What's the lamest villain you've ever seen?

>>53893267
>that lip bite though

>>53893295
Seriously. Would hire to build my supervillain lair.

>>53893267

She actually has a good thing going, if I remember right she's the one who builds secret hideouts for other villains.

>>53893330
And then keep her there?

File: 1497447169359.gif (98KB, 253x230px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 253x230px

>>53893267
>that lip bite
>that tied up pose
>that nice body and qt outfit

Really makes me wanna do bad things to her. Like make her eat a bowl full of eggs

>>53893353
Off course.

A good lair needs constant work, and having a at qt carpenter on site is handy.

File: Star_of_Chaos.jpg (40KB, 610x645px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 610x645px

>>53893267

>>53893267
She's cute as fuck, but the best part is Batman's expression - it's just a little pitying, bordering on disgusted more than being surprised or amused.

>>53893267
I want to see how she handles a bunch of screws!

>>53893267
So is this a new Rainbow Six Siege character?

>>53893463
I'll bet she's great at nailing wood.

>>53893483
I know she helps me maintain a strong wooden structure.

>>53893267
This has got me super embarrassed for no reason, I have an actual evil zombish carpenter villain and this villain being so lame makes him look lame as fuck too (not that I think he is lame but its the precedent that it sets).

>>53893267
I want to fuck the carpenter.

File: 1463838107936.png (199KB, 548x414px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 548x414px

>>53893267
>carpenter
>woman

>>53893677
Best not be talking about my waifu

>>53893677
Worked in a technical college, training carpenters and joiners. The guys were mostly people who fucked up their secondary school years. The girls were few and far between, but actually put the hours in and outperformed the guys year after year. They tended to find it hard to get work afterwards though. Lots of them transferred to multitrades (decorating) because for some reason people preferred to trust these talented woodworkers with paintbrushes.

>>53894143
>wanting a man and not a lady to do an agility based crafting task
The fuck?

>>53893741
Yes

>>53894498
>The girls were significantly (and very consistently) much more competent.
Carpentry I can kind of squint and see what you mean, except that the girls didn't fall behind particularly when they had to do site days, though they did tend to be a bit shorter than the average guy.
Joinery and other workshop stuff? If you have to be peak fitness you're doing it wrong. Work smarter.

>>53894143
>The girls were few and far between, but actually put the hours in and outperformed the guys year after year
As someone who actually went to a tech college I can tell that you a full of fucking shit.

Keep your TALES OF INDEPENDENT STRONG WOMYN WHO OUTPERFORMS MEN to tumblr or twitter just like the anecdotes of your wife's 5 year old son being woke.

>>53894793
no, I mean ladies should specifically be better at carpentry than men because they've got better reflexes and agility going on.

Like, if you're going to be sexist, you WANT a lady carpenter. It's not like they're an architect.

>>53894918
Stay mad, bro. I know where I worked.
>>53894967
As far as I could tell, it was mostly just that the girls who were there wanted to be there, and the guys mostly got pushed into it by failing their GCSEs. It's insane how little respect trades get in life, despite requiring all the discipline and intelligence most degrees do.

>>53895084
>trades
>intelligence
Haw.
Though, thinking trades require intelligence might be why sexists went for men instead of women.

>>53893431
Incredulous is the word your looking for anon.

>>53894918
Its not uncommon especially in more "manly" trades for women to outperform men on a regular basis. Mainly because they're there despite it being a "manly" task and thus typically enjoy it and actively work on getting better.
That in itself will make them the upper tiers of the group. That's not to say women are better than all men, just that in those cases they're often better than the majority of men because the majority of men don't care or want to be there so they're automatically out of the running.

>>53893501
I'd let her install my plumbing.

>>53895124
Being a good mechanic, electrician, or even plumber is actually pretty taxing brainwork outside of the very routine maintenance stuff. For builds of a certain size, where there's no architect but some complexity, a carpenter has to be able to plan and construct a building. Compared to feminist literary criticism, it's actually pretty hard.

>>53895223
He's probably not giving you a serious answer, he's either trolling or he unironically thinks that everyone without a college degree are subhumans.

>>53895223
That is negligibly difficult to the point I trust any gender to do it.
It's not like it's rocket brain science.
Wheras it DOES rely much more heavily on how well you can control and manipulate your hands.

File: IMG_3511.png (114KB, 223x311px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 223x311px

This kid who sexually harassed me in middle school. He grinded his butt on my penis and then when I told a teacher he said it was a prank.

With actual villains, I would have to say Kothophed from MTG lore, because he sends Liliana to one of the only things in the multiverse that can help her get out of her demon contract and then dies right after she comes back. Plus his card isn't played at all

>>53895168
It is incredulous, but it's also almost sad.

File: download.jpg (6KB, 201x251px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 201x251px

>>53893267

File: funny-youre-posting.jpg (63KB, 325x510px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 325x510px

>>53895268
>That is negligibly difficult to the point I trust any gender to do it.

>>53894918
Why does everything written by /pol/ sound like it's on the verge of crying?

>>53895268
Do you even know how difficult it is to science rocket brains?

>>53895314
Because it's tears of joy, due to the fact that their self esteem is so shit that they need to post their opinions, no matter how shit or wrong, on the internet and the fact that people will willingly take the bait and argue with them gives them validation.

>>53895314
Not that anon, but i would presume it is because you are projecting.
Also i can't find anything /pol/ in that post, so you might be paranoid as well.

>>53894918
The women in trades are always better than their male counterparts. They have to be in order to keep getting work.

Sadly not true with female engineers.

>>53895358
Man it's so fucking hard.

>>53895366
I dunno, you sound like you're on the verge of tears here, but
>>53895364
doesn't.

>>53895379
Only because they're so damn dumb.
They keep thinking 1+1 equals EXPLOSION.

