>ctrl+f >no filename thread c'mon guys

File: you were trapped.png (2MB, 800x4524px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 800x4524px

>>54383514
Whose cro-magnon is that?

File: Magical Realm, That Guy, Rules-Light System etc.jpg (9KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 480x360px

advanced

File: DM promises a 'low magic political' campaign.webm (3MB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 960x540px

needs a better name

>>54384200
Failed Bluff Roll

>>54384212
>To be Continued.

>>54384184
Cato the Elder didnt need to be told shit. He hated Carthage because he had literally nothing better to do.

>>54384200
>just refluff it bro

>>54383589
Russian.
Nikolai Valuyev is his name.

File: Standard Players.jpg (78KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 800x600px

>GW_Customers.jpg
>WotC_creates_Mythic_Rarity.jpg

>>54384284
what's that gif from?

File: Rogue gets robbed.webm (3MB, 360x234px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 360x234px

>>54384284
What anime?

File: Hate.jpg (164KB, 825x1200px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 825x1200px

>>54384306
>>54384316
Seraph of the End, its okay, but can be pretty game sometimes. Its by the guy who made Legend of the Legendary Heroes.

>>54384342
Now that's just plain wrong.

File: I-it's not gay when he's a girl.jpg (794KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

794KB, 900x900px

>>54384499
You're in MY magical realm now, son. There is no wrong anymore.

>>54383622
It baffles me that this image has been posted on this board for a solid decade and people still don't understand what it is.

Go to reddit if you want your stupid laughs

>>54384294
Laughed out loud.

>>54384565
I'm gonna need some sauce for this.

>>54384594
Its Chink Cupid's Chocolate.

File: this is someone's fetish.webm (3MB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 854x480px

>>54384559

File: Just because you succeed at the bluff doesn't mean you succeed at the combat.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>54384294

File: ∕ tg ∕ has always been a place for stupids laughs, you fucking newfaggot.png (314KB, 800x2190px)

314KB, 800x2190px

>>54384584

>>54384637
He was druggie so I can understand the officer's concern for his safety, especially if the guy is acting like he's carrying a weapon.

I think 3 shots might've overkill at close range.

>>54384662
The cop already had his gun out and aimed and yet the idiot was making threatening moves at him. A three round burst is pretty deserved. Especially since he continued to resist and pretend like had a weapon, even when he was on the ground bleeding out.

>>54384660
I hate that I could tell by the thumbnail it was that golem.

File: That Guy is allowed to craft a golem.jpg (352KB, 1211x900px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 1211x900px

>>54384694
We've been here too long.

>>54384428
Source?

>>54384457
>Fear of burning
That is the dead-est Uruk I have ever seen.

>>54384297
Typical new zealand

>>54384637
Good riddance

>>54384564
What is it then, if not a fire alarm?

>>54384683
Druggies aren't in the proper mind. He tried to rob a pharmacy unarmed. He deserved to get his ass beat, yes, but for his life to be taken overall, nah.

>>54384457
Don't play the game, but with all those immunities is he still possible to kill?

>>54384867
When you pretend to have a lethal weapon, you don't get to complain when you get treated like you have a lethal weapon.
He played a stupid game and won a stupid prize.

>>54384564
>>54384815
Maybe it's because the arm lock doesn't trap the puller, just puts on a cumbersome piece of wood that makes them easy to identify.

>>54384870
Seems like he'd still be weak to fire and explosives.

>>54384662
>>54384683
Agreed. If you're faking like you've got a gun, and an officer has, reasonably, drawn down on your ass, you're gonna get shot unless you carefully deescalate

>>54384830
Its okay. The story is a cynic guy helping girls out in their life situation.

>>54384763
Black Torch

File: GM campaigns.webm (624KB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

624KB, 854x480px

>>54384637
>Guaranteed_Replies.webm

>>54384297
The most annoying thing about that is comic sans

>>54384923
>Xen_Syndrome.webm

>>54384662
>>54384867
You're an idiot who doesn't know how guns work.

You don't shoot to wound, if you pull the trigger you do so with the intent to kill whatever you are aiming at, and people don't always just instantly die on the first hit like in the movies so you are instructed to shoot them multiple times until you are sure.
This goes double for people who might be hopped up on something that lets them ignore the pain and shock of bullet wounds for longer.

If you get all up in the face of a cop who is ordering you to stand-down while pretending to have a gun and then explicitly act like you are whipping it out while he has you covered you deserve everything you get.
Being a drug addict isn't a sympathetic reason.

>>54384928
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1uaX5hBByw

>>54384342
Ï recognize that bulge.

>>54384951
>>54384662
>>54384867

It could be that being shot to death is what he wanted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_by_cop

>>54384951
Thank you for being a voice of reason, anon. Unfortunately, some people are still capable of somehow not getting it.

>>54384951
>You don't shoot to wound
But why not? What is the fatality rate for a single gunshot wound? Unless it's really high, I find a policy of "always shoot to kill" hard to justify.

>>54384321
>Theater of the Mind

>>54385078
I find it easy to justify. A wounded, armed suspect can easily shoot you back; and they may not be happy with stopping at one bullet.

>>54384951
You don't understand the thing of it was a druggie, any shot in the chest area (Where cops and every other person trained with firearm are trained to shoot) is fatal.

One shot is good enough to bring pretty much anyone down

>>54385078
You're an idiot.
There's no such thing as a "safe" place to shoot someone. You aim for the center of mass to bring them down as quickly and safely(to yourself) as possible.

>>54385078
You can't just 'wing' someone and hope for the best, even a shot to the leg or the arm can cause someone to rapidly bleed out... but not so rapidly that they can't get off a shot at you or other people around them.

If you have every reason to believe an aggressor is armed to the point you are shooting them you have to go all-in since your goal is to kill them before they kill you or others.

The time of "restraint" comes before you have pulled the trigger at all where you must use your best judgement.

>>54385078
It's not a policy, it's a fact. You can't pull punches with a firearm. If you are shooting at someone, you have a very significant chance of killing them. Teaching someone to shoot at a person they don't want dead is retarded.

>>54385157
OK, so there is grounds for an exception:

>"Shoot to kill if the target has a gun."

Again, why is that the general rule? Why aim to kill people with knives, or just their fists?

>>54385170
Give me statistics. Prove that there is no "safe" place to shoot. I already asked for the data.

