Would you play an fable-style animal character?

File: 1307754694620.jpg (365KB, 700x990px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 700x990px

>>51162219

File: Owl_Wizard_Final_Small.jpg (207KB, 800x1072px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 800x1072px

>>51162223

File: bear_knight_by_windmaker.jpg (123KB, 771x950px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 771x950px

>>51162237

File: bunny_knight_and_quinny_pig_steed_by_kjkallio-d7vi6vr.jpg (227KB, 1600x966px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1600x966px

>>51162242

File: 110928_rabbit_knight_by_pc_0-d4b653n.jpg (74KB, 900x719px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 900x719px

>>51162252
Oh shit, apparently bipedal versions of the animal are considered "Very Furry" by the furry scale. Whatever. You get what I mean. Shit that existed before 90% of the media about them was porn.

File: mouse-guard.jpg (236KB, 1169x592px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 1169x592px

>>51162264

File: speedpainting__bear_knight_by_centradragon-d32qotd.jpg (325KB, 487x700px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 487x700px

>>51162272
Anyway, the point is that the characters are not supposed to be anthropomorphic at all, just having some opposable thumbs to carry shit for example and being bipedal.

File: 3d4521d3141cdd5612648e72257b7060.jpg (63KB, 564x658px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 564x658px

>>51162282
Can look more like magical animals too, as long as they look like they could be adventurers.

File: 870f2fcbc3c5cffcf8ee3452ff75b161.jpg (60KB, 736x914px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 736x914px

>>51162287

File: p-460394-wizard_cat_cl_1.jpg (86KB, 607x800px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 607x800px

>>51162294

File: wizard_wolf_by_agentwhitehawk-d979wpx.png (3MB, 1024x1418px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1024x1418px

>>51162302
Aand I'm out of reasonably-sized pics.

>>51162219
All in all, it's pretty hard to determine where the line between "bipedal animal" and "very animal-like furry" goes, but I tried keeping on mostly on the safe side with these examples. For example, I guess the line is whether it would look weird if the character would look natural when quadripedal and without equipment.

File: gw2___charr_elementalist_by_huussii-d5yegj4.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>51162219
>Would you play an fable-style animal character?

Fable-style as in something like Mouseguard or Redwall?

I'd prefer something that looked like it evolved to be where it was.

>>51163200
Well, one of the pics IS from Mouseguard, so yes.

>evolved
Well yeah, if you take that kind of idea to the game.

My setting is based on fairytales classical fairytales (at least, my take on it), so pesky things like evolution are pretty much discarded.

>>51162219
I never knew how much I wanted to play a Red Panda archer/ranger until I saw that image.

>>51162219
I'm pleasantly surprised by lack of sexuality insecure dip shits crying "YIFF IN HELL FURFAG11!" Sorry, now that I have said that the thread will go to shit.

>>51162219

In my last oneshot (Fellowship) the highlight was the non-furry anthopomorphic mouse befriending the minion of the Dark Lord to distract him.
It was beyond genius.

File: owl_studys_2_by_markelli-d639gsr.jpg (224KB, 647x1000px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 647x1000px

>>51164959

File: longbow_by_bridge_troll-d6hongp.jpg (170KB, 744x1043px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 744x1043px

>>51164972

File: Kachina_Frog.jpg (109KB, 500x650px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 500x650px

>>51164979

File: 1455568603408-4.jpg (245KB, 1280x1164px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 1280x1164px

>>51164183

File: Durgk, the last of the frog-men.jpg (115KB, 500x467px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 500x467px

>>51164992

File: johan-egerkrans-krigaranka.jpg (902KB, 1920x1920px) Image search: [Google]

902KB, 1920x1920px

>>51165032

>>51162383
You can always tell when it's a furry. There's a specific art style that apes 90s animu and Disney design, with big eyes, soft expressions. The sexualization or at least the sense that this is the idealized avatar of some pale and horrible thing behind a computer is immediately apparent. Pretty much everything OP has posted comes from an entirely different mental territory. The artists there wanted to produce art for heroic fantasy. They didn't produce those pieces consciously thinking "this is furry art, I'm a furry". When someone has those directives in mind, it becomes utterly transparent to everyone what they're doing: indulging in a masturbatory forest into one of the worst subcultures ever to arise in human history.

