> keep thinking about making a lewd RPG > keeps clouding

File: 1449932563317.jpg (178KB, 1212x2048px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1212x2048px

>>53289879
so, points of contention:
> Gotta include some fetishes that don't appeal to me.
Other people may at some point give this a once-over if it's ever finished, but at the same time a lot of my fetishes would contradict or prevent some other fetishes, so on one hand I'm trying to not rule out anyone I don't have to, but a lot of it wears down my enthusiasm to have to stat this unappealing shit out. I mean, at the end of the day this is a pet project that I'm sure nobody's ever gonig to actually run, but at the same time I can't help but feel a little selfish.
> Could just make it about my fetishes
I'd be happy, but this would greatly limit the kinds of characters you could make, and even the stories that could be told.
> I'm probably about 59% a furry.
No suit, no fursona, no OCs, but I'll be damned if I don't find some of the higher-quality art arousing. A discerning furry, if you will. I, of course, want to include this shit; at times I've even geared a version or two around being a predominantly furry game, where players play as animal people; like actually making the game people accuse Iron Claw of being. Really can't fully commit to this because A: Furry shit will turn away a lot of people automatically, and B: I'm not exclusively furry.
> It's rape-enabling
I've got rules for fucking, initiating a good dicking, and fondling people, and the mechanical consequences there of, so obviously this means any sort of neckbeard who'd actually run this game would be fully capable of committing rape; and not just fade-to-black rape, but full tilt, F.A.T.A.L., "he takes 1d3+1 damage from your dick," Rape, with a capital R. On one end I'm not responsible for what other people run with the game I built, and a lot of the mechanics are mandatory for the sort of game I'm envisioning, but on the other I know what kid of people are out there.
> I like randomized characters
A lot of people don't.

>>53289879
Nah, you are a faggot.

>>53289879

As someone who has done a lot of ERP, having rules for sex is the dumbest shit.

No dice should be rolled during a sex scene. Ever. There is no greater boner killer than that.

If you're really building a system around the idea of ERP, then you need to consider how to make sex interesting from a storytelling perspective, before and afterwards.

Whether this is something abstract or something that actually exists in setting is up to you, there's room for both. 'Mages need cum/sexual pleasure to recharge their magic' is something I've seen before, or making the idea of sexual domination something with real metaphysical power. Two people sharing a loving or affectionate experience can enhance one another, one person dominating another can drain their power for themselves, etc etc.

If you don't want to get into all that, even simple things like making a post-fuck roll to get a nice buff based on the afterglow would give it some useful place in the game without cluttering up the fucking with numbers.

>>53289879
Ohhh Magical Realm thread, Count me i-
>Futa
I'm out

>>53289879
How did the cultists manage to get the tiny dudes up high enough to tie them to her clothes?

I don't see any ladders, and the giantess looks bewildered enough about what's going on that I doubt she was complicit in it.

>>53289935
Go get a girlfriend already

>>53289935
> I like randomized characters
>A lot of people don't.

I'm one of those that do. Even though I acknowledge I'm in the minority, would you still at some point care to include some random generators to determine the physical and mental attributes of the character?

>>53290000
This.

My thing is less physically strong women (though those are fine too, to an extent) and more physically weak or small men. Regular girls dating halflings or kobolds or the sort. It's not just my magical realm, but also really adorable.

So I hope your fetish could be scaled down a bit.

>>53290000
The futa plague has ruined /d/

File: Car Lesbians.pdf (2MB, 1x1px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1x1px

>Good lewd RPG: pic related
>Bad lewd RPG: whatever OP is planning

Every major edition of D&D has had at least one third-party book of sex rules. They're all garbage, because rules for having sex are always garbage.

>>53290452
It's weird to think about how there used to be a time when there weren't any futa threads on /d/.

