How do I keep my group from constantly straying into ERP territory?

>>48370674
Drag them so close to your magical realm that they become celibate.

File: 1461785922304.png (116KB, 816x587px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 816x587px

>>48370674
Just run an ERP game you pussy.

>>48370840
Are there any good systems for that?

Kill them, and yourself for good measure.
Fuck, what a pointless thread for an imaginary group that you're never going to have, because you're such a fuckhead.

>>48370674
Stop playing pathfinder for one.

>>48370674
Neuter them

>>48370857
From what I've heard, FATAL is.

>>48370857
GURPS

File: Pathfinder general.png (9KB, 861x125px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 861x125px

>>48370956
doh

>>48370857
Exalted, kekeke
Srsly, there are Charms for erpy stuff

File: Ahri (Charm).jpg (182KB, 850x1164px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 850x1164px

>>48371065
Using the charms is the less interesting parts of the game.

Stunting is.

>>48370674
Have you asked them to tone down the ERP, because it's not fun for you and you wished to run a different kind of game?

>>48370674
Stop being a pussy and just tell them "no erp" in my games. Youre the GM. As in game MASTER. Act like it.

>>48371107
>>48371134
We were about to have such a nice thread full of memes, and you fags come and provide the actual solution.

Thread's over, i hope you're proud of yourselves.

Keep a spray bottle of ice water handy.

>>48370857

Probably FATE, so you can give yourself dice for acting like a slut.

>>48370674
Fuck all of them in the ass before the session

File: ERP.jpg (259KB, 1040x540px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1040x540px

>>>/soc/24051853

>>48370857
You don't need an actual system for ERP. You just play out the sex parts instead of fading to black. After all, you should only roll when success or failure is important to the plot. Sex in an ERP is just like social interactions between players in a non-porny game.

Also, you never want to have actual sex 'at the table' so to speak. Orgies are dumb complicated clusterfucks, and when two people are fucking together it leaves everyone else picking their noses (or I guess jerking off while watching).

And of course the biggest advice: Do this on F-list instead of at an actual table. I mean, unless your group is REALLY Sex+ or close, you're going to have trouble looking each other in the eyes after an ERP session.

>>48371171
I know you're joking, but that's actually the thing I miss the most of the old /tg/. The discussions were about solutions, not necessarily wanted or even needed ones but solutions nevertheless, sometimes even to the question being asked.

>>48371282
And even outside of individual threads it seems like 2/3rds of the board is made up of quest threads. It was alright to me when they were every once in a blue moon but now theyre everywhere and they arent even /tg/related.

>>48370674
Stop playing with horny faggots.

>>48371246
I could never do anything on F-list.
The fact that it's like hundreds of guys organizing to mutually masturbate is just too odd for me.

>>48371088
That's right

File: 1467933776926.jpg (76KB, 349x356px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 349x356px

>>48371595
That's what imagination is for, anon. Imagining the other person is a girl.

>>48371088

You'll still want the charm that prevents people from treating your seduction attempts as unacceptable influence. Then stunt away.

>>48371595
>Actually caring
A guy shot all the porno you watch
A guy wrote that smut you read
A guy drew those hentai doujins

File: manic.jpg (31KB, 150x208px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 150x208px

>>48370857
Eclipse Phase

>>48370857

DnD is best.

>>48370867

Why are you so angry about other people's fun?

>>48371046
>weeaboo c ucks

What does that even mean? Are 'true' PF players really this memetarded?

>>48371046

5e kitsunes when?

>>48373518
>A guy shot all the porno you watch

That one isn't the same at all.

>A guy wrote that smut you read
>A guy drew those hentai doujins

Non-interactive. With ERP it's two guys getting each other off simultaneously, which basically is sex. If you are a guy and ERP with another guy, that's a homosexual act. I'm not prejudiced against that, but that actually is what it is.

>>48376077
He was probably referring to whoever thought using a pregnant/cum inflated fox/cat eared lady as the OP pic was a good idea.

>>48373518
I was actually surprised at how many of the artists were women.

>>48370674
Make them masturbate before each session. Twice.

>>48376102
Oh no, how terrible. Anon, if you refuse to get off because "that would be gay", you're a loser.

>>48376150
Yeah, but most are still guys, assuming you're into the usual stuff.

