Do chastity belts ever make an appearance in your fantasy settings?

Why would they? They weren't a medieval thing.

Yes.

How does she pee?

>>51383431

this

i hate being historyfag

it kills literary all fun, i can't do fantasy anymore

pls send help

Mundane? The existence is implied in tone of the setting, but there never was explicit mention, or a need for one in the first place.
Similar devices of arcane nature? Oh yes!

>>51383402
Please post this in /pfg/ - Perverted Fantasy General.

>>51377540

>>51383451
There's an opening for it.

>>51383451
That's what they keyhole is for, you dummy.

>>51383402
Only when I'm ripping off Men in Tights.

File: iron maiden jeane.jpg (296KB, 600x1065px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 600x1065px

>>51383402
no you fucking retard

why don;t you go die in a fucking fire

>>51383472
Where do you think he got the picture from?

>>51383431
>implying fantasy is always medieval

>>51383451
Girl don't pee, take a peek into their bathroom sometimes, there's no urinals.

>>51383496
>i'd better post in this thread to let OP know how mad I am about his troll thread

>that will teach him to never make troll threads again

>>51383514
Most is, occasionally going into the Renaissance era. Chastity belts are an 1800's thing.

>>51383402
No, because it's not my fetish.

>>51383402
Yeah once, I joined an online game and made my character a grill since everyone else was male fighters or barbarians.

It was all going fine until one of the other PCs pmed me saying that the DM can be a bit rape happy with girl characters. Not wanting to be rude and drop out right before we played or change my character after telling the DM and players, I just added chastity belt to my items, and if the DM was actually going to do something retarded I'd drop out then.

>>51383402
Of course, all of my paladins wear them to ensure their continued devotion to their mistre- uhh, order.

File: 1478707095367.jpg (66KB, 566x480px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 566x480px

>chastity belts
>fantasy
Jesus Fucking Christ.

>>51383402
I don't run that kind of Magical Realm, so no.

>>51383531
You peek in girls' bathrooms? Pervert.

>>51384598
I-it's for science!

>>51384382

Hey, don't drag Margaret into this!

File: 1352761651298.gif (280KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 480x360px

>>51383457
>being a huge fucking asshole sperg

I pity you.

>Having a cadre of female knight you keep in chastity
>Never allowing them out unless it's under your persona supervision
>Teasing and edging them mercilessly before making them reaffirm their vows of chastity and locking them back up

>>51383558
19th century fantasy is fun as fuck though
a party of explorers extraordinaire mapping the depths of the savage territories gets interesting fast when said savages have their own set of very much functional mystical arts

>>51383451
That's why chastity belts are normally worn over a diaper.

File: BAR1d.pdf (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>51383402
Depends on which kind of "fantasy" you mean.

>>51383451
Typically there's sort of a grate or some slits at the front. But you still need to take them off frequently to clean them.

>>51383531
Hard to argue with that logic.

>>51383531
If they don't pee then how come they wear diapers, huh?
Do they just fill them with apple juice when nobody's looking?

>>51387495
>>51387366
Damn. Even by /tg/ standards this has taken a turn for the /d/.

>>51387536
N-not that I want it to stop.

>>51387617
then what would be the backstory of a diapered lady adventurer who also happens to be wearing a chastity belt?

>>51387640
I dunno about an adventurer. I could certainly imagine that for a princess with overprotective parents.

>>51387674
yeah but that's not as interesting as a padded adventurer or villainess

>>51387700
Yeah, but it seems odd that someone who's self-sufficient would be diapered in the first place. Someone dependent on a strong brave adventurer could be.

Plus, princesses get to wear pretty, lacey dresses. Who doesn't love pretty dresses?

>>51387700
I'm not exactly for the diaper(more of a fan of making them ask permission), but it could have to deal with some sort of vow, a lost bet, or some other control put over her, likely from another member of the party.

>>51387742
tomboy adventurers, that's who. The kind who doesn't let anyone mention her padding

>>51387754
>vow
that's gotta be an interesting vow

So could you like. Pad with Bag of Holding or some such magical gimmick for simplified maintenance?

>>51387778
A tomboy wouldn't wear pretty dresses! This feels like a "too many cooks" situation.

>>51387787
A vow of chastity isn't that uncommon.