File: download (1).jpg (12KB, 323x156px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 323x156px

>>53289946
I have some versions of that in play atm actually.
It's less rolling to see how well you perform individual acts, and more rolling to get things going. A proper night of fucking would still be best handled as fade-to-black, and you can work out the effects in one big swoop and move on, but then there's rules for, say, fondling an exposed tit to daze an enemy, using your sword to de-robe somebody, or sucking off a sufficiently aroused person to induce fatigue, are the more mundane actions one could perform before the magic and powers start coming into play. Such traits may let one also drain HP while sucking a dick, or gain scaling glamor proportionate to the size of their bust.

>>53290000
>>53290249
atm there's only like a 15% chance your character will begin play as a hermaphrodite, and only one mutation that'll give a woman a dick.

>>53290131
Currently a lot of it is randomized by default, and you get three points of "fate" or "destiny," or whatever, and you can spend those to de-randomzie one step of character creation.

>>53290085
It's been one hell of a dry spell.
Probably accounts for about 1/3rd of my life at this point actually.

>>53290521
I'll give it a once-over; I've seen it before but I've never actually read it.

File: all_right_gentlemen.jpg (117KB, 605x579px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 605x579px

>>53290452

>erp/lewd rpg
fuckin losers, youre all totally pathetic

File: 1469100405575.jpg (59KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1280x720px

>>53290975
> projecting your insecurities online instead of discussing them with your SO

>>53290975

I know, right? We're able to indulge in erotic creative expression with other consenting adults for mutual pleasure and enjoyment! Far more pathetic than outrageously overreacting to the slightest hint of sex and making one of the most natural acts of humanity a cultural taboo.

>>53290000
>>53290249
>>53290452
>>53290521
>>53290956
> ~9/150 threads
> a plague
pick one

Focus on your own fetishes. Let others build it mod in their own system support. It's better to have focused games and choices thereof than a generalized game with turnoffs. It might even be better to cut some of the more contentious elements from the game's core.

File: Blarrgh.gif (67KB, 695x398px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 695x398px

>>53291269
Anon, you should know that 9 threads takes up all of /tg/'s front page and removes good threads from the board, as well as making up over 50% of the entirety of /tg/!

YFW this is the literal exact argument used to get rid of quests.

>>53291309
You could do one better and not really put in any of your fetishes at all, but instead build in a system to add whatever we like. Maybe use your own fetishes as examples on how that system works, if that.

>>53291340
That might fall into a generalism trap though. Does anything, but nothing particularly well.

>>53291309
>>53291340
That's actually part of the reason I considered nWoD: a simple core game, on which I can alter the core character mechanics and add rules for being lewd, and then any outlying fetishes can easily be included or added as merits.

-however, nWoD doesn't scale well. It's sort of got to have a base power level, from which characters aren't going to deviate too far from. This could be preferable, keeping some of the wilder fetishes from getting too out of hand, but at the same time it really hampers some of the intrinsically outlandish stuff.

>>53289879
You should probably do something like FATE, where fetishes and so on are just aspects that are all pretty much mechanically the same

It sound like you're trying to do GURPS where every fetish is a different rule/subsystem and that's too much work for one horny dude to handle

>>53291424
Originally it was more like D&D with fucking maneuvers, and modifiers based on your sex and the quality of your sexual features. Later versions have been more simplified, many getting away from d20 all together, but FATE is too simplified for my tastes; regular RPG or otherwise.

>>53291309
Point 3 is the biggest contention in that regard.
A lot of the hangups are unintended side effects of including the intended fetishes. Making a game where you could only play as something I would find arousing would, again, deeply hamper the types of games you could play with it.

File: 58561520_p0.png (2MB, 1862x1400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1862x1400px

>>53289879
The best TTERPG I can think of is one that doesn't require sex-based rolling bar mind control/mental pollution/seduction and whatnot. The main appeals would instead be how the setting is lewd and allows for a lot of interesting scenarios in it, allowing for interesting dynamics with the mechanics to back it up.

Give us examples of how magic fits into sex, about how artifacts have been made for this sort of thing, have a holy Pantheon as promiscuous as the greek gods, have a misogynistic/misandrist societies with odd practices, etc.

That's what I'd like best out of a TTERPG. Not "cumomancer" classes who get +5 to jizz.