>>48376133
>a good idea
Anon, they did it intentionally. Same as the furry Pathfinder module thing.

if you are the only person acting against group norms you are That Guy hth

>>48376188
>Anon, they did it intentionally. Same as the furry Pathfinder module thing.

Pathfinder confirmed for worst ttrpg with worst community.

>>48371246
>I mean, unless your group is REALLY Sex+ or close, you're going to have trouble looking each other in the eyes after an ERP session.

normal people aren't as repressed as you

>>48371246

Don't have it take up table time is the best advice, really.

>>48376150

You would be surprised at how many ERPers are women, too. Young cat ladies for the most part, or lesbians, but still women.

I think ERP games are a myth.

If they weren't, I'd probably be playing in one.

Then again, text gaming...

>>48376292
>Implying I'd have that problem
Anon, I was saying that under the assumption that OP is normal.

>>48376222
Anon, there are literally furry RPGs.

>>48376318
Really, that applies to a lot of things. I mean, I like social interaction, but that's hard when you've got two players taking up a scene and everyone else is just... picking their nose. This is why I like playing on IRC or F-list where you can have things go on in PM and at random times instead of taking up session time.

>>48376361
I know at least one thirty something woman who's married and just had a kid and she F-lists.
She can't be an edgy emo chick getting seduced by hot vampire dickgirls in real life, and while she can seduce preteen boys, it's not legally or morally advisable.

>>48376388
>>>/soc/24051853
Text games are the best. You never stumble over your words and you don't have to hear someone's stupid attempt at an accent, and it's like reading and writing a book. Plus, you don't miss anything when you leave to go take a piss or get some drink.

>>48376438
>Text games are the best.
I don't mind text for one-on-one stuff.

But in the context of a game, I get bored to fucking death.

>>48370674
>Help me /tg/
>My group really likes X and has fun when I include it in my games
>How do I keep X from happening?
>I don't like it when my group has fun.

>>48376438
>Anon, there are literally furry RPGs.
No shit kid. Next you'll be telling me Mouseguard is a thing.

Doesn't mean Pathfinder isn't the worst furry rpg.

>>48370674
Just don't let them?

"I roll to seduce the barmaid and..."

"No. Moving on."

See? Not hard. Unless you're not the GM. In that case just find a new group, I went through that shit and there's no helping it.

>>48370674
Put saltpeter in their Mountain Dew

>>48376450
I love it. If anything I find it easier to keep up with, since I don't have to write anything down or take notes.

>>48376466
While I'm all for ERP, you're kind of making a lot of leaps. (Although with that image they're reasonable leaps).

File: batman-first-i-was-like.jpg (73KB, 600x1093px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 600x1093px

>>48370956
>>48371046
>My summoner's eidolon just happens to take the form of my ideal woman.
https://youtu.be/_LZXXdyMC2Y

>>48376292

Are you suggesting that a normal, well-adjusted person isn't going to feel uncomfortable sitting at a table while people (statistically speaking both men) explicitly discuss the sex-acts their characters are doing to each other, potentially for a prolonged period of time? Even if a guy did it with his girlfriend it'd be fucking awkward to sit through it as another player.

No. Unless, as he said, your group is really close, that's fucking uncomfortable. If you don't think it is, reflect for a few moments and consider whether you might have some sort of social disorder. It's nothing to do with sexual repressions, it's standard social boundaries.

>>48371246
I don't want to be that guy, but can I get a title for this doujin? It looks interesting

>>48376681
>If you don't think it is, reflect for a few moments and consider whether you might have some sort of social disorder. It's nothing to do with sexual repressions, it's standard social boundaries

what the fuck kind of "social boundaries" do you think are "standard"

protip, it is you who has a disorder here

File: Carthian Movement.png (718KB, 1142x620px) Image search: [Google]

718KB, 1142x620px

>>48376806
Hell if I know. I never actually read it, I just reverse image searched one time so I could make this. Try doing that yourself, I'm too lazy.

>>48376845
Are you seriously saying that normal people will be completely okay with roleplaying sexual situations with each other?

File: puppet.jpg (30KB, 392x390px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 392x390px

>>48376806
https://hitomi.la/galleries/555516.html

I hope you like netorare

>>48376914
Look Down > Master of The House >>> Do You Hear The People Sing

>>48376926
Much bigger problem is all the male characters being pig disgusting.

