why USA will win a World Cup before England
1. Americans really love their country and their shirt, they will sweat blood for it, and in international games I have no doubt they will give a hard time to any team, even the best ones. they really play as a cohesive, enduring and combative team. Plus American "soccer" players know that football isn't great in their own country, so they want to show their fellow countrymen that it's a good sport and USA can shine in it.
2. Now Americans begin to git gud at football, they start having their own real "soccer" culture. they have acadamies all over their place. if "Soccer" was a child's game for long for them, now their young players can go into serious pro league (MLS) which is growing steadily.
3. in the meanwhile even though English Premier League is the richest league in the world, it isnt even the best. But all this money stifles domestic homegrown talents. Who would want to sign a young but unproven English lad when you can have an hardened international foreign player for half the price? Only UEFA rules on homegrown players save the English NT. If there was no such rule all EPL teams would be 100% foreign
4. and about their NT, the english actually don't care about england, it isn't even their country (it's the UK), they only see that international tournaments are a waste of time, that they would be better off in holidays. they also have a massive overconfidence complex without anything to back it up, even Brazil, Italy or Germany aren't like that (they take the game seriously and know it's hard to win an international trophy). English think they are *better* than anyone else (IT'S COMING HOME, LA') at football, because they somewhat invented it, and have the *best* clubs at it (which are owned by foreigners, and that 90% of foreigners play for it)
I tell you, /sp/, the day will come England will be the underdog against the mighty USMNT. And that day is nigh.
Will this be on the exam later?
>>76954683
tl;dr
>>76954683
trop long; n'a pas lu
>>76954683
Socialism is actually pretty rad
>>76954940
this tbqh
>>76954940
t. never been in a socialist country
>france is butthurt again
Color me surprised.
>>76954683
>>76956398
Socialism isn't the best form of government, but it's better than any modern form of capitalism
Socialist countries are ok, I've been there, unlike capitalism starvation and homelessness are virtually nonexistent
The cancer are the SOCIAL DEMOCRAT countries that call themselves socialist, for example starving Vuvuzela
Socialism gets bad rep because it's associated with filthy jews and degenerate antifas/sjews so nationalists don't even bother reading into it
Also /leftypol/ is wrong on the ebil bourgissi that keeps da workers down!!! Inequality isn't the reason socialism is better than capitalism, the party elites live like kings in socialism and effectively replace the capitalists, but the system benefits the workers nonetheless
>>76956398
t. thinks that countries where private means of production are allowed are still socialist as long as the dictator claims that they are
>>76956556
Glad i waited three hours for this post
England won't win a World Cup until all the crusty old dogs in the FA are purged.
International football is nothing like Premier League football and until the powers that be can understand that then England will continue to flounder.
England have no specific style of play, they just try to emulate the Spanish or the Germans or whoever else is doing well at that time.
In the last Euros competition England played Prince Harry Kane every game despite him stinking the place out. Jamie Carry would have been a better option as the focal point up front. In international football it is all about the counter attack, the team that scores first usually goes on to win, so it is vitally important not to get hit on the counter.
So unless England can get their heads around actual International knock out football and not just meme'ing their way through the qualification rounds as usual then it would come as no surprise to me that USA would get further in a World Cup than England.
Vardy*
Fucking spellcheck
Fucking phone posting
>>76957380
>In the last Euros competition England played Prince Harry Kane every game despite him stinking the place out. Jamie Carry would have been a better option as the focal point up front. In international football it is all about the counter attack, the team that scores first usually goes on to win, so it is vitally important not to get hit on the counter.
I think you totally overestimate your NT m8
Against Iceland you had the game in the Pocket by the 8th minute, by your own terms, but the lack of envy from your players, the apathy of Rooney, allowed Icelanders to come back and score the first goal that killed you
>>76954940
It's like you want people to make fun of your country. Faggot.
>>76954683
Your thoughts are valid, but keep this thing shorter, goddamn