>"Drop the lowest"? Pointbuy?! 3d6 in order, anon!

>>52589344
I don't care about the issue at hand, but you may be the worst cowardly scum in this board.

"Stop playing d&d"

File: Eternal anglo.jpg (24KB, 400x256px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x256px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBmEFgd_4ho
>Comments disabled
>Dislikes disabled

File: 19c8ebb8a9f2edf44a0a32b0b020d884.jpg (46KB, 564x648px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 564x648px

>>52589367
FUCKING RIGHT, SPOONY! YOU TELL THAT FAGGOT OP!

>>52589367
I've run it before, and it's been fun for shorter games, but for the longer campaigns I tend to play with my friends I find that I end up the foreverGM anyway so I shouldn't even bother. The times I get to play,
the GM or players flake and I'm left with just a pile of wasted character sheets, all their potential gone, and an aching emptiness in my heart.

>>52589367
Probably just ignore him.

>>52589402

This. Fuck this literal faggot and his """opinions""".

Rolled 3, 3, 2, 6, 5, 4, 3, 6, 5, 2, 1, 2, 6, 6, 5, 4, 1, 3 = 67 (18d6)

>>52589367
LET'S GO, YOU SONS OF WHORES, DO YOU WANT TO LIVE FOREVER?

DEATH OR GLORY!

>>52589459
08 STR
15 DEX
14 CON
05 INT shit dude
17 WIS
08 CHA

MOTHER FUCKING LASER CLERIC, LET'S REPRESENT!

>>52589459
>Str 8
>Dex 15
>Con 14
>Int 5
>Wisdom 17
>Cha 8

What kind of a character would that be?

>>52589498
A Cleric-man, of course.

File: IMG_0092.jpg (74KB, 303x311px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 303x311px

>>52589493
5*

File: B1oIM72.gif (1MB, 260x146px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 260x146px

Rolled 4, 6, 2, 4, 2, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4, 2, 5, 5, 2, 3, 5, 2, 6 = 64 (18d6)

>>52589459
FOR GLOOOORRRYYY!!!

"Yeah, because I'm a fucking coward for wanting to play a character I want to, instead of some drooling retard with a muscle-wasting disease that barely even qualifies as a fighter, just because of the whim of the dice.
Why the fuck are you even complaining, if you want to build Sgt. Mongoloid there's nothing stopping you. Of course, if you're gonna bitch, then you can leave my table."

File: curious.jpg (11KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 320x180px

>>52589531
>STR 12
>DEX 8
>CON 10
>INT 11
>WIS 10
>CHA 13

Joe McAverage coming through! Maybe I qualify for Fighter or Thief? I'd make a helluva Farmer, at least.

Different stat generation systems are more or less suitable to different types of games.

>>52589367
We don't need to respond to Spoony at this point because he's gone, probably forever.

However, if he were ever to come back and debate the issue with me, I'd cite all the historical evidence showing that, starting very early on, D&D was practically never played with 3d6-in-order.

>>52589498
You can make a good blaster cleric in 3.5 with good dex and 17; rely on laser spells that use dex to hit and wis to cause damage. You can heal, shoot, and cast well, but that's it.

That's all you really need, though. No weak saves, spellcasting, able to hit. You're set.

Rolled 5, 5, 2, 3, 6, 2, 6, 2, 3, 6, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6, 2 = 71 (18d6)

>>52589459
Come on, how bad could it be? At the worst I get to play bumblefuck the terribad for one session before he dies from stupidity.

Rolled 2, 2, 6, 5, 4, 4, 5, 1, 1, 5, 3, 5, 5, 3, 3, 1, 3, 1 = 59 (18d6)

>>52589459
WATCH OUT MOTHER FUCKERS, THE LEADER OF THIS MERCENARY BAND IS COMING THROUGH

>>52589712
12 STR
11 DEX
11 CON
11 INT
12 WIS
14 CHA

Could bard it up, I guess? Pretty average all going, and strictly better than >>52589585

>>52589732
>Str: 10
>Dex: 13
>Con: 7
>Int: 13
>Wis: 11
>Cha: 5

>>52589756
And what are you going to do with that shit stats, bud?

>>52589739
>Paladin-in-training material

>>52589756
>Smart thief with a lot of scrolls

Rolled 3, 2, 3, 2, 6, 5, 6, 4, 1, 6, 4, 4, 1, 3, 2, 1, 6, 3 = 62 (18d6)

Lets go!

Rolled 2, 6, 2, 2, 1, 2, 5, 6, 3, 4, 3, 3, 6, 5, 4, 5, 2, 5 = 66 (18d6)

ANCESTORS DELIVER ME

>>52589796
>Str: 10
>Dex: 5
>Con: 14
>Int: 10
>Wis: 15
>Cha: 12

File: 1472790453004.png (858KB, 889x717px) Image search: [Google]

858KB, 889x717px

Rolled 5, 1, 4, 4, 6, 4, 1, 4, 3, 4, 2, 6, 3, 4, 5, 2, 5, 3 = 66 (18d6)

>>52589367
I really used to like Spoony. It upsets me how broken he is now. It's like finding out your childhood friend who always used to make you laugh became a crackhead.

>>52589792

str: 8
dex: 13
con: 11
int: 14
wis: 6
cha: 10

>>52589756
The kind of leader that inherited the position but never learned how to lead.

>>52589402
He disabled them in like q1 2016 after he had a mental breakdown. He used to leave them up.

Honestly I just feel sorry for him. Used to make great shit, now he does nothing but tweetstorm and scam all his fans for Patreon welfare. I get that depression is a bitch but at least cancel the patreon if you aren't doing anything with the cash instead of being a greedy shit.

>>52589756
Is comedy relief a class?

File: 1475531380670.jpg (40KB, 314x377px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 314x377px

>mfw had a DM who would make us choose our class first and then roll 3d6 down the line
>our only saving grace were racial mods

It was fucking hell but it was the only game at that time

>>52589822
Str: 10
Dex: 14
Con: 8
Int: 12
Wis: 12
Cha: 10

Eh. Could probably make a sub-par Rogue with the Dex. Maybe Ranger?

>>52589816
>Dex: 5
Playing a character with Polio could be fun

Rolled 1, 6, 6, 6, 1, 5, 1, 6, 2, 4, 2, 3, 6, 4, 2, 4, 4, 6 = 69 (18d6)

>>52589367
Like a man.

File: d6 bunny.jpg (107KB, 850x1566px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 850x1566px

Rolled 4, 5, 3, 3, 6, 5, 5, 3, 5, 2, 2, 1, 1, 3, 2, 4, 5, 4 = 63 (18d6)

>>52589367
Ok, let's do this.

Rolled 4, 2, 6, 6, 3, 3, 4, 3, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 3, 3, 4, 2, 3 = 64 (18d6)

Let's see what I get.