>>51387789
if there's a chastity belt locked over it, the padding better double as a bag of holding

>>51387793
this isn't about dresses.

>>51387799
Bet she didn't think that would be the result!

File: BAR3d.pdf (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>51387820
Maybe not for you!

File: into the trash it goes.gif (814KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

814KB, 320x240px

>>51387861
>sissyshit
welp

>>51387886
It's not sissy-related. What gave you that impression?

>>51387909
the objective fact that only sissyfags like being told to wear dresses

>>51387886
I get where you're coming from, but it's written to be gender neutral.

>>51387926
I wrote it, man. It was not written with sissies in mind.

>>51387838
Isn't that the best part, though?

She never thought it'd be this hard, that it would be on her mind this much. You don't really notice something until you lose it, after all.

And now she spends so many nights tossing and turning, burning and wishing she'd just been a bit more reserved with her oaths.

And the way the man holding her release smiles at her used to really bother her. Now it still bothers her, but in a completely different way...

>>51387978
then it's written for the awful ddlg tumblr crowd which is barely better

>>51387926
You know who lovehates being told to wear dresses? Tomboys.

>>51388008
Why are you being so mean?

>>51388024
There's no way that's part of her oath

How is she even gonna fight like that?

>>51388035

>Why are you being so mean?

You do realize that this is 4chan, right? Even /tg/ which is one of the nicer boards, is full of salty oldfags who only know how to communicate in poison and vitriol.

Don't take it personally, just stop being such a wuss and enjoy the board.

>>51388082
But if someone's being mean, I'm not just gonna put up with it. I wanna get to the bottom of it.

>>51388114
please DO take it personally
If you want to get to the bottom of this; here's how it is:
You posted a fic written mostly in the second person as if you were expecting us to be the kind of obnoxious tumblrsluts (or sissyfags) who would get off to it.
That's offensive, presumptuous, and denotes bad taste on your side, since only weak-ass betas are into the ddlg dynamic and its culture of mediocrity.

>>51388160
I've posted it on /tg/ before and people seemed to like it. You're the only one who's gotten mad. And the only problem you seem to be able to identify is the audience for whom you assume it was made, not anything relating to its substance, and certainly not anything more concrete than "I, as an individual, do not get off to this."

>>51388224
Oh that's bullshit and you know it.
Did you seriously write a second-person fapfic expecting your reader to NOT assume it was addressed to him/her?
Did you seriously expect me to compliment you on the quality of your writing despite the fact that it's a fapfic I can't fap to?
Fuck no you didn't.
Or maybe you're one of those smut writefags from 4 years ago who circlejerked their pseudo-literary talents instead of writing fappable material?

>>51383402

I've never had it actually appear in a game yet, but I figure that any such item would probably come up as a cursed magic item. Especially to punish an overly sexual Bard.

Twice, both of which I quite like. The stereotypical promiscuous bard woke up locked in one after getting blackout drunk, and a magic focused party with more gold then most nations locked a half dozen problematic succubi in them(complete with dimension anchoring effects) and dumped them into the plane of shadow.

>>51388289
It's not bullshit. /d/-lite threads aren't rare. There's a catalog, remember?
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/50820476/#50839683
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/49958394/#49991882
So it seems that you're the outlier. I'm not saying everyone liked it, obviously, but no one got incensed enough to make mean, personal attacks.

>>51388313
That seems cruel and unusual for a succubus. At that point you might as well kill them.

>>51388389
Regardless, you don't deserve to be praised for indulging people's ddlg or sissy fetish in a pseudo-ERP format, you deserve to be insulted and shamed for that.

>>51388439
I'm sorry to have wasted your time.

>>51388439

Chill faggot. Don't kinkshame somebody just because you're salty. Nobody's calling you out on whatever shitty /d/ fetishes YOU enjoy. Yes, the story was garbage and not really on-topic, but damn you've taken it way too personally.

Excellent bait.

>>51388453

No that's not enough: apologize for trying to indulge people's ddlg or sissy fetish, and for sharing it.
And promise you'll never do it again and get better tastes from now on.

>>51388471
No you don't understand; I'm not kinkshaming him because I'm salty so much as because he deserves it.
And I rightfully took it personally since it was posted in response to one of my posts, assuming I'd enjoy it, and written in the second person. I'd have to be a fucking idiot to not take it personally.