>>53895419
To be fair, it does. Even if we don't want it to.

>>53895366
>i can't find anything /pol/ in that post
>Keep your TALES OF INDEPENDENT STRONG WOMYN WHO OUTPERFORMS MEN to tumblr or twitter just like the anecdotes of your wife's 5 year old son being woke.
What's it like being blind?

>>53895196
I heard she takes pay in diamonds.

>>53895443
Hey, he's a degenerate, it's no surprise the eyes went off too.

File: 1420578953999.jpg (194KB, 1066x1599px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1066x1599px

>>53895314
Because they're sad and tired and more than a little scared of where the world is going and are lashing out at anything that strikes away from what they've come to identify as ideas so intrinsic to themselves. Instead of agreeing that 'maybe something could,' they'll say 'it can't,' because to do otherwise would be to tear themselves down in the process.

>>53895437
nonono.. you're think of 1 + -1, which ALWAYS = Explosion.

The only time 1 + 1 actually = Explosion is when 1 and 1 are shot at each other through a particle accelerator.

File: megumin.jpg (90KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1920x1080px

>>53895501
I think we're thinking of different rocket brains

>>53895454
I don't have any diamonds. Would she settle for a pearl necklace?

File: 1337841010204.png (492KB, 587x557px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 587x557px

>>53895369
>They have to be in order to keep getting work.
If that was true, affirmative action and gender quota's wouldn't be a thing.

>>53895823

There isn't any affirmative action in Trades, anon. Engineering, yes. Carpentry, no.

>>53895528
No, because in her case: 1 = Magic, 1 = Target, Megumin = particle accelerator.

>>53893267
Measure twice, cum once if you know what I mean.

>>53895961
I don't know what you mean.

File: Condiment_King.jpg (35KB, 390x434px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 390x434px

>>53893267
Found her dad.

Can 4chan have any discussion that doesn't devolve into political shitflinging? Any at all?

>>53896252
I'd lend her my caulk if you catch my drift.

>>53896349
Why would somebody catch a drift? Do you mean driftwood? That would hurt if you missed.
And I don't know what that has to do with caulk.

>>53895823
Affirmative action has no impact on the trades. If you have skill, apprentice, you gain your papers the same as anyone else. Nor are there any gender quotas in the trades; if there were, we'd probably have far more women in the trades because we'd be required to.

As the other anon noted, there is affirmative action in engineering, which is why you can't say all women engineers are better than their male peers. They aren't, strictly, required to be to get a job.

But carpentry, general contracting, plumbing, welding, masonry, et alia are highly competitive. You get enough bad reviews on Angie's List or Yelp and you won't be working in that part of the country much.

But please, shut the fuck up.

>>53894143
As an Electrican you are kinda full of shit. Women are few in the trades but for the most part they do well in school. These same women I went to trade school with are absolute shit out in the field.

Every woman I have worked with has pulled more stop work cards than guys and for the most retarded reasons. One kept going home 3 hours into he shift claiming she had heat stroke. They refuse to do anything besides prefabing light material or acting as a ground man for those up in lifts. Basically any job which requires them to stand around.

>>53896338
We used to be able to, before the election.

>>53896338
We don't deserve nice things.

>>53896338
Not as long as /pol/ comes here and doesn't behave

>>53896384
I would fuck her in the pussy if you understand the vernacular.

>>53896384
Nobody likes a wet towel anon.

>>53896338
Last night I was in a thread here where someone blamed feathered dinosaurs on SJWs.

So no. No we can't. Not anymore.

>>53897056

That's still up, actually.
>>53881564

>>53894967
Real life doesn't work like this.

>>53896727
I don't get it.

>>53896428
>>Your anecdotal evidence is wrong, my anecdotal evidence is right, durrrrrrrrrrr

>>53895675
Only if they come with cream filled donuts and hot coffee.

File: 1369031600413.png (254KB, 500x514px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 500x514px

>>53895189
Man, you can't be more obvious with your bullshit "Women are always better than men." spiel.

Seriously, this whole thread reads like a mashup between "I want to believe women are better than men because that's my fetish." and "I want to believe women are better than men because I hate men."

>>53894967
>adies should specifically be better at carpentry than men because they've got better reflexes and agility going on
But they don't.

>>53897352
You're a retard or trolling. Not him, and not in a trade school, but my major was very very broad and required self-discipline and actual interest to make due with it. Since it was so broad it was constantly full of dullards who failed STEM courses or the more difficult liberal arts courses, making a majority of the major complete morons. The people who were there because they wanted to excelled and the disparity between the two groups was ridiculous. It's not that difficult to assume that women who are going into a trade that is not "feminine" are likely there because they WANT to be, not because they failed out of other opportunities. Is it that hard to assume a small minority of people who want to be there could be better than the larger majority of people who fell into it?

>>53897465
>people were murdered on her behalf
>they used voter fraud to help her

Is this bait?

>>53897486
Of course, you goddamn idiot.
If it wasn't bait, it'd be on /pol/ and not here.

>>53897442
It's pretty hard to believe your gender wars girl power shit, sorry. That's not how reality works outside of gender wars episodes in 90's cartoons and feminist blogs.

>>53897486
No, they're both true.

>>53893267
/pol/ easily.
They're persistent though. Always posting about politics and gender warfare.

>>53897506
Things can be both true and bait.

>>53897515
Blame those guys who came here to talk up how women always excel and beat all the men at school.

>>53895314
Because they are. Impotent rage does that to everyone, and extremists on both sides are prone to it.

>>53897503
My example wasn't even girl power. I'm a man. I went to a majority 70-30 female school, so I was the minority that excelled in my field because the majority of people had just fallen into it. That said, the girls who chose to be in the major also excelled.

>>53897554
You might actually just be illiterate.

>>53897506
Maybe on bizzaro /pol/.