>>54384637
>people defending the stupid moron that got killed for being a stupid moron
We need a new holocaust

>>54385186
Because knives are lethal weapons to, you fucking imbecile. Fists or any other weapon can knock you down, out or incapacitate you and the perp won't have any reason to stop after one stab or punch.
The officer has to protect themselves from anyone coming at them with hostile intent because if they don't, they will very likely end up dead themselves.
Just fuck off.

>>54385167
Cops are trained when opening fire on an armed suspect to make sure the target is dead to minimize risk to themselves and the public. That means following up the first shot to make sure the armed suspect is neutralized.
Its not like their health bar floating above their head vanishes to tell you they have died in real life.

File: 3 comics in one.jpg (124KB, 540x539px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 540x539px

The thread is being derailed by the fingergun webm again.

I must try to save it!

>>54385219
What the fuck is wrong with you? Watch your tone, asshole. Didn't your parents teach you manners?

>>54385078
It's high enough that a shoot-to-wound policy would create an unnecessary further risk to suspect's lives. Lowering the criteria for when firearms are acceptable from "I believe my life is in danger" to "I needed to disable the suspect without personal risk" means more people get shot in more situations. There is no such thing as a non-lethal gunshot wound. There are only shots that kill quickly or slowly. In some cases you can get the victim medical attention before the slow one kills them. That does not mean the injury was non-lethal in itself.

>>54385186
Why are you moving the goalposts?
In this case it was a person pretending to have a gun even as the cop backed up and repeatedly ordered him to stop, only opening fire when the idiot pretended to whip out the gun he had behind his back on the cop.

>>54385187
Nobody is defending the dumb ass for getting what he got you dumb ass nigger. One anon simply said 3 consecutive shots to the body seemed overkill. He even agreed to the guy getting shot seemed fair: >>54384902

>>54385265
And people have told him why he is ignorant when it comes to gun handling and police procedures, now its just shitposting.

>>54385226
>Cops are trained when opening fire on an armed suspect to make sure the target is dead to minimize risk to themselves and the public
That is a problem as there is situations in which the "armed" suspect, isn't armed and you gun downed a nobody holding anything. I'm talking about nobodies who actually don't pretend they have a dangerous weapon or alerted the authorities of them having firearms and get shot down.

There should be a confirmation policy in place.

Fun fact: the officer in that webm was reprimanded... For being too lenient. He was supposed to shoot the moment he hand went behind his back. By pausing to give him the opportunity to back down, the cop turned the situation in a contest of reflexes and unnecessarily endangered himself.

Fun fact: you are more likely to survive a non-instantly fatal gunshot than you are to survive a non-instantly fatal stabbing.

>>54385280
Holy shit, I knew roughly that those adverts were all done in one shot but seeing how exactly they do it is something else

>>54385294
In the time it takes to confirm someone has a gun, that person can shoot someone.

Not getting shot by a cop is frankly very simple. When they say "freeze", you don't take that as a SUGGESTION. You don't stop walking and try to argue. You don't try to pull out your phone to call somebody. You don't wave your arms and make a scene. You shut the fuck up and FUCKING FREEZE SOLID.

>>54385294
>There should be a confirmation policy in place.
You know what? You are right. There SHOULD be a confirmation policy in place. In an IDEAL world, we would have the time to do that.

Unfortunately, we're stuck in a less-than-ideal world, with less-than-ideal people, who have to make split second decisions under duress. Put in the same situation, you would either fare no better or would wind up dead pretty damn quickly.

Newsflash: life is pretty damn shitty. Your hopeless optimism and pedantic whinging about what should be accomplishes nothing, because what you hope for can never exist in a non-perfect world.

Suggestion: Look up that whole serenity prayer thing. It might actually do you some good.

>>54385250
A few days ago in Australia, a guy was shot by a cop at a swingers party.

>It was a costumed event at a sex-on-premises venue
>Guy and his partner came as Joker and Harley
>He had a toy gun that he made the staff aware of
>Someone anonymously called the cops (dodgy shit going on, not relevant to this)
>Cops rock up, liase with security on site
>security inform them there is no issue and tell them about the toy gun
>cops stay on site for an hour, watching from security room
>they never go in to talk or assess situation
>Call CIRT
>Within 30 seconds of rocking up, they've shot two people
>1 was the suspect with a toy gun, the other was the woman he was having sex with.

Cops claimed he reached for the gun, witnesses claim he was pulling up his pants. Video footage shows they shot him inside of 7 seconds of seeing him.

Who is at fault in this situation?

Protip:I was there

>>54385186
Because if you dont, they can get your gun and kill you. When a gun is in play, it can be used, and therefore it should unless things deescalate quickly.

>>54385401
So it was your fault.

>>54385401
Probably the cop. Just because cops are justified in shooting when somebody threatens them, doesnt mean they're justified in everything they do. Quit assuming everything is black and white.

>>54384241
...is this porn?

>>54385454
Seconded.

>>54385454
It is black and white, though. Police officers are exoected to put their life on the line for public safety. The moment you start getting a police force that lethally defends themselves out of the fear of a potential situation, rather than the clear and present reality of it, you move away from having a police force and into the territory of state sanctioned thugs.

>>54385401
Sounds like the cops fucked up.

>>54385520
I failed my Lore check

>>54385520
Genuinely amazed.

File: firearms.jpg (104KB, 1451x597px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1451x597px

>>54385351
This line of reasoning looks valid, but then how do you explain that statistics show that other Western countries with more reserved police gun use manage to get by just fine?

Since the death rate is so minor and there is only small societal impact, it's not a major enough issue to justify getting emotional and personal about (like some assholes in this thread), but there is a basis for debate - that guidelines for police gun use in the US are too harsh and excessively permissive, and that an alternative way to rapid and lethal action does exist.

>>54385607
The US has a slant towards death at the hands of police because guns are so easy to acquire that any time a suspect reaches towards something out of sight, they have to be treated like a worst-case scenario.
Hesitation once things escalate to that level can be lethal if the suspect has a gun. They can't afford to take the chance.

File: Standard Magic Players.jpg (68KB, 500x515px)

68KB, 500x515px

>>54385621
>Rattlechains.gif
>Aetherling.gif
>Deadeye_Navigator.gif

>>54385607

Other western countries don't have the US's minority population. Or it's Dixie whites for that matter.

