Can we get a thread for female character art that isn't sexualized as all hell? Not necessarily looking for ugly women, just ones without boobplate or the ones in the middle of battle with pristine hair and makeup.
Ideally fantasy. If anyone has matching pics with black haired green eyed warrior women that'd be awesome, I need a pic for an NPC in my game.
>>52279930
That doesn't look like a woman to me.
>>52279946
Pretty sure it is, very feminine face.maybe im just gay tho
[the tough boys were the name of an adventuring group in a campaign i did and i used this art as reference for one of the members, hence the filename.]
>>52279930
I have shit
that I could post
but I'm a little too drunk right now
maybe later, if the thread's still up
>>52279930
>>52281211
>>52280886
What was the purpose of that kind of pointy foot armor, like, historically? I'm pretty sure I've seen them before. They seem like they'd be awkward when you're stuck walking on them. Did knights do a lot of kick-stabbing people from horseback back then?
>>52281277
Toes are generally pointed to make it easier when getting an armored boot into a stirrup.
Heels help keep your feet from slipping out.
>>52281307
Ah, yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Thanks.
>>52281259
I actually would dig a thread with character art of gals that at best aren't especially "good looking" (in conventional sense, e.g. more furiosa than black widow). That stuff can be fairly hard to find.
>>52279930
Everything is fapbait if you try hard and believe in yourself.
>>52280970
is this a poem?
>>52280867
that skirt seems kind of impractical, no?
Lotta good ones in these next two.
>>52281684
I'm more concerned by the lower legs and footwear.
Love this one.
>>52281570
Just because you can fap to something does not make it fapbait.
>>52281787
I think really what we're getting at is "sexualized" or particularly "sexy."
>>52282065
>tfw clothed women are your fetish
>>52283716
>tfw women are your fetish
>>52281828
>painting the tv actress
>painting her an a shitty idealized way
why
This hair may look a bit too good for OPs taste.
>>52279930
Jokes on you this shit gets me diamonds
>>52283996
>tfw armor is your fetish
>>52279930
>not sexualized
But this is exactly my fetish anon!
>>52279930
>short-haired reverse trap
>not fap bait
>>52281787
I never understood the pole attached to spiked pole weapon concept. I understand it exist irl, but it seems like the length of the pole coupled with the fluidity of the chain would cause the resulting strike to be of low velocity and power
>>52279930
But anon, full armor is my fetish
>>52286737
It's actually the other way around
>>52279930
>not sexualized
>but not ugly
wew
>>52281698
>>52281724
Can anyone confirm if these are original Degenesis ie. not Rebirth? A lot of the designs are super familiar but I can't tell if it's actual game pictures or deviantart inspired stuff. Love it either way.
>>52285912
>>52286040
>>52286569
>>52286817
Patrician taste, anons, cheers. Get fucked on, OP.
>>52279930
Someone will fap to it no matter how much you try to avoid it.
In fact, I'll fap to it on principle. Because OP, as usual, is a fag.
>>52281787
Oh, to be young and naive.
>>52279930
Women are practically made to be sexualized, though. Why deny one of their primary purposes in not only reality but especially fiction?
>>52287354
/thread
Keep posting armoured lasses though.
Is it wrong that I find this more attractive than boobplate and skimpy armour?
>>52287840
no.
>>52287852What about if I also prefer women with flat chests, flat asses and narrow hips
>>52286040
SATAN! STOP TEASING ME !
>>52287840
No, but you're just the equivalent of betas virtual signaling about how much more beautiful women without make up are.
>>52287908
Yes. The majority of those that fall into that category has not gone through puberty yet.
>>52286737
It's a two-handed flail, a militarized version of farming/threshing flails.
>>52289220
They look so dapper for two men who are about to brutally bludgeon each other to death.
>>52286040
Is this you?
>>52281881
I'm stealing this for my Blades in the Dark game. thx.
>>52288069
It's only virtue signaling if you bother to mention it. Your secret enjoyment remains pure.
Lack of fapbait was a mistake.
>>52280867
>>52281684
>>52281724
That's jousting armor, literally only good for holding a lance and getting hit by one. except it's symmetrical, which jousting armor is not. Both her arms are locked in the lance holding position, she physically could not lift her arms higher than maybe 45 degrees.
>>52290156
It might have been, anon. It might have been.
Fully clothed fapbait? Challenge accepted
>>52291583
Is this sufficiently clothed?
>>52291828
Need to go more METAL!
>>52292142
>>52288069
>virtual signaling
lol
>>52280511
Really like this. Properly realistic, but elegant.
>>52279930
>Non fapbait female character art thread
Implying I'm not fapping to this right now.
>>52281811
>Emma Watson
>Ever not fapbait
>>52281938
This frustrates me so much, because everything is so well drawn, but every single facial feature except maaaaaaybe her left eye is in the wrong place, despite being drawn well as an individual object.
>>52293640
>human with strange ears
Good job, I'm really unable to masturbate to this.