File: Ninja_Frogs_by_ursulav.jpg (172KB, 600x791px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 600x791px

>>51165039

>>51165045
This post is accurate.

>>51162219
Our group did a borrowers sort of game, where we all played either tiny humans or animals of around similar size.

File: anarkitty_by_anotherwanderer-d6g1kc6.jpg (370KB, 737x750px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 737x750px

>>51165048

>>51164774
Sure it will, because you did what all furries do: announce to everyone that you're a furry, and cry "fursecution!"

Yiff In Hell you fucking degenerate faggot, you are not welcome here. How retarded do you have to be to think that furries have a place on 4chan? You're not even fucking allowed on /d/. Think about that, and then kill yourself.

>>51165059
Epic

File: lizard by shaun keenan.jpg (868KB, 1848x1380px) Image search: [Google]

868KB, 1848x1380px

>>51165058

>>51165050
It's accurate except my autocorrect changed "forray" into "forest".

I wish it would only change words that are actual non-words, and not change less commonly used ones to more commonly used.

File: Soma_by_ursulav.jpg (99KB, 423x700px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 423x700px

>>51165073

File: landskneght_racoon_by_LeValeur.jpg (45KB, 525x471px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 525x471px

>>51165088

>>51165077
Get a better app. Mine gives me three choices based on my typing history, but doesn't take the initiative to autocorrect specifically because of the problem you cited.

File: Gidleigh_Goat_by_3_hares.jpg (127KB, 454x696px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 454x696px

>>51165098

File: Packrat.jpg (212KB, 549x700px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 549x700px

>>51165110

File: raven_guy_by_eoghankerrigan-d8nmvqj.jpg (118KB, 1024x571px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1024x571px

>>51165120

File: yang-qi917-yang-qi-cgmonster-bb.jpg (356KB, 1920x1069px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1920x1069px

>>51165135

>>51165077
That's okay, mine count both American and British versions of words as wrong.

File: clam_by_anubish-d4qwhh4.jpg (176KB, 1280x964px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1280x964px

>>51165146

File: minotaur_by_eoghankerrigan-d8yrc8v.jpg (212KB, 1024x947px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1024x947px

>>51165165

>>51165165
Wow

Those are...

Wow.

How are all these non-furry? I don't understand. They are anthropomorphic animal fantasy characters which is in the realm of furry. Where/how do you draw the distinction?

File: Numenera_Vroaordun_GuidoKuip.jpg (478KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 800x1200px

>>51165177

>>51165183
Icky things from the sea floor are underused as animal-folks

File: Furry vrs were.jpg (149KB, 930x842px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 930x842px

>>51165198
It's REAAAALLLLYYYY easy.

File: samurai_crocodile_by_fenrid-d41lb9z.jpg (332KB, 1216x785px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1216x785px

>>51165212

>>51165198
The line is blurry, but somewhere around "clearly sexualied".

File: fish Warrior by ariel-perezjpg.jpg (378KB, 1417x1629px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 1417x1629px

>>51165233

File: frogkin_by_anubish-d8fu9tb.jpg (213KB, 541x870px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 541x870px

>>51165252

File: 8058_f1_p.jpg (33KB, 330x487px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 330x487px

Hi there fable thread, do you play with miniatures? I'll leave these here just in case.

http://www.darkswordminiatures.com/shop/index.php/miniatures/visions-in-fantasy-critters.html

>>51165077
Because it's spelled "foray"?

File: longhelm_by_eoghankerrigan-d8nmxh9.jpg (115KB, 900x614px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 900x614px

>>51165263

>>51165198
>How are all these non-furry? I don't understand.
It's easier to understand if you're not autistic, so it might be hard to explain to you.

Basically, the picture you posted is furry because the artist is clearly aiming for a sexualized depiction. The image was created with the intention of being fapfuel.