>>52589367
There's no way to respond to someone who calls you a coward over your method of rolling stats in a tabletop game. They're so divorced from reality that anything you can say would be less than meaningless, since it would only serve to validate their insanity.

>>52589816
Could be ok paladin actually

>>52589367
>STR 15
>DEX 9
>CON 12
>INT 10
>WIS 12
>CHA 8

What be?

>>52589367
I resist the urge to laugh at him and excuse myself from his company.

Dice+18d6

May the gods of luck protect me

>>52589880
13 Str
12 Dex,
9 Con
9 Int
12 Wis
14 Cha

Looks like a Bard, maybe some kinda dancing bard with all that Dex. Or hell, maybe a Sorceror.

Rolled 5, 5, 5, 6, 5, 3, 4, 5, 2, 6, 1, 5, 5, 2, 1, 5, 5, 1 = 71 (18d6)

Fuck it. Let's go. I'll be the hero the Realm deserves

Rolled 5, 5, 3, 2, 1, 1, 6, 3, 5, 4, 1, 3, 3, 1, 5, 4, 5, 1 = 58 (18d6)

>>52589964
Watch out, villain coming through.

>>52589938
>>52589969
The Options section, boyo.

>>52589969
>>52589938
Bless your heart

>>52589881
STR 12
DEX 14
CON 13
INT 5
WIS 6
CHA 13

Fighter or Barbarian.

Rolled 3, 2, 6, 6, 4, 2, 3, 2, 1, 5, 3, 4, 2, 2, 3, 6, 6, 3 = 63 (18d6)

>>52589459
Fuck this shit, I'll do it anyways!

>>52589367
I wish spoony hadn't lost his fucking mind and crawled up his own ass. He used to be fun.

>>52589964
STR 15
DEX 14
CON 11
INT 12
WIS 12
CHA 11

Hmm. Mobile fighter can work. Maybe two weapon fighting. Ranger, Rogue, or Fighter.

Rolled 5, 6, 2, 2, 2, 6, 5, 3, 1, 4, 5, 2, 5, 5, 6, 2, 4, 1 = 66 (18d6)

>>52589980
Thank you for helping me in my times of duress

File: baby-laughing.jpg (40KB, 400x342px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 400x342px

>3d6 x6
>drop the lowest
>die during character creation

Alright. Let's get stupid with this.

GLORY!!

>>52590001
Str 11
Dex 12
Con 06
Int 12
Wis 07
Cha 15

Sorcerer rolling through!

File: skinner pathetic.jpg (22KB, 640x394px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 640x394px

Rolled 5, 1, 1, 4, 3, 5, 6, 5, 3, 1, 5, 3, 1, 4, 3, 4, 1, 1 = 56 (18d6)

>Not picking your class first.

Pic related, check the stats on my monk.

>>52590034
That CON though

>>52589367
>How do you respond to this man?
Tell him to learn about basic hygiene, social etiquette and to update more often before he talks to me or my wife's son ever again.

Rolled 1, 3, 5, 3, 1, 2, 2, 4, 3, 1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 1, 3, 4, 6 = 49 (18d6)

What are we using to roll backstories?

>>52589873
I want to punch DMs that do this in the dick. Either let your players pick class after stats are rolled or allow point buy/drop the lowest/stat assigning. 3d6 down the line after picking a class risks having characters who can't even function as adventurers.

>>52589367

dice+18d6

Rolled 10, 3, 10, 12, 6, 5, 15, 9, 8, 10, 13, 16, 2, 11, 8, 1, 16, 13 = 168 (18d16)

>>52589459
BEHOLD MY POWER!!!

>>52590020
Str: 13
Dex: 10
Con: 9
Int: 11
Wis: 16
Cha: 7
Some kind of old Cleric/ Inquisitor of a god where strength is import, but is jaded from his age/experience to the point he hates interacting with other people outside the faith. Maybe some kinda Dwarf?

>>52589978
STR 13
DEX 4
CON 14
INT 8
WIS 9
CHA 9

The villain is big and stronk. Not much else.

Rolled 1, 2, 5, 4, 5, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 6, 4, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3 = 62 (18d6)

THIS ISN'T EVEN MY FINAL FORM

Rolled 2, 1, 5, 4, 1, 5, 2, 4, 6, 6, 3, 5, 2, 2, 3, 2, 4, 5 = 62 (18d6)

>>52590122
WHOOPS!!!

>>52590086
Oh hey, I'm not alone

>>52589678
As far as I remember that episode he suggests trying it some time, not doing it every time. For a short campaign I'd not mind

Rolled 6, 2, 2, 6, 5, 3, 1, 4, 3, 2, 3, 6, 5, 1, 3, 6, 2, 6 = 66 (18d6)

Should I even able to see my own roll?

>>52590142
STR - 8
DEX - 12
CON - 12
INT - 14
WIS - 7
CHA - 9

Those are some shitty stats. What can I even play with this? Either a really shitty wizard or maybe a rogue?

File: Wet_paladin.jpg (323KB, 600x920px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 600x920px

>>52590144
>Str: 8
>Dex: 10
>Con: 12
>Int: 14
>Wis: 7
>Cha: 11

This is totally not good.

>>52590172
>>52590192
Cousin! We look almost same!

Rolled 3, 1, 6, 2, 6, 4, 2, 4, 3, 2, 3, 5, 5, 2, 1, 2, 6, 3 = 60 (18d6)

>>52589459
I'LL BE A FUCKING PALADIN, I DON'T CARE

Rolled 3, 6, 1, 5, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 6, 4, 3, 1, 6, 6, 5 = 54 (18d6)

>>52590192
Perfectly fine Basic/2e magic user.
Fuck it, I'll do this shit.

>>52590216
Neat! We should be utterly mediocre adventurers together!

>>52589367
>used to play this way
>made a fighter
>3 strength

Fug...

>>52589367
You're a fucking pussy bitch if you don't do 1d20 in order, you cunt.

>>52590239
I'm so sorry friend, would you like to joint myself and my cousin on some mediocre adventures?

Rolled 6, 5, 2, 5, 4, 2, 1, 3, 5, 5, 1, 6, 6, 2, 6, 6, 3, 3 = 71 (18d6)

roll 3d6, assign to a stat, repeat. No takebacks allowed.

Rolled 13, 1, 18, 19, 19, 2 = 72 (6d20)

>>52590280
Just watch me fucboi.

Rolled 1, 4, 4, 3, 3, 6, 6, 5, 1, 4, 2, 1, 3, 3, 2, 6, 6, 3 = 63 (18d6)

>>52590239
Str 10
Dex 7
Con 4
Int 8
Wis 8
Cha 17
>hey, dm, since the sum total of my modifiers is more than -2, Imma scrap these rolls and roll again

>>52590302
Congrats, you're not a pussy, you're a clumsy autist wizard, with the wisdom of a druid and resilience of a barbarian. The sky is the limit!

