Spell prerequisites?

>>50711870
>Main concern is that this would limit sorcerers/bards too much
That's not something I would lose any sleep over.

>make clerics/druids/wizards even more OP

Give them even harder spell requirements.

>>50711870
I dont think that having spells be sequential like that is really a good way of curbing spellcaster power, if anything it a wider division between blaster and utility builds. I think that if anything I think that there should be a greater diversity of things like rituals or minor passive buffs that could be slotted as prepared spells. Its my personal view that a good way to sandbag casters in the DnD vancian paradigm is to split up the spells they get and force them to make deeper commitments to use spells. Like, I think its perfectly reasonable to have a lvl 3 wizard who's only spells are a basic damage spell, and two solid utility spells like Tensor's or Animate Rope.

>>50711900
>give them harder requirements
How?

I have always wondered why the wizard is half-naked. Is this some weird sex-play?
Can princesses not get off normally anymore after having been kidnapped by dragons and other monsters too often?

File: ab-jurer.jpg (359KB, 933x1352px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 933x1352px

>>50711870
>Not posting superior filenamed version
Here you are friend OP

>>50713751
>towel-man throws book.jpg