>Toys come to live and start to attack humans. How dangerous

>>44049732
Ever read/seen the Steven King story where a witch does this to a hitman? That could happen.

>>44049853
The TV version of Battleground was also quite good.

File: 25272464757bdf1856fcd563c2abdd51[1].jpg (80KB, 1280x544px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1280x544px

There would be no mercy.

>>44049732
First, what setting?
Second, define "toys".
Third, are the living toys basically constructs, or do they also gain the abilities of the characters they represent?

>>44050215
>First, what setting?
Modern-day

>Second, define "toys".
Anything the US government regulates as a toy

>Third, are the living toys basically constructs, or do they also gain the abilities of the characters they represent?
Animated constructs limited by their points of articulation and molded appendages. Strength appropriate for a mammal of their size.

>>44050278
*their size and weight

>>44050278
Intelligence?

>>44050310
Theoretically limitless but constrained by what a 5-year-old human would be able to conceive.

Dragon Dildo Apocalypse.

>>44049732
>anyone killed by them or who gets too much paint/plastic/etc in the wound becomes a toy relevant to their nature and/or profession
>soldiers become green army men or G.I. Joes, for example
>soon everyone will belong in the toy box

>>44050334
Zero threat beyond nuisance. Would just lock in a box and go about my day. Make them smarter, then maybe.

>>44049732
>only children, manchildren, and certain self-sufficient adults can properly combat them as they still hold wonder in their hearts

>>44051544
>manchildren
>implying they have anything but despair in their hearts