>>54385520
ah shit, fell for it, again

>>54385643
>>54385665
I suppose this could be settled by some international statistics on police shootings and casualties involving suspects with proven and suspected gun possession.

The US seems to have this unique problem (rapid lethal force) and also its unique circumstances (guns, race), but I'm not entirely convinced the correlation between the two exists; i.e. that you couldn't scale back the readiness to use lethal force without seeing a spike in police casualties, despite the US peculiarities.

>>54385643
Read
>>54385508

>>54385607
>nobody in Eurocuck lands own guns
>HURRR DURRRR WHY NO EUROKEK POLEEZ KILL PEEPLE FOR WAVING GUNZ AROUND?!

>>54385935
>no guns
>noone getting shot

Funny, that.

>>54385935
Please reread the first sentence. I already addressed what you're referring to (data weighted by ACTUAL possession/suspected possession), and your post does you no favors.

>>54385954
They make up for it with other violent crime aparently. I havn't seen the chart in a while but its for crime in australia in the time since they cracked down on guns.

>>54384539
If I wanted to kill myself I would eat a whole one of these and gently slip into a diabetic coma.

Fucking hell. Where's the fucking janitor when you need the cunt?
This thread needs to be cleaned up of all this idiocy.

>>54386085
>gently slip into a diabetic coma.
Hahaha. You're funny.

File: Chuck Tingle.jpg (143KB, 676x851px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 676x851px

>>54386085
I think your teeth would rot away long before that.

>>54384530
No, fag you don't get to post ranko and claim he has a penis at the same time

>>54386080
>gun crime drops
>knife crime rises

I'd be curious to know what the survivability of a knife wound is vs. a gunshot.

>>54385607
According to Wiki, Europe in general is far less homicidal than America in general. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

For every 16 killings here, Europe has 3. Fuzzy math is fuzzy, but do some.

>>54386080
>>54386184
It's difficult to make an apples-to-apples comparison since data is so haphazardly gathered and there's no international standard.
So America's homicide rate is so high because of the prevalence of weapons that make it very easy to kill with. I.e., guns. Also why households with guns have a disproportionately higher suicide rate; using a gun is a much more surefire way to successfully do it quickly than just about any other way.

>>54386160
Wut. No one was saying Ranma has a dick when he's a girl. That's why it's not gay to fuck him while he has a pussy.

>>54386284
Nah, it's gay because he's still him, buche ain't no trap

File: 1499656428416.jpg (12KB, 292x602px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 292x602px

>>54385607
>tfw your country is better at killing it's own people than America
I would like to re-roll my character please.

File: Roll to detect traps.jpg (745KB, 1907x2437px) Image search: [Google]

745KB, 1907x2437px

>>54386331
But he doesn't have his dick when he gets wet. He's fully a girl and therefore it's not gay.
Laura Rolla on the other hand...

>>54384328
KAGAMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

File: GM tries to harden his SciFi.jpg (490KB, 630x786px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 630x786px

I'm just gonna leave this here. I don't really have an opinion on traps, but I feel that the conversation is going to go that route.

>>54386459
This isn't /r9k/ paying 300 bucks to be fucked and abused by a tranny hooker.
This is just asking if a dude is magically turned into a chick, is it gay to stick your dick in their new, magical pussy?

>>54384870
All you need to do is burn him by making something near him explode and you can grab him and throw him down a cliff to his death. Or brand him and make him your slave if you so desire

>>54385552
>a-MAZED
I fucking hate you Carlos

>>54386459
I remember reading that conclusion before (the 'if you like trannies you aren't gay' thing) and being kind of surprised. Like I understand the logic, in theory, but it's still surprising.
Also, shemales being called 'GAMs' is funny to me.

>>54384457

Having played recently in preparation for the sequel, I've noticed that there is no combination of traits that can protect an Uruk from getting punched in the mouth repeatedly.

Any advice on how to create a good Nemesis?

>>54384870

Uruks lose all of their immunities when their weakness is exploited. Setting him on fire is easy to do if you've unlocked fire arrows or if he's standing next to anything flammible.

>>54386506
>>54386640
"If it has (ever had) a dick other than mine in or on it, it's gay."

File: needs a name - Dorohedoro.png (391KB, 653x549px)

391KB, 653x549px

OC, fresh as nikaido's gyoza

>>54385548
Goatse

>>54385508
And Im not saying they should do that. I meant to say that the cop was in the right. My bad.

Im a dirty phone-poster and I was distracted by doing stuff at the gym.

>>54385228
The 3rd is the whole 6 panels or am I missing something?

>>54385167
>One shot is good enough to bring pretty much anyone down

t. not combat arms

>>54385167
>One shot is good enough to bring pretty much anyone down

There is an important difference between a shot that will kill someone and a shot that will stop them. The guy bleeding out in a few minutes doesn't help you if he has enough time to give you your own sucking chest wound before he succumbs.

If you're shooting someone, you shoot until they go down and stay down.

>>54386506
I agree. I just wanted an excuse to post the "traps aren't gay" image, complete with innuendo filename.

>>54387164
The whole actual comic reads from left-to-right.
Now read them as two separate columns.
Perform
Seduction
Sleight of Hand

>>54386687
So you're either a virgin or a flamming faggot.

File: PC thought the reward was gold.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>54384568
Holy fuck, is that real? I don't remember that at all.

File: Average Shadowrun Crew.jpg (136KB, 796x833px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 796x833px

>>54387350
I don't know, but kek.

>>54387041
Begging isn't OC, anon.

>>54385401
Did you at least get to fuck Harley before the cops got to her?

>>54386264
>Also why households with guns have a disproportionately higher suicide rate; using a gun is a much more surefire way to successfully do it quickly than just about any other way.

So, you're saying that the only reason anybody in Wales is even alive today (considering that it is ALREADY the "nation" with the highest rate of suicide per capita in europe) is because of the Gun Laws brought in banning handguns after the Dunblane massacre?

And THEREFORE if you also consider that Wales was the only UK country outside England to vote FOR Brexit that that this would have reduced the leave vote by 2.6 million and therefore resulting in a remain vote...

Gentlemen. It's clear that safer Gun Laws caused Brexit.

>>54386640
>Uruks lose all of their immunities when their weakness is exploited
I actually quite like that. You can beat him the old-fashioned and really hard way, or you can exploit a weakness you know of and make things much simpler and easier, but not an insta-kill. This is how more games (tabletop and vidya) should do things.

