3D Printing

File: tektronix.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x360px

Neat.

>>54376601
>While in reality it's because no one actually bothered to design something well.
No, the reality is that 3D printing high-quality models is even more expensive than casting models from high-quality molds.

also, I'm going to agree with you that that print looks awesome, but I can still see the grain of the print through the paintjob

There is literally no difference printing vertically or horizontally

Is this a troll?

Even his example picture to show off the difference has one method with light reflecting off the surface so you can see all the details, and the other with muted light so you can't see all the details.

What a crock of shit.

>>54377774
>There is literally no difference printing vertically or horizontally

You sound more like a troll.

There is a huge difference, one is full of stepping, the other has a smooth surface.

>>54377675

I read through his other stuffs. That model was painted right out of the printer, so if he just added some green stuff, there won't be any gains.

It's pretty cheap considering you can get that from a 300$ printer. I mean if you plan to print a few...

>>54376601
I thought everyone was already aware that 3D printed vehicles and terrain can look quite good. The problem's with the 3D printed dudes.