>>51164183
This image is not furry because the character is not overtly sexualized.

See the difference? If not, enjoy your tendies.

File: Boarbarian by ariel-perez.jpg (301KB, 1920x1607px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 1920x1607px

>>51165283

File: Reptile Warrior_ariel-perez.jpg (292KB, 1418x1328px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1418x1328px

>>51165312

File: battle_tortoise__by_rowkey-d8zn5yw.png (2MB, 600x526px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 600x526px

>>51165327

File: feast_time_by_anubish-d8duhwz.jpg (222KB, 900x1431px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 900x1431px

>>51165339

File: grippli_cleric_by_ryan_rhodes-d58yy86.jpg (105KB, 900x1148px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 900x1148px

>>51165351

File: 1396985361008.jpg (68KB, 680x510px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 680x510px

>>51162219

I'd play as Caesar any day, any setting.

File: ffa2b10039e88e7f8a242fbf5339965d.jpg (780KB, 1188x1920px) Image search: [Google]

780KB, 1188x1920px

>>51165301
>those hips
>that pose
>those eyes

You must be blind, that fox archer is very arguably sexualized. Pic related, from the same artist who is a kemono (japanese furry). You also seemed to have missed the suggestive nature of this one >>51164995

So again, where do you draw the line?

>>51165410
Are you familiar with Terra Primate?

Roleplaying in a world where MAN is the missing link!

>>51165449
Ah, one of those contrarian types who likes to make shitty arguments on the Internet.

Have a nice day!

Not only would I play as one, I'm currentl writing a campaign setting where all the player races are based on said animal races. I've currently got rabbits, cats and bears drawn up with stats and what not

File: satyrcap.jpg (394KB, 1280x1978px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 1280x1978px

>>51165472
No, I'm trying to understand the logic here because I want to make this kind of art in the future, and don't know where the line is that would make an art piece flat out furry, or just an well drawn fantasy creature.

>>51165536
Dude, just draw what you like.

>>51165536
It's very subjective. People are going to whine about how anything vaguely animal like is furry shit. And here I thought the internet had moved on to picking on bronies.

File: 1408654633344.jpg (132KB, 523x1280px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 523x1280px

>>51165301
The problem with this logic appears when you add death of the author and autists seeking self-validation through attacks on acceptable targets. No one can prove that something is not furry, and there is no clear-cut criterion by which you can preempt you game being disrupted, either by a furry fapping under the table or by a social retard foaming about furries. Your least bad option is to wait and see.

File: 7377b7bf95a7654f4ce1445544bd27e0.jpg (216KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 600x800px

Best animal character coming through. I really want to try to play a similar character sometime.

>>51165198
It's buzzwording.

Technically, every anthropomorph animal character is furry because the furry fandom first built around this principle, but then internet snowflakes tasted blood and started to hype it up to the point of making everyone sick and tired of the topic.

So according to /tg/'s purity squad, every animal/anthro character that dares tread outside the boundaries of "ugly, musky murderbeast" is considered "furry".

I will admit though, stuff like >>51165198 >>51165449 would pretty much fit the bill because somebody, somewhere is definitely having a fieldday writing smut about these characters.

File: 2866465-maxresdefault.jpg (322KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 1920x1080px

Always loved the characters from Armello.

File: 1441502874516.jpg (69KB, 620x465px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 620x465px

>>51165222
>rainbow sparkle dickwolf vs mortally afraid of being called a furry
Both are bad.

>>51166265
Damn, i used to think that guy's stuff was god-tier

File: 1430168839073-2.jpg (228KB, 900x696px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 900x696px

>>51162219
I'd love to GM something like that, but I have a hard time finding people who would play it and not have talking animals in their magical realm. Found this out the hard way while playing Bunnies and Burrows

>>51165198
Well to compare your image to >>51164183

Your image has a shirtless muscleman with big, Disney-esque eyes and a tongue sticking out in what would probably be considered suggestive to a furry. Just glancing at that image gives me the impression that it was made by a barafag, and barafags seem to overlap with furfags a ton.

