-control, where you desperately try to get far enough ahead to be safe to combo off.

just play BUGS N PIGS

>>54577128
Isn't that basically MBC but with worse land?

Is Infect worth a damn or nah?

>>54580632
It is pretty meh. It isn't enough faster than stompy to justify the huge hit in stability and variance. UG Stompy seems like the best version.

Opinions on mono blue delver as babies first pauper deck?

>>54583027
depends what u like playing

File: PauperBNP 003.jpg (753KB, 2304x1728px) Image search: [Google]

753KB, 2304x1728px

>>54580334
nope.

>>54583634
What's good about it?

File: PauperJund 006.jpg (824KB, 2304x1728px) Image search: [Google]

824KB, 2304x1728px

>>54583672
draw
lifegain
sweepers


it's really fun.