Hypothetical EDH Rule

>>48006406
the legendary rule keeps edh in check, imagine sfm and deathrite shaman decks.

>>48006406
The banlist for EDH just became longer than the list of men your mom has slept with.

File: FishCanStrum.png (398KB, 568x437px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 568x437px

>>48006460
Let it burn then. Also, damn son.

>>48006406
Sound stupid desu. Mostly because of what >>48006422 said.
But I'd like it, because it woudl allow me to finally make that Lab Maniac-centered deck I've tried to run for so long.
Maybe it coudl be done by allowing only commons.

>>48006406
Glad you showed off an OP image to explain why this shouldn't be a thing.

Also why would "becomes a legend" be a restriction?
EDH is already singleton
and because of Wizard's fuckassery with the rules, each player can now control a copy of the same legend at the same time.

>>48006969
It would stop you from getting free access to unrestricted commander token shenanigans which is beyond the scope of this thought experiment. That's also why I also added the "under your control bit" so other players can go about their business normally.

>>48006406
Anon that would be hell. Imagine the kind of damage that a Triskelion could do as a commander with a Metalworker on the field

>>48007306
Imagine the damage having metalworker as a commander would do

File: Tamanoa.jpg (63KB, 312x445px)

63KB, 312x445px

I can finally use this as my commander.