CYOA General Throg /cyoag/

File: 1408921600672.jpg (1MB, 1756x1835px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1756x1835px

>>52006690

What is Omni-Law? I don't think I've ever seen a CYOA with that name.

>>52006657
Please don't spam or tripfag again.

File: 1408921744172.jpg (396KB, 1699x631px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 1699x631px

>>52006702

File: 1408921856550.jpg (97KB, 391x473px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 391x473px

>>52006710

>>52006706
A build someone made for Battlemage. Why do you ask?

>>52006747
Someone mentioned it the other thread. Thanks for answering.

>>52006706
Spam cyoas in a cyoa thread?

File: an actually tg-related cyoa.png (570KB, 1200x1146px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 1200x1146px

Really dumb and autistic, but I couldn't help but make it once I got the idea.

>>52006793
Better than the garbage Sda makes

File: Darwin Island.jpg (1MB, 2430x1960px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2430x1960px

>>52006778
No, spam obnoxious autistic comments.

Why is there more fantasy cyoas than modern or sci-fi?

>>52006706
A build someone made for Battlemage. That period of time was beautiful to live through, and Omni-Law was the embodiment of all our hopes.

REAL CYOA Thread
>>52006707
>>52006707
>>52006707

>>52006824
Even my dubs agree

>>52006822
And yet he somehow shits up threads less than you do. Or does he?

>>52006858
We know its you Sda, your stuff is fucking garbage kys

>>52006868
Hey! SDA is shit, but his shit is good. The distinction is important.

>>52006841
A shitposter actually made a better thread than your shit one which doesnt even have the correct name, I pray u get banned

>>52006889
>tooting your own horn over making a thread

>>52006880
I actually like sda's shit but I love to bully him, I just wish I could lock him up in my basement and make him mine

>>52006793
Universal system

>>52006906
You are fucking retarded becouse I did not make this thread you piece of human garbage, you should have proof before accusing people of shite.
Fucking God please smite this human shit

>>52006706
The hero we all needed.

F

>>52006880
>SDA is shit.
How do we solve the SDA problem? What is the final solution?

>>52006936
We don't. I love his content and think it's a completely fair trade off.

Hell, I actually find his shitposting smugness oddly endearing in a way.

>>52006793
Genre System: Battle Shounen

File: 1468549327812.png (447KB, 715x759px) Image search: [Google]

447KB, 715x759px

>>52006950
SDA stop posting.

>>52006936
I want pictures of sda's butt

>>52006932
The shitposter is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a threadmaker and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

Any long CYOAs with cute boy romance options?

>>52006976
>SDA stop posting.

HOLY FUCK I ACHIEVED AMARANTH

>>52007018
Traveler, Order, Pokemon Personified, Royal Revival, Royal Protector, Hero Academy, etc.

This is a cyber crusade you filthy goys, where has awooo~ poster gone?

>>52007055
STOP SPAMMING CYOAS

>>52007081
Isn't this the CYOA thread?

>>52007087
NO CYOAS ALLOWED.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>52007087
Post OC or get out.

File: Troll Hunter (4).png (2MB, 1000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1000x3000px

>>52007081
Troll Hunter is the first cyoa I've posted in like 3 months. What's with everyone being so obnoxious now?

File: 1485213778087.jpg (109KB, 823x744px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 823x744px

>>52006822
>Sda

File: Aoi 1.png (239KB, 377x1037px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 377x1037px

>>52007100

File: Aoi 2.png (222KB, 377x1037px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 377x1037px

>>52007115

>>52007081
See lads, this is the scum we gotta fight against.
I want to make cyoag great again.
We will win again, we will win so much you are going to say: Mr awoo~ please stop we cant take itanymore, this is too much winning

>>52007114
Don't worry, some of us still love you.

File: Aoi 3.png (233KB, 373x1037px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 373x1037px

>>52007126

>>52007137
You mean none of us

File: Aoi 4.png (244KB, 377x1037px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 377x1037px

>>52007142

>>52007154
I love him, Full Homo.

File: Hikaru 1.png (318KB, 379x1039px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 379x1039px

>>52007157

>>52007168
If I love you, those that mean I love him?
If A=B and B=C then A=C

File: Hikaru 2.png (321KB, 379x1039px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 379x1039px

>>52007171

File: Hikaru 3.png (311KB, 379x1039px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 379x1039px

>>52007184

File: 1488429230065.jpg (100KB, 789x691px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 789x691px

>>52007154
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdTvwi-wRaM

File: Hikaru 4.png (318KB, 379x1039px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 379x1039px

>>52007196

>>52007182
Uuuuhmmm, Your logic is very flawed.

>>52007114
where are the cyoas you made?

File: Lisa 1.png (258KB, 368x1036px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 368x1036px

>>52007206

Pics of SDA's butt when?

File: Lisa 2.png (254KB, 368x1036px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 368x1036px

>>52007226

File: depression.png (1MB, 1200x1176px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x1176px

>>52007225
I made this one.

File: Lisa 3.png (253KB, 368x1036px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 368x1036px

>>52007239

>>52007214
Shut up you la-la-la l
Prancing homo

File: Lisa 4.png (246KB, 368x1036px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 368x1036px

>>52007254

File: Miyako 1.png (313KB, 377x1030px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 377x1030px

>>52007269

File: Miyako 2.png (310KB, 377x1030px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 377x1030px

>>52007277

>>52007225
Inside your mother, she loved them so much she swallowed them whole

File: Miyako 3.png (306KB, 377x1030px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 377x1030px

>>52007287

>>52007293
Butt pics when????

File: Miyako 4.png (301KB, 377x1030px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 377x1030px

>>52007301

>>52006657
GAH! I fel like I have this... Hole in my chest and stomach ache… But I can't figure out what it is so I can't fix it with CYOA's. What is wrong with me?

>>52007287
>>52007277

I never understood how she can be contradict so heavily in this what happened to this cyoa?

What does a dark knight need?

>>52007314
Try a bullet to the head, I heard it cures All illnesses and pains

>>52007348
A good slap in the face with reality and to get a real job

>>52007348
A cape, an identifiable helmet, some sort of magic power, maybe a horse.

>>52007348
Options for customization that range from understandable and sympathy worthy fallen paladin to overly edgy Coldsteel the Hedgehog.

>>52007367
Sir you won the Internet today

>>52007348
Nippon steel folded one thousand times.

Preferably of the glorious variety.

>>52007348

A back brace

>>52007348
He needs to be BATMAN

File: Shitty Music Video Powers v.1.0.png (1MB, 1000x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x2160px

This thread is shit, so have a shitty OC to match.
I may or may not make another version like I did with the /f/ one, leaning towards not because this took way longer than it should have.

