Is Go a traditional enough game for /tg/?
A bit too traditional unfortunately. The same goes for the other ancient abstract strategy board games.
>>50779638
Its the color of the pieces. Using all black or all white is a recipe for disaster in aesthetic design. As the Brazilians say, hue hue hue.
>>50779638
We had a few good threads around the time AlphaGo was savaging Lee Sedol's raw, bleeding anus.
There are maybe a half dozen players on /tg/ that are (Western) 15-kyu or better and maybe one in the dan range.
>>50780225
Get back to /qst/
>>50780756
There is literally nothing wrong with Quest threads.
>>50780791
No, there isn't.
They just don't belong on the Traditional Games board. Ever.
Go is one of those games I've always admired, but never had a chance to get into it.
How do I get good at Go?
>>50779638
Yes, yes it is.
>>50782965
Seconding this.
Any rulebook or guide?
>>50785332
Back when we had the go threads during the Alphago matches people posted some YouTube channels that were really good but I can't remember what they were
>>50782965
read this:
http://www.kiseido.com/ff.htm
then step by step makes some match on this browser:
http://www.cosumi.net/play.html
(first times no need for big goban 7x7)
>>50779638
>Is X a traditional enough game for /tg/?
Does it have lore people can complain about?
Does it have different rules editions people can wage wars about?
Does it have sexy imagery anywhere?
Can magical realm be inserted into it?
Can it be enjoyed in multiple ways all but one of which could be declared wrong?
Does it produce stupid copypasta?
If you answered "yes" to 3 or more questions, X is traditional enough.
>>50779638
Play online here. https://online-go.com/overview
I'd give someone a game so they can pound my anus, but it's 0100 so I should be in bed. As for lessons, try this. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLK7KgeYopZjV00yfvK8_DMlNILbqrX8vr
>>50786798
Thanks anon
>>50786098
Much appreciated.