Just jerk them off before each session so they won't be so frustrated. Jeez, that is like DMing 101 right there

File: 7a62fbe885de84c263a7db46e4610946.jpg (24KB, 250x333px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 250x333px

>>48376948
I respect your viewpoints but also you're terrible.
Also:
Red and Black is the best. Though I do like The Confrontation.
Enjolras is the ̶m̶o̶s̶t̶ ̶a̶t̶t̶r̶a̶c̶t̶i̶v̶e̶best character.

>>48377034
>>48376948

You're both wrong. Empty Chairs At Empty Tables is clearly the best song. That survivor's guilt, man

File: harrisonfordshrug.jpg (24KB, 480x240px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 480x240px

>>48376987
Welcome to netorare

>>48377106
>Empty Chairs At Empty Tables
Oh c'mon, it's almost as forgettable as Eponine

>>48377106
Javert's Suicide
Splat
https://youtu.be/hRzvdQh8D2Q
I actually did like this song, and Russel Crowe. It's still the only version I've seen.

>>48377205
Harsh.

>>48376987
I know how you feel. I'd at least be a bit happier if the guy who steals the girl is at least good to look at.

>>48370857
Surprisingly superhero systems work as well. Mutants and masterminds has some wiggle room when sexual powers come up.

>>48370674
Sorry I didn't read your thread. I'm sure it's been derailed by now.
Just teach them by using a succubus at low level that sex will get them killed. Do it twice if you have to. And throw in a heavy church influence and a lot of paladins so the people in your world will have good reason to avoid sex, especially with PCs. Set a blatant mood of no ERP here boys. Don't be afraid to kill someone for being a cunt if you really have to but don't abuse that power. Try to make it a "fair fight" when you kill a ERP player

>>48381656
Anon, you sound like a shitty ST

>>48381672
What the fuck is a ST?

>>48381918
story teller.

>>48381918
Star Trek, obviously. You should use the context of the sentence to figure these things out.

>>48381918
>>48381952
Storyteller, the White Wolf version of a Dungeon Master.

>>48370674
Have a talk with them like a mature adult, they'll probably tone it down if it's really bothering you
Or you may realize the rest of them see you as a No Fun Allowed That Guy, in which case it may be best for all involved for you to find a new group

>>48370674
let it happen. Everybody will either get weirded out or get into it.

>>48370674
By informing them that you have tentacle and mpreg fetish and if they start ERPing so will you.

>>48370857
On a more serious note, there is no dedicatedly best ERP system, you just use your favourite system for the setting you want to run.

If you want standard high fantasy, DND has plenty of stuff to magic up your realm. Exalted has even more.
Space? Eclipse Phase got loads of it.
Cyberpunk? Shadowrun.
Modern? WoD got it.
Superheroes? Every single one has enough variety by default to get you.
And then there's the generics like GURPS, FATE, Apocalypse variants etc etc

>>48371430
>Displaying 1,095 expired threads from the past 7 days
>ctrl-f quest
>83 matches
>2/3rds of the board

>>48371430
>>48383568
I don't even understand why there are still so many quests. Aren't quests supposed to be on /qst/? I once posted in a quest thread to let them know they should be posting on >>>/qst/ but I got banned for that.

>>48383670
There is a difference between "quests can be on qst" and "quests should be on qst".
And the mods very clearly show which one is the case here.

File: 1459518159972.png (17KB, 208x250px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 208x250px

>>48370690

>>48383679
That's stupid.

>>48383700
Less stupid than proclaiming 5 threads are "2/3rds" of the board.

But go ahead, keep raging and getting deleted every time to go into a quest thread to spew your retardadtion.

File: CbPujUqUMAAD8ac.jpg:large.jpg (143KB, 1024x530px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1024x530px

>>48376914
Young Communist's version

>>48383723
I'm not actually him, and quests are still a far more substantial part of the board than they should be, especially when there's a whole other board dedicated to them now. And before /qst/ there often were about 20 quests at a time.

>>48383725
I know. I made the Les Mis version because of that one.