>>52293680
>>52293658
>Good job, I'm really unable to masturbate to this.
Ok, let's go full METAL and see if you can fap to this.I'm betting you can, anon
>>52279930
All I think I've got for you OP.
>>52293707
Her shield says something to the effect of "Even a small flower can put a valorous chariot on its knees" or something like that.
>>52293815
>>52293836
>>52288206
jebus christ that neck
>>52293107
Do you have prosopagnosia?
>>52293824
I think you'll find her shield says 'a small meme'.
>>52279930
>non-fapbait
You've lost your touch, /tg/. You've forgotten the old ways!
>>52296898
>>52296917
>>52296940
>>52296953
>>52279964
Didn't OP specifically say no boob plate? Yeah, I think he did
>>52296960
>>52296978
>>52296995
>>52297010
>>52297027
>>52293016
>woman wearing a suit of metal armor
>realistic
>>52297053
>>52279930
Well, 23h.
It was a good run.
>>52297077
>>52297058
>wanting realism
>in fantasy
That sickens me.
>>52297098
>>52297120
>>52297148
>>52297153
>>52297161
>>52297058
Maybe you should learn what is realistic before posting.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomoe_Gozen
>>52297185
>>52297230
Realism can suck a fat one.
>>52297267
>>52297267
You are cancer. Low fantasy is the height of cultured civilization.
>>52297297
>>52297310
>>52297307
>not wanting to have fun
>good
Yeah, sure, lets just all play dirt farmers while we're at it.
>>52297267
Realism is not a faggot like you.
>>52297326
>>52297326
A person isn't very sexy if they're dying of sepsis.
>>52297347
>>52297333
But I enjoy the female form.
Not sweaty men in armor, like you.
>>52297367
>>52297351
Good thing it's fantasy then, where that doesn't happen. Unless you want to roll some disease checks for any wound people ever take, constantly.
>>52297379
>>52297367
Then get her in bed. She can still have a form beneath the armor. The armor is to protect the form, you fool!
>>52297379
>playing games without risk of failure
You play Pathfinder and D&D, don't you?
>>52297396
>>52297399
I play tons of games, and the more unrealistic, the better. Reality is boring.
>>52297367
That is what you say but is that true? Also I never said anything about the sweaty men you seem to love talking about, all I did was point out that someone was wrong and back it up with a link.
>>52297483
I'm sorry, anon, but you have shit taste.
>>52296960
>sweatingman.jpg
I love this artist and their appreciation for thicc.
>>52297483
>>52297509
>boring colors
>no flair
>no excitement
>stock, standing boring pose
>flat as a board
God, it's like a Bioware game in here.
>>52297529
>>52297523
I do love me some thicc.
>>52297529
>>52297554
>>52297563
Disgusting, might as well be a man.
>>52297575
>>52297575
>>52297586
She gots the crazy eyes. You never stick it in the crazy, Anon.
>>52297600
>>52297600
>>52297619
>>52297628
>>52297637
>>52297637
You should post more like >>52297600
>>52297655
>>52297655
>>52297662
I do what I want.
>>52297739
Awww. Please? I'll even stop making fun of you liking unrealistic games!
>>52297739
>>52297766
Realism is boring. You get off your job and you want to play Joe McDirtfarmer? When you could be playing Killfuck Soulshitter, Destonator of Justice?
>>52297790
>>52297529
Go to virtually any other fucking thread on the board then, you dense bastard. This thread was specifically about females that don't look like scantily clad sluts. Jesus fucking christ, man can we not have just one thread without Jiggletitticus, the Bechested Enchantress?
You're goddamn right I'm mad.
>>52297790
You can play in an incredibly realistic setting and have realistic, entertaining depth to characters. Why do you think historical fiction exists?
>>52297800
>>52297826
Because people have no imagination and don't want to try stretching it a bit.
>>52297822
This thread was dying, and now you've got people actually posting what you want in it to boot.
Also I'm sorry you hate good ol' fashioned fantasy, like games used way back when.
>>52297858
Good ol' fashioned fantasy is great for TV, art, movies, and books. But when I sit down for tabletop I aim for muh realism and low fantasy. Realistic characters reacting to realistic encounters in realistic ways.
>>52297858
Here's one of the (You)s you're desperately looking for
>>52297858
>>52297893
How does anything survive their first fight? Or do they just autodie of all the horrible disease people get in those dirty times?
>>52297858
I don't hate "good ol' fashioned fantasy," cheesecake is fine now and again. But when someone posts a thread about a topic, then says "it's expressly about [thing] and not [other thing] please," then someone begins posting about [other thing] and sucking up the image limit, it gets a little irritating.
Just rub one out and find another thread.
>>52297924
They wear armor. You know, like how they did in reality. That's what makes it realistic.
>>52297790
Even boring ol' real-world history had cool badass people in it. "Realistic" fantasy heroes can be at least as good.
>>52297924
>>52297957
Armor certainly doesn't save you from the absolutely rancid conditions of life in those times.
