No specific category, just /tg/ related art. Landscapes, creatures, worlds, cultural stuff, architecture. Post, discuss, look for inspiration.
>>50639213
>>50639252
>>50639213
Anyone got comfy interior pictures like tavern common rooms, feast halls, bedrooms, and the like?
Pic related.
>>50639430
>>50639531
>>50639545
>>50639557
>>50639568
>>50639581
>>50639611
>>50639622
>>50639632
>>50639646
>>50639652
>>50639656
>>50639662
>>50639672
>>50639682
What's the required quality here?
>>50641862
>>50641866
>>50641893
Actual wand I found on /x/
>>50641903
>>50641913
ok im done
>>50639662
Goddamit I want to go back now.
>>50639213
>Landscapes, creatures, worlds, cultural stuff, architecture. Post, discuss, look for inspiration.
This mah favorite kind of art thread.
>>50641970
>>50641978
>>50641993
>>50641997
>>50642004
>>50642029
>>50642042
>>50642048
>>50642053
>>50642059
>>50642068
>>50642075
>>50642078
>>50642089
>>50642101
>>50642112
>>50642116
>>50642123
>>50642135
>>50642139
>>50642147
>>50642153
>>50642160
>>50642172
Well, time to get on with my day. See you some other time, /tg/.
>>50642178
Thanks for the pics man
I'll go ahead and dump a few.
>>50642496
>>50642074
Can we have more non-digital art?
Digital art is below shit-tier.
>>50642504
>>50642517
Digital art should be banned forever.
>>50642521
>>50642517
I've got a few non-digital pieces. Or at least i think they are.
>>50642541
>>50642551
>>50642517
>>50642541
Yes, please bash on digital art because you have are obviously in a position to criticize hard working artists.
>>50642565
>>50642551
Beksinski is good but not exactly /tg/. He is in league of his own.
>>50642578
>>50642598
>>50642614
>>50642624
>>50642631
>>50642575
Digital art is below traditional art no matter how good it is. It doesn't have anything to do with hard work. It is inherently of lower worth.
Digital, plastic DeviantArt crap ruined D&D, MtG and absolutely everything else.
>>50642639
and that
>>50642644
>>50642654
is all i've got.
>>50642644
Do you have any reason for saying that beyond preferring the art styles that were popular before digital art became a thing?
>>50642689
Yes.
Posting digital art because I'm a contrarian asshole.
>>50642782
>>50642745
Care to share?
>>50642792
>>50642805
>>50642816
>>50642822
>>50642844
>>50642854
>>50642865
>>50642876
>>50642631
>filename
That's Cardinal Richelieu at the Battle of La Rochelle, actually.
>>50642892
>>50642903
>>50642922
>>50642937
>>50642948
>>50642961
>>50642971
>>50642980
>>50642988
>>50642998
>>50643023
>>50643038
>>50643056
>>50642631
You made up that fake filename just to draw out autists/artists, right?
>>50643067
Shame fine-arts anon didn't want to share the secret behind traditional arts inherent superiority. Guess I'll just have to go on and enjoy all this shitty digital art.
>>50642898
And what a battle it was!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gvc5UkENInQ
>>50642644
Yeah fuck digital art. I want to view traditional art digitally so I can not partake in any of the things that differentiate the two mediums.