>>48383765
>3%
>substantial part of the board

File: bottle.jpg (45KB, 630x434px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 630x434px

>>48370674

Pretty sure thread is infested with the asstarded autist from the soc erpg.

>>48383777
... anon, can you math?

>>48383830
Pretty sure that means you're just as much a soc erpg autist!

>>48383840
Can you? There are currently five quest threads. Total board size is 150 threads.

>>48376070
>kill off a thread just to circlejerk your fantasies while pretending they really happened
Why not keep this cancer on /d/ and /a/?

>>48383901
That's 5 too many. Especially when they aren't even /tg/ related at all

>>48383901
Anon, I literally said "it used to be you'd find twenty of them at a time".

>>48376681
This happened to me twice, and yes, it is as bad as you're all imagining. Beyond awkward. Both times I was "the new player," and had no idea what was going on. Both times I simply up and left the group with no explanation. The last time it happened, the DM was a married mother of three.

Yeah.

>>48376845
And this is why our society is completely fucked. If my 10+ year RPG group dies/quits I am not gonna go looking for another one.

>>48381656
^ THIS

I wish you were my DM anon.

>>48382954
>On a more serious note, there is no dedicatedly best ERP system, you just use your favourite system for the setting you want to run.

Which is our 1st clue that ERP doesn't work to begin with because it has to leech off another system entirely. That, and the participants in question have questionable motive for something other than a normal RPG session.

>>48381656
So basically make it look like an accident?

>>48384106
Roleplaying has as much support as ERP in some systems, frankly. Carousing and Diplomacy are both skills, GURPS has its seduction, and don't get me started about Exalted as mentioned up above.

ERP is questionable, but not because of lack of rules.

File: 1468566041039.jpg (112KB, 679x960px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 679x960px

>>48376361
Ancient oldfag who has been playing MUSHes for years, here. Can confirm. There are a surprising number of women into this stuff.

You can tell they're women because they're terrible at making it sexy.

There is the odd exception, of course.

Something to keep in mind, however: women who frequent these spaces either are fragile snowflakes who have serious mental issues (like most of us, to be honest), or actual sociopaths. You'll learn to identify the sociopaths from experience. Sociopaths LOVE adult RP spaces, because they're filled with fragile victims who are easily manipulated. It's like an all-you-can-eat buffet for them.

>>48384263
sawrce?

>>48383956
>writefaggin is not tg!
Befone, foul spawn of nazimod.

>>48383969
And you said they are a huge portion still. Which is incredibly, blatantly false.

>>48376438
>Anon, there are literally furry RPGs.
And Ironclaw/Jadeclaw aren't half as fucked up as Fursona splat.

>>48384263
That's one sexy dwarf/demon woman. Source mi amigo?

>>48384275
>>48384823
its Fatalpulse, check his twitter and/or pixiv (linked on his twitter)

>>48383765
>>48383723
>>48383670
>>48383670
>>48371430
The people who got /qst/ made were doing so to try and force quests off /tg/. They then proceeded to crow about their victory and go to /qst/ and tell everyone how good they were being treated by a bunch of assholes who shitspammed /qa/ to get an unnecessary board made. They - like you - lied, misinformed, and made up imaginary statistics and situations to prove their points and were not only beaten down and disproved, they managed to anger the mods so much by their victory dances that the mods decided to ignore them from then on.

So you have only people like yourselves to blame.

>>48384879
Man you questfags play the victim card harder than the jews

>>48385113
Not even him, but I remember there was an announcement thread--might have been two in fact---the mods made to ask the /tg/ users whether or not it would be a good idea to make /qst/. In any case within the entire thread, there were many anons talking about how quests took up 50%, 30% or more of the board and even trying to quote archive.moe, I think it was. It was in that thread that it was conclusively proven, that quests only accounted for about 8% of /tg/'s content as a whole. It kept getting quoted, and anti-quest people kept moving the goalposts and claiming that 8% was too much somehow, and that it justified its own board.

>>48370674
Make them use props.

