the character alignment chart is flawed, here is a better version

>>54317531
Here's a better alignment system:

>>54317531
gr8 b8 m8

>>54317531
We stopped using alignment back in 1982. I don't know why you kids still think it's a thing.

>>54317531
Because charachters morals can be represented using a 2D system. Go away D&D faggot, no one wants your gay shit.

>>54317569
Underrated post

>>54319528
I'm saving this to make a thread where anons rate their party.

As a DM, I don't think I've ever given a shit about alignment. Give your character some basic morals, and play them consistently, that's all.

>>54317531
>Lawful-Criminal
No, you fucking idiot

>>54321282
Robin Hood, you fucking idiot

Would your lawful-criminal alignment change if you traveled to a country with different values and laws?

>>54323647
Probably not.
Lawful-criminal can be viewed as regard for the law the way I see it.
If you're a tourist in a different country you (temporarily) put their rules above your ideals right? (or not if you generally don't give a fuck anyways)

>>54322748
Are you mentally challenged?

>>54322748
He's not lawful, you fucking tool. He can be good and lawless, (i.e. chaotic good) but he can't be lawless and lawful.

File: judges internally.gif (2MB, 331x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 331x240px

>>54317531
>Lawful, Good, Order -|- Criminal, Evil, Chaos
Dredd agrees with this chart.