>Fantasy setting devoid of giant statues Why do they do it?

File: argonath.jpg (82KB, 492x750px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 492x750px

>>54446090
who knows, anon. who knows.

>>54446090
I can't reason why they would waste so many resources over using them to kill liches or something

>>54446202

Or toppling the giant statues of liches?

>>54446202
>not building giant magic resistant golems to kill liches
A-anon I...

File: Koloss-von-Rhodos-aus-Bertuch-1792.jpg (156KB, 1024x1001px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1024x1001px

>>54446090
Because they don't know much about history.

>>54446364
>you will never see 127 elephants dragging a massive statue of an insane god emperor

>>54446090
Because it's fuckin glorious.

No need for an other reason.

>>54446364
>Having a statue made to a scale where your dick is around the size of the average person
>Put it in front of the ancient equivalent to a large sports stadium.

I'd make a joke, but if I had absolute power I might do the same.

>>54448850
Big dicks were seen as plebian and barbaric, small dicks were the peens of the aristocracy. And big tits where for old hags.

Rome was wierd

>>54446090
Cause they pay giants to stand around and pose all day instead

>>54449412

I love his use of colour.

>>54449489
Rome was correct in knowing disgusting cow tits were for used up old hags.

File: MonkeyOpinionsComic.png (684KB, 510x960px) Image search: [Google]

684KB, 510x960px

>>54449765

>>54446318
BUT WHAT IF INSTEAD OF A FIG LEAF THEY CARVED A STONE DICK THAT THEY COULD POUR BOILING OIL OUT OF ONTO ENEMY SHIPS

>>54446090
There are already real giants around, so they're really not that terribly impressive or evocative.

>>54451484
Counterpoint: the giants make enormous statues of their own, the humans can't even comprehend the beauty of the statues.