>excellent bait
why the fuck are you answering to a post like it's completely genuine if you believe it's bait?
Jesus fuck /tg/ is obsessed with that word.

>>51388526
Even if you "take it personally" in the sense of "thinking it was posted exclusively for your reading pleasure", that doesn't explain why you've decided to take it as such an insult.

Don't tell me you're one of those people who only likes really abusive diaper fetish nonsense and makes the threads on /d/ unbearable. It's no fun if there's not love and affection involved.

>>51388613
Your brain is all fucked up if you believe anything you've written there.
And not in a fun quirky way, more like in a "kicking dogs is a valid way of showing them your affection" way.

>>51388613
>Even if you "take it personally" in the sense of "thinking it was posted exclusively for your reading pleasure", that doesn't explain why you've decided to take it as such an insult.
How about disgust?
How's that for a motivation?

>>51388656
>more like in a "kicking dogs is a valid way of showing them your affection" way
Could you please explain to me, point-by-point, how you got to there?

>>51387991
>Man
Why not another woman of her order who's taken the same vow?
Who better to train her to get used to it after all?

>>51388679
diapers are for sphincter cripples
making someone wear them is belittling
belittling people is abusive
abusing people is not a valid display of love and affection

I'm willing to take back what I said if you're aware of those things and just using the "love and affection" theme in an sarcastic way to make the situation even crueler, which is at least understandable.

>>51388847
BDSM is not abuse. I actually was abused as a kid. I assure you, my fondness for affection embarrassment is entirely sincere, and if you can't appreciate how that works, then you have no business being involved in kink.

File: 1423332696758.jpg (116KB, 401x333px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 401x333px

>>51387754
>>51387778
>>51388024
>>51387793
>Tomboy ladyknight
>Under her amor she wars diapers and a chastity belt
>She does so because her cleric told her so

>>51388835
Hey, let it play out as you like. That's the beauty of it.

File: 1400704907376.jpg (42KB, 290x290px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 290x290px

>>51389164
>She proudly tells anyone who wants to hear about it that she wears them
>"They're a sign of my religious devotion and chastity, all the great heroes of the realm wear them!"
>The cleric tries very hard not to die of laughter and gives the knight a thumbs up

File: 1414642903982.jpg (10KB, 201x219px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 201x219px

>>51391406
Magnificent!

>>51388964
you deserve more abuse, clearly, because you don't understand how cruelty works (and neither do most S&Mfags)

>>51383490
Call a locksmith!

>>51387371
If they can be taken off frequently what exactly is the point of them?

>>51392727
Well, they were originally designed for women workers during the industrial revolution, so they could "protect their virtue" in the workplace. So they'd wear it all day and remove it once they got home. But for most of their history they've mostly been--in essence--a fetish item.

Taking them off for a five minute cleaning isn't such a big deal as long as the wearer doesn't have the key, so she has to go to someone else.

Only twice I can recall. Evil empress put such a device on her husband. Other time different game and DM, the pantheon of gods fastened a belt on a goddess because she wouldn't stop breeding with people and animals and filling the setting with demigods.

>Thread about chastity is taken over by diapers
Now I know how dragonfags feel about vore

>>51397025
You mad?

>>51397443
No just disgusted.

File: 1321170769720.png (73KB, 744x1340px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 744x1340px

>>51397557

>>51397443
Not really?
I've picked up too many fetishes to really be disgusted by much (body hair and rolls of fat are pretty much the only thing I don't like) to really be disgusted, I just find chastity FAR more interesting than diapers

>>51383402
No, that's stupid.

>>51383451
There's a small slit or a bunch of holes, not enough to allow penetration or, generally, stimulation.

>>51387366
Then how does the diaper get changed?

>>51398455
By shitposting on /tg/, shit empties out of the diaper and into the keyboard. Eventually finding it's way here via like OPs >>51383402

File: stop.gif (1MB, 310x211px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 310x211px

>>51383402

>fetish thread

>>51383551
Kek

>>51398455
Whoever keeps her locked removes the chastity belt to change her

>>51399282
What if she's traveling separately fro her keyholder?