>>48384106
Both aspects of this post are stupid.
>Which is our 1st clue that ERP doesn't work to begin with because it has to leech off another system entirely.
That's true of almost every story based type of game. Rarely will a game want you to start rolling out every social interaction. You roll for momentous occasions, not every little conversation or interaction, just as you wouldn't roll for each thrust.
>That, and the participants in question have questionable motive for something other than a normal RPG session.
This is also ridiculous. What, because they want to get off? How is that really different than the already "questionable" motives people have for wanting to play RPGs in the first place, like self-fulfillment or power fantasies or simple ~enjoyment~? When you get right down to it, that last one is the only motive there is to play RPGs in the first place.
And how is it "questionable" or something "other than a normal RPG session" just because there's ERP? If I want a mystery and investigation is that questionable? If I want completely sexless social interactions, is that "questionable"? Is it questionable if I'd want to play a game about managing a mercenary company Mother Base style? What counts as "normal" to you, so that we know which desired game types are questionable.

Jeez, I'm actually a little mad at this, man. I get that you're probably uncomfortable with ERP, but seriously? "Questionable"? You're going to call something people can do consensually with each other to have fun "questionable"?

>>48384263
You act like anything you said is women exclusive. Everyone on a MUSH is either completely incapable of dealing with other people or a shithead who wants to ruin everyone else's fun.
>You can tell they're women because they're terrible at making it sexy.
I've actually found its the opposite. A lot of guys on F-list and the MUSHes I've been on just want to put in the bare minimum effort to jerk off. Then again, there are plenty of blank female profiles probably played by women, but there are more blank males. Than there are women. Period.

>>48384632
Anon, I was around during Nazimod. It's not that "writefagging isn't /tg/", it's that "there are too many quests". And yes, even five threads is a pretty huge portion considering there's an entire other board for it. The only other thing with that many threads is Magic.

>>48384879
>>48385156
Anon, what are you even talking about. You're literally trying to say that the /qst/ board was made for no reason. That is ridiculous. There are far more than enough quest threads to justify a quest board, and that would be true even if there were only the quests /tg/ currently has. There's clearly a demand for a board dedicated to that. Yes, people will use casual dialogue and often exaggerate, accidentally or on purpose, but there have still been too many quests on /tg/, many of them only /tg/ related due to being quests.

>>48383956

And so the truth comes out. Enjoy your salt.

>>48386494
>Girls are just better than guys and totally don't have an easier time making a generic female character to get laid.

Definitely F-List scum. Go preach dickgirl supremacy elsewhere.

>>48386494

Your grasp of statistics is as lacking when discussing ERP as when debating quests.

t. Nearly-blank profile elf princess who gets bombarded with notes.

>>48386494

Pretty sure /qst/ was made to consolidate all the quests in one place and provide a "draw" to get more traffic to the site, not because there were "too many quests on /tg/".

It's like you faggots forget that this site is a business sometimes. I don't mean that you sometimes forget, but that there's probably at least one person trying to make money off of 4chan.

Anyways, a brief scroll through /qst/ will show that most of the quests there aren't from /tg/.

But quests are definitely /tg/ related despite your autism screaming inside your head that it's everything wrong with the board.

>>48387702
>>48387724
Anon, that's not at all what I said. I said
>A lot of guys on F-list and the MUSHes I've been on just want to put in the bare minimum effort to jerk off. Then again, there are plenty of blank female profiles probably played by women, but there are more blank males. Than there are women. Period.
Although, I suppose if you want to take that a hard statistic, then no, there aren't more blank males than there are female profiles entirely, but I forgot that I can't use colourful language or people will think it's meant to be scientific fact.
There are a lot of male profiles. Many of them are blank.
I know damned well that there are thirsty motherfuckers who will bombard blank female profiles with notes. I have a profile with nothing but PowerGirl art and a description that literally reads "don't approach me, you don't even know if I'm good at writing, you don't need my permission to jerk off to the images".

And, anon? If you're complaining that the dickgrills get more play than you do, you should put in more effort.

>>48388291
I will never understand people like you. Why do you want quests to not be on the board specifically for quests? Why do you feel that having a quest on the quest board instead of /tg/ is somehow a moral failing, or undesirable?
Also, 4chan is a business, yes, but that business model isn't so much "if we make it, they will come" as it is "this is a thing people have been doing on the boards for a while now, we should make a board specifically for that thing".
Hence how Warhammer Wednesdays turned into /tg/.

>>48386382
>That's true of almost every story based type of game. Rarely will a game want you to start rolling out every social interaction. You roll for momentous occasions, not every little conversation or interaction, just as you wouldn't roll for each thrust.