>>52007348
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO7n_qaQJUA

File: Shitty Flash Powers v.1.1.0.png (3MB, 1000x5000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1000x5000px

>>52007523
And the /f/ one. You can mix and match, I guess. You're the one playing, do whatever.

File: 1487456042499.png (766KB, 1000x850px) Image search: [Google]

766KB, 1000x850px

>>52007452
I like this anon.

>>52007523
This brought me to bring up a Josip on Deck song for the first time.

Holy shit.

>>52007523
>Satisfaction
Can I repair a person? Can I "fix" the dead?
>Do the Evolution
POWER, FUCK YEAH!!
>Stamina
Because why not?

>>52006841
Throg good as thread, stupid wordy man.

>>52006835
I'd say it's about even actually

>>52007348
A tanking and DPS stance they can have on simultanteously, a CD that improves their next weaponskill, some AoE, and also a cool greatsword.

Also the ability to woo all the ladies. The women do love a tough, but soft, man.

>>52007348
A depressing reason for why their like that/motive that paints them as more of a sad lonely shell of a man.

>>52006838
>period of time was beautiful to live through

NEVER FORGET

SHIELDS, MUDBRO, OMNI-LAW, LADY GIANT BELLS, AND ALL THE REST

I miss those days.

>>52008203
The Incredibly Angry man will never get his daughter back.

>>52007348
alfred

>>52008203


YOU FORGOT PISSBOMBER

File: Thumb-DragonForce_KillerEliteCD.png (306KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 450x450px

>>52007348
The hardest metal known to man.

>>52008332
Fuck yeah, also GIRTHQUAKE.

> tfw that weird faggot who won't stop giggling in the back of the class graduates months early and you later hear about him wrecking battlefields by "making it rain earthquakes."

>>52007348
a loli body.

>>52008252
That build had good presentation.

>>52008332
>>52008390
Pissbomber wasn't Battlemage.

>>52008541
Oh.

Weird considering bombing people with piss is very in character for a battlemage.

>>52007348
A cause.

File: 1487121771900.jpg (87KB, 582x580px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 582x580px

>>52008553
I'll bomb you with my piss, anon.

>>52008734
Not a possibility, homosexual.

>>52008749
>Calling someone gay

You must be a gay.

>>52008749
>>52008794
only a gay would call somebody gay you gay

File: 1486511466912.jpg (47KB, 450x428px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 450x428px

>>52008749
Why not?

You can yell, "It's like 'oishii!' in my mouth!"

File: 1488597960809.jpg (67KB, 1024x758px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1024x758px

>>52008794
>>52008804
>Motherfuckers not getting the meme.

>>52008332
Daily reminder somebody actually wrote a song about Piss Bomber anon:

He was just a rookie hunter when the Culling season came.
A few kills under the belt and already dreaming of fame.
He bid farewell one last time before heading out the door.
He ain't gonna hunt no more.

"Is everybody ready?" shouted the Master of the Hunt.
Our hero feebly answered, "Yes", standing tall on the front.
He felt the aether whisk him through the static of the veil.
And he ain't gonna hunt no more.

He tracked so long, he tracked so hard, he stalked for helpless human prey.
He braved the wind, he braved the cold, he tread all night and day.
Unaware of the silk line that snapped beneath his legs.
And he ain't gonna hunt no more.

The warhead bored through his crotch, imploding off his dome.
Cratering the dirt and mud, scattered his flesh and bones.
He was shattered and in tears, the scent of piss filled the air.
And he ain't gonna hunt no more.

The days he lived and loved and laughed kept running through his mind.
He thought about the monster waifu, the one he left behind.
He thought about the rapists and wondered what they'd find.
And he ain't gonna hunt no more.

The roaming gangs was on the spot, the curs were running wild.
The rapists jumped and screamed with glee, rolled up their sleeves and smiled.
For it had been a week or so since last a prey did succumb.
And he ain't gonna hunt no more.

He picked what remained of himself, raised his blade to the sky.
His killers they were heard to say, "A helluva way to die."
He stood there barely holding in the flood of guts and gore.
And he ain't gonna hunt no more.

The ground was stained with blood, gleaming red upon the evening sun.
Intestines were dangling from the trees 'fore it was done.
And his whispered final words were, "Fuck you piss bomber anon".
And he ain't gonna hunt no more.

>>52008794
I think he was saying that he was homo, not you.

>>52008937
They didn't write it by themselves, they just edited the lyrics of Blood on the Risers.

>>52009030
still alot of effort though

>>52006841
Oh great, you'll keep that one always like always and have to deal with two threads.... Fucking tard.

>>52009178
Interesting. Wonder what else the OP on this could cram in and people would still make their custom GFs.

>Political alignment
>Actual length and style of hair
>Race
>Flip to trap

>>52009328
There already is race choice?

>>52009420
Just skin choice and if you roll it in Special Features she can be a jew or swede or something.

>>52003211
>>52003432

Excuse me if I misunderstand, but it sounds an awful lot like you want to make your own companions rather than pick from a selection?
And then they have no backstory, and can't be used for world building?

Only Time I can remember seeing that (>>52004168), it is never used.
I don't think the majority agree with you. I would not use that system.

I want to use a character heavily based on King Arthur, but that almost certainly means endless cuckposting from one end and bitching about NTR from the other end.

>>52009613
Solution, don't include French Lanceshit.

Anyone got pictures of male driders or arachne, and male gorgons or lamia?

>>52009613
See >>52009642

Lancelot is LITERALLY the self-insert of a French knight who was in jail for being a piece of shit that he put in so he could masturbate to cucking an English hero. Lancelot is such a fucking French invention. He's from France, he fucks over the English, he lets them live out their cuck and cucking fantasies, he gets to pretend to be suave and romantic and tragic, and literally everyone sucks his dick despite him never earning it. Just don't use that piece of shit, most of what you know about King Arthur had already solidified by the time Mallory wrote his shit, he just put it in a book and added the cucking knight.

File: 1420904471202.jpg (4MB, 1508x8296px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1508x8296px

>>52007100
>>52007115
>>52007126
>>52007142
>>52007157
>>52007171
>>52007184
>>52007196
>>52007206
>>52007226
>>52007239
>>52007254
>>52007269
>>52007277
>>52007287
>>52007301
>>52007308

If you're going to post that mess of a CYOA, the least you could do is post the master image that shows ALL the secret information cards rather than wasting time posting singles.

That's my one good deed for the day, enjoy.

>>52009727
Galahad was pretty cool even if he was a complete Mary Sue.

>>52009824
Galahad is okay, but he's not worth dealing with his dad.