Meanwhile the other image, while you could argue toes the line, has a relatively realistic animal face and, like another anon argued, isn't overtly sexualized. A furry could probably fap to it, but I don't get the impression that the artist is a furry making furry things, they just wanted to make a fox archer thing without wanting to stick their dick in it.

To be honest, the fox image would probably set off a yellow flag if someone I didn't know joined a game of mine and used that as a character pic, and I'd be slightly wary of them for a few sessions just to see if they're actually furry or not (their actions would speak for it rather than the pic, since a non-furry could also want to play a foxfolk and even some furries can play animal characters while keeping their power level low enough to not act weird), while I'd probably shut down a player who used the pic you posted.

>>51165198
>>51165764
>>51165449
>>51165595
>>51165663
>>51165678

OP here. In this thread specifically, I would draw the line where if you remove all the clothes and put it on fours, it looks like an actual animal.

I didn't add that fox archer to my ref collection because it veers to close to the humane limit, and I want to stay very clearly on the other side.

Also, many of those examples have obviously human musculature, which automatically "disqualifies" it. It's supposed to be an animal, not an animal-human hybrid. Animals don't have tits, pecs and abs.

>>51169933
that sounds dumb

File: 1450099230098.jpg (204KB, 765x900px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 765x900px

>>51175710

File: 1450099267508.jpg (157KB, 765x726px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 765x726px

>>51175730

File: 1450099311836.jpg (118KB, 765x596px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 765x596px

>>51175750

File: 1450099349959.jpg (221KB, 765x1009px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 765x1009px

>>51175769

File: 1450099384763.jpg (160KB, 765x855px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 765x855px

>>51175783

File: 1450099428892.jpg (141KB, 765x696px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 765x696px

>>51175806

File: asdf.png (639KB, 1279x689px) Image search: [Google]

639KB, 1279x689px

LIGHTSABER
DRAGON

File: asdf.jpg (107KB, 601x800px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 601x800px

samurai fox

>>51165536
Most of it stems by the majority of furries and the approach of giving personality to animal characters. Fursonas are usually an alternative shade to their creator, thus they come off as more presentable and more of normal people with animal parts. Presentable as in doe eyed, Disney analogue features to be cute. As opposed to things in fantasy where things has a consistency and tend to view animal people as abhorrent so their aesthetic is more monstrous and intimidating. Thus making the former just look like degenerates who want fur over substance.

Now the problem is that the image you posted turns me on more than anything else in this thread by being so monstrous. Is it purge worthy? Yes of course! But the lesson to learn here is that no matter what it is someone's gonna fap to it. So stop giving a damn you autist.

File: 651423-4.jpg (57KB, 412x640px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 412x640px

>>51162219

>>51162219

My main black compatroit.

OP here. My reference folder for the setting has gone up from 10 to 40, so going pretty smoothly.

>>51174465
You are free to think whatever of my classifications. I think it's rather sensible, if we're going in the fable-style context, that, as you might remember, is in name of the thread.

Straight up anthros in fables would be pretty creepy in my mind.

>>51181289

Tell us more about your setting anon.

As a guy who enjoys his anthro creatures for non-sexual reasons, I'm highly interested in what this will be all about.

>>51181317
The jist of the setting is...

I already told it, indirectly. And no, not hidden in any post, it's in the title.

Fable. Not the Molyneux one

It's green-meadow light and bright fantasy, taking a lot of strides from fairy tales. Embracing the age-old cliches to the fullest, to, ironically, bring something else to the table. So I don't really need to tell you much about the Kingdom of Athaim, you probably already have a fair grasp what it looks like.

Most games I've encountered in the past years have either been dark and dreary, or pulpy and comedic. And the latter is usually fitted to modern or scifi-settings (Paranoia comes to mind).

So some questions sprung to my mind:
>When have you last time rescued a princess?
>When have you last played a sentient animal?
>When have you last played in a bright fantasy world? Because these days, even the standard fantasy worlds usually take a lot more strides from dark fantasy than bright fantasy

Most gamers, when asked, will probably say "Never" to at least two of those questions. Maybe yes to middle one if you've played Bunnies and Burrows or Mouseguard, or maybe they've rescued a princess in some part of their life.