>>54386162
Not that good actually, modern medicine can deal with a gunshot wound far better than a knife wound, since you know, it's a big thing in modern warfare to deal with bullet wounds. Knife wounds are harder to handle medically, and are just as difficult, if not harder to survive than getting shot.

File: 723px-Circulatory_System_en.svg.png (297KB, 723x1023px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 723x1023px

>>54385186
>prove there is no safe place to shoot
Got you senpai.

>>54387710
Not that guy, but can you highlight the areas that are kill or wound areas? The heart, lungs, head, neck, aortas, vena cavas, and spine are obvious.

>>54387710
So... you should shoot people sides?

>>54385401
>swingers
Serves the degenerates right.

>>54387821
You see the red blood vessels? pretty much any of those are lethal, big ones being in the shoulder, femoral and center mass.

>>54387827
Poor choice, important organs are in the side, like the liver, which is a "rigid" organ and has been known to get *fucked* up when hit by a projectile. Even then you're aiming at a very small portion of the body and is unlikely to rapidly incapacitate if the suspect doesn't surrender immediately on being shot. The safest place to shoot is actually considered the pelvis in general to my memory, but that carries the risk of crippling them and even then "safe" is a relative term when talking about getting shot.

>>54387821
You know how people in movies tend to get shot in the shoulder?

If you shoot someone in the shoulder, blood will spew from that wound very quickly. The safest place to shoot someone should be in the foot and that will still cause serious bleeding

File: Character Select and Movelist.gif (2MB, 624x335px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 624x335px

>>54387566

True, it's good, and I feel that the Nemesis System was one of the best mechanics of any game in the past five years or so. The problem is that for all the talk of players having a unique, personal Nemesis that hounds them for half the game, I feel that you quickly reach a point where no Uruk can stand against you because you're just so powerful, which means each new captain, warchief, and potential Nemesis immediately gets piled onto an ever increasing pile of Uruk corpses, so they all become interchangeable and boring.

I'm hyped for Shadow of War, but at the same time worried that the same problem will arise.

Does anyone have any good LotR filenames?

>>54383514
>I ambulatory to cat
>feces is money

File: God of Drugs.jpg (93KB, 409x307px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 409x307px

>>54382854

>>54384860
I smiled.

>>54387989
Yeah, I've been playing the first one recently, and although I'm not THAT far into it I have a slightly autistic perfectionist streak in this kind of game. So I've done ONE story mission, collected everything and done every possible sidequest in the first zone and made sure that I gather intel before killing every captain that spawns between starting any quest. I once spent half an hour being chased around by some scrubby captain in a town because I couldn't get the one Intel Uruk out of the horde with him without being gangbanged.

Anyway, I've found that although I really like the weaknesses thing and it may be just that they're all complete pussies at this point (lots have the "Die instantly to Archery or Stealth" thing and stuff) but when I've decided I want a fight and gone toe-to-toe with one of the big bastards with a billion melee tricks I still haven't found it all that hard. Stun/Slash comboes seem to do for most of them, and dodging anything they have isn't too hard even if I just want to chip them down with basic attacks.
Any suggestions for a challenge other than Speed Up and Do Quests? Graugs are the opposite, killed a couple just by sniping at them, getting a few hits on the stun and then darting out again, occasionally grabbing a couple Uruks to drain for arrows. Boring and a tad unrewarding.

>>54387393
All too accurate.

Does anyone have that reddit-post posted by some woman about how her boyfriend whom she had cheated on somehow managed to get her fired from her job and had her entire family turn against her, generally just ruining her life. I think I first saw it in one of these threads with the name "Bard BBEG" or something.

>>54388327
>BBEG
ugh

>>54388344

Ironic shitposting is still shitposting.

File: BBEG.jpg (128KB, 1152x864px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1152x864px

>>54388344
>>54388388
Nice dubs, btw

File: Bard BBEG.png (711KB, 1340x3184px) Image search: [Google]

711KB, 1340x3184px

>>54388232

The One Hit KO vulnerabilities will stop popping up once the Uruks start hitting level 10-12. One of the things you can do to make the game a bit harder (and lets face it, it is a rather easy game) is to go into the settings menu and turn off the combat prompts so you actually need to pay attention to who's attacking you and when. Turning off the AI awareness will force you to be more carefull because you can't see which enemies are alert to your presence or looking for you and turning of the enemy outlines will prevent the game from telling you when you are close enough for a stealth finisher, forcing you to be more careful. After that, you need to deliberatley cripple yourself by not buying upgrades or using runes in order to make the game harder for yourself.

>>54388327

Yo.

>>54386184
we're genocidal. If you're going to kill people, do it properly.

File: Final Exam for Bard College.jpg (37KB, 600x550px)

37KB, 600x550px

fresh oc hot off the presses

>>54385078
Anything worth pulling a gun on is worth killing. Guns are not "maiming tools". They are killing weapons. And if you have your gun out you better be prepared to kill whatever it is you are aiming at.

>>54384709
I've never understood that neckbeard's attraction to a butter golem.

>>54387484
didn't kek until I read the very last line

and then, my friend, I kek'd hard.

>>54388521
>Black and White Morality.jpg
I would still say yes.

>>54388560
What line? The webm doesn't have subtitles.

>>54383390
Why are comics always so unfunny?

>>54384870
That's the humorous aspect of the image. His weakness is so debilitating than it's nearly as bad as "loses all his buffs and waits to die when attacked" would be in regular game.

>>54388458
Thanks brother

>>54384238
Actually he visited Carthage and saw they were rebuilding their military. After having been attacked by Carthage twice, the Romans had no reason to show anymore mercy.

>>54388458
Ah, I'll give that a go. The annoying thing seems to be that pulling off the sabotage is cool and makes you feel like a badass but simultaneously denys a considerable chunk of the challenge when you stabbed a sentry, shot two campfires and a Caragor cage and watch the Big Bad Warchief shit himself then get mauled to death by a cat in about ten seconds. Fun, but sometimes you just want to charge in there and mix it up with far too many enemies like Ryze Son of Rome if it was good.

Reminds me a tad of Dishonoured, and not just for the powersets being similar. It hands you a thousand entertaining toys (Combat gear, traps, powers and grenades, or the Nemesis system) then removed the challenge if you used them. At least DH was making a point, charging in and butchering everything as Corvo makes the story go rather badly, but in Shadow of Mordor it feels unintentional.