To believe half of those things on that list you'd have to also believe that your vote was able to stop such a terrible menace. Get real.

>>53897577
>My example wasn't even girl power.
But the one we're talking about is exactly that. It's a constructed story either to push his fetish or a political leaning. Hell, you've turned your own manufactured story into one just to try and further support it, probably out of fetish or politics.

And seriously, don't whine about people objecting when you post a story that tries to push a "Women are just better than men" angle. That's never going to fly without comment.

>>53897554
I will instead blame the guys who spam political shit like hillary nonsense and gender warfare.
So, /pol/.
I mean, fuck, we didn't have these problems before you guys showed up near the election. And it's been non-fucking-stop since. It is really hard NOT to blame you for it, given the incredible correlation.
That, and you see girl power in an incredibly bland and centric message about "hey, giving a shit is way more important than other things"

>>53893357
What kind of eggs

>>53897642
I'm telling you that the guy who felt the need to push a "Girls are better than men" meme started the gender war shit, idiot.

>>53897625
No one said women are better than men. He said that women who actively seek work in male professions tend to excel, because the women who would fail tend to avoid said professions.

I'd assume the same is true for male nurses or male seamstresses--they excel because they actively seek to excel.

>>53897643
A whole bowl of them. You don't have to say what happened, you just have to eat them.

>>53897625
Anon, stop posting about your fetish for inferior women on /tg/.

>>53897655
And I'm telling you, that you are seeing "girls are better than boys" in an incredibly tame "people who give a shit are better than people who don't give a shit" story, and are using it specifically to start gender wars because that is all you have fucking been doing since the goddamn election you horrendous waste of human life.

>>53897602
Almost all of the things on that list were definitely true, though.
Also, this is the woman who was behind the disastrous foreign policy that has the Middle East and North Africa on fire.
She's honestly done so much indirect damage to Europe that I'd shudder to think what she'd do to the US.

>>53897661
False dichotomy.

>>53897658
>No one said women are better than men.
He did exactly that. He posted a story claiming that women are better than men at the trades. Specifically saying women outperform men on a regular basis. The post is in this very thread anon, don't like about it.

>>53897676
See >>53897687

>>53897697
Muscle girls are my fetish though.

>>53897711
>Posting the same message over and over
Low effort trolling.

>>53897687
I'm not lying about it, you just seem to have trouble understanding others. There's some sort of disorder you guys on /pol/ love to talk about that might explain your inability to get that anon was saying that people who are actively leaving their comfort zone will tend to excel more than people who aren't, simply because they have to.

Again, a male nurse is likely going to be above-average because he has to try harder to do it. He doesn't just fall into that shit.

Imagine having literally nothing exceptional about you besides your male gender, so you have to argue about gender politics on a Mandalorian cage fighting newsfeed.

>>53897703
Competent / assertive office ladies are fine too.

>>53897554
Son, you need to watch some Jordan Peterson and sort yourself out.

>>53897723
Don't give them actual responses anon, they've already chosen their narrative.

>>53893267
>someone posts a shitty batman villain
>100 posts of bitching about women, muh /pol/ and muh SJW
I think I'm starting to hate this place.

>>53897744
The double whammy of the quest exodous and the election really isn't calming down like I hoped it would.
This place might be terminally fucked.

>>53897697
>trump fetish
post more

>>53897754
Out of literally everything, this is the worst thing Trump's election has wrought. If she had just been elected, people would have gotten bored of /pol/ almost immediately.

Now Trump's influence will never leave.

>>53897785
Trump will truly go down in history as the shitpost president.
Which is fucking weird. I feel kind of ashamed to have "the shitpost president" be a thing.

>>53897741
>>53897723
I like how you mindlessly lump me in with the politics posters. Me taking issue with your girl power narrative has nothing to do with those guys posting about Clinton.

And no, your post contains a story talking about how women outperform men. That's blatant nonsense based on an idea that men are inferior. Don't try and hide it with after the fact attempts at self justifications.

>>53897785
Or people would be constantly upset at the monstrous things she does.

>>53897754
>Gee, lets fracture the board over something that we've proven to me numerically false
>This is a good idea
>W-why are people mad...
If anything, by creating a board that draws attention to /tg/ you've incurred the wrath of crossboarders and newfags. If the board chokes on it's own blood and dies remember you literally asked for it.

>>53897797
Trump himself is a massive troll. He's known for going out of his way to make people feel uncomfortable and pranking people that think they can get the better of him.

>>53897821
Yeah, it might have been a bad move to cave to the guys making shitpost metathreads over and over.

>>53897797
It was a fun experiment, but like all good fun on 4chan, eventually it gets old.

>>53897816
Not at all. Shit would just be business as usual. /pol/ would go back to being a containment board, instead of just a place for people to spill their shit over into every other board.

@53897805
Just replying to (You) one last time to let you know you're a complete moron and I hope your genes don't make it through to nextgen.

>>53897814
>First to accuse others of shitposting
>First to devolve to actual shitposting.
Golly.

File: Summer.jpg (54KB, 1024x600px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1024x600px

>>53897754
>This place might be terminally fucked.

File: Gotham City Sirens #6 022.jpg (472KB, 1280x1957px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 1280x1957px

>>53893267
For those of you suffering from incipient waifuism, here's a gift from /co/ - all Jenna Duffy's appearences.
Detective Comics #841
Gotham City Sirens #5-7
Batman: Streets of Gotham #12-13

>>53897842
You keep whining about other people being part of a containment board but here you can't help but post about how you love Hillary.

>>53895443
That's not even /pol/, it's like literally anywhere that isn't the ultra-feminist parts of tumblr.

>>53897849
Nah, shitposting started up here.
>>53893677
Like always, /pol/ fucking started it. It's always goddamn /pol/. Every time. I wish it was SJWs once ever.

>>53897863
I hated Hillary, didn't vote for her, and campaigned for other candidates, but nice try. Just cause I recognize the big retard is a big retard doesn't mean I like the lizard woman.

>>53897842
Pretty sure my genes have a better chance of making it than yours, because worshiping them like goddesses really isn't popular among most women, hate to tell you.

>>53897805
>And no, your post contains a story talking about how some women outperform some men.
I fixed that for you. You're welcome.

>>53897854
It's been summer since November 8, 2016. Fucking normies drank the /pol/aid and now they're shitposting all over the place with no regards. Now we can't make a fucking Jew joke anymore, because these twats have made the mods trigger happy for bans.

>>53897883
>I sat on the fence so that I could bitch about whoever won regardless of who it was

>>53897888
>about how some women outperform some men.
>>53895189
>Its not uncommon especially in more "manly" trades for women to outperform men on a regular basis
>they're often better than the majority of men

>>53897886
I'm actually in a bit of an argument with my wife right now.

>>53897901
I didn't sit on a fence. I campaigned for a candidate. The candidate lost.

>>53897908
>not uncommon
>implying it's not all

Are you retarded?

>>53897916
Do you want to know what something not uncommon is? It's common. Shocking, I know. That means it's usual, typical, normal.

>>53897937
It could be rare too, or even mythic!

>>53893387
She sure does look like she can give a good nice firm hand, as well as other stuff nice and firm.

>>53897975
>>53897937
Or even just straight 50%!
Is "half" common?

>>53897916
Oh, my apologies. Let me correct my previous statement.
>I threw away my vote so that I could bitch about whoever won regardless of who it was

>>53897984
Well, if one half is common, the other half is also common...

>>53897643
entire raw shelled eggs

>>53897908
>Its not uncommon especially in more certain trades for motivated minorities to outperform obligated majorities on a regular basis

That's how I read it. Is that logic flawed in some way, or am I just totally missing why you're mad?

If you even are mad. At this point, you're holding the reigns on the ruse cruise. I'd be having fun, if I were in your position.

>>53897290
He's right because it's a known fact women can't do hard work.

>>53897975
Context matters, honey.

>>53897984
Half of women excel over most men? That doesn't dispel the girl power bent, anon.

>>53898045
The logic that women always outperform men is no sort of logic at all, dear.

>>53898066
>women always outperform men
Where is the always coming from?

>>53893330
That's basically when she ended up doing, if I recall right.

I wonder if she works with Calculator.

File: FamiliesNamed.jpg (162KB, 2000x520px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 2000x520px

You know guys, President Tomaru is going to bring healthy family values into your country. Aren't you happy?

>>53898069
Oh sorry anon. 'Usually'. Not like it maters because that' still a statement of superiority.

>>53898045
There's also the flaw in his statement that apparently motivated men do not exist, so hey.

>>53898069
His trump fetish.

>>53897442
The women in my trade are there because they get paid a fuck ton and make tge company look good for "diversity. Other than that they are useless cunts who refuse to do their job but are more than happy to take a cheque.

>>53898091
If the man was motivated, he'd be in STEM, and not mingling with the mongoloids and negroes.
Checkmate, atheists.

>>53898107
Maybe the man really likes building shit.

>>53898125
Then he'd be building science. If he was motivated.
Or fighting wars.

>>53898091
I have to assume you're just trying to get (You)s at this point.

>>53898091
I'm not getting that at all. Are you ok, dude?
You want to talk about it?
We could move the conversation to a more fitting board, like /diy, /adv/, or, and I mean this with no ill will, /pol/.

>>53898100
Anon, stop posting about your trump fetish on /tg/.

>>53898148
You've consistently refused to face how a statement made calling women more competent than men might be biased and driven by ulterior motives, so I'm not surprised you're not 'getting it'.

>>53898088
I feel the need to ask.

I've seen variations of this posted a lot and avoided it.

But seriously, what the fuck?

>>53898091
Reading from this exchange, all the guy said was motivated minority > unmotivated majority. There is no mention of an unmotivated minority or motivated majority being compared.

>>53898165
I have? I just got here.

>>53898167
It's called family love. Daughter haters like the current one failed to properly love his daughters like Tomaru did.

quality thread everyone

>>53898170
He was comparing women vs men, stating that the women outperformed all the men and presumed women were more motivated than men. Again, the entire issue with his statement is clear.

>>53898188
You know what? I'm going to just accept that as my answer and step away from the rabbit hole. For once in my miserable existence I'm not going to seek the answers to questions I know I shouldn't ask.

>>53898198
No, he said that the motivated people tend to be better than unmotivated & that people put into unfamiliar ground or gender-unusual roles tend to be more motivated.

>>53898198
Christ, the fragility of your masculinity must be pretty bad.

>>53898209
Then accept it already. All those daughters & not one bore the current guy's child. Do you hear any weeping children crying for daddy? They want to join with their fellows from daddy's testicles.

>>53898214
See >>53897908
Specifically, the second quote.

>>53898224
Oh hey, you're straight up using politicized terminology now.

>>53898251
See >>53895189
> Mainly because they're there despite it being a "manly" task and thus typically enjoy it and actively work on getting better.
That in itself will make them the upper tiers of the group. That's not to say women are better than all men, just that in those cases they're often better than the majority of men because the majority of men don't care or want to be there so they're automatically out of the running.

File: Untitled.jpg (706KB, 1681x854px) Image search: [Google]

706KB, 1681x854px

Reminder to be good to your family & love them properly.

>>53898268
You're ignoring how that's a presumption on his part. He merely assumes the women are more motivated, he directly states the women outperformed the men.

>>53898290
with the keyword majority as if to state that it isn't a catch all situation.
Just that they're beating the majority.
Which was later clarified as the unmotivated.

Like how fucking retarded are you not to understand this

>>53898284
Looks like Kagura Inou cheated on dad with her brother, and Rika Inou cheated wit that Kuu Hazama fellow.

>>53898290
You're ignoring how your wife's daughter is likely sucking off a chad right now. Quit making it look like you haven't gotten any cunt in a year.

>>53898268
That's not necessarily true, see "Gamer Girlz."

That said, this guy just comes across as sad for immediately babbling about "girl power bullshit" the moment he saw a post favoring women, then continuing the argument for hours.

This thread is shit.

>>53898313
>with the keyword majority as if to state that it isn't a catch all situation.
>Just that they're beating the majority.
I'm not sure why you think the idea that 'most women are better than most men' is any less of a fetish/politics motivated bias.

>>53898290
It wasn't. It didn't assert anything like that. it stated that those within a less populated subcategory tend to outperform a more common subcategory due to differences in tastes & motivations. It didn't say anything outside those subcategories.

>>53898331
>Gamer Girlz
Somebody needs to check his next because another may have laid their eggs there.

>>53898337
Because the explanation for the situation makes complete sense and I'm not going to toss logic out the window for the sake of my views?

>>53898251
>Oh hey, you're straight up using politicized terminology now.

That's the first or second time I've posted in this entire thread, and I'm a male, voted for Trump, and think the majority of women in my profession tend towards incompetency. It's really pathetic that you need to assume everyone that sees how oversensitive and fragile you are in regards to the topic of women is some kind of politically opposite to you boogeyman.

>>53898351
You keep stating this over and over without introducing an actual proof. I've been showing you his direct statements here, including a statement indicting most women and most men without further qualifications.

>>53898383
You forget that his scenario is most assuredly false.

File: Untitled.jpg (224KB, 798x599px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 798x599px

Reminder that Tomaru is superior to all the beta males. Those too insecure about their lack of testicles & must assert superiority over women instead of dominating them right now shall bow before Tomaru & cry.

>>53898331
I am kind of baffled the janitors and mods do absolutely nothing to stop these obvious shitposters.
I mean, this entire discussion is about political things, and the mods are just... letting it be on /tg/. When there is a board specifically for politics.
Do the mods and janitors just want more shitposting? They seem to be outright condoning it.

>>53898391
>You forget that his scenario is most assuredly false.
Because you want it to be?

>>53898391
You keep stating this without any proof & ignoring the proofs of others. You've directly ignored what the other has been saying & twisting it to fit your agenda. I do not care about the chad banging your wife & her daughter.

>>53898420
Because it's an unsourced personal anecdote on 4chan that perfectly supports an anon's argument.

>>53898429
>You've directly ignored what the other has been saying
You or the original post? Because I'm not ignoring what he said, I've argued every part of it. You, on the other hand, just keep saying the same thing over and over.

>>53898440
You quite literally ignored what was written and went off on some girl power rant, repeating your version of it over and over.

File: Untitled.png (671KB, 1076x1450px) Image search: [Google]

671KB, 1076x1450px

Reminder that if you're spending time asserting superiority instead of demonstrating superiority, you're just another beta pussy who likely voted for the daughter hater or his fuckbuddy shitlery.

Talk is cheap. Sex is better.

>>53898368
Now let me be clear. Most of the girls I play with are great, but I've also run into a few girls who clearly are more interested in the social label of being a gamer than the game.

We've got to be careful about absolutes. Everyone getting triggered around here.

>>53898431
Almost as if a logical scenario can support arguments.

>>53898412
The mods don't give a shit about /tg/, anon. If they did, /pol/ discussions, both sides, would be on /pol/.

>>53898412
I've got to admit, I do find it somewhat humorous that people have been banned for less such as making a joke about the similarity of orc and slav rape babiesyet this thread hasn't been deleted yet. Maybe the mods are too understaffed and can't keep up with the shitposts, or maybe they've given up.

>>53895272
Are you gay now?

File: Untitled.jpg (77KB, 799x598px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 799x598px

>>53898474
>Most of the girls I play with are great
Same here. Otherwise, they wouldn't be pregnant by the end of playtime.

>>53898412
Yup... One of the problems is that the /pol/ janitors double dip and apply for janitorial service on other boards.

I know one, and I am contemplating murdering the little shit.

>>53898507
You probably should.

>>53898492
I've been banned for making fun of fat people...

>>53898492
It's kind of goddamn crazy that the mods aren't trimming this.
I mean, I can't think of a more off topic conversation on /tg/ right now.
Who do we e-mail to get janitors removed these days? Because our mod and janitor team is absolute garbage right now and needs to be removed.

>>53898483
'Logical' doesn't mean true.

>>53898528
Maybe the mods are fat?

>>53898466
Two of those girls still seem to have cheated with another guy.

>>53895252
Sometimes you get a college degree, and you find yourself a trades worker anyway.

Now back to QT villain craftsman, since op committed classic blunder of more interesting pic than topic.

>>53898558
But you can't throw it out just because you disagree with it.

If you can't beat a logical argument, why should you be taken seriously?

File: NTR-solution.png (927KB, 1119x1600px) Image search: [Google]

927KB, 1119x1600px

>>53898575
That's only a problem to inferior men.
Superior men know "cucking" just means a larger harem.

>>53898598
>Letting the cheater have her cake and eat it too, getting to fuck the other guy without consequence.

>>53898593
It's not an argument, it's an anecdote. It innately has no proof and is only arguable if you accept it as fact on faith.

>>53898606
Everyone wins!

>>53898561
Probably.

>>53898617
Except you, since your wife is pregnant with another man's child.

>>53898616
You're confusing the anecdote and the logical argument.

>>53898635
No, you're confusing what we're talking about.

>>53898575
In actual canon, those two are actually his children. Tomaru let his kids use his sloopy seconds as training.

>>53898626
So, you get the man AND the child later on to be in your harem?
win/win.

>>53895369
Engineers a shit most of the time, at least ME's. Never consider the solution they come up with in the context it will be implemented in. EE's are generally pretty good though.

>>53898650
Man you're full bore tarding it up.

>>53898626
Then impregnate that child. Simple. A wife's duty is to produce children for her husband to fuck.

>>53898646
No, you actually switched them around.

>>53898598
>>53898506
>>53898466
>>53898403
Nice meme, reddit! But anyone who cares got their yuks out of this set of VN ages ago. I know you enjoy your new toy but you're late to the party and you're being a bit boorish about it. Since I'm your friend, I'm letting you know politely. There's no way to DM youon an imageboard!

>>53898646
No you're confusing the anecdote with the logical argument.

>>53898598
I blame /tg/ for this sort of shit.

Shit like this is how I'm stuck with a qt elf slave (male) in one of my games and have to hide the shit out of my power level. Like every step made perfect sense and I'm pretty sure said elf would be receptive if my character made the first move but I'm not about to do that in front of my group.

Feels bad man.

>>53898649
So this Tomaru guy doesn't care about having his daughters as romantic partners, just as sexual ones.

>>53898661
Said the fox, bitter that he couldn't reach the multi-generational grape harem.

>>53898666
'No u' doesn't work, anon.

>>53898669
Present your logical argument, then.

>>53898528
I just got back from a ban which I responded to a Bait thread with "I thought homosexuality was a Jewish conspiracy, like race mixing and the holocaust". I thought people who realize I was mocking OP, but nope.

>>53898668
Oh, hey fellow redditor. Here to help with the redpilling of /tg/ like all the other redditors?
Haha, they'll never expect we're invading to post about cucks and how women are inferior!

>>53898697
>how women are inferior!
Nobody has done that though.

>>53898684
No, you literally got the "logical scenario" and the "sound argument" mixed up.

File: Untitled.jpg (34KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x375px

>>53898668
>reddit
Someone needs some family values.
>>53898675
Why should family bonding exclude others? Shouldn't all family bond together? Shouldn't a son lose his virginity in the comforts & security of his mother & sisters' beds? Shouldn't a daughter be happy it's her dad lovingly deflowering her instead of some stranger?

>>53898711
Haha, silly 4channer, not understanding our sophisticated memes.

>>53898598
I am so glad /tg/ solved the cuck problem.
Truly, a great day for humanity.

>>53898684
People who want to do something in a group where the majority don't care are going to be better than the majority.

>>53898697
Awesome, and then you one two them with your favorite relationship-subversive doujin and eroge schlock to completely bamboozle these pathetic normies! Alpha as fuark bro! Ha ha! r/4chan is gonna have the screencap on the front page for sure, and then we'll both be rolling in upvotes!

Now that that's over with, it's time to stop.

>>53898749
Why would we ever stop, fellow redditor?

>>53898739
Now provide actual evidence that women are one of those groups and men the other in regards to the trades, because that's anon's entire original assertion.

>>53897307
>>53896349
>>53895675
>>53895454
>>53895196
>>53893501
>>53893483
>>53893463
I just wanted to get a gazebo built without having my dick sucked just once.

>>53898758
Why fucking indeed, mental indigent.

>>53898764
Not that guy, but if the men were motivated they'd be in STEM. There is no excuse not to be.

>>53898773
The word is "ingredient"

>>53898764
There are fewer women in trade because it's not a womanly thing.
Ergo, those women are in trade because they are about it more than the shitters who just end up there.
Ego they perform better than the shitter majority.

Nobody is saying they perform better because of their gender, their gender just puts them in a situation where they wouldn't be there if they weren't good.

>>53898771
This. Dick sucked at least five times or bust.

>>53898775
>There is no excuse not to be.
Not everyone is interested in those fields.

>>53898811
His assertion includes the idea that none of the men there are motivated, senpai, also with no evidence.

>>53898793
>mental ingredient

If for nothing else in this thread you've posted besides this, thanks for making me laugh anon.

>>53898820
>not everyone is interested in those fields
Yeah, those people are unmotivated.

>>53898825
Unmotivated to do what? Be a friendless loser?

>>53898822
We try.

>>53898841
Get into a real man's job, of course.
If they were motivated, they'd be in STEM or the army.

>>53898652
I trained as an architect and ME. I am well aware of the tendency for MEs to tunnelvision. Which is ironic because that's the CE's job.

But my point wasn't about engineers in general probably not being worth the money spent on their educations. My point was that because of affirmative action hiring policies, female engineers tend to fit the median curve male engineers do in terms of skill.

Which really harms the overall STEM effort for girls.

File: fuck this shit i am out.jpg (96KB, 599x421px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 599x421px

>Oh boy i see an interesting thread in the catalog,lets check it out so that i can see various bad villians in fiction
>Thread is everything but that

Why /tg/ why?

>>53898868
Much of /tg/ was surgically removed, and then to fill the void we had an election.
Like, either one of those would cause temporary instability. Both together? I really hope it's temporary.

>>53898820
Nobody said none of the men were motivated.

You're making the assumption.

>>53894143
>The guys were mostly people who fucked up their secondary school years
>outperformed the guys year after year

The guys here refers to the same set of guys in the first quote.
>The guys were mostly people who fucked up their secondary school years
>The guys were mostly people who fucked up their secondary school years
>The guys were mostly people who fucked up their secondary school years

Can I make it more clear?

By stating

>The guys were mostly people who fucked up their secondary school years
>The guys were mostly people
>The guys were mostly
>mostly

He's acknowledging it doesn't apply to all men and as such isn't stating women are inherently better than all men like you're assuming.

