It's not a good game if you can't complain about it.

>>44259987
Is that why Mong publishing puts all those spelling mistakes in their Traveller books?

>>44259987
It's not a good thread if the OP consists of a single line of text.

>>44260376
But you can complain about it. Does that make it a good game, or is that necessary but not sufficient?

>>44260396
It's only a good game if you consider shitposting a game, and that complaining about something is the only way to define what is or isn't a good game.

File: 15 - 1.jpg (69KB, 958x539px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 958x539px

>>44260407
Shitposting is a art. And games aren't art.

>>44260447
Yes, but you can complain about it. So it must be a good game.

>>44259987
Got any new adventures to unload on us, Storytiem?

>>44259987
I think it needs to be complicated in some manner, a good and very simple game wouldn't have much to complain about. Or much to say about at all, really.

File: GURPS.jpg (94KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 250x250px

>>44261053

This, mostly.

If developers meddle with a popular game, loads of players will criticise the direction things are going. Fanboys will call this "moaning." If a game is underappreciated, people will lament that more people aren't playing it. Haters will call this "crying." If a game is unlovable, there's no one talking about it at all, much less complaining. Gamers call this "Cynnibarr."

>>44259987
I'm looking at your name OP. Either there's a storytime you're holding out on, or you left your name on.

>>44259987
Depends on the complaint.

If someone bitches on somethings can be improved, it means they want more out of it.

But if the only thing they were saying is how its shit, then the game might be shit. or vice versa.

>>44260447
>And games aren't art.
This is an objectively incorrect statement.

>>44259987
Truth. I've never seen anyone complain about FATAL

>>44262103
>not knowing the creator of the 10 comandments of /tg/

I can actually smell how new you are, wow.