>>52009818
>good deed
>a pissy shitpost
The joke is that people really do think like this.

>>52006824
>Normal Mode
>Charm, Good Luck [-2]
>Injury (broken left arm), Scarce [0]
>Abandoned Factory (somewhere barren and inland) [-2]
>Toolkit, Shovel [-6]
>Mage, Doctor (both female bisexuals :D) [-12]
>Forgotten Ones, Poacher, Abominations, Creepers [0]

This is a bit of a risky build as I am relying on playing some of my enemies against each other. The factory's inhospitable location and Scarce island bane should make it hard for the Poacher to find food. The Doctor might be able to convince him to off some of those awful fish people (who are exhausted from the trek inland anyway) and any of the abominations/creepers not caught in our many traps. If the Poacher becomes too strong off this heart diet we can poison the meat or weave a curse on all consumers of monster flesh (something something law of contagion?).

I'm torn on whether to leave when the 10-20 years are up. On the one hand there is so much to study on the island, on the other I have a duty to share my knowledge with the rest of humanity.

>>52010099

Seems more like the joke is you needing to learn what actually qualifies as a pissy shitpost around here, that's nowhere close to one.

>>52010149
You're thinking massively autistic tirades, not just pissy little whines. There's a difference.

>>52010149
The joke here is you think anon didn't post singles intentionally to be annoying/get closer to the image limit.

>>52010243

naw, anon needs to get working, doing a lousy job of both

File: tumblr_lihjciZ6JU1qaw9vn.jpg (180KB, 500x623px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 500x623px

>>52007523
>Rap God
>Barbie Girl
>Do the Evolution

The age of men is over. The time of the machine has come. I will sell everyone on the glory of transhumanism. Bless you, corporate overlords.

>>52006657
http://www.strawpoll.me/12416757

File: Anime CYOA Harem Master - Secret Info Page 1.jpg (3MB, 1500x5073px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1500x5073px

>>52009818
What's worse, both of you posted the secret information from the older version, when >>52007100 is the newer one.

File: Anime CYOA Harem Master - Secret Info Page 2.jpg (4MB, 1468x6616px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1468x6616px

>>52010630

>>52010630
And nobody posted the mystery box.

>>52010713
Are you talking about the two secret info cards made by someone else (AFAIK)?

>>52010630

The newer version isn't any better, which is why I didn't bother uploading it.

All it does is add an unnecessary mechanic with the die rolling, and an extra waifu that's both uninteresting and Mary Sueish.

File: 1416741228856.png (104KB, 361x1025px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 361x1025px

>>52010713

Oh, like this one?

It wasn't a secret, this one was just part of the shitposting at the time.

>>52010713
>>52010722
>>52010753
No you idjits, the latest version had a kitsune girl mystery box.

>>52010743
>All it does is add an unnecessary mechanic with the die rolling
I'm pretty sure you were supposed to roll for the older version, too.

>>52010767
So the last option listed in >>52010640?

>>52010775
Oh, someone glued that image to it. Used to be on its own.

>>52010809
Judging by the background, I'd say the author.

File: The Emperor of Mankind and Myself.jpg (325KB, 588x1376px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 588x1376px

>>52007523
Magical Powers: Pendulum, Death Grips, Pearl Jam

Withhold my recommendation for the gift of immortality until someone worthy appears. The new humanity and its leader for the brightest future. We Noblebright now.

Highlander has abandoned us.

>>52011695
She usually shitposts in the discord.

>>52011725
Tell me about this mythical realm of Discord.

>>52011759
There's a link in the pastebin.

>>52011763
Yeah, but what is it like there?

>>52007555
fifty_hues_of_megumi.swf, Hyper-railgun.swf, hodlmeholdmelovemebaby.swf

>>52011779
Get in there and find out for yourself.

>>52007334
As I understand it, this is how it works. If you don't choose the option to get secrets, what you see is what you get. If you do, you roll to get one set of secrets, that set being the actually existing facts of the world; all others were never true. If you choose the shrine benefit, you metaphysically realize these are the possible sets of what's true about the world and you get to choose which is true.

Basically, it's a multiverse, and the luck benefit can retroactively assign you to one of the possible worlds.

>>52011823

Thanks you anon for explaining because I would have never gotten that

>>52007018
>cute boy romance options
Do you mean husbandos, companions that happen to be gay or something else ?
How long is "long" ?

Where does the little girl theme for cyoas comes from? Is that like a meme for cyoa-makers?

>>52012217
Lurk moar, newfag. "Become the little girl" has been a 4chan-wide meme for a while.

>>52012256
oh cool. does it have a precise origin?

>>52012278
The /r9k/ delusion of "pretty girls are living on easy mode! It's unfair!"

>>52012278
I'd probably pin it on /a/, since that's where I first saw it, and since /a/ is still the primary meme generator behind most of the blue boards and has been for a long time.

>>52012288
I see, thanks.

>>52012288
Further back then that. Guys when polled anonymous almost always win out on the side of wanting to be girls against being guys. It's not hard to see why. Guys get a raw deal.

File: Moot_little_Girl.jpg (110KB, 640x853px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 640x853px

>>52012288
No, it originated from Moot wishing to be a little girl.

>>52012288
It's a lot older than that m8, and came from /b/ I'm pretty sure

>>52012313
>Guys when polled anonymous almost always win out on the side of wanting to be girls against being guys
Isn't it crazy? Everyone agrees being female is superior?

File: 1451628059983.png (489KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 1500x1500px

>>52012317
>moot
who?

>>52012353
It isn't superior, it's just easier nowadays because widespread feminist ideals made gender roles for women very easy to ignore, while men still have it just as strict as always.

>>52012383
Who knows man.

>>52012353
Not really crazy at all, and beyond a longer lifespan guys win out in almost literally everything else. Their worth is artificial but it is worth at the moment none the less. With mass produced artificial wombs the general thought process would switch with less women being around and their preferential treatment going away.

>>52012390
>It isn't superior, it's just easier nowadays
Sounds like being female is superior no?
>>52012409
Guys win out? Anon just said guys would rather be girls than guys? Why would they then if "guys win out"?
>With mass produced artificial wombs the general thought process would switch with less women being around and their preferential treatment going away.
You sound crazy. Guys can impregnate many women but men still have worth? And we didn't start killing off men?

>>52012448
>Sounds like being female is superior no?
No, the statement specifically said it isn't. Learn to read.

>>52012458
"Being female is easier". Same thing. If one is easier than the other, it's better.

>>52012488
No, if one is easier than the other, then it's easier in some respect. It doesn't mean that it's superior, and it's very often the case that harder things are superior in most ways, unless you're a failure incapable of toughing through a little difficulty.