>>54384434
"I've got a hole in me pocket"

File: thread gets derailed by pol.jpg (70KB, 600x303px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 600x303px

>>54388589
They can sometimes be, at least unintentionally. They can also be quite cringy, especially with the Israel one.

>>54384539
>genius

>>54385235
No one has any obligation to be nice to you, twat.

>>54388458
>That shitstorm
Holy fucking disproportionate retribution, Batman!

I'm not saying she didn't deserve a bit of justice for what she did, but this is so far out of line it's not even funny. Yeah, she cheated, that's crappy and maybe, maybe you could justify telling her boss as a bit of sweet revenge, but for fuck's sake, leave it at that. This goes beyond 'deserved' and into the realm of 'psychopathically vindictive'. BBEG is right; fuckboy deserves blunt-force castration at the very least.

>>54388521
...I get the distinct impression this question is more loaded than your average six-shooter.

File: Le 20ème de cavalerie.png (1MB, 1372x676px)

1MB, 1372x676px

>>54388344

>>54387909
So basically you're saying "If you get shot, you die."

Reality disagrees.

>>54387350
Some context please. Did the baby survive?

>>54389038
>there is no safe place to shoot someone that guarantees survival
>OHHH I SEE YOU MEAN IF YOU GET SHOT YOU DIE WRLL THASS WRONG

Want a (you)? Have a (you).

File: 1496728689856.jpg (5KB, 273x184px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 273x184px

>>54389038
Nice generalization. I'm saying getting shot is a very dangerous thing and carries a good risk of killing you.

>>54389126
>you can't guarantee someone survives your shots
>THEREFORE EMPTY YOUR MAGAZINE AND MAKE SURE THE GUY IS DEAD

Great logic.

>>54388761
Not him and you're right, there's no obligation. But when you come at people angry like if someone would regularly shit into your food, it makes you look retarded, not him.

File: DEGiviHWAAALbZ-.jpg (37KB, 597x597px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 597x597px

>>54389201
Well I mean, if you're drawing your gun that means you're defending your life from an immediate threat, therefore you shoot until the threat stops coming at you. So yes, that course of action is correct.

>>54383589
PONYYYY

File: Player forced to make up character's line on an intimidate check.jpg (91KB, 636x720px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 636x720px

>>54389126

In the game of (you)s, you bait or you die.

>>54389201
>I can't guarantee this person isn't a threat to me and everyone around me unless I've shot him until he stops moving
Yes. An officer does not use his gun unless lives are on the line. That's the rule. A gun is not a tool of discouragement. It's not a disabling device, like a tazer. It KILLS things. That's what it's supposed to do.

Attempting to use a firearm non-lethally is lunacy. And before you say 'rubber bullets' I want to to realize that the officer's life is his first concern. He doesn't use the gun because he wants you to stop doing thing. He uses it because he has justifiable reason to think YOU ARE GOING TO KILL HIM. And because he has to be able to safely do his job, the law protects his opinion. If it didn't he could not do what he does: keep idiots like you safe from dangerous people armed with lethal weapons.

>>54388458
>Americans

>>54388880
That was 2 years ago, presumably he's since slept with her mother, her aunt and her therapist.

>>54389090
When Liu Bei was attacked by Cao Cao's forces, he was forced to flee with the rest of his army and the peasants whom he was protecting. Unfortunately he got separated from his child during the escape. His trusted Lieutenant Zhao Yun took a squad of men and went back into the raided city where Cao Cao's army was pushing forward. Zhao Yun returned safely with Liu Bei's son but almost the entire group of men he took with him died fighting to ensure his escape. Liu Bei, frustrated with the sacrifice of good men, forsook his son, seeing the child as a poor trade for his lost men.

>>54389239
And thus officers are trained to pull their gun at the slightest hint of a perceived possibility of a threat, and shoot with a hair-trigger temperament, and not stop until the target is dead. Congratulations for taking the most extreme stance imaginable, I guess. Enjoy your dead innocents.

>>54389152
>>54389126
You are the ones saying that if someone is willing to accept a 1% chance of someone dying, then they should also accept a 100% chance of someone dying.

But that doesn't follow at all.

If I can shoot someone once and put them down on the ground bleeding with a good 50/50 chance of surviving, but a 100% chance that I can get the fuck away if I run, then shooting them again is at least 50% murder.

>>54389347
>sends a squad to get his kid
>squads gets his kid and take a casualties
>fuckit too many casualties fuck the kid

And this makes sense how? If you're a general and you send men into a mission you have to always be ready for them to not come back. That's war! And on top of this he just made the deaths, which HE ORDERED, pointless!

Why is Romance of the Three Kingdoms so full of morons?

>>54383622
In the era of feminists disrupting events in this way I could see this making a comeback

>>54389201
The logic is this:

>does this person need to die? (eg if he immediately threatens the life of others or yourself)

>if no, DO NOT SHOOT YOUR GUN because you will probably kill him if you shoot him

>if yes, SHOOT YOUR GUN UNTIL HE IS DEAD

You don't "shoot to incapacitate", because if you think the guy should be incapacitated and not dead, you should use a weapon that isn't likely to kill them like a taser or your fists. Don't try doing that against a person you think has a gun who's trying to kill you.

>>54384238
Few things are better than hating carthage

>>54389397
>I can shoot someone once and put them down on the ground bleeding with a good 50/50 chance of surviving
Impressive shot! How the fuck did you do that?

No seriously. How do you 1) make sure the incoming threat is no longer a threat and 2) keep them alive 100% of the time? Because I can guarantee no cop is going to make anything less than 100% survival on a DISCOURAGEMENT maneuver an official policy.

>>54388880
LOL, no, you fucking idiot. All that happened is that a couple broke up. Then the sister, best friend, and cousin who had the hots for the guy for years saw their opportunity and asked the guy if he wanted to fuck. Then the girl automatically assumed there was some nefarious dastardly mastermind plot to seek revenge. Because, of course, she is the center of the universe and everything revolves around her.

The guy did nothing wrong. I even applaud him for taking the cat away from the narcissistic emotionally juvenile twat. There's no way she could have been able to take care of it on her own. She couldn't even take care of herself. She had to move in with her parents, for goodness sake. Clearly she was a leech mooching off of that poor guy. And he is better off without her.