>>52589585
+1 in Str, +1 in Cha, only a -1 in dex...
Could make for an adequate bard, probably will want to get that Heavy armor training feat as soon as possible, kinda, um, kinda squishy AP there.

>>52590302
Try not to trip over your own feet again, you ugly fuck

Rolled 1, 3, 2, 6, 4, 4, 1, 4, 4, 4, 4, 6, 6, 6, 6, 5, 3, 5 = 74 (18d6)

Leggo

>>52589841
>implying that Patreon has any purpose other than as a retirement fund for trannies and dangerhair SJWs

Rolled 8, 1, 5, 6, 8, 5 = 33 (6d16)

>>52590280
>d20
>letting players get 20s on their stats

real men do 1d16+2 in order

>>52590334
STR 6
DEX 14
CON 9
INT 14
WIS 18
CHA 13
Time to be a sickass druid

>>52590337
>trannies exist oh no the world is ending

>>52589402
>Fucking 27 minutes long
I have no idea who this man is, and boy do I not care enough to find out

Rolled 5, 2, 2, 5, 6, 4, 3, 5, 5, 2, 5, 4, 5, 1, 5, 6, 4, 4 = 73 (18d6)

Sure, I ain't got that long a lifespan anyway.

Rolled 12, 18, 13, 12, 10, 16 = 81 (6d18)

>>52589459
YOU ARE LIKE A LITTLE BABY, WATCH THIS

Rolled 14, 7, 20, 20, 1, 10 = 72 (6d20)

>>52590280
All right, fuck it, lets see what we can find.
>>52590341
You next.

>>52590390
Used to be one of the better snarky internet review guys, genuinely funny. Started up a ttrpg series in 2011 where he told stories and went on rants about his opinions on different systems. Was pretty good until 2016 when he just went radio silent, with the only content he put out being awful vidya streams where he insulted his audience constantly. Now does nothing except start twitter drama

Rolled 2, 2, 3, 2, 5, 1, 6, 6, 1, 2, 4, 5, 4, 2, 5, 2, 1, 6 = 59 (18d6)

Hmmm. Okay.

>>52590407

STR: 9
DEX: 15
CON: 13
INT: 11
WIS: 11
CHA: 14

Baird the bard, at your pleasure.

Rolled 2, 6, 4, 3, 4, 3, 6, 3, 4, 4, 5, 1, 5, 5, 6, 4, 3, 4 = 72 (18d6)

>>52590313
str 9
dex 12
con 12
int 7
wis 8
cha 15
>I literally would not qualify for any class in 2e
>third roll

Rolled 5, 5, 6, 3, 3, 2, 5, 1, 3, 3, 1, 6, 5, 5, 1, 3, 3, 1 = 61 (18d6)

>>52589367
"Okay."

>>52590420
STR 14
DEX 7
CON 20
INT 20
WIS 1
CHA 10

Man, I'm at a loss here. 20 Int tells me Wizard. 20 Con and 14 STR tells me Barb or perhaps Fighter.

>>52589493
That's a monk if I ever seen one.

>>52589367
He can do whatever he wants, really.
3d6 drop lowest is okay as long as you get to reroll unplayable characters and pick your class after, not before. I just don't trust him to do either, so I'll stay the fuck away from his games.

>>52590480
Magus

>>52590511
>3d6 drop lowest is okay as long as you get to reroll unplayable characters and pick your class after, not before.
That's what I always did, I rarely ever got a complaint, well no complaints from anyone who doesn't make a habit of complaining about everything.

Rolled 14, 7, 9, 20, 4, 3 = 57 (6d20)

Alright, if we're doing this.

Kinda hoping for a fighter.

>>52590466
STR 16
DEX 8
CON 9
INT 10
WIS 11
CHA 7

Hey, not too shabby.

>>52590557

STR 14
DEX 7
CON 9
INT 20
WIS 4
CHA 3

Jesus. Alright, that's a wizard. That's a fucking wizard. A fighty wizard, but a wizard nonetheless/

Let's see what I get.

>>52590431
So whats the video in question about?

>>52590420
The buffest wizard in existence, but sadly in any non-academic discipline he's literally retarded.

Rolled 3, 5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 3, 5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 5, 2, 1, 6, 4, 3 = 62 (18d6)

>>52590581
crap, did it wrong,
let's try this again

He didn't say if you do anything else, you're a coward. He said if you're unwilling to ever try something new (in this case, 3d6 in order), that's cowardly.

File: 1383548439231.gif (772KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

772KB, 320x180px

Rolled 3, 3, 4, 1, 5, 6, 3, 1, 2, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 6, 1, 1, 4 = 62 (18d6)

>>52589367
Let's see just how stupid this gets. Rollan!

>>52590602
Str 10
Dex 9
Con 10
Int 9
Wis 7
Cha 13

Real NPC material right here.

>>52590602
STR: 10
DEX: 12
CON: 10
INT: 9
WIS: 8
CHA: 13

So... Sorcerer then?

>>52590645
Literally moeblob

>>52590645
Excuse me, I seem to have gone temporary blind or retarded.

File: 5u04055.png (99KB, 320x273px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 320x273px

>>52590557
>d20s for stats

>>52590274
you don't pick a class before you figure out what your stats are using this method

>>52590641
Str 10
Dex 12
Con 6
Int 14
Wis 14
Cha 6

An Anemic Autistic but at least has some decent qualities.

Rolled 3, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4, 4, 6, 2, 4, 6, 6, 4, 6, 6, 3, 6, 4 = 84 (18d6)

Rollin

>>52590679
There was this guy I played with back when I was president of the university's TTRPG club. He always had wonky stats. After a year and a half in club I saw him building a character rolling 3d20.

What he did was roll 3d20 and take the average, rounding up.

To this day I still have no idea where he came up with that or who told him to do that.

>>52590721
Jesus christ

>Str: 13
>Dex: 14
>Con: 12
>Int: 16
>Wis: 16
>Cha: 13

>>52589367
I mean, I'll give it a shot but if I don't roll a stat in the double digits I'm shoving these dice up your ass

>>52590721
>>52590739
STR 13
DEX 14
CON 12
INT 16
WIS 16
CHA 13

I guess I'll be the main character of the campaign since I can basically do anything if I play my cards right with racial modifiers.

>>52590785
>main character of the campaign

You ain't going to be shit with a self centered attitude like that. No GM in their right mind would let you play after hearing you refer to yourself as a main character.

>>52590679
That can be fun for one shots.

>>52590723
That sounds just weird.

>>52590859
Most GM's will let me play and that's generally because I don't play with faggots who can't take a joke.

Besides, someone at the table needs to move the plot along and it might as well be me since I can do practically anything the plot demands.