>>52012448
>Guys win out? Anon just said guys would rather be girls than guys?
Yeah, I know. That anon was me. You're mistaking me here. Women having it easier because society says so and that's why guys would want to be them. Without their vagina though women are objectively worthless when compared to men. That's all they got. Society not taking the step to get rid of women with artificial wombs is all that is stoping women from going bye bye because men can do almost literally everything women can do but better.

An easier life does not mean they're superior.

>>52012527
>Society not taking the step to get rid of women with artificial wombs is all that is stoping women from going bye bye because men can do almost literally everything women can do but better.
Really now? That's awfully sexist.

>>52012560
Where do you think you are?

>>52012527
>men can do almost literally everything women can do but better.

Yeah, in fact, wasn't a trans woman elected woman of the year?

>>52012560
And there is literally nothing wrong with that. That doesn't mean it's wrong. It is what it is and when it really comes down to it it's just numbers like everything else.
>>52012588
For better or worse.

>>52012583
You're right. I can't expect better from here.

>>52012608
>And there is literally nothing wrong with that.
There is literally something wrong with you looking down on half the world's population...

>>52012613
People are honest here. You can rephrase "women bring reproduction to the table while men do all the tough work", and it's true in a neolithic sort of way. Women didn't become gatherers and seamstresses and so on it those times because they had some sort of unique ability for those things that men lack, they became those things because it was safer.

>>52012635
Well, I'll play Devil's advocate and agree that from my perspective it is genuinely terribly unfortunate that half the population isn't as effective as the other. If women were truly better I would say so because I don't care at all either way. I'm an efficiency whore. I just want things to run well.

>>52012676
Eh, in this modern time upper body strength isn't that important for most jobs.
If you allocate your women well you'll get just as much out of your people had they been all men.

>>52012588
>elected
Glamour magazine's Woman of the Year award means literally nothing except that they wanted to make their brand seem lgbt friendly.

>>52006690
Every option is objectively shit.

No matter which Genie loses the popularity contest, you're completely fucked for all eternity.
No matter which mystery box you pick, you are still completely fucked.

The little girl option is the least shit one but you are still tabula rasaed

File: Well.gif (3MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 400x225px

>>52012715

>>52012760
The little girl option is the worst of all. It literally kills you in every way that matters within two years.

>>52012810
?The bad part is you don't get boobs for like two decades?

>>52006690
Before I knew what I was doing, when this was being posted the first time, I just chose ABCDE. Knowing what the CYOA gives you though, I would pick Power.

>>52012858
No, the bad part is that within two years you are gone and there's a random girl that has nothing to do with you there instead of you.

>>52012903
memory death anon is that you?

how a doing buddy I kind of missed your brand of autism

>>52012903
I don't get it?
Best option in the cyoa is love box but if it has harem anime rules!

>>52012937
Probably not, since I definitely remember a few other people arguing about this a lot more vehemently than me over the years.

>>52012943
I have to ask. Is this "talk like an idiot" thing on purpose, or natural?

>>52012404
ella

Just for the sake of humanity I'm just going to just simply reject te grail

>>52012390
Who's keeping that the case? Not the feminists, certainly. The feminists say that men and their gender expression are policed as well; in a way obviously different from women, and in a way that confers a certain kind of status (and they'll acknowledge that women receive status as well, but only when they tack gender roles e.g. that of the mother or the caregiver; it's the carrot that society uses to circumscribe women and men into their respective social roles), but at the penalties of being confined to that gender identity and of being ostracized if you don't perform that gender role.

Even the whole "little girl" thing hints at this. It's not women qua women who get the boons of society; it's only innocent, naive girls who are ultimately fetishized as lacking authority, responsibility, and therefore blame. Consider that in most "little girl" jokes, stay the little girl; actually becoming a woman is a step too far.

>>52012409
Getting closer to equality today is good, but that's always at threat when there are those who would want to roll it all back so that women are only for making food and making babies. It's still unequal, I would think, if there are those who think that the only value women have is in their ability to give birth and would therefore restrict their ability to be equal individuals in society.

(cont.)

>>52012961
Can you tell what "you are gone and a random girl is there" means?

>>52013006
>Who's keeping that the case? Not the feminists, certainly.
The feminists are. You're doing that thing where you're cherry picking some small part of a movement and ignoring what the majority is doing. And most feminists when faced with issues like this would say something stupid like "well, who cares about me, this is feminism, they should get their own movement."

Which is a fair thing to say, you know. Saying that feminism is a movement for the equality of both genders is ridiculous when the word itself is already showing sexist bias.

>>52012961
more than one person can wear a persona anon

>>52013006
(cont.)
Do men face problems? Certainly. For example, we hear all the time about some men are seeing their lifespans decline from things like drugs, alcohol, and suicide; shit's hard out there. And a lot of the time it's because people see these problems as self-caused and therefore are victims of their own moral failings, so they're not inclined to help; the fact that the world is shitty doesn't engender any sympathy. I saw this all the time when I did social work, and even a lot the men that came in to ask for assistance believed this about themselves. Their inability to achieve certain prescribed and circumscribed gender roles in a society that once holds them up (become a self-made man! be a breadwinner!) while undercutting the material conditions that you are supposedly supposed to achieve them with (your job, if you can get it, is de-skilled by technology if it's not destroyed completely by the insatiable drive for profit) is put entirely on these men by a society that defines people by their gender.

Do there need to be services reaching out to these men? Absolutely. But it both shouldn't and needn't be at the expense of women. In fact, it's through women's issues that we can highlight men's issues. Facing the issue of work discrimination means stronger defenses for all workers against bosses who are looking for any excuse to kick you out and bring up their bottom line. The same people who would downplay the sexual abuse of women are generally those who refuse to believe that men can be abused at all; making those things political should bring both abused women and men into the open as survivors, and already has. The people who talk about how gender roles constrain, restrict, and harm are saying that about all gender roles; they do this against the people who think that not fulfilling your gender roles, masculine or feminine, is moral failure and that those who do not conform to those gender roles themselves are failures.

We can do better.

>>52013026
You don't exist anymore, because after two years you were completely replaced by some girl that isn't you in any meaningful way.

>>52013041
Then don't use the singular to refer to them.

>>52013065
Whatever you say memory loss anon.

>>52013042
When did the CYOA thread become a forum for manifestos like this?
Anyway, the feminist movement is more concerned with inventing problems to justify its own existence than solving them anyway, so nothing productive should be sought in that corner.

>>52012747
Either the Vampire or the Angel. I WAS going to go for the Witch, but the warning is a bit too much for me.