Thus: retrofitting my own system, I started planning Fairytale RPG. Never been used in a commercial product, that should tell you something.

Sorry, started rambling more about my design philosophy there. But yeah, the idea is that it's a world where rescuing kidnapped nobles is part of a knight's job. The kingdom even has laws that can be abused if you kidnap / lock up a prince or a princess (which are used more as common words for young nobles rather than being a word for inheritor).

>>51181556
Oh yeah a little caveat: the game is not ONLY about sentient animals, in this thread I was just looking for refs for Forestfolk, the third race among humans and fairies.

I actually really like the design of JP-style raptors (and even the more accurate paleoart drawn of achillobator/utahraptor/dakotaraptor/austroraptor/etc.), snakemen,

It just fucking sucks you're automatically assumed to want to fuck them if you play them.

...also, I've yet to find any raptor-like lizardmen shit.

>>51165045
Relevant:

https://youtu.be/BfEHRahYxO0

>>51168786
Sounds like story time to me!

>>51182326
I concur.

Although, knowing it's a game about BUNNIES, you don't need to stretch your imagination to realize the possible horrors of procreation.

>>51182326
No.

Can you give non-sesualised Anthro Wolf character?

File: 1372576237170.jpg (79KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 800x600px

>>51182326
>>51182379
>PC wants to have intercourse with female rabbits, constantly
>Always failed the rolls or the females were not interested
>Finally meets an unknown female in the mushroom filled woods
>He wants to seduce her
>I make him roll for it and he succeeds
>Do the classic "and fade to black..."
>Player looks at me
>C-can you describe it?
His encounter with the female rabbit happened in a hallucination so his character died a virgin
Also all NPCs magically became male after that.

>>51168689
Chickens eat mice.

>>51162219
>non-furry animal characters
no. any setting made around animal characters will inevitably devolve into furfaggotry no matter how hard you try to not make it furry.

>>51162219
Are there any interesting books with anthro characters besides Redwall?

>>51184373
Mouse Guard

>>51184461
Anything not with rodents?

>>51184373
The Wind in the Willows

>>51184351
Just make it clear before the session that any furfaggotry will result in said furfag getting stabbed and buried in the nearby forest next to the previous ones.

>>51184817
why would you run a system about animals then?

idleness breeds heresy and cartoon animals breed furry faggotry. it's only matter of time between you coming up with cute ferret knights and someone wanting to fuck one.

>>51185000
>why would you run a system about animals then?
1. fables
2. culling furfags
If someone's that degenerate that when furfaggotry is specifically disallowed they can't either contain themselves or decline to play, they deserve to be stabbed. Or at least kicked out so hard they bounce.

>>51185268
Also, it's like saying "why do you have giants in your fantasy setting if you don't want size fetishists?"

>>51185000
Wanting to fuck one and keeping it to your pants are two different things anon.

Just because Tieflings are core in 5e doesn't mean that all Tiefling fetishists are gonna start busting their nut at every possible turn. Some people can understand social cues and situations and when not to engage to sexual fantasies.

Just because the game can devolve to furfaggotry due to degenerates doesn't mean the game is worthless. It's not the writer's fault if his innocent game without such intent is taken and fetishized, and if he doesn't allow it in his table, to him, there never was a problem.

The problem is allowing shit behavior, not the things and intent behind the game.

>>51185287
So you're planning on encounters with them being relatively rare, then? If I was playing or running a game where interacting with or playing as giants was commonplace, I'd almost expect at least one person at the table to have a thing for macro/micro.

>>51184373
Anthro as in anthro body type, or as in talking animal? If it's the latter, I highly recommend Guardians of Ga'hoole, even/especially if you haven't seen the movie. The plot can be a little predictable, but the setting and characters are great.
Though, you might not enjoy it much if you're a race purist or something; the BBEG is essentially a barn owl supremacist.