File: 1499847235205.png (107KB, 500x467px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 500x467px

>>54389375
First off
>police are involved with an individual
>police feel threatened enough by said individual enough that they draws on him
>innocent
A (you) for (you) my man.

Second off, yes. Shooting until the target stops is the best system for defending yourself. I have no qualms with it what so ever.

>>54387200
English isn't my first language, but are any of those words spelled wrong?

>>54389453
But that's just giving up on the option of incapacitating anyone who forces you to draw a gun.
It's just an excuse to murder people unnecessarily.

>>54389477
Your interpretation is entirely valid.

This is why I don't trust Reddit posts.

File: describing what you're wearing.png (81KB, 367x224px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 367x224px

>>54389402
>If you're a general and you send men into a mission you have to always be ready for them to not come back. That's war! And on top of this he just made the deaths, which HE ORDERED, pointless!
Reread it.
>His trusted Lieutenant Zhao Yun took a squad of men

His junior dude thought the general's son was important.

He thought his men more important.

>>54389453
I get the logic, but the first point is set a such a low standard (can't see the hands, threatening posture, aggressive behaviour etc.) that what follows is almost a binary - comply (and pray to God you don't look the slightest bit shifty while doing it) or die. That's extreme. Other Western countries don't do it this way, and their police aren't dying in droves either.

>>54389497
Pretty sure they're just being clever, making you read their advert over and over.

>>54389397
Except that you can't ensure that that first shot will put them down 100%.

Traditional taught marksmanship is to put a controlled pair(double tap) into the chest and then a single shot into the head, which covers most situations.

In a full on adrenaline rush, it's entirely possible for a man to not even realize he's been shot if it fails to hit something that will slow him down, so you want to take two shots to increase the chances of actually putting him down.

And if he's wearing some sort of body armor, you want to take a single shot to the head to account for that, because while getting hit while body armor can hurt like a motherfucker(and can still kill you if you're unlucky), the armor generally does it's job and keeps you from being removed from the fight.

Removing someone from a fight is not the same thing as killing him. You can shoot a man dead and he'll still have enough time to kill you back.

>>54389540
>>54389497
" The car worthy OF OF your attention"

>>54389497
Of is repeated in both lines.

>>54389397
Nice job, I too wonder how you managed to injure him in such a way, he's got a good chance of surviving AND he's absolutely not threat to you whatsoever. Especially in a single shot, damn fine shooting there. Because one shot always gets the job done.

http://www.odmp.org/officer/420-trooper-mark-hunter-coates

File: 0 points in will.png (956KB, 625x1566px) Image search: [Google]

956KB, 625x1566px

>>54389503
Someone who isn't dead is still capable of shooting you.

If your first shot is stopped by hitting a steel plate in someone's shoulder that you didn't know about, they can move their arm up and blow your brains over the street.

>that's just giving up on the option of incapacitating anyone who forces you to draw a gun.

If you're forced to draw your gun, you weren't planning on incapacitating the guy anyway. Let me repeat.
IF YOU WANT TO INCAPACITATE SOMEONE USE A TASER, OR YOUR FISTS. You shouldn't draw on someone that you don't think is a danger.

Do you really want police to be allowed to incapacitate people with guns? You really want to have police start shooting people in the back and say "he probably wouldn't have died so I was ok to shoot him so he didn't escape"? Because that's what you're suggesting police use their guns to do.

>>54389474
>keep them alive 100% of the time?
This is the part that doesn't matter, since the alternative is a 100% chance of killing them.

The solution is you shoot them until they drop their weapon, stop shooting, retrieve the weapon, and call an ambulance.

You don't just fucking keep unloading to ensure you've executed them.
You utterly uncivilized cunt.

You miserable fucking cockroaches.

>>54389503
Non-lethal tools like tasers, pepper spray, and clubs are not almost completely ineffective against people armed with guns or people who are so off-their-gourd on drugs that they wouldn't feel a grenade take a limb off. When half a second makes the difference between life and death (yours, your fellow officers, and the civilians you are surrounded by), you don't gamble. You use your gun. And if you have to fire your gun you put however many bullets you need to into the threat until they cease to be a threat. This is a vital part of training as a police officer. These protocols are drilled into every officer because the ones who don't get it are KIA.

>>54389516
Indeed, fellow gentlemanly scholar.

>>54389653
Now you're placing an impossible standard on people in high stress situations to function perfectly without issue, and to perfectly understand the current threat their opposition presents to them at all times.

File: 1497434936982.jpg (174KB, 1170x1498px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1170x1498px

>>54389653
I know you like to believe all the memes you find that makes you think american police just execute people on the ground, but it turns out, that several gunshot wounds to the torso has a pretty good chance of killing someone, even with medical attention. Who knew?

>>54389658
I never told you to use the pepper spray. I'm telling you that shooting at someone you've got to shoot at is not the same as shooting with the intent of causing death, even if you are accepting some N% probability of death occurring.

>>54388521
>free the nips
hilarious, but no way that's real

>>54389725
I don't see why the right part is circled
that expression is 100% correct

>>54384582
How the fuck did paper Mario devolve to this? You can't just select a command? You have no means of defending and counterattacking? Is this just pure shit?

>>54389725
I don't get it.

>>54389752
I think it is, isn't there already at least once city in the U.S. where it's perfectly legal for women to walk around topless?

>>54388880
>...I get the distinct impression this question is more loaded than your average six-shooter.
Considering the page says "Free the nips" at the top right...

>>54389722
That statement right there is so dangerous I can't even begin to unpack it.

If you point a weapon at someone with intent, you are signaling that you are going to kill that person, or are willing to do so. If you pull the trigger, then you are trying to kill them.

There is no gray area here.

>>54389722
Tell me then how you believe we should shoot people then if not with "intent on causing death" if you're shooting someone, you accept you're inflicting lethal harm on someone, enough lethal harm that they cease to be a danger to others. If there's some magical way you know how to shoot someone with a good chance of killing them and stopping them immediately, I'd love to hear it otherwise please refer to the link here on why you're a fucking retard. >>54389617

>>54389722
>Shooting at someone is not the same as shooting with the intent of causing death

But it should be. If you are firing a gun at somebody it better be to kill them! That is the entire point! If you are firing a gun at somebody, you have decided their life is forfeit in order to save your own life and/or to save the life of those around you.