>>52013065
You have pretty weird ideas of what existing is. but fun chatting with you!

>>52013039
No, not the feminists. Maybe you can blame some feminists for limiting their work; that might be an issue of priority. But the things that feminists want is something that benefits both women and men and women. I hear a lot about how this isn't about "equality" anymore. Well, though I think we're not even there yet, equality of the sexes in a society that is substantively unequal and damning to the vast majority of both sexes for the benefit of the very few is simply not good enough. There's better than this.

>>52013097
When did it become a place to shit on women?

>>52013111
When you are a feminist apologist you're saying everything every feminist thinks is okay. So no, you don't get to say that.

>>52013122
2012

>>52013122
When did this become a place were opinions should be seriously engaged and turned into a discussion?

File: Equality vs Equity.png (294KB, 1460x1094px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 1460x1094px

>>52013006
No, it is not. What you and a lot of people don't seem to understand is that the act of "equality" isn't equal. The very fact you most make strides to try and keep women "equal" to men shows the problem I was addressing. It is not necessary when they can be gotten rid of.

>>52013166
>It is not necessary when they can be gotten rid of.
There was this guy in Germany a couple years ago who thought the same.

File: IMG_1217.png (5MB, 1000x5349px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 1000x5349px

I see that the autism native to this thread is really flaring up today. How about we just settle down and do some CYOAs together?

>>52013198
Doesn't feel like native autism to be honest

>>52013198
I rather abort the thread and play some vidya instead until all of this blows over.

Cya than.

>>52013194
What the fuck do you want me to say? That he was wrong? There are a startling number of things that would be fixed if the roots were just pulled out.

>>52013140
Lemme tell you something. It's not feminists who make working life miserable and not-working even worse, and shit on you for doing either. It's not feminists who are trying to cheat you when your debt climbs because of predator banking and dropping wages. It's not feminists who are doing everything but the physical act to put the heroin or the gun in your hand. It's not feminists who kick you down for not being some mythical "real man" so you sit down, shut up, and stop questioning why you are being kicked down. Find out who is doing so; those are your real enemies.

>>52013216
You should see a shrink anon. I'm afraid you'll think killing yourself can remove the problem at the root.

>>52013254
Sorry, I don't live in your country.

>>52013216
Nah, that's bullshit. There can be no meaningful positive change, because humans are inherently selfish. If we were to start over from scratch, even retaining all knowledge and history, we would find ourselves in the same place. Or perhaps an even worse one.

People are animals, anon. No more, no less. We are driven to serve the self and we do so with limited knowledge and sensory experience. Shit is always going to be bad. Things are always going to get fucked up. Best you can do is try to make your little slice of reality bearable until the end.

And you bastards are making this thread un-fucking-bearable. And I'm apparently just as bad

>>52013254
No, it's not feminists. It's people. And given that power, any person, feminist, chauvinist, normal, would abuse it the same way. The only real enemy is selfishness and ignorance. Good luck fighting it

>>52013006
>>52013042

Oh look a bunch of blaber that has nothing to do with the present reality or the historical one.

Feminism is a movement made by early 20th century industrialists and capitalists to get women in the workforce so as to increase production output as well as demand. It was then further used by communists and socialists for the same purpose in the mid 20th century but also to help degrade the family unit in marxist cases.

Feminism has been proven wrong by the simple fact that women are worst of in the work place, being more unhappy, less productive, willingly working less. Not to mention other things like fighting marriage and sexual revolution associated with feminism have made women even more miserable.

>>52013122

Go back to tumblr.

>>52013285
Anon, if you start a moaning defeatist diatribe like this the only thing you'll do is make the person you're arguing against look better by comparison. It literally doesn't matter what you're arguing about.

>>52013166
Seems like your picture describes one kind of equality, but not another. Certainly they were all given the same, but what does that mean when they start out from a fundamentally unequal place? If you would simply prefer that I use the word "equity"--then, sure, why not? I want equity.

Furthermore, what we are doing to make strides is to correct that fundamental inequality. It wasn't a natural decision to keep women down, but a social and historical one, that can and should be corrected.

>>52013305
>It was then further used by communists and socialists for the same purpose in the mid 20th century but also to help degrade the family unit in marxist cases.
Such bullshit. This never happened in communist countries.

>>52007048
Windows to the Soul - 5
Wanderer's Treasures - 4

Mind controlling rich bastard touring the world seeking greater fortunes.

>>52013328
Hey, that's also my build. I actually debated taking Shifter's Phases, but I feel like it's really more of a pain unless you can get the max level

>>52013319

It did tho. But it ended quickly as marxists got overpowered by other communist elements.

Most cases of Marxism would be lucky to survive a month after the installation of communism.

>>52013352
Not even close. The family unit did start disintegrating more and more, but not particularly more than in capitalist countries, and what's more feminism was far less prominent.

>>52013270
https://youtu.be/k3mC8mfMTJY
>>52013318
>sure, why not?
Because it ends up dragging others down. That's the problem. It's wrong.
>what we are doing to make strides is to correct that fundamental inequality.
You are complicating the system and that is evil. If something is shit and the is terribly unfortunate but that should be it and dealt. That is were we will disagree with every time because you think things have inherent worth and they don't.

>>52013371
>if something is shit it should be left alone
>it's evil to change things
hurr hurr

At this point it doesn't even matter which side of this "debate" I look at, both are full of flailing and screaming autists.

>>52013367

>Feminism was far less proeminent

The Communist parties in the eastern block were proud to give women the voted, and paraded around women soldiers.

>The family unit did start disintegrating more and more, but not particularly more than in capitalist countries

Because the marxists got eliminated really fucking fast. Purges were common place, and marxists were the first to go. After the first 2 decades of a communist government it's just made up of a totalitarian government that just wants to keep power and doesn't care for ideology.

>>52013305
Are there capitalist wings of feminism? Certainly. Just look at Lean In or whatever it is. But then there has always been a feminism of working women. What do you call socialist feminism?

You should consider that women have always worked; the modern separation of work and home, and that women belong in the home, is just that--modern, brought on by the evolution of capitalism. Then women still worked; textile piece-work was one of the ways in which, in the US, capitalism spread west, a way to work dispersed populations and low concentrations of capital investment. Then in the east, there were the Lowell Mills, exemplars of the height of capitalist industrial development--and staffed by women, the Lowell Girls.
>>52013319

>>52013318

> Certainly they were all given the same, but what does that mean when they start out from a fundamentally unequal place?

Humans are not equal, and it shows.

>Furthermore, what we are doing to make strides is to correct that fundamental inequality.

Why is inequality bad to you?

And the only way to fix it is to stunt those better than the rest.