>>53291643
A valid point, and rightfully banked in my notes, but world-building is sort of a middle-phase step for ground-up design. It'll surely influence some of the revised mechanics and character elements, but the game can't be refluffed or revised until it exists.

>>53291072
So do you neckbeards wank it during sessions?

>>53290956
Would The Boss have been better if she had a dick?

File: feelsgood.jpg (20KB, 329x357px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 329x357px

>Every time another anon starts talking about making an erpg my heart skips a beat
>Rush to check out the thread out of fear that they're doing what my erpg does but better
>That feel of relief every time it turns out their system is nothing like mine and doesn't even resemble anything I'd want to play

>>53289879
>cant'd decided between several factors and fetishes
If you're not putting them all in, it's a vanity project made only for yourself to enjoy, and what's the cunting point of it then?

>>53290000
Just once I'd love an ERP setting without it being 90% futa

>>53289879
Why don't you just take an existing setting and make lewd stuff for it? That's what I did for my campaign.

Though to be fair I've used the lewd corruption mechanics for several systems, they're pretty easy to port

>>53289935
>Gotta include some fetishes that don't appeal to me.
Other people can add that if they want. The system should be easy to make stuff for, it's a TTRPG, not a Vidya.


>I'm probably about 59% a furry.
Doubt at not being a troll rising to over 70%.


>It's rape-enabling
Rape fantasies are an INCREDIBLY common fetish, despite what some people would have you believe, and also despite what those very same people would have you believe, generally don't lead to people being raped in real life nor are they fantasized about by people who are or are planning to be rapists. There's no harm in rape being possible.

Hell, a setting where rape is very common gives PCs an out if they get defeated. They might escape with their lives, if not untraumatized (depending on how hard you'd want the rape of the setting to be, some settings has it having almost zero psychological consequences).

>I like randomized characters, a lot of people don't
You're either a troll or the most beta wimp I've ever met on 4chan. And I'm not the kind of people who accuse others of being beta.

>>53291335
Quests are a distinct activity.
Talking about lewds is fundamentally /tg/.
Perhaps even moreso in the past than now.

File: foghorn[1].jpg (47KB, 500x363px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 500x363px

>>53293480
>>53293480

>>53291335
And now the board's quality is going downhill ever since, the quests just got replaced with /pol/ shit.

>>53293452
Oh, and also: >>53289946 has it right. Have mechanics for things like seduction, cleaning up grappling rules for the obvious use, maybe mutation mechanics if you're into that, but leave the rolls out of the sex.

>>53293510
The spoiler didn't look like a joke to me. Fuck quest threads; they genuinely did take up the whole front page.

File: giveafuckbay.jpg (44KB, 500x345px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 500x345px

>>53293452
> your tastes are incongruent with mine, you must be a troll

>>53293514
/x/ mode: /pol/ was the one who wanted quests gone because quests were nearly impossible for them to disrupt with their bullshit and gave them less grounds to vomit everywhere.

>>53293514
It's gotten a hell of lot better over the last two months or so.

>>53293452
>Rape fantasies are an INCREDIBLY common fetish,

WAT?

I assumed the idea behind the rapists minds was just "want to make sex with her but she wont want, so forcing her to do it will be needed."

I can't imagine some rapist losing his sex drive just because he discovered the girl also want and so it wont be rape but consensual sex

File: Smug mug.jpg (33KB, 294x273px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 294x273px

>>53293559
>I FEEL THE NEED TO SAY OUT LOUD FOR NO REASON AT ALL THAT I AM A FURRY THIS IS NOT SOMETHING THAT HAS EVER CAUSED A SHITSTORM ON /tg/

Somehow, anon, I don't think it was a difference in tastes since I fap to furry porn too, but please, go ahead and try to pretend that was at all necessary to throw in there. Also notice that I gave my advice anyway, just in case OP wasn't a troll.

The fact that you ignored that entirely in favor of trying to start shit pretty much proves there's a troll in this thread, whether it's OP or not.

>>53293623
It's not just dudes that fantasize about raping, it's women that fantasize about being raped, too.