File: 1b771eaef7122c679568f7f3bc8546ffh.jpg (65KB, 968x606px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 968x606px

Rolled 1, 5, 4, 5, 4, 2, 1, 1, 1, 5, 5, 6, 1, 1, 1, 5, 4, 6 = 58 (18d6)

>>52589459
This is gonna turn out well

>>52591000
>Str: 10
>Dex: 11
>Con: 3
>Int: 16
>Wis: 3
>Cha: 15
w h a t

>>52591039
Mad Scientist WIZZZARD!

Can we do it? Fuck yeah!
Should we do it? Who the fuck cares!

File: S3E04.398_The_Wizard_Evilly_Looking_at_His_Eggs.png (845KB, 842x473px) Image search: [Google]

845KB, 842x473px

>>52591058
You know it!

>>52589367
I see you're a traditionalist

File: lP9FsXs.jpg (128KB, 720x486px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 720x486px

Guys guys guys, you're missing an important element.

1. Picking class before is retarded. You didn't decide your job before you were born. You decided after the fickle whims of the fates were done molding who you were.

2. 3d6 down the line is the superior method, but you need a little bit of help; it's not fair to have everybody get one shot at a functioning character.

Use the DCC funnel method:

Everyone rolls four level-0 commoners using 3d6 down the line, with 5d12cp, a random piece of adventuring equipment, a random commoner occupation, and a weapon and trade good associated with that occupation.

Then you run the first adventure.

By the end of it you'll find that, by natural processes, wealth and equipment has concentrated itself into the four to six most capable commoners, who can now choose a class and become level 1 adventurers.

The rest will be dead.

>>52591058
He'll be startled into asthma attacks every time someone right in front of him starts talking, but he's still pretty good at wizard grant applications and presentations.

Rolled 5, 4, 1, 3, 5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6, 6, 3, 1, 2, 5, 2, 1, 1 = 63 (18d6)

>>52589912
No stat above 12, I will reroll.

>>52591144
You just described a life path, of which better fucking games have compared to D&D
Just don't play D&D, it's actually terrible compared to other games

Rolled 5, 3, 1 = 9 (3d6)

>>52591283
STR 10
DEX 11
CON 15
INT 15
WIS 8
CHA 4 (being rerolled)
Probably a wizard with 15 CON and 15 INT that means evocation.

>>52589841
Same. I used to watch Spoony a lot, but his video quality has just been so crap in the last two years.

Rolled 3, 1, 4, 6, 4, 3, 4, 4, 6, 3, 6, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 2, 4 = 65 (18d6)

>>52590410
You son of a gun..!

>>52589459
DEATH OR GLORY!

Rolled 5, 3, 4, 4, 2, 6, 2, 5, 2, 3, 1, 3, 2, 1, 4, 2, 6, 6 = 61 (18d6)

>>52589367

>>52591472
12 Str
12 Dex
9 Con
7 Int
7 Wis
14 Cha

Guess I'm a Bard.

>>52591000
This... This is one of a kind.

Barely sane, barely breathing genius son of a gun charmer. Would play / 10.

>>52591432
8 Str
13 Dex
14 Con
11 Int
9 Wis
10 Cha

That's a rogue or dex-fightingman if I've ever seen one.

Rolled 4, 6, 4, 1, 4, 3, 4, 3, 1, 3, 2, 6, 5, 1, 5, 3, 5, 6 = 66 (18d6)

Rolled 5, 5, 4, 1, 6, 5, 3, 5, 6, 6, 4, 1, 6, 4, 5, 2, 6, 2 = 76 (18d6)

>>52589367
By rolling 3d6 straight down. Let's see what I end up with.

>>52591628
STR 14
DEX 12
CON 14
INT 11
WIS 15
CHA 10

I'm thinking Cleric.

>>52591422
What video quality? There would need to be content in order for it to be garbage. He hasn't done shit in the last two years, and its been way longer than that since he made a proper review or had an actual story to tell on Counter Monkey instead of sperging like a retarded grognard in front of a camera for an hour.

>>52591653
Last I checked he was doing a lot of lets plays a few months ago.

I didn't watch them. I don't know if they were worth watching.

File: cat_473.jpg (25KB, 344x350px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 344x350px

Rolled 4, 4, 5, 4, 3, 5, 2, 2, 2 = 31 (9d5)

>all of this DnD stats
Check this out

>>52591694
>let's plays
>ever worth watching

>>52591750
>Intelligence 4
>Wits 4
>Resolve 5
>Strength 4
>Dexterity 3
>Stamina 5
>Presence 2
>Manipulation 2
>Composure 2
Brains and Brawn, nice.

>>52591774
There could be a good one, somewhere.

I haven't seen it yet. But it could be out there.

I can see the merit of pointbuy but I think rolling for stats/HP gain is more fun.

>>52591694
That live wire shit? No. Its really not.
All it is is just him playing a video game badly in solemn silence. Its not even on par with most youtube dumpster let's plays since he doesn't even talk or try to interact with his chat unless its to drop an epic edgy contrarian opinion or sperg out at someone who said something he doesn't like or tried helping him figure out how to play the video game.

>>52589367
I smirk and slowly nod in agreement, knowing that I came to the right place.
Then I roll 3 on Strength and play a paraplegic Caster depending on which stat is the highest.

10 Str
16 Dex
10 Con
15 Int
7 Wis
10 Cha

Not bad, seems good for a rogueish wizard who uses magic as a tool to sneak around and manipulate people.

>>52591906
Comeliness

>>52589841
I spammed the shit out of his messageboard thinking I would troll some sad sack fans
turns out only person there was me
well at least I found some gay porn on youtube

>>52591774
his swat series was fun
as were all his other lets plays but they were pretty edited so idk if you would even called it a lets play

Rolled 14, 11, 10, 14, 11, 18 = 78 (6d20)

This might be fun, let's try this

>>52591995
STR 14
DEX 11
CON 10
INT 14
WIS 11
CHA 18
It's Sorcery Time

>>52590028
Illustrious career, until he enters his first combat.

>>52589402
>Average on 3d6 is a 9
That dude just lost all credibility he may have had.

>spoony
>latest uploads
>nov 7 2017
>aug 2 2016
>jun 12 2016
oh he must have got a real job, good for him.

>>52589367
>>52589402

My first pen and paper experience was AD&D with my friend's stepfather as DM. He did this. We had a party of three fighters because we didn't qualify for anything else. I cherish the experience as an opening to the hobby but would rather never play pen and papers again than do the straight 3d6 in order.

Rolled 6, 1, 6, 3, 1, 5, 4, 3, 1, 3, 1, 4, 4, 4, 4, 2, 5, 3 = 60 (18d6)

>>52589367
Sure why not. But I'll rearrange when you're not looking just to fuck with you and your insufferable attitude.