>>52013039
>feminism is a movement for the equality of both genders is ridiculous when the word itself is already showing sexist bias.
I love it when feminists try to argue against this.

>>52013410
>The Communist parties in the eastern block were proud to give women the voted, and paraded around women soldiers.
Nevertheless.

>>52013397
Not all change is evil but all change should be scrutinized. If there is no reason for something, if the alternative is factually by numbers better, and it is, you do it. Throwing all the shit out of the window giving women all the advantages in the world will still only make them women with the odds stack in their favor while men don't need that. That's the problem. Women don't need to be men. Especially if they have to drag men down to do it.

>>52013371
I dunno, the guy on the left seems to be doing alright even with "equity".

Complicating the system? Seems like systems that have unnecessary inequalities should be fixed. Consider that you say you like "efficiency". First, we would have to ask--efficient for what purpose. Then we should ask whether society as is actually is efficient. For example, take a system in which a certain group can accrue to it status, wealth, and other such benefits; wouldn't they have quite the incentive to make sure that people believe that only they are deserving of such things, that a system of inequality is natural and desirable? The empirics of this society are scarcely ever examined. Critical investigation is always good and I implore you to undertake it.

>>52013006
>Not the feminists
No, it's the "feminists".

>>52013464
Why are you giving special treatment to change, here? Doesn't that mean that all non-change should also be scrutinized? Everything you said about changing things for no reason can be equally applied to keeping things the same for no reason.

>>52013166
>picture
Or how about buying a fucking ticket?

File: 18386550.jpg (106KB, 472x466px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 472x466px

Communism CYOA when?

>>52013417

>Are there capitalist wings of feminism? Certainly. Just look at Lean In or whatever it is.

I did not deny that, I actually started from that point.

> But then there has always been a feminism of working women.

Not really, feminist groups have nearly always been lead or at least funded by men going far back.

>You should consider that women have always worked; the modern separation of work and home, and that women belong in the home, is just that--modern, brought on by the evolution of capitalism.

Women have not always worked tho. Not in the sense of a trade, or hard work. Women would maintain a household and do light work. At most they would be nurses or teachers. There is no such thing as a willing woman lumberjack, glassblower or solider in history. If it ever happened it was out of necessity or because of another reason.

>Then women still worked; textile piece-work was one of the ways in which, in the US, capitalism spread west, a way to work dispersed populations and low concentrations of capital investment. Then in the east, there were the Lowell Mills, exemplars of the height of capitalist industrial development--and staffed by women, the Lowell Girls.

That's because of the industrialists I have been talking about. Though technically I should have not said the 20th century. Since the idea of using automation to allow more working hands, be it women or children goes as far back as mechanization.

>>52013456

>Nevertheless.

At least for my nation is went as far as guaranteeing equality between women and men in the constitution.

>>52013518
>At least for my nation is went as far as guaranteeing equality between women and men in the constitution.
You know perfectly well this has nothing to do with the things we're talking about here. Giving votes to women happened everywhere.

>>52013464
What would you prefer happened with women if they're so bad?

>>52013533

>You know perfectly well this has nothing to do with the things we're talking about here. Giving votes to women happened everywhere.

Equal voting and women in the work place are the base tenants of feminism. Going as far back as the suffragette movement.

Anything else has been tacked on.

>>52013550
And we're obviously talking about that everything else, since that sort of feminism has been completed a long time ago.

>>52013567

>And we're obviously talking about that everything else, since that sort of feminism has been completed a long time ago.

Yeah but I am trying to disprove the base tenants of feminism. Meaning that nobody can wiggle out with "that's not my kind of feminism".

>>52013576
You won't ever succeed. Even far less controversial topics have words and concepts in them that nobody can agree on.

>>52013607

>You won't ever succeed.

It's not that hard, we already know man and woman are not the same, anyone who has not failed biology can see that. And recent studies show that women are not happy being career women.

The equal voting part I don't disagree. It's just that I don't think everyone should be allowed to vote. A minimum like paying taxes should be required.

I'm not even sure OC can cure this autism. Time to let the thread die a few weeks?

>>52013637
>It's not that hard, we already know man and woman are not the same, anyone who has not failed biology can see that.
People just ignore things like that.

>>52013648

It's almost done anon. Something tells me these people won't go in for another thread.

>>52013659

They can deny reality all they want but they can't deny the consequences.

>>52013678
Yes they can. They just vote for it.

>>52013637
>A minimum like paying taxes should be required
They had something like that in my country. Led to many people starving because men would rather give up receiving money from the state then not vote.

>>52013701

> Led to many people starving because men would rather give up receiving money from the state then not vote.

Natural selection at it's finest.

File: 1422781690442.pdf (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

/cyoag/ is for cyoa

>>52013712
You do not understand what natural selection is I see. It is a good thing you will never have any political power.

>>52013832
It's a perfectly good example of natural selection. I don't know what tripped you up here, was it how arbitrary the cause of death was?

>>52013832

>People die and therefore are removed from the genepool
>You don't understand natural selection

Wut?

>>52012715
Men are superior to women in many more ways than just upper body strength.

>>52013792
Thank you based anon.

>>52013518
Would you call Lucy Parsons, Emma Goldman, Clara Lemlich, Marry Harris Jones and other such working-class militants and feminists as simply being led by men? And in Europe there were those like Rosa Luxemburg, Sylvia Pankhurst, Alexandra Kollontai.

Women have always worked. In "feudalism" (some people seem to have an aversion to this work, so call it "a mode of production in which the means, of production, principally land tenures, were parceled out based on ties of obligation and loyalty, which were then further parceled out on the basis of the same" if you like), before the separation of work and home, women worked in the same places as men, often because they were in the same family. Did they do different jobs sometimes? Certainly, but that only suggests that the idea of gender roles are old, and obviously does not mean that they never crossed over--even in those times we see women as heads of households all the way up to heads of state. And that there were no women willing to do those roles is patently false; the American Revolution itself had women masquerading as men to be soldiers and women serve as soldiers now, and women are in all sorts of trades today, including as lumberjacks and glassblowers, and always have been.

And I would hardly call those industrialists "feminists". No, they fully expected the women who worked for them to conform to gender roles, to eventually quit and get families. Even in the latter half of the 20th century leading up to today, women are often expected to work for the sake of a family and to quit to take care of them; look at the ads targeted towards women's temporary labor in the 20th century as an example.

>>52013637
>>52013659
Why separate it on the basis of men and women? Why not on some other biological basis?Perhaps only the top quarter of all people in terms of intelligence or strength or whatever should get rights, hmm? It's very convenient that you fall into the right side of the distinction you choose.

