What do you think about the "Lantern Control Deck"?
>>51068168
I'd rather play classic control, but gotta admit that in some formats that soft control is the best you can get.
I don't expect it to ever hit Legacy.
>>51068168
What do you want to know about it?
I've played it for almost a year now and it's my primary deck in modern.
>>51071916
Lantern is the definition of hard control, "conventional" control is soft control. I agree about the legacy part. The deck and others like it have significant issues with cards like Brainstorm.
Is Kuba Lantern list viable?
Joke tier.
>>51076472
>Kuba Lantern
What is this? Google doesn't show anything.
>>51068168
I like the synergy between codex shredder and lantern of insight.
After rereading an online list I think I understand it now. Use the bridge with a low cmc deck, drop your hand as much as you can and nix anything that could get through via top deck manipulation and hand shenanigans. Plus some low cost cyclers to help ensure that you get the bridge.
I don't particularly enjoy Bridge as a card. But I'm a scrub, so hey.