>>54389653
Alright let's try this from another point of view. How do you do it.

Let's assume for a second that you're the officer in the OP for this whole argument. How do you handle the situation in a way that guarantees two things: 1) that the punk in front of you is no longer a potential threat to you and nearby civilians, and 2) your safety?

To be a functional cop you MUST HAVE both. Not either, both.

Remember: you don't know if he has a gun.

>>54389719
It seems you have not been reading the thread. See, for example:
>>54384951
>>54388531
>>54385181

>>54389758
Someone who fails his roll won't see the mathematical, but the grammatical expression.

File: angel-blooded succubus.png (346KB, 625x930px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 625x930px

>>54389534
>I get the logic, but the first point is set a such a low standard (can't see the hands, threatening posture, aggressive behaviour etc.) that what follows is almost a binary - comply (and pray to God you don't look the slightest bit shifty while doing it) or die. That's extreme. Other Western countries don't do it this way, and their police aren't dying in droves either.
Other western countries DO do it this way with armed police. The problem is that there's a much more perceived prevalent armed crime in the US, along with the government going "hard on drugs" or whatever they're going hard on leading to excessive force police raids.

That, and US police are all armed due to the number of perceived threats. A good number of western police don't arm the majority of their police: Britain, Ireland, Norway, Iceland and New Zealand are all examples. That means their gun squads get to have extra gun training, and the police that don't find it exceedingly hard to shoot people without a gun.

>>54389786
Why are cats so adorable by themselves, but when you get them into a group large enough they become scary?

>>54389758
>>54389767
You always execute multiplication and division before addition and subtraction.

Done right, it would result in 40 - 16 = 24.

>>54389767
>>54389758
Did ya'll niggas forget the order of operations? you divide before you subtract. the equation would solve out to 40-(32/2)=24

>>54389725
the funny thing is you can fail this so hard you succeed

>>54384254
kek

>>54389838
I was going to say, this is actually a correct math problem.

>>54389825

Except that 4! = 24. So it's still correct.

File: __cirno_touhou_drawn_by_sai_bankoru__8749166610e3eeda17be465bc05cb9ad.png (20KB, 400x450px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 400x450px

>>54389811
>I'm agreeing with their points and that shooting someone is generally lethal
>somehow I'm not paying attention
Anon can you read or are you just dumb?

>>54389758
>>54389767
The joke is that people that don't know what ! means mathematically will assume the expression was done in the wrong order and get mad, since 8 ÷ 2 = 4.

>>54389752
>>54389767
The whole "expose breasts in public" has the particularly juicy sub-section called breastfeeding.

>>54389869
Anon, no! Arguments aside this is still a filename thread! All images must have a filename joke.

>>54389790
You are shooting at someone because the situation has escalated to the point where you had no choice but to use a lethal weapon.

There is a difference between shooting someone until they are down, and continuining to shoot, thus brutally executing them in the street.

Though, if Wikileaks is anything to go by, it seems that American police tend to find that distinction extra difficult, compared to the rest of the world.

>>54389894
Man, it's almost like guns inflict injuries that can devolve rapidly into lethality, who knew?

>>54389894
>There is a difference between shooting someone until they are down, and continuining to shoot, thus brutally executing them in the street.

Go on? Gimme a point by point. I'm genuinely curious because if you manage to solve this puzzle American police could avoid a lot of needless deaths.

>>54384457
>Becomes terrified when he burns

This sort of suggests this isn't a natural reaction to being on fire and that he's some sort of pussy who can't take a little bit of being on fire like the other Orcs...

>>54389894

Shooting a person who is threatening and non-compliant is not an execution. That is defending your life and the lives of those around you.

>>54390018
>he doesn't light himself on fire
What are you gay? It's the best way to get /fit/ my man, no better way to burn that fat away.

>>54390050
That's just not true.

>>54390075
How do you figure that?

>>54390050
At this point he's not even trying to fish for his (You)s, he's got us hooked and he's just reeling in at this point.

>>54390075
Anyone want to pull up the literal hundreds of court cases demonstrating this anon incorrect as a matter of not just public opinion but actual common law?

File: DC 15 Disbelieve Glamer.jpg (83KB, 640x973px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 640x973px

Remember when we used to argue about more trivial shit?

>>54390077
""I see no God up here."
- t. Jurij Gagarin "
- t. KGB bureau of public affairs

>>54384254
I'm a GW customer but I don't get it

>inb4 dumb GW customer

>>54390159
I want to shoot that dress.

>>54390159
Well as someone pointed out in the bait thread. It's because everyone was forced to politicize in the last decade or two and take almost fanatical "us vs them" stances on their beliefs. 4chan just makes it worse thanks to a tradition of starting shit and baiting people.

>>54390168
what is the guy in the front holding?
Who do you think it belongs to?
Who do you think the guy in the back represents?

>>54390168
GW is killing your wallet and making you watch.

>>54390165
its really insulting that that quote gets attributed to him all the time when it was Khrushchev, Gagarin Was Russian Orthodox, had his kids Baptized, kept icons in the house, and was known for being religious.

>>54389919
There is no puzzle; just don't execute people who are clearly disarmed and incapacitated. And if it can be proven that a policeman just shut off his brain and murdered someone without checking if they even had a gun to begin with, then he is obviously to be fired.

Police need to be held to a higher standard. If they are allowed to just go judge Dredd at the slightest imagined threat to their safety, then you're just paying them to execute people in the streets.
Sometimes for no real reason other than reflex or instinct.
That breeds a careless chucklefuck attitude, and that's exactly the kind of shit that doesn't fly in other countries.

No fucking surprise you've got so many violent deaths.
It's not a terrible thing to encourage police officers to be slightly more careful and calculating, if it literally saves lives.

File: 1342630689544.jpg (14KB, 189x352px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 189x352px

>>54384688

>>54385078
>But why not?
Because even wounded, an armed (or unarmed) assailant is a mortal threat.
>I find a policy of "always shoot to kill" hard to justify.
It's easy to justify if you understood, even a little, about how bullets and guns work. I'll drop a few talking points here:

1. I'm just quoting numbers from the hip, but handgun rounds travel 600-800mph. You shoot someone once, they're not going to realize they've been shot until the brain catches up. That could take seconds to hours, depending on circumstances. (like drugs!)