>>51185526
Pretty much this. I've played with self-proclaimed furries before. With one or two exceptions, most of them were actually pretty cool, and I wouldn't've known they were furry if not for some of them outright saying it and others talking a lot about stuff like Dust an Elysian Tail and Zootopia (and they never played one of the human-variant races when possible).

>>51185526
This. I have no problem with furries, I have problem with them injecting their fetish in everything possible.

>>51187404
Yeah. Magical Realm is a problem regardless of fetish, but furry seems to be one of the more common fetishes.

File: dungeoncover[1].png (464KB, 381x535px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 381x535px

>>51184373
In comics you have Usagi Yojimbo, Blacksad, Endtown, The Humans, and Dungeon series.

>>51185268
reading these comments give me the impression that everyone else's games have like seventeen furries playing. I don't understand how it seems to be difficult for everyone to have talking animal characters in a game and have it not devolve into fetish stuff.

I'm a GM and have run multiple campaigns with a bunch of people and we usually have one person playing a talking animal or something (because they want to try something that isn't the regular races eg: human and elf). And none of the campaigns have had any incident where someone tried to fuck the talking animal or other furry shenanigans. Like my setting got talking otters, penguin foot soldiers and armored bears and we haven't had any issues. How everyone else seems to have to put a preface in the start of their campaign with "nobody fucks the animal guy" seems surprising to me.

Maybe for once Tim the player wants to play as a penguin ranger because Tim thinks it's funny, and no magical realm shit had to get involved.

>>51169933
who cares what you think

>>51165077
I've taken to calling it "Auto-Assume" personally.

>>51163814
cute but I doubt it could draw the bow for shit.

I want to play a were-beetle or a skaven.
There was ascifi gam set on a lost generationship that had evolved animals: cannae mind its name as it was 20 yeras ago i had it and it looked like it was from the early 80s. bipedal rabbits, cats, dogs etc and mini-sized humans descended from the crew. anone know it?

>>51189737
In my case, it's more like an assumption from the get-go. If you plan bringing any fetish stuff to my table, stop. I never say it, because I think it's obvious. This isn't, of course, limited to furries. It's all who think that trying to put their magical realm into my game is okay, especially if it's explicit and distracting. I don't need to preface any game with that, because I haven't had any problems with magical realm, but in case it ever comes up, my personal code is very much against it. I don't insert my fetishes into the game, you don't insert yours.

>>51190686
Crossbows exist for a reason.

File: aquila scholar.jpg (189KB, 722x850px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 722x850px

>>51191185
just reading these make it sound like having to constantly shoot down magical realm shit is an everyday battle, which I'm kind of surprised.

The most distracting thing that keeps coming up in my campaigns isn't sexual more of foolishness, that I got is one guy who wants to always be a suave aristocrat character, which always seems to devolve into him looking like Zapp Brannigan and making situations worse.

That's the most distracting thing I got, so I guess I'm lucky, because reading these makes it sound like every group got some emotionally repressed sex fiend who cums under the table at the mere mention of the word "dog".

File: Our Chance to Shine! Art Thou Ready Senpai!.png (72KB, 465x305px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 465x305px

>>51191417
I'd imagine a lot of people here play with other /tg/ denizens, which means the DM has but to mention dragons or kobolds and a quarter of them will fling themselves dick-first at the nearest scaly creature.

File: 1462685780782.png (334KB, 990x1199px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 990x1199px

>>51191185
Do you run these games at your local church.

File: polarcourt.jpg (135KB, 864x576px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 864x576px

>>51191417
As an actual furry, I'm also surprised when reading how it seems every furry does this. Seriously, magical realm is for alone time only. And I know quite a few other furries who play RPGs who also agree on that sentiment. There are basic social rules you follow, and in addition, roleplaying sex with a bunch of other people you aint attracted to isn't fun or sexy, just fuckign weird and disruptive.

The last campaign I played in featured no sexy times at all, and the DM was an otherkin with 2 furries and 2 normies playing various races: lupin (me), tiefling (normie), dwarf (other furry), and tengu (other normie). We had to kick out a 40kid at the beginning after he refused to engage in the setting and who devolved into hysterics and a full on tantrum after learning that the dwarf player was a furry. God that fuckign fandom is filled with autists.