>>53898890
If they were only referring to the unmotivated guys and not all the guys, they would have said 'these guys', anon. Otherwise he's referring to all the men present.

>>53898890
A+ reading comprehension
F-- see me after class taking the bait

>>53898920
Because he clarified as much if you're later and it's the more logical conclusion?

>>53898920
Once you already have established a subject, you can say things like "these X" and still be referring to the subject.

>>53898921
With my A+ reading comprehension, I'm a little confused on what the F-- grade is for.

Please clarify.

>>53898950
After class.

>>53898935
He didn't clarify anything later, the rest of his argument is saying "GIRLS DON"T GET JOBS DESPITE THEM TOTALLY BEING BETTER THAN MEN"

>>53898939
The original reference to guys was referring to all the male carpenters and joiners in his classes, read it again.

>>53896338
yeah
politics

>>53898978
>>53895189
>That's not to say women are better than all men, just that in those cases they're often better than the majority of men because the majority of men don't care or want to be there so they're automatically out of the running.

>>53898978
Yeah, I read it again, the subject was established previously.

>>53898867
I just hijacked your post chiefly to rant about ME's, because as a controls technician, I'm constantly dealing with poorly thought out and executed mechanical spaces that fill me with a murderous rage. I have to rant occasionally, or else I might actually say what I think one day to one.

>>53898867
>>53899011
Honestly, fuck engineers and highly educated professions in general.
So many of them are absolute garbage at their job despite having a certificate.

>>53899006
>>53899007
Yes, that statement is saying that all of the women are better than most men, creating a statement of general superiority.

>>53899037
That doesn't seem to follow from what was said.
Are you feeling all right?

>>53899055
Poor attempt at an argument, anon.

>>53899060
That also doesn't seem to follow from what was said.

>>53899055
No, he's retarded.

>>53899037
The statement goes back to the logical argument posted here
>>53898811

and again it's a matter of circumstance brought about by gender, not an inherent statement about how sex > other sex.

Which was also supported later with the topic of affirmative actions making for the situation to not be the same.

>>53899078
That post isn't the original statement we're arguing. That's something he extrapolated. This argument is a product of criticism directed at the veracity of the original anecdote.

>>53899152
That doesn't follow, though.

>>53899353
You're a broken record, anon.

>>53899361
It's never stopped being true.

File: it_follows_ver9_xlg.jpg (255KB, 1011x1500px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 1011x1500px

>>53899353
>>53899398

>>53893267
>Come to thread not because I was interested in OP's topic but just to see how many other guys think The Carpenter is cute.
>thread is about cutepenter and also actual carpentry.
TG at it's finest...
Also captcha had a picture of an animu figurine... so it was a good day.

File: 1469789170476.png (258KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 512x512px

Jesus christ guys.

I even clarified I wasn't saying women were better than men naturally. It was simply about the motivated being better than the unmotivated. How did it get to this point?

>>53899642
Because you treated all the men as unmotivated louts in your anecdote.

>>53899642
A troll. Like, shit, nobody has that bad reading comprehension.

>>53899651
>all
I literally said the opposite though.

>>53899642
Because everyone is a princess and their feelings need to be validated, every slight to their world view must be defended as if it were a personal attack.

>>53899651
That doesn't follow.

>>53897816
This.
/pol/ will still come to /tg/ if Hillary won, to complain about Hillary.
No matter who won the election, /pol/ would shitpost...

What a time to be alive.

>>53899758
>implying /pol/ shitposts here
>implying it's not just fa/tg/uys trolling themselves with /pol/ shit because they know it triggers everyone

>>53899815
Well, this DID all start around the /pol/ invasion.
That, and fa/tg/uys don't do that trolling shit.

>>53899848
>>53899815
Well, we do have the board immigrants who shatpost about how much they hate quests.
They'd have no problems trollin' people.

>>53897290
>Uses anecdote to support argument
>Other anon uses anecdote to support counterargument
>w-why are you using anecdotal evidence ? That doesn't count

>>53899848
>/pol/ invasion

/pol/ is too busy invading /pol/ to be bothered with /tg/. where do you think the shareblue_change_file_name_before_posting.jpg images come from? /pol/ trolls the shit out of itself when they get bored. there's no need to come here when the >you's are just sitting there ripe for the taking.

>>53897894
that just means you have become the /pol/

>>53900036
They can take time out of their busy schedule to fuck with everyone else.

>>53893418
>not nids
lauffing big cat . jape

>>53897486
there was actually a thing looking into the dnc and it did explain they openly used it.
I mean it's a part of the political machine, murder, lies minor, rigging is all fair game man.
Political idealists don't get far for obvious reasons or they if they do they end in a ditch.
Case and point, Bernie sold out to her at the end man, then not sure if this is true bought a new house

>>53894918
>wife's son meme
Spot the cunty stepchild!

File: 1377917169371.gif (956KB, 288x198px) Image search: [Google]

956KB, 288x198px

>>53900092
do you check under your bed and in your closet to see if /pol/ is shitposting there too?

>>53900230
>it was totally a thing guys! I read it on pol!

>>3900295
No, animals.

>>53895314
>4chan started to associate not being a faggot tumblrtart with being a /pol/tard
You can't even say niggers anymore without people getting offended here

Is it Tomaru time?

>>53900437
The majority of 4chan has never been full /b/pol/tard.
Being an asshole is one thing, acting like an edgy wannabe racist faggot is another. Idc about racist jokes or people having fun with it. It's another when someone believes it and actively shits up a thread because people don't all circle jerk his 12 y/o edgy values.

File: hatsune_miku.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>the jannies haven't given this thread the death that it has earned yet

>>53895314
Humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.

>>53900507
Well, yeah. The janitors hate /tg/ related content.

>>53898771
But she leaves a fine polish on everything.

>>53897797
You should be. We all should be. Shame on you, fellow Americans. Shame on you, fellow Channers.

