Why are Dungeons and Dragons books so small?

>>53577140
Ease of transport?

>>53577140
Why would they be bigger?

File: 4121237-head-shot-of-a-handsome-57-year-old-caucasian-man-looking-into-the-camera-with-mottled-background-pa.jpg (7KB, 113x168px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 113x168px

>>53577140

1.) most books generally are much smaller than 11' so it can't be said that DnD books are really small

2.) what would be the benefit of making them larger than 11'? given that you're not talking about thickness, you're not adding content just making the already existent content larger which would be pointless.

what the fuck are you even talking bout? how big do you want them to be? all rpg books i've seen are around that size or smaller, thicker sometimes but having them be bigger just seems like it wold make them uncomfortable to handle

>>53577229
>what would be the benefit of making them larger than 11'?

Larger book allows for larger font and more pictures.

>>53577349
Are you the guy that posts wordswordswords in the OotS threads?

>>53577349
>Larger font
Put on some glasses grandpa, or get laser eye surgery
>More pictures
What are ya, 12? Fucking hell, all you need is text/numbers, any pictures should be considered a nice bonus, not something to make a bigger book over. use your imagination,,,

>>53577140
>5'10 vs 6´1

>>53577140
I think they're the maximum size they can be while still being convenient to take to sessions

>>53577398
Who doesn't love curling up with a good book?

>>53577140
Easier to fit in a backpack, and can be easily carried one handed or carried on a stack.

Large books are incontinent to transport.

/thread

>>53577140

OP would you happen to be a britfagby any chance

>>53580185

>incontinent

/thread indeed