Was he clean?

Not even Lemond was clean

>>77287982
kek

nope

>>77287982
lmao yeah he was

>>77288222
lmao

>>77288222
trips of truth

>>77288222
rofl no he wasn't

>>77287982
No. Nobody of that generation was clean, never caught, and that is.

>>77288058
post doctor fuentes special juice

>>77287982
>le everyone is on le steroids because they're good at something!

hey you fucking virgin, just because they had more talent than you did and worked harder than you ever could dream of doesn't mean they were pinning shit in their arse

the only generation on steroids was during the cheating americans who will not be named and then others had to use them because he either bullied them into doing it or they had to use it to compete

now stop fucking posting threads you dumb fucker

>>77288617
And what about the entire Banesto team crushing everybody continuously for 5 years? pls explain why it then stopped totally. Pure coincidence?

File: 1.jpg (55KB, 620x430px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 620x430px

>>77288617
This fucking guy.

>>77287982
>five Tour wins in a row and no one gives a shit
Big Mig was too kind and soft-spoken. Will be the same with Froome ten and twenty years from now.
Both nice guys and deserved winners, but will never be viewed in the same league as the real greats.

>>77288617
this must be bait

>>77288617
The ghost of Simpson that keeps haunting Ventoux disagrees with your statement.

File: Tom Dumoulin Laughing.jpg (5KB, 120x120px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 120x120px

>implying a 6"2, 80 kg rider that won five (5) grand tours was clean

>managing to beat a doped up rominger, ugrumov, berzin, pantani, leblanc, chiappucci and bugno
>clean

idontthinksomate.mp4

>>77287982
That depends a lot on your definition of "clean".
He lost to Rijs of all people.

>>77289244
>you need to take steroids to get to 80kg at 6 foot 2

what? just go to the gym for a few weeks amte, it's not really that big...
>>77289457
it's called being better, better enetics, better training dipshit

>>77292281
he's obviously implying that someone that heavy would have great trouble winning tdf due to the mountains

>>77292360
lance had a bmi of around 23-24 when he was racing

80kg @ 6'2 is around bmi of 22

>>77292771
That's not how climbing works.
It's absolute weight, not weight in relation to height.
That's why there are basically zero top GC riders over 70 kg at this point in time.
The EPO era allowed somewhat heavier riders to compete because they gain more from the drug.

>>77289059
it's the same brit who always posts in cycling threads that only yankfats cheat

>>77288617
this is what everyone thought about norway

File: espada10.jpg (199KB, 1600x1053px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1600x1053px

>>77287982
No but he had the goat bikes

>BANEsta
>Getting caught was part of his plan
>6'2 (big guy)

>>77287982
No.
But he was pretty based anyway.

>>77288617
It's not a secret that all the top athletes from every sport have been doping since before WW2

File: 14958129452070.jpg (103KB, 831x639px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 831x639px

>>77287982

Yeah
Having lung capacity 7.8 litres.