>>52013941
Why separate it at all.

>>52013869
Not that anon, but, technically, people just dying and being removed from the gene pool doesn't count as true natural selection. Natural Selection constitutes a natural evolutionary drift over many generations, where less useful or outright detrimental traits are removed from the gene pool by affecting the survival chances of the possessor. And there traits are genetic. Stupidity or stubbornness, as I'm sure many of you have noticed, is behavorial and societal, not genetic. Simply dying doesn't constitute a display of natural selection at work.

>>52013955
Indeed, why separate it at all.

Hey /cyoag/, what are the comfiest cyoas you know?

>>52014001
You tell me.

>>52013988
>being stupid enough to kill yourself over some random meme isn't a detrimental trait

File: IMG_1115.png (5MB, 1200x5400px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 1200x5400px

>>52014017
You know what it is. Might switch devices and post my favorite comfy CYOA because it's too long to do on mobile

>>52014022
It's not a genetic trait at all, it's behavior or perhaps societal since the two are closely intertwined. It's cute that you know a 7th grade science term, but using it to look smart in silly internet arguments is childish

>>52014017
conduit

>>52014022
>You tell me.
Anon he's arguing NOT to seperate you fucking dunce.

File: cuddle.png (3MB, 1200x5500px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1200x5500px

>>52014017

>>52014056
Behavior is genetic to an extent, which means that every behavioral flaw that gets people killed is also genetic to an extent.

Otherwise we never would have evolved an aversion to snakes for example.

>>52014071
Badly.

>>52007055
>Aspects of eduction
Science
+ upgrade half price
+ 1 troll type known

Aerial Infusion

>Troll type known
Man eaters

>/500 credits
Troll cave 40
Van 20
- Machine Gun 40
- Lantern 30
- Speed mod 30
- Protective plates 30
- Ectocycllic plates 10
- Camouflage 20
= 220

>Weapons:
- Armaments 60
>Armour:
- Swat armour 40
>Spirit:
Old world guide 60

>Land
The coast
>Companions
Vampire
Ectographer
Necromancer
>Nemesis
Witch Coven

How come /d/'s CYOA threads are more civil than ours?

>>52014120
It's a fresh new stream. There hasn't been time for the autistic sediment to form yet.

>>52014103
You're the retard here. He's arguing NOT to seperate, he isn't going to come up with arguments FOR seperating >>52014022

File: IMG_1189.jpg (7MB, 1400x6000px) Image search: [Google]

7MB, 1400x6000px

>>52014129

>>52014120
Their id is already satisfied from the turbo-lewdness there, so their superego is free to make them behave properly

>>52014143
Yes, I know all of that anon, you haven't told me anything new yet. I was just turning it around on him by giving him the same treatment he was giving me, since I wasn't against what he was saying in the first place.

Now piss off you fucking retard, and mind you own business, since you're obviously too dumb to do it for more than one person at once.

>>52013941

>Would you call Lucy Parsons, Emma Goldman, Clara Lemlich, Marry Harris Jones and other such working-class militants and feminists as simply being led by men? And in Europe there were those like Rosa Luxemburg, Sylvia Pankhurst, Alexandra Kollontai.

All that communism.

>Women have always worked.

No they haven't don't confuse household maintenance with true work. Helping along the farm is not real work, and it was a thing expected by everyone to do, including toddlers.

>Certainly, but that only suggests that the idea of gender roles are old, and obviously does not mean that they never crossed over--even in those times we see women as heads of households all the way up to heads of state.

Gender roles are results of biological imperatives, and are natural. There is a reason for their existence. And you pointing out exceptions doesn't change much. And heck I can bet you that even your exceptions fit in at least the broader scope of that gender role.

>And that there were no women willing to do those roles is patently false; the American Revolution itself had women masquerading as men to be soldiers and women serve as soldiers now, and women are in all sorts of trades today, including as lumberjacks and glassblowers, and always have been.
>Women Soliders
With the exception of partisans they were almost always women seeking glory and worst than men.
>today
>women lumberjacks

That's besides the point because we live in a post feminism world that has pushed women into those jobs.

>No, they fully expected the women who worked for them to conform to, to eventually quit and get families.

Because kids means more workers.

>Why separate it on the basis of men and women? Why not on some other biological basis?Perhaps only the top quarter of all people in terms of intelligence or strength or whatever should get rights, hmm? It's very convenient that you fall into the right side of the distinction you choose.

Define rights please, and give me examples as well.

>>52014120
Everyone here has pent-up sexual frustration? There's more autists? People go to /d/ to get a load off then leave but people stay on /tg/ for hours?
But hey, we get a bit of OC! Sometimes.

File: IMG_11902.jpg (3MB, 1400x6000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1400x6000px

>>52014150

File: IMG_1191.jpg (7MB, 1400x6000px) Image search: [Google]

7MB, 1400x6000px

>>52014198

>>52014137
They're not much younger than ours, just less constant.

File: IMG_1192.jpg (7MB, 1400x6000px) Image search: [Google]

7MB, 1400x6000px

>>52014217

>>52014226
The people there are.

Just wait a year if those threads are still around. You'll see it gets worse and worse with time.

File: IMG_1193.jpg (7MB, 1400x6000px) Image search: [Google]

7MB, 1400x6000px

>>52014235

File: IMG_1194.jpg (7MB, 1400x6000px) Image search: [Google]

7MB, 1400x6000px

>>52014258

File: IMG_1195.jpg (7MB, 1400x6000px) Image search: [Google]

7MB, 1400x6000px

>>52014280

>>52014033
>Log Cabin

>Touch Me, Touch Me

>Auto-/ck/ (11)
>Jam Session (10)
>200% Comfy (9)
>Gaymen Piisii (8)
>The Rest (7)
>Fully Loaded (6)
>/diy/ zone (5)
>FUCKING NERDS (4)
>/fa/bulous (3)
>Aesthetics (2)
>Companions (0)

>Be the Girl (17)
>Redesign (15)
>Inter-bot 9001 (14)
>Very Own Soul (13)
>Last Resort (11)
>Attractive Forces (10)
>Skinship (9)
>Never Let Go (6)
>2 Birds, 1 Soul (4)
>Aether Orchestra (3)
>Machine Learning (1)
>Stylish (0)

File: IMG_1196.jpg (7MB, 1400x6000px) Image search: [Google]

7MB, 1400x6000px

>>52014291

>>52014099
>Midnight

>Snow

>Couch
>Large Windows
>Fireplace

>Other

>Bedding
>Soft Carpets
>Radio
>Sleepware

>>52014246

I'm still waiting for them to make their own stuff instead of steal ours

>>52014397
They can post my CYOAs as much as they like. If they post something you made then it's alright if you get mad about that though. Not that I'd agree you should get anywhere with it, since that's not how things work here, but still.

