Should princesses be allowed to dress casual?

>>52317130
No. They can wear armor and fight on equal ground with men in my setting, but the moment they step outside wearing leggings I'm going to Bitch a fit about it.

>>52317130
Depends on the setting.

>>52317130
Who gives a shit?

>>52317130
In their off time, same as everybody else.

File: 0f87954b52ac29d973d602f2b1320de9.jpg (101KB, 564x910px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 564x910px

>>52317130
Only if they need to be incognito. Otherwise it's all pretty dresses all the time.

>>52317130
Yes

>>52317130
Absolutely not.

Not because I believe this, but because princess stories are better when they start out forbidden to do fun/human things by their station.

>>52317130
>Should princesses be allowed to dress casually?

You can't just ignore adverbs, OP

>>52317190
it was just an excuse for the OP to post the picture so he can fap to it

>>52317130
She's a princess, she'll do whatever she want's.

>>52317130

Mostly what bothers me is seeing the princesses with realistic anatomy, limbs, wrists, etc... then put Mario Bros cartoon physique next to them...

>>52317130
say it with me OP

D E P E N D S
E
P
E
N
D
S

O N
N

?

>>52324809
the princess?

>>52324859
The royal tailor.

>>52317130
I don't think you understand fashion. Whatever the royal family wears is what is fashionable.

>>52325459
Not once the merchant class can afford to pay designers

>>52317130
Should princesses be allowed to dress?

>>52324081
Why is this the most common form of /tg/ shitposting though?