New Warhammer 40,000: Stronghold Assault

>>53339203
TIME TO SELL TERRAIN I SEE

Release the goddamn rules you fucks

I like the idea, but it doesn't really strike me as anything super special, especially given it was fairly specifics light about things.

Looking forward to transports tomorrow, but I'm not expecting any massive news from it.

Can't it just be tomorrow already?

Buildings always were niche and boring and this new stuff doesn't change that.

>>53339245
>Slain on a roll of 1, 2 or 3.
Well, that sounds brutal and a tad unfair on elite armies. If it's the same for vehicles I would think we'd see a LOT less deathstars.

>>53339374
>artillery batters a bunker
>bunker collapses on your squad
>approximately half of them escape
>the rest are crushed to death by falling rubble
Sounds pretty reasonable. Maybe there should be some saves based on toughness rather than instant death. Guardsmen getting squashed by the ceiling falling on them is fine. Terminators maybe not. Maybe they could lose a wound or die if they've already lost a wound.

>>53339374
I'd guess you generally wanna fall back if it's going down, and that'd be if you don't bail out in time.

>>53339465
Terminators could just be temporarily stuck in the rubble like Angron in the Crusade. Not really dead but incapacitated for the battle.

>>53339465
I think it represents light units getting crushed and heavier units getting stuck under the rubble.

>>53339260

>GW doesn't give any warning before dropping a new edition
>people bitch
>GW discusses the new edition in great depth
>people bitch

Truly, gamers are the worst of scum.

Didn't FW put out special army lists for something like this before?

>>53339570
Different strokes for different folks.