So you're agreeing with me and just calling it stupid. I'm okay with that.

>This is also ridiculous. What, because they want to get off?

Of course. It would be at this point the rest of us would tell them to get a room. The player is blurring their real-world unfocused horniness with that of their character, who obviously doesn't have anything better to do, such as slaying a dragon or blowing up a death star, "Pfft, I'm jus' here to get LAID."

>like self-fulfillment or power fantasies or simple ~enjoyment~?

My experience has shown ERP to be it's own circle-jerk. . .though more figuratively so of course.

> If I want a mystery and investigation is that questionable? If I want completely sexless social interactions, is that "questionable"? Is it questionable if I'd want to play a game about managing a mercenary company Mother Base style? What counts as "normal" to you, so that we know which desired game types are questionable.

It's not about what YOU want. It's a GROUP storytelling dynamic in a generally casual social setting. It IS questionable when someone is obviously looking for head. Their Quagmire antics are a joke and embarrassing, which derails the whole game.

>Jeez, I'm actually a little mad at this, man.

Back up everyone! Anon is mad!

>You're going to call something people can do consensually with each other to have fun "questionable"?

Not when the game is introduced. If it were straight-up agreed upon at the outset that ERP would be an element of the game, then you could give players a FAIR CHANCE to opt-out. Most of the time when this happens, it's a spontaneous act on the part of the sexually desperate. the "consent" is read-into as implied

This is why we can't have nice things

>>48370674
Make a rule that your players need to blow each other before sitting down at the table. Any player that has some left in the tank can't play. That way you'll get players who are really committed to tabletop and players who have it all out of their system.

>>48388601
>Why do you want quests to not be on the board specifically for quests?

Not that guy, but it's mostly out of stubbornness. Those of us that enjoy some quests and are capable of ignoring the ones we don't like see the new board as a victory for the assholes who indiscriminately shitted up the quests I like. So we refuse to budge out of sheer bloody mindedness.

I enjoy some content on /qst/ (Black Company is a good one). I don't see them as "traitors" or something like some of the more autistic fans, but I still like to defy assholes, even if it's in a meaningless way on a Guadalajaran Lichen Arranging site.

>>48388601
>Muh colorful language

Ah, the saltiest way to say you were wrong but don't want to admit it. Now fuck off with your female/herm ERP supremacy bullshit.

>>48388601
>I have a blank character
>You should put in more effort

Not him, but...what? Also, dickgirls are the laziest way for a straight guy to play something with tits, and they're generally nothing like real transgirls.

File: 1429396173072.png (735KB, 1663x1076px) Image search: [Google]

735KB, 1663x1076px

>>48388601

Because /qst/ is shit and I ain't budging for you, autist.

>>48370674
Suck some dicks/ snorkel some pussy before the game.

>>48382954
>implying they arent into that stuff to and won't expect you to go into extreme detail now
>>48385158
>>48389261
> what if they are down for it?

>>48389505
>they're generally nothing like real transgirls.
What gave you the idea that they were ever meant to be?

>>48370674
I have 2 groups i gm for. One that is straight up table top. the other is ERP that devolves into occassional orgies. I have no problem with this, but thats because im getting regular fucks on the side so i dont have to give them later.

>>48370674
Well, first of all, actually playing with real people instead of figments conjured from the Lesser Plane of Imagination will solve most of your problems.

If that fails, or in the extremely unlikely event that your OP refers to a real group that actually exists, tell them to stop. If they don't, why are you playing with these people? They're clearly not your friends or a good fit for your preferences.

>>48370674
>How do I keep my group from constantly straying into ERP territory?
Tell them that ERP encounters must be LARPed

>>48384106
>Which is our 1st clue that RP doesn't work to begin with because it has to leech off another system entirely. That, and the participants in question have questionable motive for something other than a normal RPG session.
Fixed, no roleplay, only rollplay

>>48386494
>You're literally trying to say that the /qst/ board was made for no reason.
It was....

That was, and still is in fact, the main objection in the thread. It was the entire argument against. Literally a thousand posts saying exactly that.

>>48371430
>it seems like 2/3rds of the board is made up of quest threads
You're retarded, but in a cute way.

