Feathered dragons are sexier than scaly dragons, prove me wrong.

>>52440684
Therefore scaly dragons are better than feathered dragons.

>Ignoring floofy fuzzy dragons
Y'all can kindly fuck off

File: lewdcoa.jpg (113KB, 855x1200px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 855x1200px

>>52440684
No, you're 100% right.

>>52440785
Fuck off furfag

>>52440684
I think it's a matter of opinion, but thank you for the contribution to my own creatures/dragons/feathered folder.

>>52440684
If it's not reptilian it's not a dragon.

>>52440701
fpbp, as usual

No, you are absolutely correct. Feathers and scales is such a cool look.

File: 1442601350743.jpg (2MB, 2560x1750px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1750px

>>52440684
Anyone got any coutals? For, uh, reasons. Related to the campaign I'm running.

>>52440796
Lucoa is both, Kanna is the feathered dragon.

Which indeed makes the OP correct

>>52440684
Eh, I actually don't like feathers on dragons

>>52440684
>Feathered dragons are sexier
>sexier
Furries please go!

>>52440796
REMOVE DRAGONS!

>>52440684
You are obviously trying to get a argument started so that porn is posted for both scaled and feathered dragons.

Doesn't mean I mind that though. Make better bait next time.

>>52440684
A wish dragon will always be your friend.

>>52441859
You do realise that birds are part of reptilia?

>>52440796
That's a human with horns attached to their hat, not a dragon.

>>52445846
Since when?

>>52446530
Have you looked at a chicken's legs? Or any bird legs?

>>52446605
No, I mean, when I went to school, Reptilia and Amphibia and Birdia or whatever were different phylums. I know it *changes* whenever biologists feel like, but if Birds really did get folded into Reptilia, that's in the most literal sense, news to me.

>>52446530
>>52446636
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptile

Extant groups
Crocodilia - this is obvious
Sphenodontia - tuataras
Squamata - lizards and snakes
Testudines - turtles
Aves - birds

The date for this change is sometime in the last few decades as new fossil evidence came out showing the evolution of birds from theropods and the archosaur group. Along with genetic evidence showing crocodiles as the closest living group to birds. Basically past scientists were sloppy with their classifications and thus reptile and reptilia are holdovers from a more inaccurate past.

Sauropsids is more accurate, with mammals falling under the other reptiliomorpha, Synapsids.

File: 18eb29b240fe59b206b6a87913413d8f1487223971_full[1].png (418KB, 639x359px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 639x359px

>>52440796
technically she's a feathered serpent, not a dragon

>>52440684
Nothing wrong with a feathery dragon, but if I want to get my rocks off I'd rather have a soft feathery griffon to snuggle up to
>dat superior soft and warm belly
>dat roosting to keep you warm at night
Its like sticking your face in a sun-kissed featherduster.

File: __kanna_kamui_kanna_kamui_and_saikawa_riko_kobayashi_san_chi_no_maidragon_drawn_by_errant__1440f9cbba8b12053419f8af3d141dca[1].jpg~original.jpg (46KB, 827x583px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 827x583px

>>52447857

>>52448084
post more