>>53293452
I honestly think it's kind of fun and refreshing when porny settings like CoC just kind of include this assumption that people culturally don't freak out much over rape.
It's more like "Oh god damn it, I'm gonna get raped aren't I? Well, dang it what an inconvenience this is gonna be!".
It's very obviously very different from real world rape when it's put that way.

I guess it takes some fun of it for some of the more hardcore brutal sadist rape fetishists, but it's not exactly as if they're a majority.

>>53293623
You have a lot to learn. It's gonna be a wild ride.

Please have sex. And check my 5

>>53293623
It's an incredibly common fetish for people in general. It has nothing to do with actually wanting to rape someone or that person being a rapist. It's a fetish for the same reason bondage is: some people like the power/loss of power that comes with it. It's just another power fantasy like BDSM, vore, or macro, that's the appeal. This is backed up by psychologists, in fact, and it's almost unanimously agreed that rape FANTASIES (key word here) are both more common than most would like to admit and harmless, because as stated before, they are very unlikely to make someone rape people for real. That's not how fetishes work, anon.

But to go at the other statement you made

>I can't imagine some rapist losing his sex drive just because he discovered the girl also want and so it wont be rape but consensual sex

While I can't verify this for sure, the psychology community agrees pretty damn strongly that actual rape has nothing to do with getting sexual pleasure. It's about forcing the victim to do what you want, it's about having the power over them to do so. So... Actually, yea, what you're incredulous about is pretty possible.

File: guess.jpg (31KB, 600x565px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x565px

>>53293664
>tfw guy who fantasizes about being raped
>tfw my dream gf is nonexistent for multiple reasons even ignoring the multiple physically impossible fetishes
>tfw too much of a social failure to get any sort of gf anyways
>tfw not even autistic, so it's just me being shit

>>53293684
It is pretty fun like that, yea. The system I mentioned >>53293360 here does just that. Rape is not a big deal psychologically... But it DOES increase corruption, and corruption can do nasty things to a person, so it's still illegal, just for reasons of possibly breaking someone into a mindless sex slave permanently.

And like I said in the other post, it leaves PCs with an alternative to death if they lose. Sure, the bandits might capture the PCs in a normal campaign... But why? And why would it keep happening? In an ERP, that's much easier to explain, especially when there's corruption that can be lessened by forcing it on other people. And since it raises every day no matter what you do, going crazy or sprouting extra limbs as the corruption goes out of control is a very real threat.

>>53293664
>women that fantasize about being raped,

>fantasize about being raped,


Is this something created by the god of atheism?

>>53293924
Wanna have a real mindfuck? It's still possible to be raped even if you have a fetish for being raped.

Again, it's the word fantasy that's important. It's not REALLY rape, no one is REALLY getting hurt. It's done with the understanding that they can trust their partner and that they're in safety (Aftercare is INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT here too), rather than with some random stranger they don't know or trust. It's giving up power willingly, in this case. An actual rape would take that power and control away against the person's will, with all the psychological trauma that would come with it.

File: tumblr_mtg09ciw4n1rq01f1o1_1280_by_honeybadgerradio-d7zagcr.jpg (200KB, 595x1352px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 595x1352px

>>53293623
Excuse the tumblr filename.

>>53294080
Also how are all the female characters automatically objectification instead of power fantasies for women?

It goes both ways.

File: 1451005188784.png (35KB, 1015x192px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 1015x192px

>>53294115
Because for women those female characters are "threatening" because it takes away power they feel they should have over men for having a vagina.

>A man sees another man doing something cool
>Damn, that's cool. I wish I could do that too.

>A woman sees another woman doing something cool
>Stop doing that! You are making me look worse than you!

File: c92.png (502KB, 550x818px) Image search: [Google]

502KB, 550x818px

>>53294080
Obligatory Jojo edit

>>53294115
Men are mature enough to realize that cartoon characters are cartoon characters while women (particularly those who haven't matured emotionally as they did physically) see female characters as competition to their monopoly on sex.

In the end, the only people who have a problem with it are attention whores who aren't dating material anyways.

