Pathfinder more like MATHfinder lol.

>>49203316
>ironic b8

2edgy4me

>>49203316
Lol, that simple.

>>49203316
Remember folks, this constitutes ADVANCED training for the US military.

>>49203316
You know, bait aside, the fact that many /tg/ posters whine on 3.5 and Pathfinder being "too much number-heavy", makes me think of the percentage of people with ADD here.

>>49203316
LOLz I see what you did their XXDDDDDDD!!!

File: traveller1.jpg (59KB, 750x600px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 750x600px

>>49203721

Pathfinder has a lot of crunch. Some people like that, some people don't. Neither group is wrong, or sperglords, or bad at math; people like different types of game.

A lot of the arguments on /tg/ stem from people confusing "this is not to my taste" with "this is bad and people who like it are dumb!"

>>49203783
This guy's right.

Hell, I'm a math major and I don't want that shit in my /tg/

>>49203720
Go read the full thing then

>>49203783
>Neither group is wrong

no, 3.PF is actually shit but the math is just a symptom of the larger problem that you have 10+ variables for any given roll because nobody knows how to reign their shit in. At a certain point, manual math becomes tedious, even if incredibly simple. That's the whole reason man started using number counting devices.

Expected to see Sacred Geometry when opening the thread. Disappointed.

>>49207270
>wrong fun reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee