Find a flaw. If you can.

There could be two of them

>>49982272
Has anyone ever used one of theses in their army? I have been thinking about it as it looks nice.

>>49982272
Its weapon is fucking terrible, and the sicaran ventor is better

Is there an room for the crew besides the driver?

>>49982423
So. If your imperial guard how do you field it then?

>>49982272
Flank/rear attacks

>>49982528
Go back home, and hope you are young enough to become a spacemarine

>>49982533
Yeah that big exposed fuel tank is hilarious. I'd give it the benefit of the doubt and say it's an extra though.

>>49982272

Poor man's Shadow Sword

>>49982533
You've pretty describe every tank, hell that would work normally for troops as well.

File: hgjfdfsadsdfgfhj.jpg (163KB, 1049x674px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1049x674px

>>49982272

Same answer as always, you fuck

>>49982272
I reckon it's one of the better looking heavy weapon variants. The others don't really do it for me, the size of the inferno gun (?) and dinky fuel tank on that other one looks pretty shit, and I'm not sure about the open topped plasma. I think the older style tube shaped plasma would suit it more.

>>49982308

I had an Astra Militarum one. I found two Vanquishers with ace's cost a few points more but were better.

It will kill anything it shoots bar a titan but 300 points in one tank is a bit risky.

>>49982272
No skulls

File: Find a flaw with this thread.jpg (121KB, 1518x730px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1518x730px

>>49982272

>>49982272
>Find a flaw.
>If you can.

Are you trying to be a tank or an assault gun?

In the Grim Darkness of the Far Future, there are only People Who Dont Paint Their Vehicles Frequently Resulting in Needless Corrosion and Reduced Mechanical Reliability.

>>49983927
It actually looks more like it's been driving through or over rusted shit, by the way it's on the tracks.

File: 99590105234_DKKGRENADIERASSAULTCARRIER1[1].jpg (26KB, 600x620px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 600x620px

>>49982272
it's not a universal carrier

>>49982272
Fixed gun with an extremely restricted traverse, not only will you have to turn the entire vehicle to shoot at things off to either side, but you'll have to turn the vehicle often to keep the gun pointed at any moving target. Also riveted armor doesn't do pretty things to the people inside it when it gets shot.

>>49982272
It costs too much and its resin

>>49982272
No sponsoons, not enough skulls.

>>49982272
this bread again.

>>49983276
"Yes"

>>49984345
/thread

>>49984265
>italian_land_raider.jpg

File: why.jpg (23KB, 288x499px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 288x499px

>>49984265
What is the point of this vehicle existing?

>>49982272
The track design on that thing is horrible, especially with the long and low gun on it.

>>49982272
Poor maintenance, judging by all the rust.
I thought Kriegers were supposed to look after their equipment.

>>49982767

I meant Solar Auxilia, nobody actually calls the Guard the AM I just got mixed up with all the faux Latin.

File: ansaldoMIAS.jpg (338KB, 1190x1340px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 1190x1340px

>>49985065
too much armor for italian tonkette, this is how a proper italian tank looks like

File: 1455299560732.jpg (56KB, 794x800px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 794x800px

>>49985361
Same reason it existed for real in WW2.

Its a cheap, versatile vehicle that can transport stuff closer to the front than a soft skin truck but can also be a light assault vehicle, artillery tow, mortar vehicle or whatever.

File: carlos.png (138KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 350x350px

>>49982272
I like the cheeto dust on the wheels

>>49986134
That's not really a pun, Carlos.

>>49985969
Oh god, you have to walk in this position to move?

>>49986096
It looks like it can only transport 4 guardsmen in a combat situation and get utterly obliterated by absolutely anything on the battlefield, would it not have been better to just make a Chimera?

>>49986372
bren carrier sections consisted of 12 infantry carried on 3 carriers plus a dude on a motorcycle and fuctioned as scouts

doesn't really fit the kriegers but I can see it in a steel legion or cadian outfit

>>49986372
Not every model FW makes rules/models for is a full on frontline combat vehicle. All they have to do is resist small arms fire and artillery shrapnel to do the jobs they did IRL.

>>49986372
It's supposed to tow gear.
Would you rather have ten of those for your heavy mortal platoon, or one chimera for the same price, with 9 mortars having no means of transportation ?
Same reason we got training planes and liaison cars. By saving money on it you can buy other gear elsewhere.

>>49986605
Still good for trench warfare, it can tow supplies to the front without bogging down or being highly vulnerable to artillery like a regular truck.

It tows artillery too which is pretty important for what Kriegers do.

>>49982272
>gun is not on a turret
>you have to rotate the ENTIRE FUCKING TANK to fire at another target
>can it even aim up or down?

It's shit.

>>49987354
I'm amazed that a chimera would cost 10 of those, I expected it would cost about 3.

>>49987532
A chimera is fully amphibious, NBC protected, is armored beyond "gretchin-proof", has decent weapons instead of one or two machine guns, optics, a turret, a comm system, and a better engine.
Of course exact figures are impossible to draw, the two vehicles being imaginary and all, but it costing ten times as much as a Centaur isn't much of a stretch.