File: Dung Beetle Knight.jpg (115KB, 660x545px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 660x545px

Hey, TG, how do you feel about insect people?

>>51192113
>As an actual furry, I'm also surprised when reading how it seems every furry does this.
Another actual furry here. It's because 90% of all this is made up and 5% of the remaining 10% is exaggerated.

Cute furries OP.

File: 1405281180278.jpg (160KB, 600x816px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 600x816px

>>51192234
They are cute.

>>51192234
>>51192518
Wasn't there a whole series of threads about making a bug-themed RPG? Someking like fables but you'd get ant people bee people, moth people etc.

File: Jerome_Bevan.jpg (97KB, 700x906px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 700x906px

Would Beyond the Western Deep stuff count?

File: Twins.jpg (163KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 650x650px

>>51192234
All in favor!

>>51192630
What, like a non-shitty version of Army Ants?

>>51166753
But anon, your image is just a regular human father.

>>51192630
I remember seeing something like that. I only remember it being discussion and not actually making an RPG, but my memory isn't exactly the best. Sounds like it'd be pretty neat, though.

File: 1429607357787-0.jpg (168KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 600x800px

>>51191417
>makes it sound like every group got some emotionally repressed sex fiend who cums under the table at the mere mention of the word "dog".
It's pretty much this, but instead of "dog" it was "anything with a cloaca"
When he tried to have sex with a bird person, and kept going on about "It's a butthole and a vagina" I stopped him and told him he's skeeving everybody out. He throws a hissy fit
The next session he's fucking around on his phone, interrupting everyone to show them something on his phone, and just being a general jackass.
I ended the game after that.

>>51165573
/mulp here, people mostly moved back to arguing about furries again after a few years. For the most part the only people who still give a shit about people posting pones are people from 4chan. I would imagine that's because the distinctions upon which the controversies lie on an entirely different axis from the distinctions between traditional anthro, bipedal, and furry art.

It's neither here nor there though. I find that most of the cringe furry stuff is satire and for the most part they just want to be left alone in their cliques.

>>51193079
>I ended the game after that
You didn't just boot the disruptive player?

>>51193479
There were only three players, and one of them really wasn't getting into the setting. And after somebody wants to fuck a bird that kind of kills it for everyone.

>>51191417
That actually was not what I intended. I just think it's a good general rule (unless you're running ERP, which I am not). A rule I've never needed to enforce, but one lurking on /tg/ has made me rather conscious about.

File: Bear and Cat.jpg (273KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1280x1280px

>>51193610
I would try to get another crew going with new people, and never tell birdfucker about the new game. Or do, matters if I want him to feel shitty for his choices (if I want to be spitey). But I feel bad that you had that experience

>>51193647
let's us hope you don't need to use that rule

>>51193079
Also trying to figure out how it being a butthole and a vagina is a selling point.

File: 1412764559592.jpg (162KB, 600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 600x1064px

>>51194620
I don't either, but I'm perfectly fine not knowing

File: 1412790893420.png (325KB, 645x776px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 645x776px

>>51194408
It's a learning experience. I've got a couple people interested in a Micolite20 one-off but I'm going to call the kobolds "lesser goblins" just in case I find myself with a new bird fucker

>>51165252
Got any sharkmen or more deep-sea creepers in the style?

>>51165059
/b/ called and wants your insecure faggot ass back :^)

File: cleopatra_wasp_and_mayan_spider_by_nagisadreamer-d4rojpd.jpg (213KB, 1062x751px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 1062x751px

>>51192234
Bug people are awesome

File: Gregor.jpg (85KB, 574x800px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 574x800px

>>51197648
Not him, but I got this.

>>51182379
Was it Warrens or Burrows that had some focus on that mentioning that you should attempt to fuck every female since procreation in serious talk is important part of rabbits life cycle?

Tho it also clearly mentioned that you should not do that too hard if players are too young / players are uncomfortable with it.