>>52297961
Ok, thats true, real life did have some cool people. A whole lot'em died from really dumb shit or disease though.
>>52298013
You certainly have no idea what you're talking about.
>>52298013
>>52298030
Pretty damn sure disease killed a whole shitton of people throughout history, Anon. A wound gets infected, and you're in deep shit.
Thats why people used to rub shit on their blades, to spread disease.
>>52297858
Don't act offended that they don't want unrealistic character art in a thread about realistic character art. Its just what they want here. They weren't even judging you for liking the unrealistic, sexualized stuff, they just were looking for what they want. You're the one that is getting offended here, acting attacked just because someone wants the thread to be about what it is clearly stated to be for. You saw something that you didn't like and thought "WOW, FUCK THESE GUYS FOR NOT LIKING SEX DUNGEONS AND BAD DRAGONS" and went on to try and disrupt a thread that was going nicely just because you felt like we were assholes for wanting something other than you did. Nobody is upset that you like what you like, so let us like what we like. Cunt.
>>52298055
Well, duh. Don't get cut, dumbass. Wear armor. If you do, wash the wound ASAP. If it's severe enough, cauterize it.
But wear armor. It was invented for a reason.
>>52297957
Many, many people successfully fought and lived without armour, some even fighting entirely naked, because not everyone lived in 15th century Europe where munitions plate was a relatively common thing.
Even in the Iron Age some people successfully lived through battle without armour, let alone in the Bronze, Neolithic, or Paleolithic ages. The difference here is that people wearing 15th century plate, hoplites using little to no armor, and a Neolithic or Paleolithic warrior probably generally shouldn't be existing side by side.
>>52298099
Also shields. Shields are badass.
>>52298128
You're right. I should have suffixed my post with, 'If you don't have armor, then don't get hit. If you can't help but to get hit, then don't get in a fight.'
>>52298167
Sorry, I'm being a pedantic fuck.
>>52298193
By the grace of my infinite benevolence, I forgive you.
And anon thinks you can't be sexy while wearing armor.
hammer/parrying dagger is totally the new meta
This is my last one for tonight. I hope you enjoyed!
>>52297153
god DAMN that negress is BURNT
>>52297529
>>52298320
I would do very lesbian things to that woman.
>>52279930
> not having a scantaly dressed grill in your party
Thats your first mistake
To all the people posting girls with tits the size of suns bursting out of tiny tops, I have a question: do you run with that kinda shit in your games, or is it just because you haven't rubbed one out this evening and you're on /tg/? I couldn't even imagine how unbearably awkward it would be for a group of dudes to describe and interact with a woman that sluttily dressed beyond maybe "she's provocatively dressed, with a lowcut top.".
>>52299430
Personally, I play with a group of mature adults who are fond of Frank Frazetta-esque Sword and Sorcery with hot ass skimpy bitches and hot ass skimpy dudes and don't start sweating and fumbling over themeslves at the description of a scantily clad woman.
>>52299519
>mature adults who are fond of Frank Frazetta-esque Sword and Sorcery with hot ass skimpy bitches and hot ass skimpy dudes
What an oxymoronic trainwreck of a sentence.
>>52299592
>not striving for perfect physical beauty
>mature
You weakling.
>>52299592
If read by a friendless autistic wreck of a subhuman neckbeard, sure.
>>52299592
I'm gonna make some assumptions here. You're that weird weedy or obese nerd that nobody likes with an obsession over pseudo-historical accuracy and pseudo-realism because you think it makes you oh so mature, even though your depth of understanding of genuine realism and historical accuracy is child-like at best.
When the subject of, say, pre-modern history, arms and armour, or medieval combat comes up, you start rambling about how it totally actually worked I swear guys, colored by your false and sad notions, even though you've never donned real armour, learned and practiced any genuine martial combat, and probably can't even bench your bodyweight, let alone an actually impressive weight.
You spend your time masturbating to pictures of realistic, or at least what you think to be realistic, late medieval/early Renaissance European armor, and whenever anyone shows any interest in things like classic Frank Frazetta art you start screeching or mumbling autistically while everyone around you rolls their eyes uncomfortably because they're actual adults and just want to play around with their cool skimpy Conan characters.
Yes, I realize what this thread originally was for, and no, I'm not any of the assholes that posted images inappropriate to the thread's subject. I'm just here to laugh at you.
>>52299964
I don't give a shit about realism, I just find the "bigger is better" "sex sells" mentality to be childish and annoying, especially when it's forced into a place where it explicitly is unwanted. It's fine in small doses, and I'm all for parody games and the like, but to treat it like it's the end-all-be-all of fantasy is narrow-minded.
If you did not spam this thread with fapbait though, then my quarrel is not with you, sir. Though I am cringing at the "let me read you like a book" tactic.
>>52293909
Man, she has got her game face on. Great expression.
Lewd-faggots almost ruined another thread.
>>52285759
Griffith?
>>52302891
>bumping an image dump thread that reached image limit
Good job, anon. At least sage.