>>52592154
>Str 13
>Dex 9
>Con 8
>Int 8
>Wis 12
>Cha 10

Well this is resolutely shit/average.

Rolled 2, 3, 5, 2, 4, 5, 6, 6, 5, 2, 6, 3, 4, 6, 5, 1, 4, 4 = 73 (18d6)

You suck at rolling dice.

>>52589367
Honestly, rolling for stats is perfectly fine by me, when I am inclined to play Pathfinder, I will have my players roll 4d6, and drop the lowest, then let them choose a race and class based on that because that is presented as the default way of generating stats and I will go by that because, honestly part of me wants the game to feel as 'authentic' as possible, while still telling my own stories.

>>52592227
10, 11, 17, 11, 15, 9. Looks like I'm a beefy cleric.

Rolled 2, 4, 1, 6, 1, 1, 3, 2, 5, 2, 2, 1, 4, 5, 1, 3, 2, 2 = 47 (18d6)

>>52589367
heh, watch this

Rolled 2, 1, 1, 5, 4, 5, 3, 5, 4, 4, 6, 4, 5, 2, 1, 5, 1, 4 = 62 (18d6)

Yeah sure, whatever. Let's see what I get. If I get some super high rolls the GM is just doing to backpedal.

Rolled 3, 6, 4, 6, 5, 5, 5, 6, 3, 4, 3, 3, 1, 2, 1, 6, 1, 5 = 69 (18d6)

DEATH OR GLORY DEATH OR GLORY

>>52589402
I only made it a minute in, and he said "You never, ever tried this."
I tried that when I was 12 and just started playing D&D, where everything I thought about the game was completely wrong

>>52592268
Oh god, I can tell from the total it wasn't good at all.

>>52592279
Str 4
Dex 14
Con 12
Int 14
Wis 8
Cha 10

Guess I'm making a wizard. Can someone carry my spellbook?

"Sounds fun, I hope you don't mind not putting too much thought put into characters at first, I imagine we may be rolling characters rather often."

File: 1365109770100.jpg (26KB, 400x349px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 400x349px

Rolled 5, 2, 5, 5, 5, 3, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 1, 6, 4, 6, 1, 2, 5 = 64 (18d6)

COME ON BARBARIAN

>>52592296
>13 str
>16 dex
>14 con
>10 int
>4 FUCKING WISDOM
>12 cha

You could do a lot with this statline honestly, but lets face it, with that Wisdom you're gonna get mindcontrolled into a relatively attractive cocksleeve for someone

Probably a TWF character? Maybe even a Bard?

>>52592268
7str
8 dex
10 con
5 int
10 wis
7 cha

what class would even work for this, aside from the obvious answer of none.

>>52592361
None, thats a character that gets thrown in the trashbin

Realistically you could play a really, really dumb cleric.

>>52592345
S 12
D 13
C 8
I 7
W 16
C 8
guess I'm a Cleric then

Rolled 1, 6, 6, 5, 5, 2, 6, 1, 2, 6, 3, 2, 3, 1, 3, 4, 3, 2 = 61 (18d6)

BIG MONEY NO WHAMMIES

>>52592382
>13 str
>12 dex
>9 con
>11 int
>7 will
>9 cha

Christ.

Rolled 1, 3, 2, 1, 3, 1, 1, 4, 5, 1, 6, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 6, 6 = 59 (18d6)

>>52592370
alright but what about this roll

Rolled 2, 5, 6, 2, 3, 4, 6, 1, 1, 1, 4, 1, 5, 3, 6, 1, 6, 4 = 61 (18d6)

It's time for another exciting edition of: Crippled, Retarded, or Ugly?

>>52592412
>6 str
>5 dex
>10 con
>10 int
>13 wis
>15 cha

Sorcerer.

Rolled 5, 2, 4, 5, 1, 6, 5, 2, 3, 3, 1, 4, 5, 5, 1, 2, 1, 1 = 56 (18d6)

let's go let's go

>>52592425
>13 STR
>9 DEX
>8 CON
>6 INT
>14 WIS
>11 CHA

Looks like we got Retarded this time. Stupid Cleric it is

>>52592403
either rogue or fighter.

>>52592477
Honestly just throw it in the trash, its too weak

Rolled 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 6, 4, 1, 6, 2, 3, 2, 3, 5, 6, 1, 4, 4 = 59 (18d6)

>>52589459

>>52592351
Honestly this character would be at least entertaining to play.

Rolled 3, 5, 6, 2, 2, 2, 4, 5, 2, 4, 1, 6, 1, 3, 6, 3, 5, 3 = 63 (18d6)

>>52589459

Rolled 6, 3, 6, 2, 6, 2, 5, 5, 5, 6, 4, 3, 3, 1, 6, 3, 2, 6 = 74 (18d6)

>>52589459
I'M JUST HERE FOR THE PAYCHECK HONESTLY

>>52592607
>JUST HERE FOR THE PAYCHECK

>15 fuckin strength
>10 dexterity
>15 fucking chon
>13 intelligence
>10 wis
>11 cha

FIGHTER LORD

>>52590859
>getting mad over a clear joke

Rolled 1, 3, 6, 5, 4, 2, 4, 3, 5, 4, 2, 4, 2, 3, 5, 4, 6, 2 = 65 (18d6)

>>52589367
Playing a paladin of holy fire, I don't gove a fuck.

>>52589873
How frequently did you need to make a new character, anon?

>>52589459
Str: 9
Dex: 12
Con: 10
Int: 14
Wis: 9
Cha: 15

I got a workable magic-user who can also be the party face.

Rolled 1, 6, 4, 4, 1, 5, 5, 3, 1, 6, 3, 4, 4, 5, 1, 5, 3, 4 = 65 (18d6)

>>52589459

Rolled 18, 17, 7, 7, 4, 6 = 59 (6d18)

>>52593160
Real men do d18

>>52593322
Sweet 18 int 17 dex here I come Wizard who dies if hit.

File: smug pipe man.jpg (38KB, 570x576px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 570x576px

>>52589459
>08 STR
>05 INT
>08 CHA

How fitting that you rolled an ugly retarded manlet.

>>52593322
Human fighter

>>52593399
A fate worse than death.

Rolled 6, 4, 1, 6, 5, 5, 2, 6, 3, 1, 2, 4, 2, 1, 6, 6, 2, 5 = 67 (18d6)

>>52589459

>>52593501
Str: 11
Dex: 16
Con: 11
Int: 7
Wis: 9
Cha: 13

guess I would go rogue

>>52593496
Champion

>>52589367

You respond by saying "GOD DAMN IT SPOONY MAKE A NEW VIDEO ALREADY!"

Rolled 6, 6, 3, 6, 2, 1, 4, 4, 2, 3, 3, 2, 6, 5, 1, 3, 1, 6 = 64 (18d6)

>>52589459
GOD WILLS IT!