>>51197711
Thanks for shitting an awesome thread, faggots.

File: 1482527246145.jpg (71KB, 601x518px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 601x518px

>>51202376
Welcome to /tg/. Where invoking the inexcusable on the incredible is inevitable.

>>51197648
Look up House Hadross, it's a sea-themed faction for Wrath of Kings. Miniatures, but I'm sure you'll find art if you look around.

http://wrathofkings.com/ks/factions/house-of-hadross/

File: Alice_In_Wonderland_Rabbit.jpg (330KB, 695x1022px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 695x1022px

Always wanted to roleplay a character similar to the rabbit from Alice in Wonderland, but didn't want others mistakenly take it as furry material.

It kind of sucks that furries have to ruin everything.

Animal races usually have the best racial shit in games like Pathfinder.

You're just a fucking baddie if you don't use them.

>>51180847
MY nigga, came to post that
Also
Honey badger brawler/monk
Lynx ranger
Fox mage

>>51205615
Just don't play it as yifftastic furbait. Same thing when playing dragonborn, or when playing a halfling and worrying about shortstack accusations.

>>51192635
This looks nice and what is Beyond the Western Deep?

File: 1418434609755-0.jpg (47KB, 318x463px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 318x463px

>>51181673

>>51205615
>blaming others for your own cowardice
lmao

>>51166110
Rango

File: 1429690802245.png (175KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 500x375px

>>51202376
The first actual shitpost in this thread was you sperging out, and your consecutive posts weren't much better. So collect your bonus irony and fuck off back to piss containment.

>>51163200
I always thought a setting that dropped all the standard races and was instead just different "evolved" humanoid animal species: croc-folk, bear-folk, otter-folk, cat-folk, etc. would be potentially interesting. Just the thought experiment of "what traits do these creatures have and how would that translate into their society" would be interesting I think.

Sadly, it would "stink of furriness" I fear and probably hard for people to take seriously.

File: manmammoth.jpg (48KB, 682x709px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 682x709px

>>51218681
This artist actually has several different animals in the same style if I recall. I only saved the ferret one as I'm a racist.

File: Cats-rpg-2-e1458675532810-610x240.jpg (55KB, 610x240px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 610x240px

>implying you wouldn't play a game as cute cats going out on cute cat adventures

What are you, a faggot?

File: d5e2dafdc547b1a5003dd57f555d6650.png (1MB, 1205x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1205x1280px

>>51218649
I guess it doesn't really help that most of these systems hire known furry artists to do their art.

For awhile I hear really good things about Ironclaw and after playing the system not too long ago I can confirm it's great. HC SVNT DRACONES is something I'd like to try next.

It's kind of funny how much people on here seem legit afraid to have anything to do with anything furry.

>>51218649
So a system set in Zootopia, or more insular by species? Sounds fun either way.

>>51219235
>most of these systems hire known furry artists to do their art
Makes sense, though. Furry artists have a lot of experience drawing anthropomorphic characters doing various things.

>>51219235
Ironclaw is pretty great, but HC SVNT DRACONES is hot garbage. Someone on another thread described it as Ancap's First RPG and that's a pretty accurate description.

Anyone got anything relating to Firbolgs? Preferably casters/clerics. Finding any good art of them is tricky as hell.

>>51220441
>So a system set in Zootopia, or more insular by species? Sounds fun either way.

Nah, I'd probably pick between 6-12 "known" races at the start, think about which may be the more successful as "main" races, the larger kingdoms/empires, then build the rest out as more "regional" powers ("croc-folk and frog-folk don't like being far from water, so they tend to stick to the swamps, lakes and rivers, and never where cold" which would kinda inform you where they would be) and there is always room for more as more of the world is explored.

There would probably be some social mixing but most would stay along racial lines I think. Though one easily imagines potential friends and allies ("dog-folk and cat-folk never get on very well having very different ways of seeing things, but both will stand together against the unknowable evil of the ant-folk!" or whatever).

Just something different that orcs and elves and shit, but yet still grounded in familiar concepts enough so people won't feel totally alien and lost.