What are your thoughts of people role playing sex in detail

>>44427932
It's pointless and serves to get one person off while making everyone else uncomfortable, unless the GM decides to pull some shit.
Next question.

Sex in game wat do spam again? Wasn't the last purge bad enough?

Unless it's an ERP game I do not want them to have any form of detail for it at the table. They can take their fade to black.

>>44427932
It has to be larped.

Should never be had in any real life game whatsoever unless you're ERPing since you'll probably be doing it whatever no life losers you've associated yourself with.

>>44427955
It's also an excuse to shill that poorly written webcomic. This thread is an abomination in every capacity.

>>44428156
>Unsounded
>Poorly written
Are you literally retarded? Please explain this baseless assumption.

>>44428207
>please, fall for my provocation and help me shill!

No. Fuck off, and stop spamming that shit.

>>44427932
Is this real-life game played solely between two people who are lovers with nobody else around?

This is the only circumstance in which this is acceptable.

>>44427932

So what is that thing supposed to be? It reminds me of a Tiefling or a Huldra or any number of creatures.

>>44427932
It's a fetish. Which is fine I guess, but it's not for here. We're not here to masturbate. You don't go to /tv/ and ask them what they think of pornography as movies, do you?

>>44427932
Whenever they start, I begin rolling my hips about erotically and licking my lips seductively while doing my best Emperor Palpatine impression.

That usually speeds things along nicely

>>44428207
>Pedosounded
>good
Fuck off, lolicon scum

>>44427932
>role playing sex in detail
Stop there. No. We're here to have adventures, not get you off under the table. If you're putting more detail into sex than you are into describing your armor, you've already made everyone uncomfortable enough to justify leaving.

File: 1436749350427.png (126KB, 352x390px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 352x390px

>>44427932

Only if we're actually having sex in real life at the same time or plan to later.

>>44429411
How do you do it?
Roll first and act according to the roll, or act first, then roll and attach a modifier based on your performance?

>>44427991
>5 players in group
>3 straight guys
>1 girl
>1 gay guy
Larping the sex scene is out of the question. We just don't have the demographics for an enjoyable orgy.

>>44429633
Two guys in the vag, one in the mouth, the fag in the ass.
There, everyone fits.

>>44428854
wat?

File: Girl.jpg (56KB, 1600x1200px)

56KB, 1600x1200px

Book of Erotic Fantasy or Nymphology?

>>44429633
>>44429877
One guy in the gays ass
One gay in the gays mouth
Last dude getting a handjob
Girl fucks off somewhere

>>44427932
Depends on how drunk the party is out of character, and whether or not you're playing it for laughs or being creepy about it.

File: ch10_158.jpg (230KB, 600x900px)

230KB, 600x900px

>>44428394
Nobody knows. Neither of them are natural though. The guy is a zombie mage (not a lich, just a human mage who got killed and turned into a zombie, but somehow kept his mind intact), and the girl is apparently some sort of artificial demihuman, but she doesn't even know herself.

>>44427932
That you don't do it

>>44430327
Sounds pedo as fuck

>>44430373
Here's your reply. But honestly it's not pedo. I read the entire thing and t focuses way more on world building and character growth.

>>44430373

She reminds him of his daughter (who was murdered in front of him). That's basically the crux of their entire friendship.

>>44430557
>>44430595
>I literally just made this shit thread to shill this comic

You're despicable.

>>44430611

It's a shitposting thread man, I just popped in because of the OP image. Already reported it, so whatever.

Only seen it done acceptably a few times. Otherwise it's just not worth it, and not comfortable or fun.

Online is different, but only if it's that kind of game.

>>44427932
Hey, if they're into that, fine by me. Gives me time to work on stuff. Or use what I learned from watching the entire filmography of Ron Jeremy.

>>44427932
If it doesn't disrupt anyone else's fun, why not?