2. A bullet doesn't magically and arbitrarily stop when it hits something. Like the Energizer Bunny, it just keeps going, and it may not keep going in the direction you pointed the gun. Let's say you shoot an assailant in the arm: it's going to enter and exit and keep going. Maybe it goes across the street and hits a tree- no big deal. But maybe it goes through the person's arm and across the street and hits someone driving down the road. maybe it ricochets off the bone and kills a kid. Now you've got injured/ dead people, and an assailant that doesn't realize he's been shot.
3. it is incredibly difficult to shoot a moving limb. center mass is called "center mass" because it's big and obvious and not at all difficult to hit, even under intense scenarios.

summary: it's far more effective and reliable to shoot to kill than it is to shoot to wound.

>>54383589

As >>54384246 said, he was also a Russian boxer who when retired was awarded a political seat just becausy

>>54390323
>There is no puzzle; just don't execute people who are clearly disarmed and incapacitated. And if it can be proven that a policeman just shut off his brain and murdered someone without checking if they even had a gun to begin with, then he is obviously to be fired.
Ok, sure.

What's that got to do with a policeman with a gun on a suspect who's acting like he's got a gun behind him and makes as if to pull it out?

What should the cop do?

a: shoot him until he goes down
b: wait and see what happens

>>54390371
He's already "answered" that question, he's going to say "shoot the guy until he stops and call an ambulance" while then proceeding to say "But american police can't stop shooting the guy and they execute him on the ground!"

>>54390323
>just don't execute people who are clearly disarmed and incapacitated.
So don't shoot people that you've shot.
...oookay?

>If it can be proven that a policeman just shut off his brain and murdered someone without checking if they even had a gun to begin with, then he is obviously to be fired.
What method of checking runs no risk to the officer? Remember he must look after his own life as well. Blue lives matter, as the trolltastic saying goes.

>>54384241
Sauce?

>>54390077
The Russians were fucking stupid though, because all the dust from the graphite in the pencil would wind up inside of their equipment and fry it all.

>>54390271
>>54390274
Oh, I was looking for a wallet or money actually but I didn't recognise that thing. Yuromoney looks different.

File: Rigger goes sneaking.gif (2MB, 451x338px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 451x338px

>>54389666
What the fuck is this, Satan?

>>54389725
If you do PEMDAS, this answer "4!" is correct.
4!=24
If done from left-to-right, it's grammatically correct.
40-32=8, 8/2=4

>>54389778
What does a didgeridoo and gay sex have to do with Minotaurs in EDH?

>>54389822
It's unusually vexing and large groups are generally intimidating.

>>54390206
>4chan just makes it worse
4chan wishes it could be as toxic as every other social media website. Who needs bait when any celebrity wannabee can go on twitter or start a blog about how x is ruining America. 4chan can't offer that attention despite how much of a cesspool it is.

>>54385520
I don't get it.

>>54390481
>Yuromoney looks different.
that's clapistani money

>>54387519
Well suicide did drop dramatically in the UK when ovens that were relatively easy to stick your head in (coal gas ovens) were phased out - it just dropped by a percentage and stayed at a similar level ever since. The ease of the method is a pretty big factor in suicide

>>54390477
The Russians didn't actually take up pencils, they used wax crayons, then later developed a pen similar to the off-the-shelf ones NASA bought (rather than developed with muh taxpayer $$$ as is usually claimed)

>>54389822
Really? I always thought they just got MORE adorable, even if they're those gangs of Greek street cats. Seriously, there's thousands of the things everywhere, it's amazing.
It's MICE that become terrifying in hordes, if only because the ground starts moving.

File: Kharne's Crotch When.png (77KB, 151x189px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 151x189px

>>54384559
Someone posted my OC!

>>54390488
>What does a didgeridoo and gay sex have to do with Minotaurs in EDH?
I should not need to explain the gay sex part.
http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=2904

File: PC still has one or more HP.webm (873KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

873KB, 500x500px

I feel like this should have a /tg/ related filename but for the life of me I can't think of a good one.

File: the PCs meet the ambassador.jpg (45KB, 750x1024px)

45KB, 750x1024px

>>54383514

>>54390759
Jesus anon, that guy had kids, show some respect.

File: 28901-18427-24584.jpg (82KB, 960x660px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 960x660px

>>54384637
Taking out the trash.

File: Your life on 4chins.jpg (82KB, 500x375px)

82KB, 500x375px

>>54390788
>tfw muses won't exist in your lifetime

Why is Eclipse Phase categorized as horror when you could just sit in your living cubicle and hang out with your personal head-AI all day? Comfy.

>>54390759
>our problems with roaches are getting out of hand.jpg

File: Won't the Real Slim Scaly Please Stand Up.png (469KB, 894x771px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 894x771px

Cropped from
>>54385035

>>54390706
I didn't know that was a card. Bravo to >>54389778

>>54388880
What I find interesting about this one (assuming its real at least) is that i get the feeling that this woman is not (or is not aware of) her actual relationships with her friend/sister/cousin. And there are some red flags pointing towards her being maybe some kind of narcissist. I remember there being a small discussion about that last time i saw it on here.

Mind you, Im not defending the Ex's actions or anything like that, but unless this man is a hentai-protagonist you cannot make people hate each other with your magical penis. Im willing to bet that there is some beef between the women in the story that the narrator is not willing to share (or aware of).

File: 19702-7336-32159.jpg (22KB, 480x290px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x290px

>>54384867
>threatening a cop
>doesn't deserve to get shot

File: after the war of wrath.jpg (155KB, 600x742px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 600x742px

>>54390018
Lil bitch snagga cant handle his fire, he fucked living in Mordor

>>54390759
no blood?

>>54391016
At the very least "...I saved [her friend's] life when she took up cutting" and " ...and [the cat] definitively loved me more than my ex..." are tells that this woman have no difficulties seeing herself in a positive light.

>>54384867
>He tried to rob a pharmacy unarmed
No, no, anon. He tried to ILLEGALLY GET cough syrup

File: 1463187082129.png (16KB, 167x230px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 167x230px

>>54385078
>What is the fatality rate for a single gunshot wound?

>I find a policy of "always shoot to kill" hard to justify.
>>I find a policy of "always shoot to kill" hard to justify.
>>>I find a policy of "always shoot to kill" hard to justify.