>fades into irrelevance

>implying he has to fade into it

I have no idea who this guy is

>>77163129
guest "star" in the Simpsons, i think

>>77163082
the real GOAT, dominated in a star studded era, unlike federal dominating walkovers

>>77163082
What kind of signature is that? Disgusting desu

>>77163376
It's a lanyard for the trophy

File: 160318201248-spc-open-court-pete-sampras-00040115-full-169.jpg (168KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1600x900px

JUST

File: bridgette.jpg (22KB, 400x250px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 400x250px

WIFE

>>77163322

>dominated

Never even made a french final

Agassi was always better than this boring chap.

>>77163648
Sampraswinslol

>>77163322

>Nadal
>Federer
>Djokovic
>Not a star-studded era

You're stupid.

File: tennis simpsons.jpg (170KB, 823x1024px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 823x1024px

>>77163165
Isn't his name Andrew?

File: stinky.jpg (11KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 225x225px

>>77163322

based sampras, his loss to roger at wimbledon '01 is still among the most superb matches i've ever seen, roger's breakthrough win against the defending champ.

How would /sp/ react to his match against 19-year old Federer?

>>77165092
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRB4hTXrlvo

>>77164682
14>8. Plus, Sampras never wore a wig during a match.

>>77163082
He has a nice house in thousand oaks