>>52593671
STR: 15
DEX: 9
CON: 10
INT: 8
WIS: 12
CHA: 10

Sounds like a veteran fighter to me.

>>52593646
Truly, a fate worse than death.

>>52589367
3d6 in order isn't bad if the game is balanced around it. AD&D and every D&D after basically required characters to have 4d6 drop lowest because stats became so incredibly important, but it's not a problem in OD&D and BD&D.

Rolled 5, 1, 4, 5, 6, 4, 2, 4, 3, 2, 3, 1, 3, 1, 2, 5, 6, 6 = 63 (18d6)

>>52589459
sure why not

Rolled 5, 2, 3, 1, 5, 1, 1, 2, 4, 1, 4, 5, 4, 3, 6, 4, 1, 2 = 54 (18d6)

>>52589367
I roll 3d6

I allow rerolls at my table

>>52594151
10 str
15 dex
9 con
6 int
6 wis
17 cha
Guess I'm the party mascot then

>>52593764
More like challenge to make interesting, hardcore rp only.

Rolled 6, 3, 4, 4, 6, 1, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 6, 6, 6, 4, 6, 1 = 76 (18d6)

>>52589367
rolling my statttts

>>52589401
spbp

>>52589367
If my players are up for it, I'll try just about anything if we think it could be fun. Personally I am not against 3D6 in order, but if nobody wants to play that way, we won't. Calling us cowards for not having fun your way is immature.

Rolled 5, 2, 3, 1, 4, 6, 2, 3, 2, 1, 6, 4, 5, 1, 1, 4, 1, 3 = 54 (18d6)

>>52589367
Let the dice decide!

>>52594217

STR 13
DEX 11
CON 12
INT 11
WIS 18
CHA 11

I AM WISE MAN

>>52594300
STR 10
DEX 11
CON 7
INT 11
WIS 7
DEX 8
with a negative total bonus of -5!
I think i proved why other dice rolling systems are used than 3d6 downwards....

>>52594344
That's actually just a -3, and you had just as much of a chance of rolling that as rolling a set of stats with a total of +3.

>>52594172
STR 08
DEX 07
CON 07
INT 10
WIS 13
CHA 07

Hill dwarf bumps Con to 09 and WIS 14

be a cleric and pick one of the domains that gives heavy armor

>>52592033
>Implying I would sully myself with combat.

That's what canon fodd- er... hirelings and party members are for. ;)

File: 1278344311724.png (17KB, 527x434px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 527x434px

Just saying to y'all, anyone who doesn't do 4d6 drop highest is a coward.

>>52591774
>>52591788
I personally enjoyed Yahtzee's Let's Drown Out series.

The idea is that he and his mate would play a boring video game and ramble over it for an hour. It was a pretty enjoyable series

>>52589367
"3d6 in order? We're playing Connect Four!"

Rolled 3, 2, 5, 5, 6, 4, 4, 1, 4, 2, 6, 2, 2, 1, 4, 5, 6, 6 = 68 (18d6)

>>52589367
Hold me, I'm scared.

>>52589459
Dice+18d6

MOAR GARBAGE MEN!

>>52589459

File: girlbard.jpg (151KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 640x960px

>>52595595
STR 10
DEX 14
CON 9
INT 10
WIS 7
CHA 17

Bard then, eh?

Rolled 6, 1, 1, 5, 2, 6, 1, 4, 6, 1, 3, 3, 5, 4, 5, 4, 3, 1 = 61 (18d6)

>>52589459

>>52595782
STR 8
DEX 13
CON 11
INT 7
WIS 14
CHA 8

behold, it is... uh... a very mediocre ranger!

>>52590599
the idea of building a D&D character by starting with the stats, which you do the old fashion way -- roll 3d6 per stat and all stats in order, then build from there (selecting class, etc).

A lot of people bitch at him for it, but his point is that sometimes it can lead to unique and interesting characters. He even talks about how not to be draconian with it and make it easy to roll new stats if your roll so terribly that it actually gets in the way of a making a functional character. For instance, if you roll a chars background and it means they lost an eye -- which happened to one of his players and the player decided to stick with it by making a big part of his backstory.

He also says that if you aren't ever willing to at least try something different when making a character (this being an example of something different), then you're a coward. Which I think is pretty fair, given how many powergamers I've seen that freak out when they aren't guaranteed optimum stats.

File: 40338379.jpg (3MB, 1919x2715px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1919x2715px

Rolled 4, 6, 2, 3, 6, 1, 5, 4, 6, 5, 3, 5, 2, 1, 5, 4, 5, 4 = 71 (18d6)

>>52589459
Alrighty.

>>52595846
Nah, a shitty player will make a shitty character no matter what method of character generation. I started playing 30 years ago and hated dicing characters, once I got introduced to my first point buy system, I never looked back.

The entire "But you can re-roll if you get shitty stats" crap is pure bullshit. Why not just cut the extraneous crap and go straight to point buy?

Rolled 5, 2, 5, 5, 3, 2, 4, 6, 4, 4, 5, 4, 1, 6, 1, 5, 1, 3 = 66 (18d6)

>>52589367
I praise you, lord RNJesus Christ, and ask that you do not abandon me in my time of need.

Am I scum for using the elite array?

>>52595863
STR 12
DEX 10
CON 15
INT 13
WIS 8
CHA 13

Some kind of...fighter?

Fuck it, these are the perfect stats for an old thief coming out of retirement for one last job.

>>52596009
No, but you are scum for playing 3.x.

>>52589367
I give it a year before we hear about Spoony's suicide.

>>52596008
STR 12
DEX 10
CON 14
INT 13
WIS 8
CHA 9

I thank ye, O lord RNJesus Christ, for making me above average.

With these stats, I would play a NG Variant Human Transmutation Wizard Sage who can't find love (despite working out) and has strangely determined that the best way to find love is to find magic paints to paint to life the perfect girl. +1 to INT and CHA for nice even stats, proficiency in Arcana, History, Investigation, Medicine, and Religion for studying how to create life, and the bonus feat Magic Initiate (Cleric) to get guidance from a God of Love on the matter.

I think that's sufficiently autistic enough. I like it.

>>52596088
i play 5th though.

BLESS ME BASED SPOONY

Rolled 6, 5, 1, 2, 6, 4, 1, 4, 2, 4, 2, 3, 1, 1, 2, 2, 4, 4 = 54 (18d6)

What did I get

>>52596303
STR 12
INT 12
WIS 7
DEX 9
CON 5
CHA 10

Makes a pretty rad elf, Sickly though perhaps.

>>52595962
Its really just for different sorts of games. My first RPG was D&D 3.5 and I always preferred point buy.

My second RPG was Dark Heresy 1st edition and I would never ever EVER make that anything but rolled stats as written in the book. It just depends on the game.

File: clay.jpg (7KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 259x194px

>>52589367
4d4, drop highest.