>>48390610
Don't know, I think the charm wore off long ago.

>>48390662
I have a thing for developmentally disabled adults.

>>48389141
>So you're agreeing with me and just calling it stupid. I'm okay with that.
No, I'm pointing out that the logic itself is flawed. You act like its something unique to ERP, but it's not, it's something that is true for every genre beyond dungeon crawling.

>Of course. It would be at this point the rest of us would tell them to get a room. The player is blurring their real-world unfocused horniness with that of their character, who obviously doesn't have anything better to do, such as slaying a dragon or blowing up a death star, "Pfft, I'm jus' here to get LAID."
a) it's safe to say the group is okay with this, since we're talking about actual erotic roleplaying games. b) that's like saying players are bringing their "unfocused" sense of justice/worth/etcetera into a game, which is also a ridiculous argument because why does it matter? And how is getting laid any different than "I'm just here to slay some orcs"? Neither is inherently better or worse than the others, if that's what the group is interested in.

>It's a GROUP storytelling dynamic in a generally casual social setting. It IS questionable when someone is obviously looking for head.
Except, Anon, we're talking about a GROUP that wants head.

> If it were straight-up agreed upon at the outset that ERP would be an element of the game, then you could give players a FAIR CHANCE to opt-out.
Anon, you literally answered a post by someone giving advice on how to run an ERP game >>48382954 a game specifically dedicated to ERP. You countered by saying that it doesn't work because "it has to leech off another system entirely", and that the players have "questionable motives". Those are true of any RPG, and honestly Perry Charrie wanting to feel useful and fulfilled in life isn't much different than wanting to jerk off when you get right down to it, but apparently one is more ~questionable~ than the other.

>>48389505
What? You think having a blank character is good?
>Also, dickgirls are the laziest way for a straight guy to play something with tits, and they're generally nothing like real transgirls.
While I'm not saying dickgirls are the best or anything, this is a fetish site and people like that. Not every shemale character is just a dude with tits. And also >>48389758

>>48389523
>>48389380
>>48390532
This honestly sounds childish and stupid. /qst/ gives you many more tools to run quests, but you're refusing to use it and instead sticking to a board that doesn't really want you.
I mean, shit, I don't mind quests but I still think they're better off on another board.

>>48389474
Anon, you seem to be confused if you think I'm saying herms are superior.

File: ever wonder why pathfinder is go-to for erp.png (43KB, 1539x497px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1539x497px

>>48370857
Pathfinder is the default.
You can use pretty much anything as long as it includes stuff you care about.
It's not like you'll be making mechanical rolls while typefucking each other. You idiot.
The campaign's just there to provide context, characters, and dynamics.

>>48370857
MAID, if they're into that

>>48393473
>You act like its something unique to ERP, but it's not, it's something that is true for every genre beyond dungeon crawling.

What a pro-ERP thing to say.

>Except, Anon, we're talking about a GROUP that wants head.

At least you're honest. But then that makes the motive argument I made even more obvious. Thanks for the help.

>Anon, you literally answered a post by someone giving advice on how to run an ERP game

Which also mentions non-ERP centered games as well, meaning you're just further confusing the issue.

>but apparently one is more ~questionable~ than the other.

Because of whether or not the initial group dynamic was "consentual" or not. At this point you're wandering around trying to get an edge in what you perceive to be an exciting debate. So please let me gently guide you back to the real OP. The GM appears concerned that ERP is threatening to hijack the game. So there. The end-result for the host/GM is, "Give everyone a chance to opt-out, and then enjoy your sad little circlejerk." Or go find a real relationship, but that would be too beneficial for the overall nerd community as a whole, wouldn't it?

>>48376188
>Oh no, how terrible. Anon, if you refuse to get off because "that would be gay", you're a loser.

I really wasn't sure how to reply to this. It's so retarded it's hard to know where to start with it. I guess I can begin by pointing out that what you're saying isn't even an argument, it's just noise.

In fact I'm not even sure what angle you're coming from. It looks a lot like a passive-aggressive concession, since you aren't rebutting anything but are still maxing out on the snide. On the other hand it also could be interpreted that you're saying anyone who isn't gay is a loser, which would be extreme even by the most brain-addled SJW standards.

