Thoughts on Shadowverse? It seems to me like the online card

>>>/v/

File: 30 minutes.png (188KB, 378x525px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 378x525px

>>50360858
Yeah, I know. Thanks for the bump anyway.

You can go to the general but its going to be pretty biased
>>>/vg/160909335

In terms of digital CCG's I thought it was pretty bland and unimpressive. These days the only ones I really care for are Duelyst and Runescape Legends, both of which do things differently enough to be interesting. Most games are just bad Hearthstone or Magic ripoffs (Like fucking Hex. Jesus that game is shameless.)

I'm not sold on /tg/ banning all things electronic. Online CCG should have a home here.

>>50362863

/tg/ is specifically for games that are not videogames. That's the purpose of the board. Shadowverse and HS are both videogames. Magic is a real card game with physical cards, so it's allowed here.

>>50362863
>>50363807

I think there needs to be a degree of nuance here.

It's obvious if something is a videogame and can only exist in a digital format. But an increasing number of games are emerging which are designed to emulate and draw on classic tabletop and traditional game experiences. Just because they're in a different medium, IMO, doesn't change that they're still within the boards remit.

>>50363836
Yeah. That was what I was getting at. The boards aren't perfect partitions of interest. Broadly speaking something can be both a traditional game and a video game, and should have a home in either board.

>>50362191
Would you happen to know how the TES card game is? Haven't gotten into alpha/ beta myself.

File: 250px-Pack_Raptor.png (188KB, 250x349px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 250x349px

>>50360561
Hex already did that in a much better way