Is it feasable to convert the Cyberpunk 2020 ruleset over to d20 5e?
>>51359929
Probably not. 5e is good at running D&D, and not much else. Theoretically you could cannibalize the d20+mod+proficiency and the Advantage/Disadvantage mechanic, but that's about all you could feasibly convert to other systems.
All that being said, someone did take it upon themselves to convert Shadowrun classes to 5e subclasses.
>>51360002
Thanks for the insight
>>51360002
>Theoretically you could cannibalize the d20+mod+proficiency and the Advantage/Disadvantage mechanic,
Well I did that for my homebrew.
But he's right, those are two separate systems designed for quite different worlds.
Also, you already have a CP2020 thread, don't need to start another one.
>>51359929
Why would you convert a decent system in a abject pile of dogshit? The work to convert CP2020 into a D20 system will take longer than learning CP2020.
>>51360656
I want to spoonfeed my play group and make the skills a bit more concise like 5e.
>>51360801
Here, you can use mine.
>>51361275
Woah this is great. Do you have your own homebrew pdf you can share?
>>51361505
and thank you*
>>51361505
Yes, I rolled my own joint. It veers off quite a bit from Cyberpunk 2020 into espionage territory and new rules (especially hacking), but it's still mostly compatible with the original.
>>51361944
Thanks I appreciate it.
>>51361944
This is really good! Lots of content packed into a 71 page game. The core mechanic is pretty nice too.
Would I be correct to assume that using a d10 + attributes in the 1-10 range as the main die makes the game less "swingy", and gives a greater advantage to skilled experts?
>>51362880
Yes. The CP2020 system is less random and gives more weight to Skills and Attributes, since the die roll is only 1/3 of the total possible outcome.
>>51361944
Time to roll out a game, I guess. Anon you're awesome.
>>51361275
>stat for COOL
what a great system
>>51363897
Thanks, mate. Good luck with your game!
What are the "monsters" in a cyberpunk setting?
>>51366959
MAN
>>51367466
Which variety?