>>48396185

Sounds to me like you're just prejudiced about ERP, and then making a whole bunch of squirrelly arguments around that opinion that don't really add up to anything.

>>48370674

In online interactions, I insist that anything off-color be handled in an Alt channel or in a separate session. They can roleplay their character's personal lives in as much or as little detail as they'd like as long as there's no mechanical impact and they operate with an understanding of the amount of influence they're permitted on NPCs.

And thus the main story is limited only to humor at the table and reaction modifiers.

Just tell them all the characters they meet are ugly.

>>48384632
>all writefagging is /tg/
I'll believe you when we get /wst/ back on here. I want to write about hammerspace dragons for more boards than just /trash/.

>>48396870
Vorefags disgust me.

>>48397056
Good~
Seriously though, I've been thinking of writing a hammerspace dragoness getting fucked by a normal dragon (not sure of scale colors), and I don't think /scaly/ would be as interested in non-anthro as /tg/.
Alas, lewds get banned here now, apparently.

>>48396185
>What a pro-ERP thing to say.
More like a pro-RP thing to say, but yeah, I'm fine with ERP because I'm not an idiot. I'm more concerned with people playing stupid slapstick games than I am ERP, and neither one effects me unless I'm in the group.

Anon, you're weirded out about ERP. Just admit that.

>>48396349
I'm saying that "it's gay" isn't really a reason not to do something. So what if its gay? Are you so worried about being labeled "GAY" that you'd avoid doing something enjoyable? We're not even talking about actual homosexual interaction, either. We're talking about getting off to something a guy wrote.

I'm saying that being concerned about being labeled gay makes you a loser. Only high schoolers are worried about that.

>>48396870
Isn't /wst/ on /d/ now?

>>48398242
>Isn't /wst/ on /d/ now?
It's somewhere, if the updates to the master smut list are any indication.
Really should move to /aco/ though, since /d/ is a desolate wasteland of dicks since the purge and the hardly get any traffic except the auto-posters keeping the threads filled with the same dickpicks forever.

>>48388291
>weeb girls and tanks
>weeb mechs
>weeb mech pirates
>fucking dragonball
That shit is more /a/ than /tg/. And it doesn't even matter, /qst/ was created to keep this cancer off /tg/ but the janitors are massive faggots and still allow it here. Doesn't mean people can't tell you to fuck off to your contaiment board.

>>48398242
Yeah, but /d/ is for dickgirls now. Plus, intelligent dragons off of /tg/ have gotten me banned before.
And unless something changed, the thread is much deader there than it was here.

>>48387724
It's rory, he fakes numbers to support his imagined ideas all the time.

>>48400074
>>weeb mech pirates
Using published TTRPG system, totally not /tg/ at all.

>>48398242
I ERPed once and it was terrible.
Never again.

>>48396870
>I'll believe you when we get /wst/ back on here.
Believe me that I consider banishing of wst a transgression against the principles of tg.

>>48398571
>It's somewhere, if the updates to the master smut list are any indication.
It's on >>>/d/6937079/ yes.
Iduno if they tried /aco/ or if they stuck to /d/.

>>48401745
>>>/d/6937079
Oops, link fix.

>>48401549
No, anon, you just can't understand things.
"Too much" isn't a statistic. And there are more male profiles on F-list than female profiles.

>>48387724
You know, earlier I was saying how you missed my point (and just to be clear, you did), but fuck me I made a blank character last night and I got bombarded like fuck. Now I know what to do next time I do want play...

>>48401614
Plenty of people have terrible first impressions of activities, but try again and enjoy them.

>>48371246
But if /erpg/ is too kinky for me then where do I go?

>>48401745
>people writing fetish porn and then circlejerking each other about it is one of the cornerstones of /tg/
Not even trolling my man, please kill yourself

>>48370674
Cooties are a real and dangerous disease.

File: love it.jpg (31KB, 298x270px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 298x270px

>>48371088
That is a fabulous picture, just perfect for me.

>>48376611
My PFS Summoner's Eidolon takes the form of his perfect woman. IE his wife what dun got murdered by a fuckton of devils.

>>48370674
My experience as a DM of ERP games suggests that if try to run a lewd game, you'll get a pretty tame game. At most, you'll have players settingbup lewd one on one stuff between their PCs but then never getting around to it.