>>53293814
>>tfw guy who fantasizes about being raped
lots of guys like being tied up, and lots of women like being the dominant one bro. it's not as uncommon as you think

>>53294172
Eh, I'm a man and I feel pretty threatened by attractive men. I just have enough introspection not to channel it into anti-woman politics or other retarded shit like that.

File: 1444408648337.png (1MB, 1290x662px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1290x662px

>>53294507
Then where is she anon? Where is she? I look all over but can never find her no matter what.

>>53294552
Lots in this case does not refer to a large percentage, but rather, a large flat number.

Godspeed in your search buddy.

>>53294552
well that sort of thing is pretty fucking personal for people to disclose unless you're on some fetish forum or some shit

>>53294080
Thing is, the artist(a guy) who drew this got a fuckton of sjws on his back for making this particular strip because it confined women's tastes to a particular type.

Walkyverse had a lot of potential... sorta.

>>53294590
> who drew this got a fuckton of sjws on his back for making this particular strip because it confined women's tastes to a particular type.
Self-cannibalizing SJW are the best thing. Nothing more pleasurable than seeing them being "betrayed" by their "allies" because their "allies" don't consider them SJW enough anymore.

Ultimately, the only winning move is not to play, no matter what you do they will find a way to bitch about it. They have no end-game at all.

>>53294575
>Lots in this case does not refer to a large percentage, but rather, a large flat number.
I'm stupid. What does this mean?

>>53294637
Nah. The endgame is easy. Simply agree with them and claim you're sex-positive until you can fuck the (reasonably) attractive ones and drop them like hot Shit. You'd be surprised how many are fetlife subs.

>>53294733
>You'd be surprised how many are fetlife subs.
No matter what, the D reigns supreme.

File: 9c9.jpg (368KB, 1307x528px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 1307x528px

>>53294750
Forgot my pic.

>>53294750
Nah, it's not even the D. It's confidence. Confidence reigns supreme, and this SJW Bitching they use as a substitute doesn't hold a candle when confronted with the real thing. Neither does what we do.

>>53294789
You can't use your D without confidence though.

>>53294645
Ten million people is a very big number,
but it's a very very small portion of the population of the world.

>>53294645
It means he was bullshitting you and it's actually few women.

>>53295024
Well, what with the existence of the internet, and since they're likely to be looking for people exactly like him (presumably a rare breed as well), it might not be so bad.

But basically, yes.

File: 1488311124321.png (687KB, 1024x896px) Image search: [Google]

687KB, 1024x896px

>>53289879
More like 95% Homo, 5% Hetero you actual cuck.

>>53290975
I've come to terms with that.

>>53289935
Don't forget impregnation. That's a big one.

>>53295536
HOLY SHIT
OOOOH SNAP
GOD DAMN
OH MY GOD
HOLY FUCK
ARE YOU LITERALLY OSCAR WILDE
DAAAAAAAAAMN

>>53295536
Now now, while OP may or may not be a faggot, there's no good reason why he would lie about something as respectable as homolust.

>>53295869
OP is always a faggot. It's just sometimes he's an awesome faggot like Freddy Mercury.

>>53294080
>be simple farm boy
>find these books in public library
>check a few out because vampires
>acquire fetish to be vampire sex criminal
Leaving the farm was a mistake.

>>53291269
9/150 threads specifically about it
half the fucking pictures in every other thread
last time I went to /d/ there wasn't even a monstergirl thread

>>53290521

I read this, but never actually managed to figure out how to play.
Any examples/Playthroughs/LP's/AAR's out there?

>>53290000
Being into futa on female, as a straight male, is objectively straighter than being into male on female.

File: Ugly man in wig.png (60KB, 300x250px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 300x250px

>>53298422
No it means you're a disgusting tranny.

>>53289946
>>53293516

These guys get it.

>>53293924
>>53293996
Check out the sales of 50 shades of grey sometime.

>>53289879
You're a fag.