>>53900483
The point is that people are starting to care more and more about others saying "bad words" for some reason
I'm relatively new to 4chan, but I don't remember this happening before and nor have I seen it mentioned anywhere
It's as weird as getting into some fat chick's tumblr and seeing her use words like nigger or faggot
It's almost uncanny

>>53901068
I'm not sure how we could have avoided the shitpost president timeline, other than unilateral war on the russians.

>>53897894
No no no sir. The Perpetual Summer began during Chanology. We took ourselves seriously and paid in blood. We shall never again be free; we drew too many eyes our way.

I just lost The Game.

>>53901140
You know what. I stand with this anon.

I just lost the game as well.

File: banner.png (10KB, 300x100px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x100px

>>53897496

>>53901140
>>53901178
The pools closed, you guys.
Due to ____

>>53901108
The thing is people are fine with words here. They're not okay with the rampant shitposting that is going along with that.
Saying nigger is fine. 100 posts of why someone is wrong because they said a black dude can be an amazing engineer is just annoying.

>>53897840
I think it's a sign of a website growing in size/appeal that it stops being about "the people who like X" and starts being "about X".

"People who like TTRPGs" have reason to like quests, some did, some didn't, but in the end it was essentially just a "role-play-by-committee" story, which was great if you hate PbP games, didn't have anybody IRL to play with, or didn't want to risk an randoms online.

/tg/ is just more popular, but it also means that the rules have to be stricter, because more people means more people "bending" the rules which is overall "bad" for a community.

>>53897901
>I hate both major candidates but anything else is considered "sitting on the fence" or "throwing away my vote"
God bless the American political system, the only time you can criticize someone when they say "maybe we should eat somewhere else" when you've just stopped at a restaurant that serves either cow shit or horse shit.

>>53893267
Post the rape edit

>>53898885
>Much of /tg/ was surgically removed
That almost implies /qst/ isn't a dead board.

>>53897744
Same. I just wanted to laugh at some lame villains, was that too much to ask?

File: 66124806.jpg (25KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x400px

>>53897643
All these faggots fighting over political women shit, and then we got this anon asking the important questions

>>53899651
Even if they did, they just admitted that they clarified what they ACTUALLY meant.
At this point it sounds like you're one of those people who when a journalist/news feed makes a retraction/clarification on a story just keeps going "BUT YOU SAID-!" and ignoring the fact that the follow up was a clarification for poor wording/communication, instead treating it as them denying what they said had the meaning it did.
Hint: If they needed to clarify, then they are acknowledging the fact that they may not have caused their High School English teacher to spontaneously orgasm with joy by writing something that 100% can not be interpreted incorrectly no-matter how hard someone tries.

>>53901287
Smartest thing I've seen all thread.

>>53903750
Anon, if you cut off your leg and place it on another room it won't get to building it's own life.
You both bleed out, the only important difference is that the leg does so first.

YOU ARE ON A QUEST!!!
A crossroads lies before you.
To the east, is a lovely college, where beautiful women learn how to build palaces.
To the west, is a thriving trade city, where the city council is embroiled in a hotly-contested election!
Which way do you travel?

>>53903846
where do you think anon?
>To the east, is a lovely college, where beautiful women learn how to build palaces.

>>53903846
Where did we come from? If the hotly contested election is contested by the other cities in the kingdom we might be able to find work as an outsider who "isn't involved".
Do we need money, or are we set for now? Building palaces seems like a good job too, but unless we can afford the tuition/housing we might be learning out of a cardboard box unless we plan on doing the "professional student" thing... is that related to the other cities election?

With such little information I'll go with:
If we have good money/have good loan system for students:
>Enroll in the lovely college
If we need money
>Find a job in the trade city so we can afford to enroll in the lovely college.

>>53903888
we should take up male prostitution, college is a woman's experimental phase, a lot of them like to try new things.
>>53903841
>>53903750
Personally I didn't see a problem with quests being on /tg/, I'll never understand why there were people that gave so much of a shit about them

>>53903908
Good point. If we ever get desperate we could probably get a little bit of cash by selling our body, so yeah. All in on the lovely college plan.

My understanding is that every now and then lots of people would go "Hey that quest thing is pretty cool, but I have an idea for my own" and once a fortnight or so they would just FILL the place, but I wasn't here when it was super bad apparently so it's just what I could piece together. I only saw it when it was Haphazard, Harembro-quest, and another magical girl quest of some kind, that I could see consistently alive.

File: nope gif.gif (2MB, 286x210px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 286x210px

>>53893267
>Carpenter
>Not wearing PPE while operating power tools
0/10 would not commission for a custom wooden furniture set

>>53903952
To be fair, she's actually a pretty good carpenter in the comic, at least way better than she is as a super villain.

>>53903681
>stricter rules
The rules have gotten significantly more lax, though.
I mean, look at this thread.

>>53903929
While I kind of get that, it doesn't change the fact exiling the quests on their own containment board seems to messed up /tg more than a lot of people guessed it would have, then you got the elections aftermath and /tg just isn't as good as it was before. Honestly, if I were the mods I would've just changed it back and let the quests return, it would just make at least somewhat better despite the clear political divide that now exists. Not that much better, but better overall.

>>53903929
plus it just pisses me off that the mods caved in at all

>>53904052
The mods caving did cause a pretty incredible uptick in shitposting.
I mean, fuck, that's never a good idea.

>>53904112
nope, never. I've almost never seen a situation where caving in because people are complaining produced good results. I don't even give a shit about quests, but I thought caving in like they did was the stupidest thing they could have done.

>>53893357
You're a monster

>>53904126
Honestly, the only time I've seen 4chan do it is when the ones complaining were also ban evading.
Like the MLP spammers that just kept ban evading until all MLP discussion was cordoned off.