Min HP for level 1.

Half starting gold.

Begin with no spells memorized.

Five arrows/bullets/bolts maximum at any given time.

>>52590605
I'm willing to try something new if it isn't complete shit. Drinking my own piss would be "trying something new". Doesn't mean I'm a coward for not wanting to do it.

>>52591144
You're missing an important element yourself.

1. It's a fantasy game that people play to get away from reality.

2. See point 1.

>>52596427
DM gets 2 "jack dice" calls per PC, meaning if you roll good, he can veto it and reroll.

DM gets 2 "jack dice' calls per monster, meaning if he rolls bad, he can veto it and reroll.

Magic Missile has a flat 25% chance to miss.

Cure spells require a touch attack on allies.

DM has final say if resurrection spell works or not after all components have been used, so if your 4th level sorcerer is too overpowered, he can say "No, you're dead. Roll 4d4-1."

>>52591865
>he doesn't even talk or try to interact with his chat unless its to drop an epic edgy contrarian opinion or sperg out at someone who said something he doesn't like or tried helping him figure out how to play the video game
Or to scream a random movie reference or just scream in general, which is made even more horrible by the fact that you've probably turned up your volume to at least hear the game because the game volume is much lower than his mic volume.

This exact thing happened when I tried to watch one of his streams a while back. That was the last time I tried it.

>>52596427
>>52596508
DM never pays for pizza but eats half.

DM throws fit when we're tired of rerolling level 1 characters penalized for not realizing there was a incoming volley of invisible fireballs.

DM no longer invited to future Dnd games.

One player's 11 year old brother barely knows rules and makes a much better DM.

I wish I were fucking kidding.

>Roll race
Kobold
>Roll class
Fighter
>Roll stats
STR 5
DEX 11
CON 11
INT 7
WIS 14
CHA 8
>Add racial mods
STR 1
DEX 13
CON 9

WTF am I supposed to do with a 1 strength fighter?

>>52596611
Try and fail to stab yourself to death because you can't do damage with a 1d4-5 sword.

I played 3d6 in order in 2E once. It was pretty fun actually. Even my really crappy character was kind of fun. I wouldn't want a bad character for a long campaign, though. I'd definitely go red shirt with him.

>>52589367
"Screw you, I will Roll 3d6's untill I acheve a stat array that is astheticly pleasing. "

>>52589367

>not doing not doing d3+d4+d5+d6

Plebs

Rolled 2, 6, 4, 3, 4, 1, 3, 3, 1, 2, 5, 6, 3, 6, 3, 1, 6, 1 = 60 (18d6)

FOR GLORY!!!

Rolled 5, 37, 10, 60, 15, 32, 39, 14, 55, 18, 2, 37, 24, 61, 40, 65, 10, 3 = 527 (18d66)

>>52596711
I AM LEGEND

>>52596914
STR 52
DEX 107
CON 108
WIS 57
INT 125
CHA 78

FEAR ME

>>52596485
Oh shit, sorry, you're right. My friends and I have been playing the /wrong way/

>>52596462
3d6 in order isn't complete shit. At least not in the versions of D&D where it was recommended.

>>52596939
>107 DEX

DEX FAGS GET OUT REEEEEEEEEE

>>52596982
So none?

>>52597004
I thought OD&D character creation involved 3d6 down the line, and maybe B/X. It's been a while since I've looked at them, though.

I run S&W, and have my players roll 3d6 twelve times and write them in a circle, and then they can pick any six in order (going clockwise).

>>52596982
It was kind of shit in 2e, because the tables were all balanced about 4d6k3.

>>52597004
Six editions recommend 3d6 in order. Interestingly, the order you were meant to roll them changed.

Willing to bet my stats will be shit.

>>52597097

>>52597097
>>52597121
Or i won't roll because apparently i have brain problems.

>>52597041
An anon already debunked this in a previous iteration of this fucking thread. Historically, no editions of D&D have ever recommended 3d6 in order. Not even the od&d. In fact some of them even outright recommended avoiding it as a method of rolling stats.

Even seen some guy crunch the numbers once and come up with the the conclusion that it was next to impossible to classify for a bard or a paladin in AD&D, Spoony's favorite game, with the probabilities of 3d6 in order. Meaning he's basically full of shit along with everything else.

Its never been more than another stupid draconian house rule created trough poor understanding of existing one. Just like critical skill failures.

>>52597004
OD&D, B/X and BECMI

>>52597183
>no editions of D&D have ever recommended 3d6 in order. Not even the od&d.
Are you fucking daft?

>Prior to the character selection by players it is necessary for the referee to roll three six-sided dice in order to rate each as to various abilities, and thus aid them in selecting a role. Categories of ability are: Strength, Intelligence, Wisdom, Constitution,
Dexterity, and Charisma. Each player notes his appropriate scores, obtains a similar roll of three dice to determine the number of Gold Pieces (Dice score x 10) he starts with, and then opts for a role.

The only difference here is the order and the fact that the DM rolls instead of the player.

>>52597183
>Just like critical skill failures
care to elaborate? I always detested the exaggerated effects of critical failures, as if failing by itself wasn't punishment enough, but how to role play it properly?

>>52597240
Skill rolls can't crit.

>>52597243
ah well yes, but attack rolls
why

>>52589873
My first DM did just this. Someone had to roll up a new character every TWENTY FUCKING MINUTES.

>>52597263
Basically, skills aren't supposed to crit because they are a measure of your basic abilities. It wouldn't make sense for you to suddenly lose the ability to see because your spot was too low, as an example.

Thus, skills can't crit. Otherwise, the gradual increase in skills would be near meaningless. There's also the option of taking 10 or 20 on many skills, which makes the point of criticals nearly useless.

In all its just a system that works out badly for the players more often than it would help them any better than it would have anyways. It would also take the point out of some skills that have increasing DC's based on situational factors.

Rolled 3, 1, 3, 1, 4, 4, 6, 5, 2, 4, 3, 4, 5, 6, 5, 2, 4, 4 = 66 (18d6)

>>52589459
I got a bad feeling about this

>>52597442
STR: 7
DEX: 9
CON: 13
INT: 11
WIS: 16
CHA: 10

Uh. Guess I'll just be some dude who sits in the back of the party and gives advice?
I seriously can't think of a good use for this character.

LET'S GO

Rolled 4, 1, 3, 3, 5, 5, 4, 5, 6, 1, 3, 6, 4, 6, 5, 5, 4, 2 = 72 (18d6)

>>52597464
forgot to roll

>>52597472
STR 8
DEX 13
CON 15
INT 10
WIS 15
CHR 11

I guess I'm a laser cleric

BURN THEM WITH HOLY FIRE

>>52597407
well I agree completely, although I remember once playing an early tabletop witcher game (published in 2001, never really took off)
it only used d6 dice and for any check you threw like 3d6 and if you got a six there (kida like crit success) you got automatic pass and 1 on any was automatic fail, only things inbetween used modifiers and such.