The ideal erpg is pathfinder.
>rules are so complex you can't be retarded enough to use them during hanky panky
>rules and races for any godamn fetish
>magic too
>variable power level and content focus
>plenty of situations you can get into
etc
>free rules
>everyone is familiar with it (whether or not they want to be)
>low barrier of entry

Remember boys and girls, nobody wants to stop having sex (or, okay, typefucking) to roll dice and consult the grapple rules flowchart. What you do is you run a risque normal game, and then use that and the characters in it as context and plot for lewd.

>>53293842
>Sure, the bandits might capture the PCs in a normal campaign... But why?
To get ransom or to sell them into slavery.

>>53289879
I bet the stench of that giant orc's snatch is enough to knock you out.

>>53289879

You're chasing a hopeless dream anon.

I've created slutverses before, in attempts to quell the /d/emon within me.
But the best part is to just drop it, since nothing good will come from this.

>>53289879
Is it d20? Or what dice are rolled for the purposes of resolving conflict/situations that arise?

>>53289879
>l-l-LEWD! XD
I hope that one project clouded by the "lewd rpg" was killing yourself and now you can finally do it.

>>53300607
So, what happened to you anon?

>>53300951
Most renditions have been d20-based, but there's a couple of BoL versions, and most recently a nWoD pitch.
At the end of the day everyone knows d20.

File: wst.png (765KB, 479x408px) Image search: [Google]

765KB, 479x408px

>>53300979
the only people who use the word lewd are 300lb virgins

>>53302092
If OP made his game with d20 as the main resolution mechanic, I hold him in contempt.

>>53302114
>the only people who generalize are 300lb virgins

>>53302160
>people are 300lb virgins

>>53294115

Men perceive women as sex objects.
Women perceive men as success objects.

It doesn't go ''both ways''.

>>53289935
Okay, so I run a lewd d20 game and first up, despite having some erp rules, 90% of erp is just rp. The rules are only for "the incredibly jaded duke demands you impress him in bed before he helps you" or "trying to get some orcs off with blow- and hand-jobs before they just impregnate you instead"

> Gotta include some fetishes that don't appeal to me.
I just made having a fetish give you a bonus for actions where you do it to others, and others get a bonus when your kink is included in what they do with you.

> Could just make it about my fetishes
The system should cater all around, but do what you and your group find entertaining. When I had more male players the game had more seduction going and use of protection. Now things have swung to more women in the group and the overall theme has shifted impregnation by monsters.

> I'm probably about 59% a furry.
And? DnD/PF have plenty such races, just see what your players choose, or keep their inclusion to occasional.

> It's rape-enabling
It's fantasy and plenty of people are into that as long as it remains fantasy.

> I like randomized characters
Bad idea in a lewd game, people will want to make characters according to their kinks. But feel free to make odd NPCs or have chaotic magic that alters a trait or two. Corruption features in my game, so people can often have minor to major changes just from demon sex or the like, if you want to go that way.

>>53289879
Stopped reading at futa

>>>/b/

>>53293176
Post it here anon. Let us see what you have created.

>>53294580
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e__1KU7lg-4

>>53294080
>romance novel covers
>conclusive proof of what females find attractive
kek

>>53294115
>Also how are all the female characters automatically objectification instead of power fantasies for women?
If the appearances of those characters were being designed by women, for women, as opposed to by men, for men... then you'd have a point.

>>53294172
>>53294475
>>53304484
See these posts for more examples of guys who don't understand women.

>>53311683
>If the appearances of those characters were being designed by women, for women, as opposed to by men, for men... then you'd have a point.

Some are actually designed by women. Bayonetta comes to mind.

>>53311683
Then show us some lewd media made by women for women. If all those guys are wrong, I want to know what's right.

File: 1260076160002.png (280KB, 452x710px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 452x710px

> Oh hey, my thread's still h-
> ...
I want to report my own thread; wtf?

