Hello. I'm a Pathfinder vs 5e thread here to fish for replies.

File: owl_studys_2_by_markelli-d639gsr.jpg (224KB, 647x1000px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 647x1000px

Did you say owl thread?

File: EternalDebate.png (289KB, 1072x774px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1072x774px

Hello, I'm a Cestree vs Ribbon post here.

Ahem. Cestree is nothing but unattainable fantasy, and Ribbon is more relatable. For all the checklist points Cestree has, it still just doesn't match up to the spunk and fervor Ribbon has.

this will no be a very productive thread that shall die soon, me thinks

They're both objectively trash, and here's why:

> DM: let's go around the table and introduce our characters
> Player 1: I'm a half-rabinowicz half-drow poo-caster/ sewer maintenance technician with a bionic arm that fires green slime and rabbit feces
> DM: exactly like the sourcebook, good job

File: 1425249858984.jpg (26KB, 308x308px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 308x308px

>>53744595
>Tries to make a bait thread
>Posts something literally everyone with normal mental development will agree with.

>>53744595
If you want to b8 properly you need to argue that Pathfinder is the superior system.

I'm firm on that belief for a few reasons.

>Pathfinder is the most realistic to true world values edition, you can literally with any effort (most casual tier DMS lack this effort) recreate real world physics and interactions.
>Pathfinder gives you the most character choice whether you want to play a Kitsunr Sharpshooting rogue or a elemental , alchemist wizard.
>Pathfinder has the most respect for alternate communities such as lgbt.

>>53749707
>Pathfinder has the most respect for alternate communities such as lgbt.

And we have a bait post

>>53746148
Both have "combat as sport," both take too long, both say "you need to plan stories which last for 20 levels"

Delta Green 4dayz yo

>>53744595
>>53749707
>>53750205
Let me try:

5e is better because it's a system that most players get bored of after a major campaign, and it creates less harmful habits in roleplayers when they move on to better systems.

Pathfinder, on the other hand, as well as 3.5, is famous for ruining an entire generation of roleplayers, and has an almost fanatical following with fans that will, foolishly, support it tooth and nail.

And 4e is a video game, right?

>>53754821
No, 4E is the inherent flaw of having a company interested in making money develop an entertainment medium. They were going too far into this colllective IP that had an rpg, an MMO, a bunch of novels, and a lunch box. They spent too much time making this game appeal to every audience they were marketing to and ultimately didn't spend as much time fixing the RPG as they should've, or making the MMO better, or getting their version of Roll20 out the door.