>>52014397
You mean the futa/trap queen CYOAs were made on here first?

>>52014397
It's happening as we speak. And has been for months.

>>52014430

Why haven't we seen any then?

>>52014421

>futa
>trap

They can keep that trash.

>>52014500
Can't be posted on blue boards.

>>52014500
We have.

>>52014129
>Dreamrealm Flavor
Pirate Realm

>Dreamrealm Shaping
Ancient Ruins
Lascivious (14)

>Skills, Abilities, Perks
Pirate Prince (free)
Prince of Thieves (free)
Prince Stallion (13)
Scholarly Prince (12)
Prince of Maps (11)
Melee Master- Cutlass (10)
Aquatic Prince- Sense Tides and Shoals (9)
Sorcerer Prince- Darkness (8)

>Princely Paraphernalia
Copacetic Coneyance (free)
Amu'zan's Armament (7)
Amu'zan's Aegis (6)
Climbing Clodhoppers (5)
Immaculate Sponge (4)
Murky Move Mantle (3)
Opulent Outfit (2)
Personal Palace (1)
Water Warper (0)

>Darker Dream
Easily Distracted (1)
Rival Sibling- Brother (2)

>Quests
Massive Monsters- Main Quest
Strip Club Struggle- Side Quest

>Damsels
Taleri Kassendel

>DLC Dreamrealm Flavor
None

>DLC Dreamrealm Shaping
Monsters (1)

>DLC Skills, Abilities, Perks
Luck Blessed Prince

>DLC Princely Paraphernalia
None

>DLC Darker Dream
Impish Sibling- Sister (2)

>DLC Quests
Extremely Eerie Edifice

>DLC Damsels
None

With my 2 extra points, I will take Humanoid Enhancement and Prince Charming

>>52014500
It's /d/ ,what sort of CYOAs do you expect exactly?

>>52014572
You know. Something like the pill CYOA, or be the girl CYOAs

>>52014606
That's /h/ material, if you don't have at least 3 tentacles up your orifices then it's not really /d/.

>>52014171
You seemed to be for male and female six distinction being a criteria for discrimination in society, adversely for women. That, if that is your position, seems highly arbitrary, and if you really wanted to discriminate on the basis of biology, one could even argue that doing it based on intelligence or strength would be less arbitrary. I leave it up to the reader to decide whether or not it is just as reprehensible.

>>52014177
>communists
I named those militants as a counterpoint to your idea that feminism is merely a plot by industrialists.

>not real work
Even though they were often doing the same work as men, you're saying that's not "real work"? Even if, if you want to measure work in terms of effort or something, it was almost certainly more difficult than the same kind of work that is done today? Yet no one calls modern farming solely "women's work".

>biological imperatives...exceptions...
First, the empirics are shaky, and the fact that you have to deal with the "exceptions" the way you do seems to prove my point. So when problems pop up with your conceptions of gender roles, you can conveniently fudge your definition so that it fits in the "broader scope". Perhaps you can fudge it a little bit further, such that there is no distinction at all.

>partisans...glory
So they're either patriots or self-interest es...just like men. Hm. I wonder why motivations matter so much to you here when before you were saying it was just "about the numbers". Do you also dismiss male partisans or glory seekers?

>besides the point
So no evidence will work with you, because from now on you can call women doing anything counter to your gender roles the result of a "post-feminist world" a priori.

>kids...workers
Yes, an excellent reason for capitalists to uphold traditional women's gender roles. Not very feminist.

>define rights
In the US, the right to the equal protection of laws, which includes the right to not be discriminated against on the basis of sex.

>>52014650
Doesn't matter, /h/ stuff gets posted heavily on /d/ already.

>>52014572

Fetishes that aren't "put a dick on something that shouldn't have a dick"

>>52014033
>Room Type
Log Cabin

>Entrance Method
Touch Me, Touch Me

>Physical Items (12)
Auto-/ck/ (11)
200% Comfy (10)
L-LEWD!! (9)
Ocean Man (8)
/fa/bulous (7)
Normie Station (6)
Gaymen Piisii (5)
Thrill Ride (4)

/out/ (2)

>Companions
Custom Characters w/unlimited companions (0)

>Abilities/Extras (17)
LESBIFY! (16)
Redesign (14)
Inter-bot 9001 (13)
Lasting Effects (11)
Reality Convert (9)
Charm Cognition (7)
Aether Orchestra (6)
Machine Learning (4)
Believe It (3)
Stylish (2)
Last Resort (0)

>>52014666
Well Satan if you hate dicks that much then just DIY. The rest of us cock-connoisseurs will keep making stuff for each other.

>>52014666
Stop being so tsundere, silly satan

If you don't like /d/ then don't go there, if you like it then check it out and see for yourself it isn't as bad as you think

File: Nana 1.png (189KB, 375x1034px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 375x1034px

>>52007308

File: Nana 2.png (193KB, 375x1034px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 375x1034px

>>52014761

Are there any CYOAs that let me be the waifu (male) ?

>>52014653

>I named those militants as a counterpoint to your idea that feminism is merely a plot by industrialists.

I also mentioned feminsm also being taken by the left wing.

>Even though they were often doing the same work as men

No they would not, they would help plant and harvest but stuff like moving hay, taming animals and other heavy work was done by men unless out of necessity they had to do it. Like in times of war.

>First, the empirics are shaky, and the fact that you have to deal with the "exceptions" the way you do seems to prove my point. So when problems pop up with your conceptions of gender roles, you can conveniently fudge your definition so that it fits in the "broader scope". Perhaps you can fudge it a little bit further, such that there is no distinction at all.

You never brought on any execption tho. My point still standing. You are more or less just dancing around my point.

And the biology is there, from muscle mass, to how our brain works, to how we grow up and especially what we are good at.

>So they're either patriots or self-interest es...just like men. Hm. I wonder why motivations matter so much to you here when before you were saying it was just "about the numbers". Do you also dismiss male partisans or glory seekers?

Males are expected, and best at being soldiers. So when the call for war comes some men will become front line troops because of patriotism. Women only need to fight if men are unavailable. Any woman that joins front line combat outside of need is a glory hunter.

>So no evidence will work with you, because from now on you can call women doing anything counter to your gender roles the result of a "post-feminist world" a priori.

Because you brought up an example from post feminism world. Again point me to something like a 15th century female miner that was not pressed into work.

>Yes, an excellent reason for capitalists.
No it gives them a reason to back and forth. Have women working but still have them have kids