How long is a piece of string?

>>51594464
As long as it needs to be.

Not quite long enough

>>51594464
The one you've posted is standarised for 100 meters. And it's cord, not string

The distance between both ends

>>51594464
More than 5, but not quite a million.

>>51594483
>>51594484
>>51594497
>>51594506
No, I want to know the ONE CORRECT EXACT length in objective non-self-referential units of EVERY piece of string in EVERY setting, because I'm too autistic to comprehend that different pieces of string can have different lengths.

>>51594537
Oh, I get it. You're stupid.

I remember when shit posters were at least semi intelligent. Oh how we have fallen /tg/, to have come to this.

>>51594590
>I remember when shit posters were at least semi intelligent. Oh how we have fallen /tg/, to have come to this.
the whole fucking site has that problem

>>51594559
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/51578007/
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/51515980/
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/51412585/
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/51406067/
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/51243406/
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/51144971/
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/51113048/
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/51088515/
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/50874730/
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/50772077/
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/50700108/

>>51594765
Oh, you're a depends fag. Gotcha. Thank you for confirming my suspicions that you are, indeed, stupid.

depends on setting

>>51594765
These are essentially worldbuilding posts, though. I agree there don't need to be so many, but it's not a genuine query, it's meant to be a jumping-off point for people to discuss their own and each others' settings, and maybe improve them.
I thought that was really obvious but maybe not

>>51594847
>it's meant to be a jumping-off point for people to discuss their own and each others' settings, and maybe improve them.
That's retarded, and I feel sorry that you were born this dumb.

>making a thread because you're upset about something that was posted in a different thread

Pretty pathetic OP

>>51594464
Longer than a snippet of strong, and shorter than a length of string.

These are actual sizes, incidentally.

>>51594893
Well I'm glad you're willing to be reasonable about it, anyway

>>51594537
Twice as long as from the end to the middle.

>>51594961
That is a self-referential answer.

17 cm. You didn't specify which string.

>>51595638
EVERY piece of string in EVERY setting is now exactly 17 cm, no more no less.

Precisely one SU (String Unit) in length.

>>51594847
These are essentially "hey /tg/ I'm bored and unable to come up with an interesting OP" posts. They're the very epitome of lazyness, we could program a fucking bot to do them and yet not loose any board quality in the process.
You wanna start discussion? How about you bring something to it, then?

A well-thought OP doesn't prevent interesting discussion from sparking, on the contrary.

"the characteristic length scale of strings is typically on the order of the planck length"

>>51594506
How many ends does a rope have?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhS7Lx62EW4

>>51599800
Two. And a center.

>>51594464
About thirty attoparsecs

>>51598154
So much fucking THIS. These threads are the /tg/ version of those cancerous "What did he mean by this?" threads on /v/ and its bastard boards.