It was weird and kinda half baked with definitely more focus on story with only a side of dice rolling so maybe it made sense in designers mind, I dunno

>>52589367
>Str: 7
>Dex: 5
>Con: 9
>Int: 8
>Wis: 9
>Cha: 5

Is there a "useless chucklefuck" class?

>>52597505
Character literally doesn't qualify for any class. You would have to reroll in order to play at all.

>>52597553
>literally doesn't qualify for any class.
Cleric.

Please be good

Rolled 3, 5, 5, 3, 5, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1, 5, 3, 5, 4, 3, 4, 1 = 58 (18d6)

>>52597793
Where did my roll go?

>>52597804
STR 13
DEX 11
CON 5
INT 9
WIS 12
CHR 8

Do I just die in one hit or what?

Rolled 1, 5, 5, 2, 4, 3, 5, 5, 4, 4, 2, 4, 1, 2, 6, 6, 3, 6 = 68 (18d6)

Let's see how it goes

Rolled 4, 3, 6, 2, 2, 2, 4, 5, 5, 1, 6, 1, 1, 4, 2, 6, 5, 3 = 62 (18d6)

>>52589459
what could pawsably go wrong

>>52597861
STR 11
DEX 9
CON 14
INT 8
WIS 9
CHR 15

I guess I'd have to built a shitty warlock?

>>52597896
In BD&D you could build a pretty fucking good fighter with those stats.

File: 1460586532554.jpg (27KB, 720x575px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 720x575px

>>52597895
13 STR
06 DEX
14 CON
08 INT
07 WIS
14 CHA

can't think of anything

Rolled 2, 2, 1, 3, 3, 5, 4, 2, 1, 3, 6, 4, 1, 6, 2, 5, 4, 4 = 58 (18d6)

>>52589367
Okay. Let's roll up a character shall we?

>>52597936
see
>>52597912

Rolled 2, 5, 3, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 6, 4, 2, 6 = 51 (18d6)

I do this, and my GM rewards me with magic items. As a Gm i reward taking risks, so i've adopted 'determine stat how you want, but i'll reward you for being a fool'

lets test my luck

>>52589367
A real man flips a coin for a stat

>>52597961
STR 5
DEX 11
CON 7
INT 13
WIS 9
CHA 13

Eh, I've played worse. I once played a 3E LG Factotum with 7 STR, 8 DEX, 10 CON, 12 INT, 8 WIS, and 9 CHA. Made it to level 6 before getting stabbed in the back by a Paladin because MUH CHIVALRY.

What's funny is we also had a CN Warblade with 17 STR, 16 DEX, 15 CON, 15 INT, 12 WIS, and 15 CHA... who 'rolled his stats at home before the game, honest'. He also died the session before me because he didn't run from the huge fire elemental.

>>52597990
>3 CON
you'll have to watch out for any paticularly strong breezes

>>52597990
>>52598015
Str: 10
Dex:5
Con: 5
Int: 8
Wis: 13
Cha: 12

I shall be the shittiest of clerics. Armed with my ever missing crossbow, my less than adequate intelligence, and love for my godemparah, none shall fear me.

(i usually choose class before i roll too, gets me more magic shit)

>>52589367
Done it before, let's see how things go this time.

>>52598034
ALSO I CAN'T MATH

Str: 10
Dex:5
>Con: 3
Int: 8
Wis: 13
Cha: 12

Rolled 1, 4, 6, 4, 2, 4, 4, 3, 1, 1, 6, 3, 3, 1, 2, 6, 1, 4 = 56 (18d6)

tryin again, lets see if it do this time.

Rolled 4, 4, 5, 3, 2, 5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 1, 6, 2, 5, 5, 2, 2 = 63 (18d6)

>>52598040
Dammit I knew not sleeping would fuck up the quality of my posts!

>>52589367
>str10
>dex9
>con10
>int15
>wis12
>cha17

>>52598094
Fucking bards

Rolled 1, 5, 3, 6, 6, 2, 5, 3, 2, 1, 6, 2, 3, 3, 2, 4, 4, 2 = 60 (18d6)

>>52598013
So assuming my character dies pretty early on, let's roll up a backup shall we?

>>52598050
>Str 13 Dex 10 Con 6
>Int 12 Wis 13 Cha 9

Sooo... A sick elven weaponmaster? A cleric of the god of disease?
Maybe one of those psions that deal with STR powers only.

>>52598106
STR 9
DEX 14
CON 10
INT 9
WIS 8
CHA 10

Basically average stats for a human being, could make a decent enough thief or rogue. Better than the last character at least.

Rolled 3, 1, 5, 4, 5, 6, 2, 2, 5, 5, 1, 3, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 3 = 56 (18d6)

>>52598131
A third one just in case. These games are lethal after all.

>>52598042
Fuck it once more. I enjoy challenging characters.

>>52598048
okay, so

Str: 11
Dex:12
Con:8
Int:10
Wis: 6
Cha:11

Not as bad as i was expecting, but utterly unimpressive.

Rolled 3, 5, 5, 1, 3, 6, 1, 2, 6, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 5, 6, 2, 3 = 60 (18d6)

>>52598174
Hate, rage, i'm rolling a barbarian with these.

Rolled 1, 5, 1, 4, 1, 3, 4, 1, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 5, 1, 5, 6, 6 = 61 (18d6)

>>52589459
FOR GLORY

>>52598187
STR 6
DEX 8
CON 8
INT 11
WIS 10
CHA 17

bards4lyfe

>>52598184
Sr:13
Dex: 9
Con: 9
Int: 6
Wis:11
Cha: 12

Not even a bad barbarian. Not a great one. but not bad. He shall be named 'Horse'

>>52598133
STR 9
DEX 15
CON 9
INT 9
Wis 7
Cha 7

Eh, could make a decent archer I suppose. Quick with his hands but lacking in everything else.

One of my favourite approaches to stat generation in 3E was the following: You get three 6s, three 5s, three 4s, etc. Divide those dice however you like among your stats, so for example you could put two 5s and a 4 into a stat for a 14 but then you'd only have one 5 left to put anywhere else. It basically adds up to 63 total points among stats.

If you want to simulate 4d6 drop lowest you instead need to hand out 73.5 points approximately, so three 6s, four 5s, five 4s, four 3s, and two 2s would work.

Rolled 6, 6, 1, 6, 3, 2, 5, 1, 4, 6, 3, 4, 4, 4, 6, 5, 3, 5 = 74 (18d6)

>>52589459
Let's go

Just fuck my shit up

>>52598315
>STR 13
>DEX 11
>CON 10
>INT 13
>WIS 14
>CHA 13

What the fuck these are actually good for rolled now I can't decide