Damnation is DEAD
What does it say in human language?
>>53477066
>creatures lose indestructible until end of turn
>destroy all creatures
Is that right?
>>53477096
I think "All creatures lose indestructible until EoT, Destroy all creatures."
>>53477096
All creatures lose indestructible until eot.
Destroy all creatures.
>>53477066
What if I'm playing indestructible creatures and want to only blow up my opponents side of the board
Damnation lives
>>53477126
But what if you play with creature that regenerate themselves and only want to blow up your opponents side of the board.
Hour of Devastation lives.
4 mana wrath is pretty cool, but the question on everyone's mind is: what does the flavor text say, though?
>>53477200
>Huehuehue en dingo
That's what I can read from it.
>>53477200
Something alongs the lines of
"No one is worthy"
Nicol Bolas - God Pharaoh
sauce? this isn't on any of the spoiler websites
I'm kinda wanting to see what the art of this is like properly, when its not shitty artifacted and in spanish
>>53477200
Nenhum é digno.
>yeah, what it said in english
None are worthy.
I think Bolas was trying to farm planewalkers to steal their spark. No Amonkhet planewalker yet, that is unlike what Wizard would do.
>>53477258
It was spoiled some minutes ago. Give it time.
>>53477258
The only reason I am inclined to believe it is that it's in Portuguese and the fucking Brazilians have been the first ones to leak the last like three sets.
>>53477258
I honestly don't believe it's real, because even if they reprinted damnation it would be at mythic, and a stronger damnation for the same mana cost is so unlikely that it's basically gauranteed to be fake.
>>53477066
>four mana sweeps in standard
Lolno, this is something they've expressly said they won't be doing anymore.
>>53477443
>Dawn to dusk kills every aggro creature deck in the format
>It's 4 mana
You are just fucking dellusional and repeating shit you heard somewhere else.
>>53477346
I wouldn't be so certain. All wrath effects they have printed have been at rare, and a wrath one turn earlier, while certainly a lot stronger, doesn't necessarily equate to mythic-levels of rarity.
Plus, when they were talking about cards being more powerful in the future, this is the set where they said we'll start noticing it. I mean, shit, nobody thought we'd have something like fatal push at 1 mana uncommon, but here we are.
>>53477466
>highly conditional 4-mana spell is anything LIKE what OP posted, or Supreme Verdict, or even just Wrath
If you listen very carefully you can probably hear me rolling my eyes at you.
>>53477473
I kinda feel like you're the OP grasping at straws.
>>53477322
>>53477346
no es fake
>>53477499
>standard is enlightened by creature & sorcery lives matter, doing away with instant-speed privilege that ruined mtg in the past
>bigoted constructed players who don't understand equality demand better answers and """interaction"""
>wotc caves and prints a 4cmc wrath again
classic fascism
>>53477066
time to sell my damnation
>>53477667
Well, I'm not the OP, and that's not a criticism at all, so hey. Guess we're getting damnation, my dude.
>>53477734
sorry but I 100% believe his this is a typical Brazilian lie
>>53477312
it already exists. sorta.
>>53477346
damnation makes it so regenerate doesn't kick in
this mysterious card makes it so they can't evade destruction through indestructible, though regeneration can still take effect
>>53477096
Fuck you, /pol/tard!
>>53477066
nicol bolas
the man , the myth, the legend
>>53477896
they phased out regeneration and have replaced it with temporary indestructible, which means that this (fake) card is functionally a reprint of Damnation
>>53477896
Is there even a single creature with regeneration that's relevant in any format? Meanwhile there are a handful of indestructible cards that are played competitively.
>Nicol Bolas showing up to save Standard.
What a bro
>>53477896
it also hits a flavor point in the set, because it destroys the gods too. the flavor text says "None are worthy"
>>53477931
they only phased out regenerate for new cards. older cards still use the "regenerate" keyword.
