So, I have a question for you: Lets imagine in a alternate universe

Here's a question for you - why don't you fuck off back to /r9k/?

File: herd u were a neighsaying shit.jpg (95KB, 610x584px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 610x584px

SUDDENLY

DIRE STALLION

>>52354372
What was that one story with the tugboat and the space society?

I think it's a humanity Fuck yeah thread idea

Either:

1. We go extinct.

2. A random mutation causes a few people to lose this ability. Their children rapidly outnumber and outcompete the self-sterilizing humans and we're back at square one.

3. A cultural rule "if a women is known to be pregnant and loses the pregnancy, kill her" develops and is strictly enforced.

>>52354747
Assuming constant, unthinking use of this ability without the threat of death is kinda stupid.

>>52354372
If you don't believe that a vast majority of pregnancies will be aborted in a fit of irrational paranoia/anger you haven't been around enough women.

>>52356387
>>>/r9k/

>>52354372
And all the rapey replies to OP are why we can not have nice things.

>>52354372
As it is, most societies are patriarchal for a very simple reason. Men are bigger and stronger than women. A woman could abort an unwanted pregnancy, but if a man wanted her to have the pregnancy it would likely end badly for her.

That said, I reckon there would be a lot fewer exceptionally poor people and in general people might be better off.

>>52356387
Depends on the society.

If it were right now, a majority of pregnancies would probably be stopped until late 20s/early 30s due to the "liberated" mindset of women, where motherhood is not seen as a social requirement. Now if this were a more conservative culture, then it would likely be rarely used until after a few children, as that sort of mindset tends to value larger families more.