>>53289879
Here OP. Have a look at this for inspiration.

https://dnd.rem.uz/3.5%20D%26D%20Books/Other%20Products/Book%20of%20Erotic%20Fantasy.pdf

File: 1433865874562.png (5MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 2048x1536px

>>53289946
>As someone who has done a lot of ERP, having rules for sex is the dumbest shit.
>>53291643
>The best TTERPG I can think of is one that doesn't require sex-based rolling bar mind control/mental pollution/seduction and whatnot. The main appeals would instead be how the setting is lewd and allows for a lot of interesting scenarios in it, allowing for interesting dynamics with the mechanics to back it up.
>>53299252
>Remember boys and girls, nobody wants to stop having sex (or, okay, typefucking) to roll dice and consult the grapple rules flowchart. What you do is you run a risque normal game, and then use that and the characters in it as context and plot for lewd.
>>53293360
>Why don't you just take an existing setting and make lewd stuff for it? That's what I did for my campaign.
>Though to be fair I've used the lewd corruption mechanics for several systems, they're pretty easy to port>>53293516
>Have mechanics for things like seduction, cleaning up grappling rules for the obvious use, maybe mutation mechanics if you're into that, but leave the rolls out of the sex.>>53305611
>Okay, so I run a lewd d20 game and first up, despite having some erp rules, 90% of erp is just rp.
Pretty much these are the best you're going to be able to do for a game; Building the mechanics around sex from the ground up is not only going to make it a tedious, unwanted task for you but also any potential players.

As they use to say in the Weekend Smut threads, the actual sex is best used sparingly, since you're just going to burn yourself out if it's nothing but sexy times.

>>53290000
>>Futa
>I'm out
>>53290249
>>53290452
>>53293299
>>53306839
So how do you guys feel about Tentacle Vaginas?

>>53292187
>So do you neckbeards wank it during sessions?
Well this is why you usually ERP online via text, keeps these sorts of things from making it awkward.

>>53312320
You were gone! GONE!

>>53311683
>If the appearances of those characters were being designed by women, for women, as opposed to by men, for men... then you'd have a point.
Ranma 1/2, a manga that features gratuitous amounts of topless scenes, "nudity," and the like, was drawn and written by a woman.

>>53312477
>You were gone! GONE!
I have no idea what you are talking about...

>>53311699
>>53312581
Without disregarding your excellent points, while those are good examples, they are generally the exception rather than the rule when it comes to the artist. And in both cases the expected audiences of the material are male, not female.

While the appearances of most comicbook characters are designed by males, with again primarily a male audience in mind is something that can't be ignored in this discussion if we really want to get to a solid conclusion (and yes, like many nerdy things, this has been changing over the last 10-15 years, because the societal stigma against being a nerd has dropped considerably, especially for video games and comics).

And allow me to clarify, I don't think recognizing that the depictions of females superheros and other comicbook and video game characters is unrealistic and generally not appealing to female nerds automatically means you have to be against it. I generally prefer them myself, and don't think there's anything wrong with them. And if someone wants to fill the demands of female nerds for material that they find more appealing, then the capitalist system is certainly with its rights to provide it for them.


Also I once knew a chick who had a rape fetish (no, I didn't fuck her). Basically it's just a variant on S&M fun. With the dom playing the part of the rapist, and the sub the victim. And if you know anything about S&M, then you know that it's a paradox, because the sub is really the one in charge (in a proper and healthy relationship), because they have the power to call a stop to things if they should feel uncomfortable or whatever (ie: the safe word).

>>53293759
>While I can't verify this for sure, the psychology community agrees pretty damn strongly that actual rape has nothing to do with getting sexual pleasure. It's about forcing the victim to do what you want, it's about having the power over them to do so. So... Actually, yea, what you're incredulous about is pretty possible.
Hogwash. Legalized prostitution reduces rape rates. Besides, if it wasn't about sex how would the guy get a boner? This is just something people say to feel good about themselves.

>>53313564
>Without disregarding your excellent points, while those are good examples, they are generally the exception rather than the rule when it comes to the artist.
Even so, you can't deny that there are plenty of female characters out there in comics, vidya, anime, etc. that are written and drawn by women while still having gratuitious amounts of fanservice thrown in as well. To say "well, that's just the exception" undermines the entire discussion because the original argument called to question how exactly all female characters are automatically objectified instead of being power fantasies for women.

If you're going to continue down this argument, you should decide what your actual argument is going to be.