>>51398000
What a moronic waste of trips. Your image has absolutely no relevance to the post you replied to. Go back to your containment board, whichever one it may be, and never return.

>>51401705
Now that's an interesting scenario, worthy of actually being played
the simplest answer is that they do not get separated for long or the keyholder gets an assistent to travel with her

>>51383402
The only reason for it to appear is because I ended up playing That Game. I don't play That Games.

A knight is called to raise his sword for King and country. Not wanting his wife to be unfaithful, he locks her in a chastity belt and summons his squire. He says to the squire "Boy, I am trusting you with this key. If I do not return within a year and a day, unlock the chastity belt and allow my wife to remarry."

After passing the key to him, the knight sets off on horseback. Looking back at his hometown, he sees the squire at full gallop. When the squire reaches him, he asks "What's wrong, boy?"

"You gave me the wrong key!"

>>51402375
I am now glad I clicked on this thread

>>51383402
No, because they're retarded, the pretense under which they matter should never, ever be brought up in a game, and they didn't exist in the middle ages.

>>51383558

In /my/ Renaissance, chastity belts were definitely a 1500's-1600's thing.

>>51391406
>The party meets an aged Paladin Lord of high renown
>Being a follower of the same god as the Ladyknight and her Cleric, he invites them to his hall for dinner and lodging
>Over dinner the topic of her "sacred garb" comes up and she brags about her devotion to the other assembled guests
>One of those present calls her out as a deviant for indulging in such inappropriate dress and she falls back on her stand-by
>"They're a sign of my religious devotion and chastity, all the great heroes of the realm wear them! Just ask Sir Paladin!"
>His look of confusion and horror at her display is matched only by her growing panic at the revelation that she has sullied by the perversions of her clerical companion
>The cook's huckleberry pudding desert goes uneaten as all the guests retire early in awkward silence

>>51403356
That will be hilarious in a different context

>>51403686
It is often hilarious when idiot perverts realize that their proclivities are looked on with anything less than joy by normal people. Not for the pervert of course, but I find their shame funny at least.

File: 1de2044d869fa7.png (14KB, 254x248px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 254x248px

>>51403729

>>51403746
stay mad diaperfag.

File: 16d9d725db9.png (146KB, 254x248px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 254x248px

>>51403763

>>51383457
I like medieval history as well.

But I also let people have their fun you don't have to be an autist about it.

File: tumblr_oh8fpzcDLZ1ujbdkfo1_540.png (274KB, 370x810px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 370x810px

>>51388024

File: 1446079569618.jpg (32KB, 500x316px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 500x316px

>>51388024
Remove the "tom" part and I'm all in.

>>51406478
Make it chocolate skinned and a childhood friend while we're at it.
And make the dress a summerdress.

>>51383402
Actually we just saw one last session. I killed my friend's character after we had a mini boss fight. Boss was a blade singer. Friend had a backup character already, so DM introduced it quickly. We go into the boss' house to find out he was a sick fuck who castrated people. Dm had friends character trapped in a fucking cage with music blaring from this orb at an incredible volume. Not knowing how to turn it off i placed it in my bag of holding. Apparently he was going to castrate and mute friends new character but we got there in time. Right now he's naked with just a chastity belt and a quarter staff and we are in the hunt for his spell book. Shit was hilarious.

File: 1476768843295.png (696KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

696KB, 1280x720px

>>51404654
That's going too far, and that's coming from a guy who likes musclegirls.

The two musclegirls from Keijo hit that sweet spot between being muscular and not being a man-boon IMO.

>>51383457
>tfw know fuckall about history
>games are fun but I am fully aware I am stupid and don't want to be

>>51388035
To be fair to >>51388008
DDLG is pretty cancerous

>>51383402
>there are people on this board who aren't wearing one RIGHT NOW
explain yourselves

>>51411177
I masturbate once or twice a day, would be inconvenient.

>>51383402
Okay OP, here's the deal

If I don't get to make threads about my weird niche fetish, you don't get to make threads about yours.

>>51411177
My dick would get crushed.

File: Becausereasons.jpg (77KB, 720x479px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 720x479px

>>51383402
Yes but I bypass it by hacking the pleasure nodes of female brains. https://youtu.be/ttLJV6KYHys
>My PC's wish.