>>53477956
sure, but that's not at all relevant for Standard, because those cards don't exist in Standard, which means that for the purposes of Standard this new card is actually doing what Damnation does . it's a Standard-legal version of Damnation
also as someone else pointed out it's probably just strictly better than Damnation cause I don't think any cards with regeneration see competitive play anywhere
>>53478000
You aren't wrong about that. There is one card in Standard I can think of with the keyword, but it's just shit so nobody really bothers with it. But as soon as that set rotates out it literally won't matter then.
>>53477942
Yeah, due to elves and other decks that have ways to regenerate, while indestructible is pretty niche, it's unlikely this card will see much play outside of standard where it's nice to have a turn 4 board wipe instead of a turn 5.
>>53478086
If it's cheap most people are going to run it instead of dropping 200-250€ on damnations.
The Theros God-Killer.
>>53478128
Yeah, it being budget damnation is more or less a given.
>>53478162
Only if they are animated.
Kills the Amonkhet ones though, guaranteed.
>>53478000
Ezuri in elves. That's about it.
>>53478000
It's because WotC is actively trying to phase out Regenerate and replace it with temporary Indestructibility to make it easier for newer/shittier players to grasp.
>>53477066
>Todas as criaturas perde
>criaturas perde
Alguém manda isso de volta pra gráfica.
>>53477918
>the man
>>53478031
Unnatural Endurance and Birthing Hulk from OGW also had regeneration. I can't remember anything after that.
>>53477066
I doubt a card like this won't have the story watermark.
>>53479348
That plus no card ever has used the set's key art.
>>53477066
>perde
that can't be right.
No way they would let that pass. It should be 'perdem'. It's basic portuguese.
>>53477896
You know this artwork looks nice and all but something really bugs me.
Look at the two lighter obelisks, the one closest to Bolas.
Look at where they meet his wings. They go OVER the edges of his wings, like the artist made a mistake with their layers in the final render.
>>53477066
There's a typo ("perde" should be "perdem"), and the text lacks a space between paragraphs
>>53477066
>Removes indestructible
>Then kills
>Gideon's special ability across all his cards is that he becomes a dude with indestructible
RIP Gideon, we hardly gave ye character development.
>>53479857
Also, it probably should read: "Ninguém é digno" instead of "Nenhum é digno."
>kill you even if you can't be killed
>>53479883
>gonna kill gideon with the sorcery speed wrath
K
Here is what it says:
Hour of Devastation
Sorcery
All creatures lose indestructible until EoT, destroy all creatures.
Source:me
>>53481137
>What is Quicken
>Certainly not a spell a grixis mage would cast
>>53477066
>4CMC wrath in current standard
Seems fishy
>>53481242
You're not gonna fucking run Quicken.
You're LITERALLY not gonna run Quicken in standard and you're still not gonna fucking run quicken in modern because Gideon is niche as fuck in modern and what the fuck else could possibly be worth dicking around spending extra mana for instant speed?
>Selfless Spirit still works just fine.
>>53481622
How
>people spend 30 dlrs in damnation after reprint because it's finally "cheap"
>print another 4 cmc black wrath shortly afterwards
Lmao what a kick in the nuts. I wouldn't be surprised if this makes damnation drop even more.
>>53477066
Pretty sure this has already been confirmed fake.
We have never had a card that used the promo art and never had a card that shared a name with its own set.
Fake as fuck.
>>53481622
I think it doesn't.
>1. Your opponent casts Hour of Devastation
>2. In response you sacrifice Selfless Spirit
>Selfless Spirit's ability resolves, all is indestructible
>Hour of Devastation resolves, all is dead
Unless you can use Selfless Spirit between Hour of Devastation resolving and your shit actually dying I don't know how you'd pull this off.
>>53477066
Does it say 071/154 or 023/154?
One means its fake the other that it might be reel.
>>53482992
You don't.
It wouldn't do anything.
There's a 1 black drop that saves a creature though from this on akh
>>53477066
Fake, text should be centered.
>>53477186
>regeneration
>2017
>>53478408
Maybe he was a dragon man.
>>53482691
Conflux was in Conflux.
>>53484377
Maybe he was just a dragon
>>53481549
To be fair people ran quicken with Supreme verdict in RTR Theros standard. It's a moot point since they won't print quicken though.